Peter-
I banged my head against a similar problem -- it wasn't UniObjects, but
involved third-party DLL's. In short, everything worked fine until I
tried to use it in the context of a web service. I don't know why or
what the workaround is, but the problem is that ASP.NET doesn't play
well
How on earth do You implement a persistent local variable without
using named common ??
- -- mats
@USER0
@USER1
@USER2
@USER3
@USER4
This is also in the manual. :)
Dave Barrett,
Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe
I will be out of the office starting 09/06/2005 and will not return until
09/07/2005.
I will respond to your message when I return.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Yes it's a possible way of 'remembering' some values but we
ruled it out for the same reason as unnamed common - sooner
or later you'll interact with a subroutine or function that also
uses them and then ...
btw named common isn't quite safe either -
it's possible that another routine uses
Sorry, but I have to disagree. Whether or not using the Named COMMON is
basically a good practice is beside the point. There is something wrong
somewhere when a subroutine takes progressively longer to execute each time
it is called, even though there is nothing accumulating anywhere. The
Named
I'm doing some research for a talk and am interested in hearing from people
who are running (or have run) transaction processing systems on both U2 and
SQL Server. What are your intuitions and/or facts about the differences in
cost of ownership between these two environments? Do you think the COA
btw named common isn't quite safe either - it's possible
that another routine uses the same name for it's common ...
I hit that using Pace at a previous job ...
What's really needed is a 'local static' modifier.
Would be nice :-)
What's really needed is a good software mapping
Universe supports the ENUM command that does the same thing as adding our
favorite CNT I-descriptor to the dictionary or VOC. It is always available
without editting dictionaries or vocs. It does add a column to the output.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw named common isn't quite safe either - it's possible
that another routine uses the same name for it's common ...
I hit that using Pace at a previous job ...
What's really needed is a 'local static' modifier.
Would be nice :-)
What's really
To coincide with the release of Version 3.1 of our DesignBais product, we
are delighted to announce the creation of our newsgroup, hosted by Google
at:
http://groups.google.com/group/DesignBais-Forum/
Stop by the website (www.designbais.com) , read the newsletter, download the
new product from
Named common can be a very powerful tool and where needed is often the
best, if not only, way to create a solution that works for the user. Like
any other tool it has its good and bad points.
First and foremost is selecting a name that is as unique to the process
(not filename) as possible.
I just downloaded the PDF docs -- it appears the INDEX.PDX is missing
Anyone else have this issue, or did I somehow grab a defective ZIP from the
IBM Web Site?
And if anyone has the index.pdx for UD 7.1, I'd love to get it -- I used the
'search' all the time in the 6.1 docs
David W
Should be there..
In my installation:
C:\IBM\UDDoc\ud71\index.pdf
You may have to open it 'directly' (find it and double click on it) to use
the Adobe search tool
Wally Terhune
Manager - U2 Advanced Client Support
IBM Information Management
Tel: 303.294.4866 -- New Number 9/24/05:
Nope -- not in the ZIP file on the IBM web site, it would appear...
It *should be*, but it's not... Where did you get your copy of the
documentation??
David W.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune
Sent: Tuesday, September 06,
I assume you are talking about a web service when you say a .NET service.
When you are doing a webservice you have to process through the IIS
facility. With IIS particularly older versions of windows server there is
an issue with running dlls for security reasons, a bit like the sandbox
security
15 matches
Mail list logo