On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
I try to sumarize the result of the discussion. This file was
factorized, but it was proofed that calibration data are very board
specific, and factorizing this file is not correct. I agree with Fabio
and Eric that it is
Hi everybody,
On 02/09/2014 01:51, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Eric Nelson
eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
I believe that the Wand board is using the configuration files
from the nitrogen6x tree.
Yes, I should have said As it stands today only mx6qsabresd
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Nitin Garg nitin.g...@freescale.com wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg as this is
was designed for the mx6sabresd board. This also updates the
cgtqmx6qeval which makes use of this
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Nitin Garg nitin.g...@freescale.com wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg as this is
was designed for the mx6sabresd
Dear Nitin Garg,
In message 1409581243-12695-1-git-send-email-nitin.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg as this is
was designed for the mx6sabresd board. This also updates the
cgtqmx6qeval which
Wolfgang,
(Dropping Leo e-mail as it bounces, adding Alex who seem to be working
on BSP support at Congatec now)
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
In message 1409581243-12695-1-git-send-email-nitin.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
Move
Dear Otavio,
In message CAP9ODKonaZ9v76WAdd4k7or_kUWF=attlf+-drqgqyvgkbt...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
But in the next sentence you state that this very file is also used by
another board (cgtqmx6qeval) - so apparently it is NOT a board
specific file. Actually this makes even more sense
Hi
Il 01/set/2014 21:02 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de ha scritto:
Dear Otavio,
In message CAP9ODKonaZ9v76WAdd4k7or_kUWF=
attlf+-drqgqyvgkbt...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
But in the next sentence you state that this very file is also used by
another board (cgtqmx6qeval) - so apparently it
Wolfgang,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
In message
CAP9ODKonaZ9v76WAdd4k7or_kUWF=attlf+-drqgqyvgkbt...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
But in the next sentence you state that this very file is also used by
another board (cgtqmx6qeval) - so apparently it is
Dear Otavio,
In message cap9odkrsc4o-p7+cmkkbeda8wwwxvpnpxoyoctp6wcvoj5g...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I disagree (but this is my personal view on this). The reason why I
disagree is because the DDR calibration is very design dependant so
if/when Freescale optimize their DDR data setting
Dear Nitin Garg,
In message 1409581243-12695-1-git-send-email-nitin.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg as this is
was designed for the mx6sabresd board. This also updates the
cgtqmx6qeval which
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Nitin Garg,
In message 1409581243-12695-1-git-send-email-nitin.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg as this is
Hi Fabio,
On 09/01/2014 03:27 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Nitin Garg,
In message 1409581243-12695-1-git-send-email-nitin.g...@freescale.com you
wrote:
Move board/freescale/imx/ddr/mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg to
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Eric Nelson
eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
I believe that the Wand board is using the configuration files
from the nitrogen6x tree.
Yes, I should have said As it stands today only mx6qsabresd and
congatec share the same mx6q_4x_mt41j128.cfg script.
14 matches
Mail list logo
