RE: [U2] UV: tests for inequality failing. Wide0 parameter?

[Womack, Adrian]

 Wide0 should have no bearing on numbers in that range. The Wide0
problem that I've encountered is when values do look (and print) the
same and an equality comparison fails (not the other way around).

Are you sure COST.VISIBLE is true? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joey Walter
Sent: Thursday, 2 March 2006 8:30 AM
To: U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV: tests for inequality failing. Wide0 parameter?

I'm having a problem with comparisons for equality between variables
failing.

Very simple code:

IF COST # COST.WAS THEN
 IF COST.VISIBLE THEN GOSUB SHOW.COST
END

And I'm expecting of course for the gosub to be executed when I know for
certain the variables COST and COST.WAS are not equal - but it doesn't
happen. For instance the test for inequality fails when the variable
COST =
1505 and variable COST.WAS = 1507.

I wrote a line of code to display the OCONV'd variables and in the case
mentioned above it displayed this:

recalc.unit.cost; cost was 15.07 cost is 15.05

But, the subroutine to display the new cost did not get executed.

Anyway, I'm guessing it's a problem with that bizarre little parameter
called Wide0?

I currently have it set to 0x3eb0. Why do I have it set that way -
purely because I had problems with the default setting and someone
tossed me a clue and told me to try 0x3eb0 and I never had problems
since on my development machine or any other - until now.

Anyone that can help me out with this? What's a reasonable/functional
setting for Wide0 parameter. I don't need accuracy past six decimal
places.

Thanks.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


DISCLAIMER:
Disclaimer.  This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete 
the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any 
way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not 
represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should 
scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no 
liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of 
any attachments to this e-mail.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV: tests for inequality failing. Wide0 parameter?

[Eric Armstrong]

I had a similar problem and discovered that division still worked, i.e.
1507/1505 # 1; so I could condition on the number 1.

Eric Armstrong
Programmer/Analyst
Lobel Financial
714.816.1207


-Original Message-
From: Joey Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 4:30 PM
To: U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV: tests for inequality failing. Wide0 parameter?


I'm having a problem with comparisons for equality between variables
failing.

Very simple code:

IF COST # COST.WAS THEN
 IF COST.VISIBLE THEN GOSUB SHOW.COST
END

And I'm expecting of course for the gosub to be executed when I know for
certain the variables COST and COST.WAS are not equal - but it doesn't
happen. For instance the test for inequality fails when the variable COST =
1505 and variable COST.WAS = 1507.

I wrote a line of code to display the OCONV'd variables and in the case
mentioned above it displayed this:

recalc.unit.cost; cost was 15.07 cost is 15.05

But, the subroutine to display the new cost did not get executed.

Anyway, I'm guessing it's a problem with that bizarre little parameter
called Wide0?

I currently have it set to 0x3eb0. Why do I have it set that way -
purely because I had problems with the default setting and someone tossed me
a clue and told me to try 0x3eb0 and I never had problems since on my
development machine or any other - until now.

Anyone that can help me out with this? What's a reasonable/functional
setting for Wide0 parameter. I don't need accuracy past six decimal places.

Thanks.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] UV: tests for inequality failing. Wide0 parameter?

[Joey Walter]

I'm having a problem with comparisons for equality between variables
failing.

Very simple code:

IF COST # COST.WAS THEN
 IF COST.VISIBLE THEN GOSUB SHOW.COST
END

And I'm expecting of course for the gosub to be executed when I know for
certain the variables COST and COST.WAS are not equal - but it doesn't
happen. For instance the test for inequality fails when the variable COST =
1505 and variable COST.WAS = 1507.

I wrote a line of code to display the OCONV'd variables and in the case
mentioned above it displayed this:

recalc.unit.cost; cost was 15.07 cost is 15.05

But, the subroutine to display the new cost did not get executed.

Anyway, I'm guessing it's a problem with that bizarre little parameter
called Wide0?

I currently have it set to 0x3eb0. Why do I have it set that way -
purely because I had problems with the default setting and someone tossed me
a clue and told me to try 0x3eb0 and I never had problems since on my
development machine or any other - until now.

Anyone that can help me out with this? What's a reasonable/functional
setting for Wide0 parameter. I don't need accuracy past six decimal places.

Thanks.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] NLS on UniVerse

[Kevin Zollinger]

Hello all!

We are heading down the road of doing an in-place conversion of our large
database and application from standard ASCII to NLS. We have involved IBM on
a couple of levels in our research, but would like to see what other folks
have been able to do with NLS in the "real world"  We've been told
that Reynolds & Reynolds of Australia has been very successful in using NLS
and would like to talk to them about their experience. I am trying to avoid
calling 1-800-ReynoldsofAustrailia and so am looking for some contact info.
Do any of you know who we could contact at R&R? An email address or phone
number would be ideal. Of course, if we have any Aussie R&R folks on the
list please drop me a line.

I don't know how much interest there is in the rest of the denizens of the
list, but anyone else who has war stories or happy remembrances of NLS are
also welcome to send email!

Thanks for your interest.

~kevin zollinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] image collection for storage...

[George Gallen]

I'm looking for something more like a photographic copy stand.
no moving parts. you put the document under it, and it does
an image scan. I don't really need the OCR abilities.



but the above looks like it only passes video. I guess a screen
capture might work...but it would be great if it also did .jpg

George

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 4:35 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] image collection for storage...
> 
> 
> I have a Visioneer Strobe XP-100 scanner that I use on my 
> desk and it works
> well with single documents. We are looking at some imaging 
> software from our
> ERP VAR that uses the same scanner to digitize and index to customers,
> vendors and transactions. The XP-100 is about $230 and uses a USB
> connection. You could have one at each terminal.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   George Gallen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:29 AM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject:[U2] image collection for storage...
> > 
> > I'm looking into the possibility of using a scanner to record images
> > of cards customers fill out for archival and retrieval usage and not
> > have to save the original card.
> > 
> > For ease of use, the stand-type scanners look like the best option
> > for speed, put the card down, it "takes" a picture/scan.
> > 
> > I have not been able to find any of these however online 
> for comparison.
> > 
> > Does anyone on this list use them? Cost is an issue, 
> anything more than
> > $1000 "range" would not fit well with the project. OCR is not needed
> > just the image.
> > 
> > I considered trying to rig up a 4mp digital camera with the computer
> > pulling the image directly from the camera's memory card, 
> but I'm not
> > sure if the camera I have to play with will function while 
> the computer
> > has access to the card.
> > 
> > George
> > 
> > George Gallen
> > Senior Programmer/Analyst
> > Accounting/Data Division
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220
> > 
> > SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care 
> information and
> > education worldwide.
> > http://www.slackinc.com
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] image collection for storage...

[GarryS]

I have a Visioneer Strobe XP-100 scanner that I use on my desk and it works
well with single documents. We are looking at some imaging software from our
ERP VAR that uses the same scanner to digitize and index to customers,
vendors and transactions. The XP-100 is about $230 and uses a USB
connection. You could have one at each terminal.

> -Original Message-
> From: George Gallen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:29 AM
> To:   u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject:  [U2] image collection for storage...
> 
> I'm looking into the possibility of using a scanner to record images
> of cards customers fill out for archival and retrieval usage and not
> have to save the original card.
> 
> For ease of use, the stand-type scanners look like the best option
> for speed, put the card down, it "takes" a picture/scan.
> 
> I have not been able to find any of these however online for comparison.
> 
> Does anyone on this list use them? Cost is an issue, anything more than
> $1000 "range" would not fit well with the project. OCR is not needed
> just the image.
> 
> I considered trying to rig up a 4mp digital camera with the computer
> pulling the image directly from the camera's memory card, but I'm not
> sure if the camera I have to play with will function while the computer
> has access to the card.
> 
> George
> 
> George Gallen
> Senior Programmer/Analyst
> Accounting/Data Division
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220
> 
> SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care information and
> education worldwide.
> http://www.slackinc.com
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] UniObject file write in VB

[Jeff Powell]

I am creating a VB project that accesses multivalues. How do I create a
new record? Here is my approach.
OpenFile
ReadRecord
Record Nothing ? (this is not nothing with new record) or
Record.Count=0?
No - get MV count +1, update field values and write -- this works
Yes - create a new record UniDynArray (VB won't let me do this),
insert values, set file.record=new rec, write -- this does nothing. No
new record.

Any suggestions? The documentation on VB uniobjects is real weak.

Thanks,

Jeff
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] image collection for storage...

[George Gallen]

I'm looking into the possibility of using a scanner to record images
of cards customers fill out for archival and retrieval usage and not
have to save the original card.

For ease of use, the stand-type scanners look like the best option
for speed, put the card down, it "takes" a picture/scan.

I have not been able to find any of these however online for comparison.

Does anyone on this list use them? Cost is an issue, anything more than
$1000 "range" would not fit well with the project. OCR is not needed
just the image.

I considered trying to rig up a 4mp digital camera with the computer
pulling the image directly from the camera's memory card, but I'm not
sure if the camera I have to play with will function while the computer
has access to the card.

George

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care information and
education worldwide.
http://www.slackinc.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] SOAP

[Jerry Banker]

When you're working with a product that is nearing 40 years old you look at 
things that way. Beside it was an off hand joke. If 8 years is an eternity 
then I'm almost eternity squared. :-)


- Original Message - 
From: "gerry-u2ug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "gerry-u2ug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] SOAP



"give us a break"  sorry I don't understand the comment.
8 years is an eternity in this business - cripes primetime java is only
about, what, 3 years older than that - would you hold the same opinion
about a faulty java runtime implementation ?
Soap is a well documented protocol and the age, or perceived lack of, is
no excuse for sloppy implementation.
If it wasn't ready it shouldn't have been released.

But that is beside the point.  I wasn't slagging uv soap handling, I was
asking if there was some config settings that I haven't seen that would
modify its behaviour.

Gerry




-Original Message-
From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 28, 2006 18:45
To: gerry-u2ug; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] SOAP

You do realize that SOAP is barely 8 years old (1998) and not really
accepted for half that time so give us a break. :-) It hasn't even hit
puberty yet.

- Original Message -
From: "gerry-u2ug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:41 PM
Subject: [U2] SOAP



Well , I wasn't paying much attention when all the SOAP messages were
recently flying about, so I am sorry if I'm going over old ground.
I am trying to access a web service from Universe 10.1.8 using the

This is just a simple test service set up for testing the universe
access - taking a single string parameter and returning a string.
The service method is called but the parameter is null.

SoapRequestWrite returns :
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema";




http://mynamespace";

SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap/soap/encoding/";
>
  SomeVal




To me the problem looked obvious : the Param element is not associated
with the ns1 namespace.
So using SoapSetRequestContent and changing the Param element to :
  SomeVal
Everything works peachy.  This also works :

http://mynamespace";

SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap/soap/encoding/";
>
  SomeVal


Either way the inconstant use if the ns1 namespace is mucking things

up.


So now to the question,

Is there a config setting that I am missing that will get the proper
message format generated or is Universe Soap support really flaky ?
It does appear that manually coding the SOAP message is the only way

to

go which, in my opinion, gives is no advantage over the way we were
doing this via CallHttp.

I did come up with a compromise solution :

stat=SoapRequestWrite(SoapReq,msg,1)
msg=change(msg,"xmlns:ns1=","xmlns=",-1)
msg=change(msg,"ns1:","",-1)
stat=SoapSetRequestContent(SoapReq,msg,1)
stat=SoapSubmitRequest( ... )

Not a big deal and much better than manually coding everything but it
makes me wonder at the reliablity of U2 soap implementation.

Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle

[Wendy Smoak]

On 2/28/06, Tony Gravagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I agree with this approach and recommend mv.NET, which has many more
> features than UO (it can use UO as a pipe) but costs a lot less than
> RedBack.
>

 Having been outvoted on the choice of platform for a class project, I've
been spending some time in Visual Studio lately.  (Never say never!)  So of
course I want to see if I can talk to UniData. :)  Due to lack of time, I
haven't gotten farther than printing out the PDF mentioned here
http://pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AccessFromDotNet , but it's a start.

Would anyone else who's got this working care to contribute a .NET companion
to the longstanding UOJ example on the wiki?  Come on... here's your chance
to convert a confirmed Java developer. ;)

 * http://pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UniObjectsTest
 * http://pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?TestMeInstructions

--
Wendy
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re[2]: [U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle

[David Tod Sigafoos]

I think i would only use vb.net IF there was something specific that
the uv odbc connection does not provide.

I have found that for most applications the ODBC connection is not too
slow and for most MV guys it is much easier and faster to learn the
vb.net.

And the price is right ..

Tuesday, February 28, 2006, 5:52:52 PM, you wrote:

MR> Depending on what you are trying to do,  ODBC (slow and awkward IMO) or a
MR> VB/VB.Net program that can easily access both databases would be a
MR> very easy
MR> way to go about it.  You would need uniobjects or Redback to connect to
MR> Universe.  

MR> Again, depending on your goals, there are some tools out there like the
MR> stuff from ON Corp.   

MR> HTH

MR> Mike R.

MR> -Original Message-
MR> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MR> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MR> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MR> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:21 PM
MR> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
MR> Subject: [U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle

MR> I am trying to establish a connection between UniVerse 10.1 ( aix unix )
MR> and Oracle (Window 2003), has anyone done this before? I was told to 
MR> either use socket connection or ODBC. It seems that it is not that easy to
MR> use socket connection talking to Oracle, so I am thinking of using ODBC?
MR> Any ideas. Thanks.


-- 
DSig `
David Tod Sigafoos  ( O O )
 ___oOOo__( )__oOOo___

"Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" - Frank Zappa
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle

[James Cowell]

We came up with a novel solution to pass data back and forth between UV (10.1.8 
on HP-UX) and Oracle (10.1.0.3 on IA HP-UX).  We wrote a GCI wrapper for the 
Oracle OCI client that allowed us to call a set of stored procedures we wrote 
on Oracle from Databasic.  This allows us to connect, enqueue, dequeue and 
commit using Oracle Advanced Queues.  They work very well. 

We never really had much luck with ODBC on Unix for UV. 

James


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2006 04:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle


I am trying to establish a connection between UniVerse 10.1 ( aix unix ) 
and Oracle (Window 2003), has anyone done this before? I was told to 
either use socket connection or ODBC. It seems that it is not that easy to use 
socket connection talking to Oracle, so I am thinking of using ODBC? Any ideas. 
Thanks.

Regards
Frederick
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


**
The contents of this e-mail are subject to contract in all cases and William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates make no contractual commitment save 
where confirmed by hard copy.  

The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates.  We accept no liability, including 
liability for negligence, in respect of any statement in this e-mail. 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be subject 
to legal privilege and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to which they are addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately, then delete this e-mail.  

Please note that William Hill can accept no responsibility for viruses and it 
is your responsibility to scan any emails and their attachments.

This message was from William Hill PLC whose registered office is Greenside 
House, 50 Station Road, Wood Green, London N22 7TP.  Company Registration 
Number: 4212563 England.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] SOAP

[gerry-u2ug]

"give us a break"  sorry I don't understand the comment.
8 years is an eternity in this business - cripes primetime java is only
about, what, 3 years older than that - would you hold the same opinion
about a faulty java runtime implementation ?
Soap is a well documented protocol and the age, or perceived lack of, is
no excuse for sloppy implementation.
If it wasn't ready it shouldn't have been released.

But that is beside the point.  I wasn't slagging uv soap handling, I was
asking if there was some config settings that I haven't seen that would
modify its behaviour.

Gerry
 



-Original Message-
From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: February 28, 2006 18:45
To: gerry-u2ug; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] SOAP

You do realize that SOAP is barely 8 years old (1998) and not really
accepted for half that time so give us a break. :-) It hasn't even hit
puberty yet.

- Original Message -
From: "gerry-u2ug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:41 PM
Subject: [U2] SOAP


> Well , I wasn't paying much attention when all the SOAP messages were
> recently flying about, so I am sorry if I'm going over old ground.
> I am trying to access a web service from Universe 10.1.8 using the
>
> This is just a simple test service set up for testing the universe
> access - taking a single string parameter and returning a string.
> The service method is called but the parameter is null.
>
> SoapRequestWrite returns :
>  xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance";
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema";
>>
> 
> http://mynamespace";
>
> SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap/soap/encoding/";
> >
>   SomeVal
> 
> 
> 
>
> To me the problem looked obvious : the Param element is not associated
> with the ns1 namespace.
> So using SoapSetRequestContent and changing the Param element to :
>   SomeVal
> Everything works peachy.  This also works :
>
> http://mynamespace";
>
> SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap/soap/encoding/";
> >
>   SomeVal
> 
>
> Either way the inconstant use if the ns1 namespace is mucking things
up.
>
> So now to the question,
>
> Is there a config setting that I am missing that will get the proper
> message format generated or is Universe Soap support really flaky ?
> It does appear that manually coding the SOAP message is the only way
to
> go which, in my opinion, gives is no advantage over the way we were
> doing this via CallHttp.
>
> I did come up with a compromise solution :
>
> stat=SoapRequestWrite(SoapReq,msg,1)
> msg=change(msg,"xmlns:ns1=","xmlns=",-1)
> msg=change(msg,"ns1:","",-1)
> stat=SoapSetRequestContent(SoapReq,msg,1)
> stat=SoapSubmitRequest( ... )
>
> Not a big deal and much better than manually coding everything but it
> makes me wonder at the reliablity of U2 soap implementation.
>
> Gerry
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [wintegrate] Determine presence?

[Dave Walker]

SYSTEM(7) returns the terminal type here (UD 6.0). Even thought I am using
wintegrate as my terminal application, SYSTEM(7) returns viewpoint, the TERM
setting on the host. YMMV.

Regards
--
Dave Walker
"The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar
territory."
Paul Fix

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Barry Brevik
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:13 PM
> To: U2-users (E-mail)
> Subject: [U2] [wintegrate] Determine presence?
> 
> 
> I've inherited a bunch of code that tests for the presence of 
> the client
> running wIntegrate like this:
>  
>  IF UPCASE(SYSTEM(7)) EQ 'VP60'
>  
> Is this a reasonable method?
> 
> Barry Brevik
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/