Larry:
1. Thanks for writing.
2. We started to use Goole Mail a few months ago.
3. I only see inbound filtration settings.
4. While I also use Outlook 2013... a lot of times when I am sending...
including this time... I have been using the gMail web client.
5. I hope that this message arrives
Hi Bill,
This made it to the list, and was delivered. Did you get a copy of it?
--Larry
Larry Hiscock
Moderator
Larry:
1. Thanks for writing.
2. We started to use Goole Mail a few months ago.
3. I only see inbound filtration settings.
4. While I also use Outlook 2013... a lot of
LH:
Thanks for writing.
No... I did not see my original post appear... both in Outlook 2013 and the
gMail web client.
I presume that this is a Google Mail thing.
I expect to contact Google tech support on it.
--Bill
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, lar...@wcs-corp.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
This
We've been having an anomaly that has occurred over the past 7 years
we've been using UniData on Windows.
Yesterday one of the accounts on our ASP server, that contains about 30
accounts, had a billing issue. This issue was created because a single
BASIC program didn't run a couple of lines
Put the five into a single transaction.
You will never see the issue again
-Original Message-
From: Bill Haskett wphask...@advantos.net
To: U2 Mail List U2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 25, 2013 12:25 pm
Subject: [U2] [UD] BASIC Code Failing
We've been having an
Bill, at Pick Systems we occasionally saw issues like this, where the
object code would behave differently if specific statements (their
opcodes/tokens) were broken across frame boundaries. Until DBMS
patches become available, the problem could be avoided with some
carefully-placed NULL
my google mail on both my galaxy s2 as well as desktop and laptop are iffy
loads of sending and receiving errors with delays as much as days
i have a friend with stuff in her outbox from a month ago...
otoh, it is free
On 7/25/2013 11:08 AM, William Brutzman wrote:
LH:
Thanks for
I agree with Tony. I once had a program that my fix was just adding a
JUNK = 0 line near the top of the program. With that do-nothing line
the program worked. Comment the line out or remove it completely and
the program seemed to skip lines of code.
This was a LONG time ago, though.
I have seen this recently with either UNIVERSE or UNIDATA. I don't
remember which. I have very very rarely seen this happen in 26 years. I
believe it is a glitch in the compiler or in the RUN command. I was able
to rewrite the offending part of the program and it would work. I wish I
had the
I just remembered another situation I saw once where a program behaved
strangely. When we used the command to verify the object code (BVERIFY?)
it didn't verify. A recompile fixed it because the object code became
corrupt due to a system crash.
Sometimes you can have the same thing happen,
Robert:
...the object code became corrupt due to a system crash. That sounds
plausible. Our systems rarely go down, but they do get rebooted with
Windows Updates. UO connections often fail, then get picked up. Telnet
often freezes or aborts (mostly client issues) then they log in again.
As always, thanks G-Man!
I can't replicate it. It just comes up every six months (or so) with
something totally different happening within our application, not to
everybody, but to someone. The testing is always the same; test to
confirm, put in the DEBUG, recompile, test, confirm fix, take
You can turn off automatic reboots.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Haskett wphask...@advantos.net
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC Code Failing
Robert:
...the object code became corrupt due to a system
I recall seeing and reporting this issue back in UniData 3.5.2 on Solaris.
I recall seeing and reporting this issue back in UniData 5.something on AIX.
Both times, support calls were opened.
Both times, as we had done much of what you have already done, the call was
closed as No Fault Found
Do you have the two-inch lead shielding around your server room to block cosmic
rays?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Wyatt bwyatt_...@comcast.net
To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 25, 2013 5:28 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC Code Failing
I recall
We never knew which guys to ask for - the guys in the black suits or the
white suits?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
don't worry about the color of the suit. It's the hat that matters. I think the
choices are black, white, and red.
On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Bob Wyatt bwyatt_...@comcast.net wrote:
We never knew which guys to ask for - the guys in the black suits or the
white suits?
-Original
17 matches
Mail list logo
