Is it the same query for both files/tables (that share the same
dictionary)?
Do both your queries work from a different client PC? If so, is there
different client software versions or ODBC clients?
Regards,
david
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
What feature do you need.
-Original Message-
From: John Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:48 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] AR collection software
Anyone know of a good Pick-based AR collection management software
package?
Create a VOC enter that is the typo that executes the correct process.
Example
ED VOC EDIT.PROG
01: S
02: ED BP
ED VOC EDIT.PROG
01:PA
02:ED BP
ED VOC EDIT.PROG
01: PQ
02: HED BP
03: P
(note that line 1 may need to be PQN)
If you want to have it global catalog a program under a different
What I did was link to the table in Access, open it, and then click on a column
to sort it. So it should have been an identical query.
I thought I'd test it - get Dr Dee Bee Spy to monitor me doing it on the table
that worked - and guess what! That table won't sort now, either!
I thought that
Yes, I've already got some VOC entries that are shortcuts to longer
named jobs, and we do have a few VOC entries to catch common typos, what
I'm wondering is if there is a more generalised way of intercepting
unrecognised commands, ideally a way of calling a specific 'handler'
program that can see
Columbia Ultimate http://www.columbiaultimate.com/ will likely be your only
commercial, pick-style option. Ontario Systems
http://www.ontariosystems.com/ used to have a system that ran on pick
variants, but I think they moved everything to the Cache database (a
pick/sql hybrid)
The software
hey all,
has anybody run across/seen an issue where a process sets a lock
via READU and then when it tries to write back the record cannot because
the record is locked but somehow lost the fact that the process trying
to write the record is the process that created the lock?
I am not
Hi Doug,
has anybody run across/seen an issue where a process sets a lock via READU
and then when it tries to write back the record cannot
because the record is locked but somehow lost the fact that the
process trying to write the record is the process that created the lock?
My money (but
I notice you're on nix ...
Is the piece of code that writes invoked via an EXECUTE or PERFORM from the
code that did the original READU?
I wouldn't expect it to on doze, but on Unix that *might* change the execution
environment enough to cause a problem... (grasping at straws to see if it
Not exactly on topic:
Back in the day (that would be the early 90's) I used to work in a SCO unix
environment - the command interpreter had a built in spell checker that would
offer a suggestion for the command you might have meant whenever you had a
typo. Pretty nifty.
-Original
John
Are you making the move from being factored to trying to doing your own credit
and collections? So that you need to track outstanding orders and compare
them to outstanding invoices and the customer's credit limit?
Or do you already have invoicing, cash posting and an aging system?
Which U2 and os
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:27 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: ODBC problems
What I did was link to the table in Access, open it, and then
Thats for the responses Wol and Martin!
Wol - the lock and the write are in the same program so there is no
execute involved.
Martin - I need to look up the archives that previously talked about
the query processor holding a group lock but that is exactly the lock
we are seeing (a group
If you are sure that this is a Group lock (of what type ?), you may adjust
the UniVerse parameter PAKTIME, which stands for the duration of a Group
lock corresponding to the record displayed just before the Press any key
to continue... prompt.
Reason being for that parameter that when a LIST
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:46 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: RE: [U2] [UV] AR collection software
John
Are you making the move from being factored to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kathleene M Hunter
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:45 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] AR collection software
What feature do you need.
Kathleen, I think the main
Is the rule of thumb about the value of GSEMNUM valid for other systems?
We are running UV 10.2.3 on Win2003 server with a 110 UV user license.
Our VAR set GSEMNUM to 97. Is this likely to cause any problems?
I hasten to say we have no locking issues on our system.
Thanks,
Laure Hansen,
City of
[ad]
John,
We have a web based CRM system with notes, tasks and templates to create
tasks that fits the bill. It is based on new technology (Eclipse based
XLr8) and runs on either Unidata or Universe using Apache Tomcat and our
middleware called U2Weblink(tm). One of our clients uses the system
18 matches
Mail list logo
