Hona, David S wrote:
>Isn't InterCall available for UD? It's supposedly the
>underlying interface to UV for UO and UOJ.
David,
InterCall definitely is available for UD. In my earlier post I think I
erroneously called it UniCall.
I do not believe that InterCall is the underlying interface for U
If only ...
You shouldnt torture us like that - on our first day back to work after the
Easter weekend!
Now I'm going to spend the rest of the day thinking about the Black Barn
vineyard in Hawkes bay...
Enjoy your roadshow you swine
Brian Leach
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
Brian,
Whilst I appreciate YOUR position, you have to remember that I'll be leaving
NEWCASTLE, NSW - you know, the Hunter Valley? Port Stephens? Lake Macquarie? All on
the doorstop !
It IS a hard life, and I'm glad I get to do it !
PS: We are usually on the lookout for skilled people looking f
Except for one possible inconsistency with the instructions regarding
OPENSEQ, the documentation seems very straight-forward. However, I'm
still missing something.
My intention is to:
1) create a record (if it doesn't already exist) in a DIR-type
file;
2) clear said record if data
I've always just opened the file and deleted the record before the OPENSEQ
OPEN 'MBP' TO F.MBP THEN
FILE.NAME='customer_tm.txt'
DELETE F.MBP,FILE.NAME
OPENSEQ 'MBP',FILE.NAME TO F.SEQ ELSE NULL
END ELSE
END
Mel Maresh
-Original Message-
From
I may be over simplifying this but there appears to be a "STOP missing
after the CLOSESEQ command. If this is actually the case in your code, the
WEOFSEQ will be executed one last time before the program terminates.
Could this possibly be the reason?
dan
If you don't position the file with READSEQ, and you don't use the
APPEND clause on WRITESEQ, it should overwrite the file from the
beginning. The initial WEOFSEQ should be unnecessary, and in fact is
probably why you're only seeing an empty file. We use sequential file
processing in a number of
Should have read farther through your code. Your problem is the APPEND
clause on the WRITESEQ statement. This means append this record to the
END of the file. You don't normally need to use this clause unless you
want to ADD data to the end of an existing file. You also don't need
the 'PCPERFO
I need to run the WIN.IMPORT routine from a phantom and I can't seem to be able to do
this. Is there any way run file transfers that convert a file to dbf format from
within UV via a phantom process. Running UV 9.5.x on NT4
Thanks for any insight,
Les
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
That WAS the reason.
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:51 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: [UD] OPENSEQ, WEOFSEQ, CLOSESEQ
I may be over simplifying this but there appears to be a "STO
My main problem is resolved but your suggestions raised some other
questions, Larry.
When I take the initial WEOFSEQ out, the first run will produce the
result I need. But if I run the program again, the error statement is
returned each time the WRITESEQ statement is executed. When WEOFSEQ is
exe
Comments inline:
> When I take the initial WEOFSEQ out, the first run will
> produce the result I need. But if I run the program again,
> the error statement is returned each time the WRITESEQ
> statement is executed. When WEOFSEQ is executed right
> after the OPEN... statement, I get the desired
We are running UV 9.4. And I am hoping that is the cause of my problem
I have developed a connection pooling mechanism for our Java apps. Pretty
standard stuff (java wise). Just a bunch of UniSession objects in a Stack.
When the application fires up, it logs in 10 sessions and pushes them on
Goo'day,
Check the archives.
IIRC, somebody (Ray Wurlod??? ) published a *complete* set of code for
OPENSEQ/READSEQ/WEOFSEQ, etc, full of THEN ELSE's about 12 to 18 months ago
that goes a long way to getting the damn thing working correctly.
At 03:14 14/04/04, you wrote:
Except for one po
Follow up:
It turns out, if I leave 'them' alone. i.e. Don't run PORT.STATUS,
everything is fine.
It's as though PORT.STATUS triggers some kind of clean up.
I can live with that. But if anyone can give some insight into what
PORT.STATUS may be doing behind the scenes I'd be curious to he
On Behalf Of Daly, Mark
> I've tried using the UniSession setTimeout() method. But it
> doesn't seem to have any effect.
Dave Meeks posted in April'02 suggesting setTimeout(), so I assume it
was working then. No telling whether IBM broke it after that, though!
Have you tested it outside your web
Hi,
Does anyone out there know whether IBM is considering database independence
(ala jBase) for the U2 databases? By this, I mean unplugging the
Unidata/Universe database and plugging in SQL Server or some other
database. The last I heard that it was being considered for a future
release, but hav
I think the target was for next year.
David Jordan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Mayo
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 2:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The future of U2
Hi,
Does anyone out there know whether IBM is consid
>Ken Wallis wrote:
>InterCall definitely is available for UD. In my earlier post I think I
>erroneously called it UniCall.
>I do not believe that InterCall is the underlying interface for UO or UOJ.
>Those are based on UCI AFAIK. There is no UNIX client piece for UCI that I
>know of. Last time
Hona, David S wrote:
>Well, we've been using UCI on Solaris and HP-UX for a number
>of years, so it is definitively available.
Sorry David, can you just confirm that for me? You have client 'C' or other
language programs running on Solaris and HP-UX which use UCI as the API
which allows them to
I'd also think that rather than "any" database, the target would be DB2 :-)
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage – an Evolution in Software Development
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of djordan
>Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:20 AM
>To
>Ken Wallis wrote:
>>Hona, David S wrote:
>>
>>Well, we've been using UCI on Solaris and HP-UX for a number
>>of years, so it is definitively available.
>Sorry David, can you just confirm that for me? You have client 'C' or
other
>language programs running on Solaris and HP-UX which use UCI as t
I believe the wording was DB2 and then others based on 'demand'.
Roger
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Ross Ferris
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:06 PM
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: RE: The future of U2
>
>
> I'd also th
Hona, David S wrote:
>Yes, I can confirm - we have two "live" client 'C'
>applications on Solaris
>and HP-UX servers - utilising the IBM UniCall Interface (UCI)
>library, to
>interface to another Solaris host server (where the UV DBMS resides).
>
>The interface works quite well, albeit with a coup
Hi
I have a client who has a paragraph that does a SELECT and sends the result
to a print queue. In other words, the results of the SELECT are a print
job. But how can we/she print headings with that SELECT?
Example code:
>CT VOC UCA.WEEKLYAUDIT
UCA.WEEKLYAUDIT
0001 PA
0002 SP-ASSIGN Q21
Add "FORCE" to your LIST.
It's a very annoying UV feature ;-)
Regards,
David
> LeRoi Keiller wrote:
> If there are no records to display, it says so, but no heading is
produced.
> The report should at least say BLAH BLAH REPORT, at the start, and end
with
> END OF REPORT.
--
u2-users mailin
Wow, thanks. So easy. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Hona, David S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:38
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: How to display a heading with a SELECT statement?
Add "FORCE" to your LIST.
It's a very annoying UV feature ;-)
1) Being unfamiliar with this, I checked the manuals regarding the use of
FORCE in a LIST and I couldn't find that reference in the manuals. Could
it be for UniData rather than UV?
2) Let the "FORCE" be with you. . . Hey, it's just too good a pun to
resist.
Steve
At 02:38 PM 4/14/04 +1000,
It does work with UV.
I found it in the User Reference pdf on page 1-50: "Use in any RetrieVe
sentence to force the display of column headings and headers when no records
are selected."
AdrianW
-Original Message-
From: Steven M Wagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2
29 matches
Mail list logo