Re: [UD] Union Query

2004-05-01 Thread Clifton Oliver
No, and Yes. Just doing a SELECT in SQL style on UV gives you a crt display of the result set. But if you use the SLIST extension, you can then access the select list (see System Description manual) as "normal" for the UV environment. -- Regards, Clif ~~~

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-05-01 Thread Steven M Wagner
I will be the first to admit that I know next to nothing about SQL in the UV/UD world. Can you use the output of the SQL SELECT in UV/UD? Thanks. Steve At 05:14 PM 5/1/04 +1000, you wrote: Gordon J. Glorfield wrote: > In that case, I'm sorry to say, there is no way to logically > do what yo

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-05-01 Thread Don Kibbey
le of Micro$oft SQL servers along with the UniVerse machines. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 3:15 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: [UD] Union Query Gordon J. Glorfield wrote:

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-05-01 Thread Ken Wallis
Gordon J. Glorfield wrote: > In that case, I'm sorry to say, there is no way to logically > do what you're asking with UD. Gordon, you should now better! ;^) sql> SELECT NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP FROM ORDER_FILE UNION SELECT NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP FROM ORDER_FILE_OTHER; All you need here

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:11:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > 001: I > > > 002: > TRANS("ORDER.FILE",@ID,3,""):TRANS("ORDER.FILE.CAN",@ID,3,"") > > > 003: > > > 004: NAME > > > 005: 25L > > > 006: S But could'nt you do something like IF TRANS("ORDER.FILE",@ID,3

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Mark Johnson
ed to know as well. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Bruce Lunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query > Open mouth, ... insert foot. Or whatever :) > > I'm sorry, I

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Bruce Lunt
MAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:41:17 -0400 From: "Burwell, Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Me

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
) Ed Burwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 973.361.5400 x1512 -Original Message- From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query In the dict of FILE.A create a dict called: NAME.LO that has: TRANS("LOC

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Bruce Lunt
cell From: "Burwell, Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: U2 Users Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:41:26 -0400 R. Bruce, Could you give

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Allen Egerton
From: "Burwell, Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query > Does that work for you? It doesn't work for me. > > ORDER.FI

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
What is a Distributed File? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UD] Union Query In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:12:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I hav

Re: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:12:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have 2 files in separate accounts that are structured the same. I want to > do something like: > > SORT ORDER.FILE AND ORDER.FILE.OTHER WITH DATE > > "01/01/2004" NAME ADDRESS > CITY STATE ZIP Is the

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
ORDER.FILE",@ID,3,""):TRANS("ORDER.FILE.CAN",@ID,3,"") 003: 004: NAME 005: 25L 006: S -Original Message- From: Allen Egerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Allen Egerton
From: "Burwell, Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:41 PM Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query > R. Bruce, > > Could you give an example? I'm having trouble e

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
d the NAME dictionary look like? Thanks. Ed Burwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 973.361.5400 x1512 -Original Message- From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query What I have done in the past is concate

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Bruce Lunt
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:49:46 +0100 Hi Ed, You could test for the record existing in one file and if it does use the dict for that file otherwise use the dict for the other file: TRANS("FILE.A",ID,1,"X"); IF @1 <&

Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread asvin . dattani
o:'U2 Users Discussion List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: bcc: Subject:RE: [UD] Union Query @ID in this case points to the filename mentioned in my statement: LIST ORDER.FILE the @ID's from ORDER.FILE.OTHER are showing up as non-existent: (My merged list contains 1

Re: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Donald Kibbey
I don't have two files of that type to test with here, but would a SQL query work for this? Don Kibbey Financial Systems Manager Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/30/04 10:12AM >>> Hello, Does anyone know of a way to do the equivalent of a UNION "quer

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Jeff Schasny
ubject: RE: [UD] Union Query No, a record ID in one file will not exist in the other file. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Gordon Glorfield
oper MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burwell, Edward > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:24 AM > To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' > Subject: RE: [UD] Union Que

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
ECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [UD] Union Query My suggestion is to create a "V" type dictionary item(s) that with point to your other file. For example, if you want to look at the city name in your file, ORDER.FILE.OTHER, create the followi

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
No, a record ID in one file will not exist in the other file. -Original Message- From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:14 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: [UD] Union Query TCL (or whatever your flavor calls the queery language) is a

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Grant.Boice
Phone: (703) 334-0156 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web:www.bench.com <http://www.bench.com> -Original Message- From: Burwell, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:05 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List&#x

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Jeff Schasny
elate? -Original Message- From: Burwell, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:05 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: [UD] Union Query I understand how Unibasic could handle a list that has been merged, but how would you do a Uniquery statemen

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
Thanks. Ed Burwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 973.361.5400 x1512 -Original Message- From: Baakkonen, Rodney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:27 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: [UD] Union Query You could use MERGER.LIST to get one list which is a U

RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Baakkonen, Rodney
You could use MERGER.LIST to get one list which is a UNION of two separate selects of each file. But you would not know which file the key was from when you were done. But Unibasic or Virtual dictionary items could take the merged list and produce what you are looking for. -Original Message--