It looked like it had the instructions for both UV and UD. Especially
updating the uci.config on the client to attach to the updated port. It's a
little strange that it's so easy in UV and so hard in UD
Colin
-Original Message-
From: Bill Haskett
Sent: August 30, 2010 5:03 PM
To: U2
I was wondering if there was an easy way to reverse engineer unibasic object
and turn it into
source code? We have some old (but necessary) programs that we can't seem to
find the
source anywhere for. However we do have the object code. Any help is
appreciated.
Chris
A long time ago, I wrote a reverse compiler for Reality. It even found the
variable map if you compiled with the M option and put the right variable
names back. Yes, it can be done, but I don't have the source for the reverse
compiler anymore, and it wouldn't work for UniBASIC anyways.
Take a look at:
http://www.srs4uv.com/
--
Carl Dula Voice: 973-227-8440 X111
Pulsar Systems, Inc.Fax: 973-227-8440
271 Route 46 West, Suite H209 email:c...@pulsarsystems.com
Fairfield, NJ
Cool. How about Unidata?
Take a look at:
http://www.srs4uv.com/
Charles Shaffer
Senior Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Sweet!! Thanks a ton Carl.
-Chris
From: c...@pulsarsystems.com
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:41:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [U2] possible to reverse engineer unibasic object?
Take a look at:
http://www.srs4uv.com/
Has anyone a real-world application where UniVerse shared record locks
are used? I'm struggling with when they would be preferable to using an
update record lock. Anyone willing to share their experiences?
Thanks.
Perry Taylor
ZirMed
626 West Main St , 6th Floor
Louisville, KY 40202
I had a process that would spin off multiple phantoms, each putting a
shared lock on a control group record. When each child phantom
finished, it would release its shared lock. When the main process was
able to obtain an update lock, it knew all the child processes had
completed and it would
When you have data you want to update, but do not want to prevent people from
viewing the rest of the data.
I.E. Updating patient information for the next insurance enrollment period, and
still letting customer service reps access the data to help customers.
HTH
-Dan
- Original Message
Hi,
The READL is one verb that causes a lot of confusion, and I have not found a
use for it.
READU prevents another person to lock the record, but regular READs continue to
work without a problem.
READL permits multiple READL or READ but no READUs/WRITES are permitted. You
cannot update with
10 matches
Mail list logo
