RE: Reply Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-20 Thread Dan Fitzgerald
the legislators" - P.J. O'Rourke Dan Fitzgerald From: "Foo Chia Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: U2 Users Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Reply Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004

Re: Reply Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-20 Thread Scott Richardson
64K strips? is that like 64k bytes, (i.e. 64 * 1024 = 65536 bytes?) - Original Message - From: "Foo Chia Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:39 AM Subject: Reply Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 H

Reply Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-20 Thread Foo Chia Teck
Hi all, There have 180 user license, some of them are using vb application (about 15 uvcs), 20 uv-net connection, about 60 telnet connection and 20 of fixed tty dump terminal users. Some of the user are using SAME user id to login to universe is that will cost the issue ? I have double up th

Re: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-19 Thread Karl L Pearson
Regards, > Scott Richardson > Senior Systems Engineer / Consultant > Marlborough, MA 01752 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: http://home.comcast.net/~CheetahFTL/CC/CheetahFTL_1.htm > eFax: 208-445-1259 > > - Original Message - > From: "Foo Chia Teck" <[EM

Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-16 Thread Sara Burns
We upgraded UniVerse 10.0.11 from AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.2 last October. We also run Oracle and Vantive on the same box. One thing we have found is that we need to have at least twice the amount of Paging Space as real memory. If the free Paging Space gets down to zero the machine dies a horrible de

RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Youngman
ED] On Behalf Of Steve Ferries Sent: 16 April 2004 14:45 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 HI All, Before doubling you swap space, check to see how much you are using at your busy times. We have an 8 Gig system, and a 6 Gig pool: Page S

RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-16 Thread Steve Ferries
n List Subject: RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 Okay, it's AIX not linux, but I've just noticed that RAM = swap. You are an ABSOLUTE FOOL if you do that on linux. Maybe (or maybe not) the same applies to AIX - quite likely since they are both nixen and probab

RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Youngman
April 2004 14:06 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 Performance of UV applications on various Operating Systems is not rocket science. Perhaps better described as large, nasty tight onions that need peeling, one layer at a time, and understan

Re: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-16 Thread Scott Richardson
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:22 AM Subject: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 Hi, We are facing performance degraded when running Universe 10.0.0 in AIX 5L 5.2. A bit intro on hardware specs. We are using pSeries 650

RE: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-15 Thread djordan
Sent: Friday, 16 April 2004 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2 Hi, We are facing performance degraded when running Universe 10.0.0 in AIX 5L 5.2. A bit intro on hardware specs. We are using pSeries 650 running on SMP 2 Power4 processor with

Performance Degraded running u10.0.0 in Aix 5.2 ML 2

2004-04-15 Thread Foo Chia Teck
Hi, We are facing performance degraded when running Universe 10.0.0 in AIX 5L 5.2. A bit intro on hardware specs. We are using pSeries 650 running on SMP 2 Power4 processor with 4GB of RAM, 4GB Paging size and RAID5 SSA Hard Disk. My Universe configuration as below: Current tunable parameter s