: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Canale, Jr.
Sent: 30 November 2007 23:30
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] mv.net versus Web DE
Tony Gravagno wrote:
If you don't want to pay for Visual Studio
[Ad - kind of] There may be another way for people
Is there a link for this somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Monday, 3 December 2007 10:00 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] mv.net versus Web DE
If you want visual studio for free
You can download a free version of Visual Studio Basic called express. It
is a slimmed down version, but should do most of what U2 developers would
use.
http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/default.aspx
Regards
David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
for VB and web developer is free.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: 03 December 2007 09:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] mv.net versus Web DE
Is there a link for this somewhere?
-Original Message
Charles_Shaffer wrote:
Over the years MS has limited
interoperability, corrupted standards, and generally tried to create the
impression that Windows is the only OS in the world. And people buy it.
Even IT people.
Quite true in many ways, the only company in the world to beat Micrsoft on
Tony Gravagno wrote:
If you don't want to pay for Visual Studio
[Ad - kind of] There may be another way for people on Long Island to get the
brand new Visual Studio 2008 Professional for free. Next week (Dec. 6th),
the LI.NET Developers Group will be hosting a meeting and at that meeting
it.
Mike Randall, MCP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Canale, Jr.
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:30 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] mv.net versus Web DE
Tony Gravagno wrote:
If you don't want to pay
We looked a mv.net and found the Windows platform very limiting and would
force us to use Visual Studio.
Uniobjects is not strictly limited to Visual Studio. I am currently using
the non .NET version of Uniobjects in a LotusScript program and it seems
to be working OK. I suspect that it would
Doug Averch wrote
We looked a mv.net and found the Windows platform very
limiting and would force us to use Visual Studio.
Charles_Shaffer wrote:
Uniobjects is not strictly limited to Visual Studio.
People often confuse .NET with Visual Studio. VS facilitates the use of
.NET, but
'twere a popular forum discussing this late yesterday @ IBM U2
conference, San Fransisco edition.
Jackie Burhans had I nice chart at the end showing about 8 different
IBM-supplied approaches.
I attended it mostly to hear any Redback (now aka WebDE) gossip. I
have to move from 4.2 to 4.4 and it
I have made some headway with Adobe Flex and UniObjects for Java;
I almost have a live production application.
The price is right and Flex is robust and easy to use.
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
Hutchinson
Sent:
Martin,
We looked a mv.net and found the Windows platform very limiting and would
force us to use Visual Studio. We should know about limiting, our prior
tool ran only on IIS using ASP. There is the problem of pricing as well.
We have to buy a license for everyone of our machines and our
12 matches
Mail list logo
