I'm doing something a bit unusual (for me at least) and am encountering a difference
in behavior that I suspect is wrong - however I'd like the group's opinion on this.
I have a UniBasic program that executes the following line of code:
PCPERFORM "cd \folder\folder\U2Account; udt PHANTOM Progr
ssion List'
Subject: RE: [UDT] Use of PCPERFORM and the PHANTOM command
Timothy Snyder wrote:
>Graham, David wrote:
>
>
>> I have a UniBasic program that executes the following line of code:
>>
>> PCPERFORM "cd \folder\folder\U2Account; udt PHANTOM ProgramNam
I just thought that I'd post the results of my testing. If you'll recall I was trying
to launch a program as a PHANTOM from the O/S command line and it was not returning to
the command line until that process had completed (which could be several minutes in
the case of one program).
With furt
Steve,
I recommend that you check out WinFAST (www.goWinFAST.com). We have been using the
product for 2+ years now and it's blindingly fast, as secure as your existing
application and can be implemented in less than 30 days with minimal code changes (or
you can go 'whole hog' and re-write your
No so at all - the majority of the WinFAST installations that are out there (not
STORIS mind you but the other, non-MV ones) are primarily done in "AutoGui" mode.
This is a mechanism that we chose not to use because we opted for the "whole hog"
approach. I recommend that anyone looking for a r
I have a simple-minded idea that may increase the value of the U2UG website and
prevent us from loosing the huge amount of already accumulated knowledge that resides
in this list. Would it be possible to transfer the posts to the list to the website?
I know that there may be some legal wrangli
Not to be obnoxious but why not keep data in one place? How would it benefit someone
to start a question in one medium and then be referred to another? That sound
counter-intuitive to me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004
Dawn -
It seems that there is only one piece of the puzzle that is missing; the ability to
not only receive e-mail from the various forums but also to reply to that e-mail by
way of e-mail (as opposed to writing the reply from within a browser). If that one
feature were implemented I believe
Forgive me if I sound like a broken record here but it is most assuredly NOT necessary
to (as the OP puts it) "go check the forums". You need only subscribe to the forum
and can then receive e-mail each time something is posted. That e-mail contains the
entire content of the posting.
The only
