Thanks for the info; I had not heard this one before. All of the apps
that I have written so far are quite small-scale and, although I do use
session variables, I don't think they are affected by the conditions
that you mentioned.
However, we all know what will happen if I make the ASSumption
Hello,
Recently, I have installed wIntegrate Version 6.0.4 on my WinXP Pro
machine for evaluation use. So far, I really like its enhanced
features but have noticed one difference between the previous version
which I had loaded. My defined break key is reacting differently.
Always before I could
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a 486/Pentium-1 looking box. They would
like to move everything to a contemporary box.
While I don't create systems, I would like some suggestions on which kind of
W2000-class server to hold a 5 user version of UV. I don't want to switch
databases to UD
I did get Crtl-C to work. But it took some experimenting. So I am not sure that
I know all the steps that I did to get it working. I gave someone else the
settings that I had and they say it still does not work. The setting that
finally allowed me to use Crtl-C was to go into Setup, Keyboard
Ok, I'm going to reply to my own post here. :-)
I figured out what the problem was. On the Setup | Communications |
Windows Socket setup screen Telnet tab there's a Break Signal and
that was set to Break. After changing this setting to Interrupt,
my defined break key is working fine.
On
Mark,
We just went through a conversion from a UV box and can help you if you
haven't already been overwhelmed by responses.
Contact me at 919 567-0042 or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will
American Computer Technics, Inc.
MAJ Programming wrote:
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a
Hi,
You can run a 5 users of uv on a lite box (I do it on a notebook)
Use W2003 server (W2003 is more demanding in ressource like UV, it can run
on XP too ).
To switch from sco to windows, you must use *uvbackup* tool into sco to
prepare a file, then copy these file to windows and use
Seems to me a move to Linux would be better since they are probably more
familiar with a nix system. The spoolers are completely different. Whatever
way you do decide then you should use uvbackup and uvrestore to move your
accounts. It's simple from either the command line or the Uniadmin front
Mark,
I'm moving a client to a new server right now. The specs we are
using are Dual Core Xeon 5140, 4 GB memory, with Windows 2003. It sounds
like you could get away with a much smaller system. I shy away from
using desktops as servers, so I'd recommend you go with a rack-mountable
if
Cost-wise, consider a dual-core AMD X2 system. If you have a little more
funds, the 5140 or 5150 Xeons are well cached chips for the money. Either
way, get a dual-CPU mainboard that is one-CPU capable so that you can drop
in an upgrade chip later as CPU demand increases. (Trust me, it will..)
Why do you need uvbackup?
I'm NOT recommending that you don't use it, but a while ago I had a
linux box, a SCO box, and a Windows box, and quite happily copied UV
files between all three of them using the OS-level copy command. Bearing
in mind they all run on Intel chips, and byte order is a chip
Glen:
I bought a Dell dual-core AMD Opteron rack-mount server several months ago, to
go along with the 18 month old Xeon rack-mount server
we purchased. The machine was virtually identical, and cost more by the way.
The AMD is twice as loud as the Intel and is most annoying. It's always
Sorry.. I meant dual-core AMD Opteron for a Windows server, not the X2 64
chips. You can do fine with X2's on an unstressed Linux server. You will
want to look at the Opteron 200 series for 2-way setups. The 100 series
Opterons are for single-CPU setups. You *can* run one 100 series CPU on a
Chips aren't noisy. The cooling systems on them and in the cases are.
That's Dell's ducted single-fan passive CPU cooling at work. I have AMD's
all around here, as well as one Xeon, and I have relatively low noise. I
build servers here to my specs and one of the things I strive for is low-RPM
Seems to me a move to Linux would be better since they are probably more
familiar with a nix system. The spoolers are completely different.
I agree with what Jerry said. In addition to his points, consider that
changing the operating system means that you have to worry about any
Wol,
One reason for using uvbackup is that the index file path names within UV
are hard coded and I have had interesting issues when not using uvbackup to
move work directory/accounts around between machines.
Also, it gets rather tedious setting up the many VOC entries for the OS
files again.
On 6/13/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all -
I am trying to find where I can get the samples mentioned in the Unidata docs.
I have PE installed and the samples would hopefully help me get through a
project faster than figuring it out on my own. Anyone know where I can get
them?
U2logic is announcing the release 1.1.5.14 of XLr8Editor for Eclipse tool
set.
1) For Universe users we have added caching to speed up the loading of the
files the second time through. This is a clickable option on the
preferences window option.
2) We have a dictionary editor. You can edit or
Dave Taylor did a wonderful job explaining the difference in porting
UV from NIX to NT and many of the things that should influence the
choice of base platforms.
As someone who is porting from UV from AIX to Linux, I will add even
NIX to different NIX has its challenges in the area of
Thanks for all who responded. I have to see how much gets printed versus
gets downloaded (accuterm) and printed from the desktop.
Thanks
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: Ken Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:44 PM
Subject:
The other 'fun' you'll have is if they have serial printers. If memory
serves, you'd have to convert them over to termservers if you go the Windows
route so that they have network addresses (though my memory has been known to
be faulty).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a
statement for those a little more familiar with server architecture
I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which
performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell
22 matches
Mail list logo
