OT RE: We need a web based Forum!

2004-04-23 Thread Wendy Smoak

 I would whole-heartedly agree with this.  BUT I have never 
 seen such an 
 animal in action myself.  I think it's mythical.
 Will

It is not mythical, one of the forums I use works exactly like that.
You do have to be set up as a user and subscribe to the forums you
want to read.  But after that, emails show up on the forum, and anything
posted to the forum goes out via email.  (It even puts a cute little
postmark on the message if you view it on the web page, to show it was
posted via email.)

A quick look says that the forum software is...
O'Reilly WebBoard 4.20.82 (c)1995-2000 Duke Engineering/O'Reilly 
Associates, Inc. 
WebBoard is a trademark of O'Reilly  Associates, Inc. 

-- 
Wendy Smoak
Application Systems Analyst, Sr.
ASU IA Information Resources Management 
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: OT RE: We need a web based Forum!

2004-04-23 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 4/23/2004 11:32:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  I would whole-heartedly agree with this.  BUT I have never
  seen such an
  animal in action myself.  I think it's mythical.
  Will
 
 It is not mythical, one of the forums I use works exactly 
 like that.

I'm a show-me kind-of-guy, so name the forum or post a link so we can all see that it 
works that way :)
Will
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


OT: RE: We need a web based Forum!

2004-04-21 Thread Geoffrey Mitchell
OK, I hate to keep perpetuating this thread, which has nothing to do
with U2, but...

That has not been my experience with web forums.  Most forum software I
have seen brings topics with recent replies to the top, and highlights
threads with new activity.  I have seen long dormant threads become
active again weeks or months later because someone happened to read them
and reply.

As for the lack of immediacy, good email integration seems to me to
solve that.

The argument that, for some people, access to email is more acceptable
in their environment than access to email, however, is a very valid one.

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 02:03, Anthony Youngman wrote:

 But it is far less immediate. I sometimes have conversations with
 people stateside. I'll find an email when I get to work at 8am BST
 (British Summer Time, not Bering Straights Time :-). I'll respond.
 
 Then the person it was aimed at will get to work at, say, 9am New York
 Time, respond, and we bounce ideas around for an hour or so before I go
 home.
 
 A forum relies on me (a) noticing their message at 8am my time - and
 forum scanning puts me off - I miss loads. Then (b) they've got to
 notice early morning their time that I responded, and (c) I've got to
 catch them at it!
 
 That just won't happen, in the normal course of events. One of the
 reasons I've abandoned many fora is that I keep coming across plenty of
 conversations that happened while I was away, but could easily have
 contributed to. And I get p*ssed off that my (I fool myself they are
 relevant) comments get ignored because the subject has now gone stale.
 
 Cheers,
 Wol.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Geoffrey Mitchell
 Sent: 21 April 2004 00:10
 To: U2 Users Discussion List
 Subject: Re: We need a web based Forum!
 
 Why is that an argument?  A forum is not the same as a chatroom.  It
 is just as persistent as email.
 
 On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 16:38, Kate Stanton wrote:
 
  From New Zealand, the main argument against a forum is that we sleep
 while
  you work and vice versa.  It is 9:30am here now, and 7:30am in Sydney
 -
  expect to hear similar story from Australians in about 2 hours.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private 
 and confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on 
 anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any 
 way, or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission 
 error or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your 
 information system.
 
 Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong 
 Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333.
 
 

-- 
Geoffrey Mitchell   314-684-1062
Programmer/Analyst  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Knights Direct
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users