A site that has mv.NET installed can have inbound or outbound web services
calls in minutes, and the cost is a lot less than a connection pool
license. In fact, if you get mv.NET from Nebula RD, I'll provide
functional samples for web services for free.
Tony Gravagno
TG@ removethisNebula-RnD.com
Sara
The web services require a pooled connection licence.
Which is, unfortunately, not available with PE.
Grrr
Though I have to say, when I finally got to play with the IBM web services I've
found them disappointing, particularly in the lack of data types. Maybe someone
who can afford
That's weird ... has that changed at all recently?
I used to create multiple masters by hand and never did anything like
that ... (and never bothered to update PARTFILES either :-)
Where does it store the pointer to the master file? Field 2 of the VOC
is just a multi-value list of the relevant
Knowledge of u2 programming a must, with UniVerse language a strong
plus but not required.
Huh??? Who are you calling an oxymoron!
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage Better by Design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Dula
Wol,
I think you are confusing multi-part files with distributed files.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 8:30 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV]
Then things really are confusing ... I'm talking about the file-type
introduced by Prime, and officially managed using the DEFINE.DF command.
By multi-part, do you mean the Pick style NEW.ACCOUNT,PIOPEN type
file? I'm certainly not thinking of those - they were never in PI and
I've never had
Yeah - I had a play with the beta program, TBH it is only about 20 or so lines
of code in ASP.NET to write a web service front end to a unibasic subroutine so
I never bothered using the new web service developer !
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had the feeling for some time that the digest is not complete.
Today I posted a query re Web Services which I cannot see in the digest,
although I see a number of replies (Thank you). Am I missing some
sections or are some posts being omitted?
Sara Burns
Sara Burns (SEB)
IS
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained
Odder and odder.
I don't ever remember seeing a file at OS level with the name of a
distributed master file. PI *or* UV. As implemented by Prime, iirc, any
partfile could be used as a master to get the algorithm definition etc,
and you were warned that a VERY QUICK way to corrupt your distributed
Sorry Wol,
Yes, I did think you meant the Pick style multi-part, sorry about that.
But as far as the distributed files as managed by DF they have always
had a master file of type (27 or 41 - cannot remember which ) which was
basically just a header and I think had the algorithms etc in them.
Just an fyi for everyone,
IBM is removing the connection pool requirement from web services. This
will be a client side change, due out in September. We requested the
enhancement a few months ago and just received word when it would be
available.
Mike Dallaire
Mortgage Builder Software Inc.
PARTFILES on UV is purely decorative. (Someone _please_ correct me if
that isn't true!)
PARTFILES was vital on PI, but maintained on UV solely for backward
compatibility in case guys like us ported some user-grown PI critter
that relied on it.
Perhaps a UV example would help.
FSR is distributed,
We use distributed files and yes a master file is created. The DEFINE.DF
command creates a type 27 file and a dictionary file is created that is
a type 30 file.
As a matter of fact we use the one dictionary for all of the part files.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Youngman
Tom,
In AIX 5.1, tar won't work on files larger than 2 GB:
The tar command is not enabled for files greater than 2 Gig in size due to
limitations imposed by XPG/4 and POSIX.2 standards
From the AIX 5.1 Command Reference manual...
Regards,
Bob Wyatt
We are migrating to AIX 5.1 with
There is a setting (in AIX 5.3 at least) to allow for files larger than 2 GB.
It's one of the tunable kernel parameters.
Why mess with tar, though? If VMS allows (and I don't know if it does or
not) why not either NFS mount a drive and do copies - or use ftp? As long as
it's an internal
/mail.quarantine/20070622 (message
l5MMHhIi028924).
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd looking for feedback on @SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE as returned from BSELECT of a
multivalue attribute.
Run the following basic code in the UniData demo account:
CMD = 'BSELECT CUSTOMER TAPES_RENTED'
CRT CMD
EXECUTE CMD
CRT '@SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE =
Let me re-phrase my question.
Does anyone know if the following option is available in the tar command on
VMS?
-L InputList
The Inputlist argument to the -L option should always be the
name of the file that lists the files and directories
that need to be archived
Sara,
Tom Pellitieri has noted that the digest often shows e-mails out of
order. This has been brought to our attention, but we aren't sure why it
is happening. Your original e-mail might be in a different digest,
possibly *after* the one or ones holding the responses.
- Chuck
Sara
Seeking advice on dynamic files. Unidata 6.1 on HPux.
Client has a couple of big, dynamic files with horrible performance. I
took a gander and was surprised to see the following:
File name(Dynamic File) = STUDENT.ACAD.LEVELS
Number of groups in file (modulo) = 1019
21 matches
Mail list logo
