Hi Brian/U2UG,
Now that I work for Rocket, I'm not sure if I should still vote. Thoughts?
If I can, I'd like to reiterate the questions I posed this time last year
before I do vote.
Hi all,
I've posted an open letter regarding the U2UG elections to the nominees. I'd
love to see more dialogue
You work for Rocket.
There are 20 U2 people there, and only 2 have heard of U2UG.
Words fail me.
I'm not sure if I should be just amazed or righteously angry.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel McGrath dmcgr...@rocketsoftware.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri,
Hold on,
That is the quoted text from my email to this list last year. I don't think
there is anyone on the Rocket U2 team that has not heard of U2UG.
Also, there is many more than 20 U2 people here at Rocket.
Cheers,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
Will,
How about a third choice?
Dan's post is a RE-POSTING from last year, from before when he worked
for Rocket...
On 3/9/2012 12:51 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
You work for Rocket.
There are 20 U2 people there, and only 2 have heard of U2UG.
Words fail me.
I'm not sure if I should be just
I didn't comprehend that point at first.
One would hope that Rocket would be solidly behind the U2UG
-Original Message-
From: Allen Egerton aeger...@pobox.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Mar 9, 2012 9:56 am
Subject: Re: [U2] Calling U2UG Members
Will,
On 09/03/12 17:12, Daniel McGrath wrote:
Hi Brian/U2UG,
Now that I work for Rocket, I'm not sure if I should still vote. Thoughts?
When we set up the U2UG, that was one of the things we discussed. And
seeing as you are eligible to stand in the elections, it would be a bit
of a poor show if
Dan
Absolutely you should vote..! The U2UG is best served through its
relationship with Rocket, so there is nothing to prevent members from Rocket
from voting, standing or otherwise contributing. In fact, the more the
merrier.
(We do have Rocket U2UG members - though many haven't updated their
Allen Egerton aeger...@pobox.com wrote:
Will,
How about a third choice?
Dan's post is a RE-POSTING from last year, from before when he worked
for Rocket...
On 3/9/2012 12:51 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
You work for Rocket.
There are 20 U2 people there, and only 2 have heard of U2UG.
Words
I installed the new U2 BDT (Basic Developer's Toolkit) and attempted to
use it. In the U2 resource tab (after I created a server connection)
one gets a list of accounts. Drilling in one gets a list of files.
These include links ('Q'-files). When I click on one of the program
links I get
On Unidata, globally cataloguing a program causes it to run in a separate
memory space so that if 10 users are running the program, only one copy of
the routine is loaded into memory. From the docs: Multiple users can run
globally cataloged programs simultaneously — UniData brings one copy of the
The concept is similar, but there's an additional step.
See UV 11.1 Administering Universe pdF, Chapter 18,
UniAdmin pdf, Chapter 16, Managing Catalog Shared Menu.
Most UV shops in my experience don't bother with it, but I think it's a
good tool and not difficult to master.
cds
On
Universe shared memory can bite.
The speed improvement is probably not an issue, unless you are truly running a
subroutine ten thousand times every hour.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Stevenson stevenson.c...@gmail.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Mar
Hi Bill:
BDT uses UOJ for connection which does not support environmental variables.
You would have to shell out to get them and convert the files manually. I
looked in the manuals and did not find an alternative.
BDT does not have a keep alive. The default for a UOJ session is an hour.
If
Thanks Doug.
Just another product that forces me to dance to their tune rather than
letting me work in the most efficient manner that 20 years of experience
has taught me. Yes, they're much smarter and better than me.
But then, my daughter informs me just how stupid I am on a daily basis!
14 matches
Mail list logo
