Mike... Wow, the 64bit is an easy solution. I tried something with
either the create-file or the resize command 6 months ago and it failed
with my conclusion at the time that it must not be supported on our
windows 2003 platform. Yesterday I used the create file with the 64bit
option and it
: [SPAM] - RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level
data files possible? - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields
in the email addresses
Mike... Wow, the 64bit is an easy solution. I tried something with
either the create-file or the resize command 6 months ago
(Logitek Systems)
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:56 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [SPAM] - RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level
data files possible? - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields
in the email addresses
Mike... Wow, the 64bit is an easy
We decided to try (64bit Type30 on 64bit OS) part files on a couple of
large transaction files because it made archiving easier for us. We
could just drop off a chunk at a time.
However, we've since discovered that part files can't be used with
SBClient SmartQuery because it uses S/REFORMAT verb.
, Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 11:26 a.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data
files possible?
We decided to try (64bit Type30 on 64bit OS) part files on a couple of
large transaction files because it made archiving easier for us
Running Universe 10.0.17 on Windows Server 2003 32bit:
Can I create a distributed file for a data file that is part of shared
dictionary (ie a multi-level data file)?
I can't seem to get the syntax right.
Here is the scenario. We have a large stock file with current
transactions called
Of Buss, Troy
(Logitek Systems)
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2008 10:36 a.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files
possible?
Running Universe 10.0.17 on Windows Server 2003 32bit:
Can I create a distributed file for a data file
I'd do something like this paragraph (not tested...) but it should
create the parts and update them to all point to the same dictionary.
0001 PA
0002 CREATE.FILE DICT TEST.SHARED.DICT 3
0003 CREATE.FILE DATA TEST.P01 DYNAMIC
0004 CREATE.FILE DATA TEST.P02 DYNAMIC
0005
0006 DISPLAY UPDATING