Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:21 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
So, Perry, what did you finally decide to do?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo
]
Regards
Kurt Neumann; U2 Distributor in Africa
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: 06 May 2011 02:55 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
/rebuilding an index.
Perry
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:53 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
That should work
So, Perry, what did you finally decide to do?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Thinking back to Prime INFORMATION, that was the default behaviour. You could
have deferred updates pending and still have new transactions update the
indexes.
But, then, in Prime INFORMATION BUILD.INDEX and UPDATE.INDEX were two separate
commands, unlike the UniVerse implementation.
Required YesYes SL N0
Perry
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:24 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking
That should work.
And then you can write your own update program to back-populate the
index w/o having to do a build at all.
But if your my connivings are true, then why doesn't RocketSQ give
that to us as a concurrent build option? A few years ago they (as IBM)
declared that 7x24 uptime
an index.
Perry
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:53 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
That should work.
And then you
for
building/rebuilding an index.
Perry
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:53 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
On 28/04/11 17:53, Charles Stevenson wrote:
That should work.
And then you can write your own update program to back-populate the
index w/o having to do a build at all.
But if your my connivings are true, then why doesn't RocketSQ give
that to us as a concurrent build option? A few years
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
On 28/04/11 17:53, Charles Stevenson wrote:
That should work.
And then you can write your own update program to back-populate the
index w/o having to do a build at all.
But if your my connivings are true, then why doesn't RocketSQ give
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:24 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built
On 29/04/11 00:08, Perry Taylor wrote
I think I have found an unsupported way to doing this. It appears
there is a flag in the INDEX.MAP file that controls this and flipping it
does the trick. I'm hoping there is an official way to do this so I
don't have any surprises when I muck with the internals. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Perry
13 matches
Mail list logo