RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Anthony Youngman
To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could update the user at that time. I never was able to find any

RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Donald Kibbey
List Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could update the user at that time. I never was able to find any of this documentation

[OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Daniel_Plocinik
snip upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. You think maybe somewhere along the path between 9.5 and 10.1 the SQL setup and operation was improved just a tad? Don Kibbey /snip please feel free to do so. My experience with this specific issue revealed that it has stayed unchanged and I get the

Re: [OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Donald Kibbey
Well, that's a hearty pat on the back for all those old timers out there who worked on UniVerse during the VMark days. Still, better to upgrade (IMHO). Afterall, why not add some excitement to your life and chase some new features instead of the same old ones you already know how to deal

Re: [OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Glenn Herbert
I do agree that IBM has made a decent effort at keeping UV viable, and that is a very nice thing indeed. Some of us put in a LOT of ourselves to get it where it was at 9.6. I believe that upgrading is a good thing too, although only if undocumented features are kept at a minimum. At 09:43

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 3/18/2004 3:26:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sent: 17 March 2004 19:40 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I

RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Ray Wurlod
List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up SQL step 1 Why might I have the 9.5 docu? Because we're still running it :-( It's all very well, but there is some truth in the old adage if it aint broke, don't fix it. Cheers, Wol -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread FFT2001
Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could update the user at that time. I never was able to find any of this documentation on this - and when I asked IBM, since I

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Glenn Herbert
Will, I missed what you were trying to do. Still some people here who might be able to help if we knew the question. At 02:39 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote: Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Daniel_Plocinik
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: ver.com Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Glenn Herbert
Will, According to the manual, you'd first grant CONNECT privileges, then you can grant DBA. Not sure why it says the admin id isn't an SQL user. On NT it should default to the administrator you installed with. At 02:56 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote: Glenn, et al. I have a client who has never

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-12 Thread FFT2001
I have a client who has never used SQL on their system and I'd like to set it up. It is a Universe 10.0 on Windows setup. When I look at UV_Users I see two users one is NT Authority/System and the other is OSP/administrator My first question is: Is there really a windows login called System ?