Sounds like the kind of thing that would happen if the file
had a lot of overflow.
Or a very badly designed index, or trigger.
Any of those possible?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January
They are in the UniVerse Basic Extensions manual in the online PDF
documentation.
Blink and you'll miss it.
IBM have been a lot better at adding new facilities to UniVerse than they
have been at telling anybody they are there.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken,
Except that in real life Q, T and X would be variable names which mean
something in the context of the program. ;^)
Regards,
Charlie Noah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
Clifton Oliver wrote
In that case, a determinate structure like FOR-NEXT is
Laser or impact?
How much usage?
We have had fairly good success with the not too bottom of the line
HP printers (ie. hp4050). PCL was fairly easy to implement. You can
always get a fairly inexpensive lpd/lpr generic paralell network
adapter to make it a network printer as well. (much cheaper
I remember having similar problems and the issue came down to how I
referenced the library. Are you doing a 'Reference' or a createobject?
I think the solution for me was to do a createobject, but it has been
awhile.
Another thing to keep in mind is that when you work in the IDE sometimes
quote who=Brian Leach
Sounds like the kind of thing that would happen if the file
had a lot of overflow.
Or a very badly designed index, or trigger.
Any of those possible?
Brian
We don't have any triggers on those files. There are no indexes on one of
the files and the other one has 5
David Cason wrote:
I've just discovered the wonderful world of the UniDataSet
class thanks
to a post in the archives by Dave Meeks. There's even a
snippet of code
provided. I'm very interested in learning more about this wonderful
class
I posted an example that might answer your first
Okay, tested the process against the file with no indexes. It ran in 19
minutes. it was taking hours before. I didn't save a copy of LIST.INDEX
FILE ALL DETAIL but it did have some very skewed groups, as I watched it
scroll by. But mostly it looked very even... I've never seen this behavior
I am trying to build SQL query using Wintegrate. One of the fields that I
select is the location of a product in the warehouse. The SQL query output
truncates the location and puts one or two characters in a blank line. How to
resolve the column width issue?
Thanks
Krish
---
u2-users
Hi All,
We would like to determine if any of the programs that were run in a certain
timeframe were re-compiled. Does anyone know how (or if) I could see the
date and time of the last compile?
HPUX 11 UDT 6
TIA,
Bruce Lunt
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
I've seen this kind of thing when an index of a sparsely populated field
was created without the NO.NULLS option.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:11:15 -0800, you wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to determine if any of the programs that were run in a certain
timeframe were re-compiled. Does anyone know how (or if) I could see the
date and time of the last compile?
HPUX 11 UDT 6
Unix box, right? So do a ls in the
Take a look at the directory that contains the program you are running and
look at the timestamp of _NameOfProgram. HTH.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Lunt
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:11 PM
To:
From unix shell prompt, do ls -l BP.O/PROGRAM.
This will display the last modify date of the object program.
-- Rod Hills
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Determining
Running in UniVerse on Windows.
I have a select list of say 140 records from a file, then when I drill down
further by say a 'list' or 'sort' on the selected list, I only have 139
records shown.
I suspect I have a record with no 'real' ID.
How can I select and / or remove this record ?
Cheers,
Look in the directory where they are compiled. The compiled version of the
program begins with an underscore. The time/date stamp on that file is the
time/date of the last compile for that program.
hth
Colin Alfke
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Lunt
Hi All,
We would like to
I know this issue has been reported to IBM (don't know what IBM calls
it, but the 'bug' # is 144655). I'm trying to figure out if anyone has a
workaround (or if this has been fixed at a later version).
When I prompt for selection criteria from a 3rd party client (i.e.
Access), the unidata odbc
Do a select, copy all the records to a temp file, clear the data in the
original file and copy the records back.
In one system that I worked with, just editing a null record and deleting
it, would end up deleting the entire file. Nice featurenot!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Suddenly today we started seeing
'No more LCTs'
when we tried to log in.
Checking the process list shows LOTS and LOTS of udcs and udapi_slave
processes, which I can tell from the userid are coming from my
UniObjects for Java code.
But I don't hold sessions open. I connect, perhaps run a
It may be that it actually has an ID, but that ID has a delimiter (a
value mark or attribute mark) in it.
If it's really no key, can you:
SELECT filename ''
ED filename
??
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Simon,
Have you tried to do a SSELECT (Ok, I only know Unidata, but UV is similar),
and then Edit that list.
Anything that has a NULL ID in the file will float to the top and then just
delete that record.
Iain.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Karl
This sounds like an index overload issue - check NO.NULLS and for
overloads.
I have seen similar problems with extreme overload on a file with 99%+ of
all the records with the same key (and yes - it was NULL).
If there is stuff you do NOT want to index and it is not NULL then consider
a
Thanks, Jim!
That gives me just what I needed.
Thanks to everyone for the fast response!
Regards,
Bruce
From: James Canale, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Determining compile date and time
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005
Operating System, and version?
Can you run your process list command and redirect it's output to a
ps_out.txt file?
Then cut paste a few representative lines of these processes?
Run a netstat -a ns_out.txt command and take a look at the output from
it.
Maybe a little cut paste from there?
Scott Richardson wrote:
Operating System, and version?
Can you run your process list command and redirect it's output to a
ps_out.txt file?
Then cut paste a few representative lines of these processes?
HP-UX 11
The usual stopunirpcd script wouldn't work-- said that the RPC daemon
was
Iain,
Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 2:36:41 PM, you wrote:
HI Simon,
HI Have you tried to do a SSELECT (Ok, I only know Unidata, but UV is similar),
HI and then Edit that list.
HI Anything that has a NULL ID in the file will float to the top and then just
HI delete that record.
You might also
Have you tried
SELECT tblname WITHOUT @ID
DELETE tblname
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Tod Sigafoos
Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2005 12:19 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re[2]: [U2] Edit / Remove a record with
Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted:
:: One of my clients would like to replace their pre-printed forms
:: with those generated by the system. Basically the form has been
:: re-created in MS Publisher and saved as a PRN file.
::
:: I understand that there is some magic to send the form, keep
Do you mean you're trying to do an inline prompt through an ODBC
connection? You're a brave soul.
I would prompt for imput in the 3rd party client and pass the full string
through...
hth
Colin Alfke
-Original Message-
From: Amy Cook
I know this issue has
Are you using indices? This sounds like it could be a case of the index needing
to be rebuilt, as it is finding 140 records matching your criteria yet there
are only 139 on the actual file.
HTH
Kurt Neumann
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
30 matches
Mail list logo
