Yeah, I'm pretty sure if not globallyl or voc cataloged, it defaults to
the calling program's file. Been doing that for awhile.
Roger
Jacques G. wrote:
I've been working on a Universe 10.xx on an Dec Alpha
machine, I found an account where a subroutine was
being called and the routine wasn't
Here is one I wrote a whle back, when I needed it.
It currently looks for any call statements and explodes them and displays it
in a tree structure..
Of course, to can be modified to suit your needs.
Regards
Bjorn
Program Start:
PROGRAM GET.CALL
*
Try this to see what programs are in shared menu
analyze.shm -b
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2005 08:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Default Catalog?
Perhaps it's set to load into shared memory at Uv
Kevin,
Can I throw a me, too in?
Thanks,
Charlie Noah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
Kevin -
Funny. In my office we were just talking about the need for such a program.
Would you mind
sending me a copy, too?
Jim
Yes we're in the process of rolling out sudo to our IT staff and
removing root access but we have not been able to get MASTER OFF to
work.
I was always led to believe that MASTER OFF is a cleaner way to drop
Universe sessions rather than killing the sessions at unix level.
Mike Farrant
IT
I've found emperically
kill -4 [pid]
*seems* to nicely kill uv pocesses, but I'm not sure why.
Sometimes I have to repeat the command several times before success.
I kinda assumed MASTER OFF must do a kill -4, but have nothing to back
that up, just that UV processes seem to disappear
On our windows Universe system we used to have a phantom process that
ran under with administrative rights. This used to check a file every 15
seconds for instructions to MASTER OFF a port. The users had a program
they could run that wrote the record to the file. That way they had the
ability to
If no catalog exists for a called subroutine UV looks in the same program
library as the calling program.
Rich Taylor | Senior Programmer/Analyst| VERTIS
250 W. Pratt Street | Baltimore, MD 21201
P 410.361.8688 | F 410.528.0319
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.vertisinc.com
Vertis is the premier
Kill -4 generates an illegal instruction trap and core dump. I have always
heard that kill -1 (hangup) is the nicest way to kill an errant process,
and kill -9 (kill) is the last resort.
Larry Hiscock
Western Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I would think MASTER OFF it is a better way, because its not a 'back
door' approach. If you are dropping to the command line, then just
execute something like;
Sudo /usr/ibm/uv/bin/master off 123 ;*where 123 is the user number
You could create a group called uvmaster and add the users to that
Brian,
At the cludgy end you could use CGI to write a script (select
your language
here) to write request information to a directory, have a
phantom scan it
and write the response back, and then have the CGI script send
that back to
the web server. Very simple, but pretty slow and limited in
The kill -4 might also need to be done three or four times before that
mechanism kicks in.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
Larry
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 10:28, Drew Henderson wrote:
man signal (may have to use man 7 signal should tell you.
It looks like SIGILL, for illegal instruction
Drew
Stevenson, Charles wrote:
I've found emperically
kill -4 [pid]
*seems* to nicely kill uv pocesses, but I'm not
Thanks, Bjorn.
There doesn't seem to be a need for the System Builder $INCLUDE or the
call to SET.COMMON as long as the AM entries are changed to @AM. I'm
curious, though, as to why you would write it to only run on cataloged
programs. Like you said, it can be modified to suit our needs but I
Here's what strace shows during a master off operation;
kill(27239, SIG_0) = 0
kill(27239, SIGTERM)= 0
This isn't the whole trace just the lines relating to 'kill()'
I believe SIG_0 means stop processing signals (cant find doc on that
one), then the
Has anyone got any information on this param in the uvconfig;
# MALLOCTRACING - Turns on malloc tracing for UniVerse Support analysis.
MALLOCTRACING 0
I am still having some performance problems that I am trying to get a
handle on. I am interested in knowing if this would help me or not.
George, your implementation isn't cludgy by default. It's only slow and cludgy
if the processes involved aren't tuned to function
with file spooling. The basic design of MVWWW utilizes file spooling much in
the same way. I get very good throughput using it. It
is not anywhere as efficient as
No, it won't...
I originally put this facility in as an alternative to commonly available
memory tracing facilities, such as Purify and the like, due to it's
unavailability on certain platforms.
It allowed for the tracing of malloc/calloc/realloc/free calls across the
product, checking for
Hi all,
UV9.6, HPUX11
Has anyone ever seen a DATA statement stop working?
I had a user that was running a program that would basically...
DATA PROGRAM2RUN
EXECUTE 'SELECT FILE'
and the DATA statement would never execute.
I had them logout, log back in, and it starting working again.
There
DATA PROGRAM2RUN
EXECUTE 'SELECT FILE'
Data adds something to the stack. IF there is already something on the stack
then it adds it to the end. So my idea is that your stack wasn't exhausted.
Generally I prefer this syntax
EXECUTE SELECT FILE,//IN. PROGRAM2RUN
Which I believe will overwrite
Ok then I'll leave that one alone.
Maybe you can shed some light on this situation. I have a 'purge'
program that takes invoices in OM, OI (header and line item files),
writes them to OM.H, OI.H (history files), then deletes them from the
OM, OI. When we were on DG/UX, this purge could run
One of the things I have done in this situation is to have the purge
program sleep for 10 or 15 seconds every several hundred records. I
know this is hokey, but it seems to allow the file I/O buffers time to
catch up.
Dick Kryka
Director of Applications
CCCS of Greater Denver, Inc.
Paragon
Well, without going into great levels of detail (given I don't have much to
go on), I'd suggest the following to start:
a) Obviously, if your files are overflowed, that will cause problems...
check those, and ensure that's not the problem.
b) Check your lock tables to ensure you have enough
Thanks for the reply Will. I forgot to mention that I always clear the stack
prior to doing this.
-- Original message --
DATA PROGRAM2RUN
EXECUTE 'SELECT FILE'
Data adds something to the stack. IF there is already something on the stack
then it adds it to the
I would love to know what Universe is doing during this 'freeze'.
Thanks
Anthony
Updating the internal indexes. Suspend updates to the indexes and it will fly,
that's my bet. You probably have some long index chains.
Will
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
Me too please?
Jef Lee
IT Vision
Level 3 Kirin Centre, 15 Ogilvie Road, APPLECROSS, WA 6153
Tel: (08) 9315 7000 Fax: (08) 9315 7088
P O Box 881, Canning Bridge, WA 6153
A.C.N. 068 914 867
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit
CCE was written ~15 years ago and I'm not sure if it was on an
Ultimate or NCR, but either way it was an old, old implementation. If
I knew back then...
Anyway, it runs from a proc:
001 PQ
002 HRUN filename CCE
003 P
This is the routine you were asking about, right?
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also there is a SYSTEM(x) you can do which tells you
if there is something
on the data stack, and there is a command like
dataclear or something like
that which will clear it.
INPUT XX, -1
IF XX THEN
CRT There is something in the data stack
END
Generally I prefer this syntax
EXECUTE SELECT FILE,//IN. PROGRAM2RUN
I don't like this syntax. It reminds me of the more
cryptic pre-processor commands in C. When I see, it I
go back to the manual to make sure of what it does.
EXECUTE SELECT FILE
IF SYSTEM(11) THEN EXECUTE PROGRAM2RUN
The $INCLUDE SET.COMMON are just standard in the programs so that is why
they are there.
As for using only cataloged programs, our programs are stored by module and
within that module there can be 3 different BP files.
Eg: AR Module:
File 1: SS.ARBP
File 2: ARUFO
File 3: ARPROGS
So I am not
Check the indexes to see if they were created without NO.NULLS, and
that is appropriate to the application.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
31 matches
Mail list logo
