In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dawn
Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
They bought out most of MUMPS and seem to have enough former PIck
folks there who were saying that it was a similar situation of needing
to take Pick apps into a broader environment with today's expectations
for 24/7 but with
.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Dawn Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:29 PM
Subject: Spam:Re: [U2] RE: [U2C] U2 / Cache
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Yes. Jim no longer works for InterSystems as of February or so, but
his two colleagues, John Greg, from both jBASE and Reality are still
there. So, yes, it was not MUMPS developers (in general, at least)
attempting to figure out what MV was all about, who write this
implementation, but seasoned
Hi Jerry -- I started responding and decided I wasn't certain about
some points so I passed your question along. I will get back to you on
this when I get a response. What I do know is that the file structures
look the same to any application software, but different to the OS.
I can also pass
Thanks, Dawn, for that thorough response.
You mention the helpdesk project at IBM. Susie S. told the Spectrum
gathering at Long Beach that the embedded db is UniVerse.
Perhaps we're not speaking of the same project. I was also told by
others this is the coming app to manage all software
and
On 4/17/07, Baker Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Dawn, for that thorough response.
You mention the helpdesk project at IBM. Susie S. told the Spectrum
gathering at Long Beach that the embedded db is UniVerse.
Perhaps we're not speaking of the same project. I was also told by
others
I'll pass along this answer on both u2-users and u2-community, but
please respond on community since this is not about U2, per se.
Thanks. See below. --dawn
On 4/17/07, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dawn,
One thing I don't think you mentioned is the file structure. Tell me if I'm
wrong. The
One thing to be careful with Cache is that it does not have the same
transaction processing as U2. With U2 modifications made in a transaction
block are not visible to other users until commit, as I have been advised in
Cache those modifications are immediately visible to other users.
Regards
I'm pretty sure you are right about that, David. We had them explain
transactions and it sounds like it makes complete sense to use that
feature in Cache' where I have never used it in U2. --dawn
Dawn M. Wolthuis
Tincat Group, Inc.
On 4/17/07, David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing
If you don't want to use their own 'Zen' object stuff, can you use
whatever you want? C#, VB, Java ?
How does it like ODBC, ADO or other methods of getting to the Cache
data?
We've all had our days hemmed into a proprietary environment.
I hope I'm wrong for the sake of my comrades like Dawn, but
Hi Baker -- good points and questions.
On 4/16/07, Baker Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't want to use their own 'Zen' object stuff, can you use
whatever you want? C#, VB, Java ?
Since Cache' has a development platform, like all MV systems have,
there is a p-machine side (like all
-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: [U2C] U2 / Cache
If you don't want to use their own 'Zen' object stuff, can you use
whatever you want? C#, VB, Java ?
How does it like ODBC, ADO or other methods of getting to the Cache
data?
We've all had our days hemmed into a proprietary environment
12 matches
Mail list logo
