Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread George Land
I doubt you'll ever believe me, until Rocket send you your branded skateboard that is! On 03/05/2011 17:52, fft2...@aol.com fft2...@aol.com wrote: We'll all believe you, when they are published. What's the link again? In a message dated 5/3/2011 4:21:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

[U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread Symeon Breen
Hi I seem to recall someone stating recently that uniobjects works much better with uv rather than ud, something to do with connection times etc. We are on ud71 on redhat ES 4 and do have problems with uniobjects.net with regard speed and stability. Does anyone have any

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread Rex Gozar
When I see the demand for U2 or Pick programmers rise, then I'll believe the market is growing. rex On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:46 AM, George Land george.l...@aptsolutions.net wrote: I doubt you'll ever believe me, until Rocket send you your branded skateboard that is! On 03/05/2011 17:52,

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread David Jordan
New sales are mostly packages. A new site implementing a package does not equate to a new site needing U2 programmers. Hence a growth in job advertising is not a measure. Another impact is that new U2 applications have front ends developed with other languages like .Net, java. Etc. Often

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread Bill Haskett
Symeon: We use mv.NET with uodotnet and have seen various Windows errors. Tony G. indicated that mv.NET is just a wrapper for UO.NET, at this level, and the problem is with uodotnet. We're running UD V7.1.9 in our production environment and uodotnet.dll v2.1.1.7211. I'm not a rocket

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread Charlie Noah
Hi Bill, A little off-topic, but it seems that whenever you get 2 or more vendors involved in anything, they automatically start blaming the other, and nothing gets done. Charlie Noah Charles W. Noah Associates cwn...@comcast.net The views and opinions expressed herein are my own (Charlie

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread Bill Haskett
Isn't that the truth. An interesting side note is debugging. When technologists suggest we use a black-box technology approach, all this does is create massive investigation problems in a layered environment; which most are today. For not-easily-reproducible problems, logging exacerbates

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread Steve Romanow
I was just pondering that problem as you wrote that Bill. :0) On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Bill Haskett wphask...@advantos.net wrote: Isn't that the truth.  An interesting side note is debugging.  When technologists suggest we use a black-box technology approach, all this does is create

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 5/4/2011 12:47:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, george.l...@aptsolutions.net writes: I doubt you'll ever believe me, until Rocket send you your branded skateboard that is! That's right George. I like action :) At least IBM called me *once* to see if I wanted to renew my

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 5/4/2011 6:50:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, da...@dacono.com.au writes: Often they are training those people to write U2 code rather than hiring pure U2 people. That is simply excellent for the future of U2 programmers. Train people to write really awful code with little

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

2011-05-04 Thread Bob Wyatt
My vote is that this pool of excrement we have been swimming in with posts like this needs to stop. They are fruitless, pointless, and have no bearing on technical details or issues in the U2 database realm. In case some need reminders about the purpose of this list and others: u2-users:

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep thelist busy

2011-05-04 Thread Harry Reiter
I totally agree with you Bob, enough is enough! Harry Reiter -Original Message- From: Bob Wyatt Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 12:10 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep thelist busy My vote is that this pool of excrement we have

[U2] SB+ GUI, making Ctrl-X work like cut and not exit

2011-05-04 Thread Caryl Lange
Possible? Avante 9.1.7a/SB+ on Windows, tasty GUI flavored Best Regards, Caryl Lange Applications Development Manager HME 14110 Stowe Drive Poway, California 92064 phone: (858) 646-8806 cla...@hme.com mailto:cla...@hme.com Visit our website: www.hme.com http://www.hme.com/

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread David Wolverton
SO... what does Rocket say when you ask for Support on UO? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] uv v

Re: [U2] SB+ GUI, making Ctrl-X work like cut and not exit

2011-05-04 Thread Boydell, Stuart
Have you tried modifying the terminal definition (/TERM.DEFN) and redefining the Quit Process key sequence to something other than Ctrl-X? That may work. Cheers, Stuart -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf

Re: [U2] uv v ud

2011-05-04 Thread David Jordan
Hi Bill I ran into a funny like that. The application was compile with an old version of uniobjects .Net and had an issue with the new version of universe. I recompiled with the new version of uniobjects and the issue went away. Other area to look for - I have had issues where a subroutine