At 00:18 -0400 2005/08/13, Mark Johnson wrote:
I think the EQUATE TRUE TO 1 comes from a taught programming discipline from
a long time ago and, like many learned things, isn't bad so it doesn't need
replacing. But I don't think it's necessary.
I use constructs like this a lot and I'm new to
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 19:36 -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
I don't specifically recall the guy's name but it's from India or Pakistan
or some hindu country. It's not Chandru Murthi though.
Thank him for me for making that part of my client's system more consistent
than the other half. It's a
In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:01:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're walking through and you see a CUSTdotwhatever you *know* -
or at least you *should* know, if you're at *that* level - that
CUSTdotwhatever is, the CUSTomer record and whatever refers to a
In a message dated 8/12/2005 4:33:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That begs the question. EQUATE the attribute number for a dynamic array
(compiler replacement) or EQUATE the field for a dimensioned array, (alias
concept). I've seen many examples of both but I think
Rubbish,sorry Tony but that's what I think. You say experienced developers and
big companies don't use EQU INVNO.TABLE TO CUST(40). I beg to differ. What do
you call experienced? does 20 years count??? and what do you call a big
company??? we only have two boxes running universe, two HP boxes,
I wasn't clear about that at all, sorry. What I meant was that experienced
developers don't put a table of 50,000 invoice numbers into a single
attribute in the customer master file, or even reserve one atb for open
invoices and another one for closed, especially when either one of those
atb's
Tony,
Thank you for clearing up the issue of using EQUATES. I was ready to pile
on you along with Les Hewkin. We use EQUATES and live by what they
describe. I have learned never to trust DICTS.
I always value your responses, since you where the head guy at Pick Systems
RD. Keep writing to
In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:00:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for clearing up the issue of using EQUATES. I was ready to pile
on you along with Les Hewkin. We use EQUATES and live by what they
describe. I have learned never to trust DICTS.
The only
.
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: Les Hewkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
Rubbish,sorry Tony but that's what I think. You say experienced developers
and big companies don't
be realized. Otherwise, it's just another half-baked inconsistent
method.
My 1 cent.
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
In a message dated 8/12
issue at hand.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:00:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you
intentionally.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:35 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject:Re: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
I'll add another localized comment from my experience.
My client
(())
((88.74 ..74 -::-
((88.74 * Peace
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
or
some computer graphics :)
- Original Message -
From: Dave Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
Interesting. Especially since I have the distinct pleasure of sharing a
cubicle
simply:
BELL$ = CHAR(9)
This solves a lot of confusion.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
Goo'day, Will
At 13:27 12/08/05 -0400, you wrote:
In a message dated 8/12/2005 6:00:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for clearing up the issue of using EQUATES. I was ready to pile
on you along with Les Hewkin. We use EQUATES and live by what they
describe.
-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Maybe spam] RE: [U2] Remove Scenario
Mark:
I've said this before many times. Use equates when you later want to
alter
one or another side of an equality. For example:
EQUATE APFILE.BALDUE TO APFILE.REC(2
17 matches
Mail list logo
