I will be on vacation from April 3 - 11 and will be unable to read or respond to email
until after that time.
If your matter is urgent, please contact my assistant Jan Levinson at 949-493-6570 x
99602 and she will attempt to help you.
Thank you,
Bill Glockner
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL P
HI All,
We have several files that are right at the 2 Gig limit. We are pretty sure
that we have resized them using the 64 bit option.
However, just to make sure, how may we determine if the file is indeed using
64 bit addressing.
Thanks,
Steve Ferries
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
This sounds very tempting, using MV as a data warehouse to a non-MV (or MV)
primary application. Does anyone else have any insight on how this flies,
management-wise or technically.
I like it as all of the original reports are already written and tested and
it keeps the customer a MV customer.
Th
Mark,
Technically Overview:
Using some sort of a schedule, you identify new and modified data
on the Great Plains system, and move just that data to the MV system,
converting the layout and data.
That leaves you with the following discreet tasks:
How do you identify new or mod
Bullseye. The client already experienced a month-end (Mar31) and the VP of
Marketting was in a snit as most of her reports could not be completed in
Great Plains either directly or with Crystal Reports which everyone believes
is a magic pill.
I visit this client once per week and each week since t
In a message dated 4/4/2004 12:04:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As a quick f'r instance, if I were set the task of selecting records based
> on an indexed field (column) from a UniVerse BASIC program, I'd use
> SELECTINDEX to process the index directly, rather than u
>One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise)
>wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION').
I brought this up a couple of times, nobody seemed to be interested
to check the difference.
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
In a message dated 4/4/2004 9:11:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise)
> >wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION').
>
> I brought this up a couple of times, nobody seemed to be interested
> to check the dif
Ray,
Thanks for explaining some of these things you mentioned below, hopefully
some of the below would open some eyes... and help developers
analyze some performance areas of UV.
>yacc. Leroy might like to chip in on this one. On this basis I
>would be loath to agree that the "SQL Interface is
>Personally I would be surprised if either database had a way of handling
>leading wildcards other than an exhaustive scan.
Use "Contains"/English Query. See MS-SQL Server Docs.
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECT
>We are moving to UV 10.0.19 and have a couple of questions.
>1) Is any one using UV 10.0.X with AIX 5.2 using JFS2 file systems?
>2) Is any one using UV 10.0.X with AIX 5.2 using suspend.file and breaking
the mirrors
>to handle the system back up, while the file system is still mounted?
>Thanks in
Goo'day,
Is this conversation going anywhere?
All I can recall is a rant and rave about (IMO, incorrect) perceived
deficiencies of UV from this bloke, followed by a stream of invective
towards any responder that had the temerity to offer a different outlook,
and for the past couple of days, no
Hi,
We have published a Unidata File through ODBC view. One of the dictionaries
published uses subroutine call to get data. The dictionary using subroutine
call, does not work from ODBC, the rest of the dictionaries work fine. Is
there anything we can do to fix it?
Regards
Kafsat
This email an
13 matches
Mail list logo
