Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Maybe the FCC moved offices to Motorola too? :P On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Clay Stewart < cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote: > Easy, FCC has moved lots of certification department funds to netnutrality > department. Not UBNT's fault > > > On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Eric Willia

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

You read my mind :P On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Kameron Blomquist < kame...@sightlinewireless.com> wrote: > Could always go ePMP [image: 😛] > On Jan 10, 2015 8:37 PM, "RickG" wrote: > >> +1! Tired of waiting too! I'm looking at alternatives! >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Eric Will

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Easy, FCC has moved lots of certification department funds to netnutrality department. Not UBNT's fault On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Eric Williams {WISP} wrote: > Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano > Bridge for SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

Has only one 5Ghz with same PtP do the same thing... So I assume it has same issue as 2.4 where we definitively determined on multiple sets that the issue happened. WDS was on on both. On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Clay Stewart < cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote: > No, these were 2.4, a

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

I was meaning for Eric. I do remember a couple people (you and Luthman stick out) that had NanoBeam interoperability issues. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Clay Stewart" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent:

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

You tried WDS. Turn it off. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 11, 2015 10:11 PM, "Clay Stewart" < cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com> wrote: > No, these were 2.4, and there is an issue when NanoBeam is downstream > connected t

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

No, these were 2.4, and there is an issue when NanoBeam is downstream connected to upstream NanoBridge. All traffic downstream from NanoBeam drops. On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Mike Hammett wrote: > I'm assuming an AP with NanoBeams and NanoBridges as clients was set to a > DFS channel and the

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

Why will it drop the traffic down stream? Clay Stewart wrote: > Eric, you did not fully explain the issue other then "one NanoBeam > mixed in with older NanoBridges" costing you time due to freq change. > Wanted to make sure you are aware that you cannot connect a NanoBeam > to a NanoBridge. It

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

That's not the case. On January 11, 2015 1:34:14 PM AKST, Matt Hoppes wrote: >Unless the gear is simply unable to pass the test..just saying. > >I don't think it's a back log at the FCC. I think it's a fundamental >hardware issue that Ubiquiti is going "oh crap. What do we do now?" > >Now.

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Unless the gear is simply unable to pass the test..just saying. I don't think it's a back log at the FCC. I think it's a fundamental hardware issue that Ubiquiti is going "oh crap. What do we do now?" Now. Why they don't just certify them for passive station DFS I have no idea. > On Jan

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Thank you, jackasses. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Jerry Richardson (airCloud)" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 4:28:00 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Na

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

You can thank jackasses running non-compliant gear that interfered with FAA traffic radars for slowing the process. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: > > Well. Unless the hardware fails the DFS test? > > > >> On Jan 11, 2015, at 13:49, Eric Williams {WISP}

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Well. Unless the hardware fails the DFS test? > On Jan 11, 2015, at 13:49, Eric Williams {WISP} > wrote: > > Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano Bridge for > SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam for SU, I only have > 5700-5800 where all the

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Which is ridiculous... Glad we can get a steady supply of nanobridges otherwise we'd be screwed. On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > It's taken 15 months so far for DFS from announcement to date. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

It's taken 15 months so far for DFS from announcement to date. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Eric Williams {WISP}" To: "ubnt users" Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 12:49:14 PM Subject: [Ubnt_users] 5150

[Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please... Part 2

Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano Bridge for SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam for SU, I only have 5700-5800 where all the RF noise is. I'm hoping for some words of wisdom from Ubiquiti like, "Hey, we can do that for you guys and why did we no

Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio

Correct. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "heith" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 10:34:41 AM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio Power Beam, I have a f

Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio

Power Beam, I have a few of these, but they are not DFS compliant or the newly released lower 5 ghz band right? Thanks From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 12:42 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group S

Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio

thanks From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Joey Craig Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 5:29 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Panel Antenna for M5 Rocket Radio Streakwave has them for $14.95. On Jan 9, 2015 4:36 PM, "heit

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam AC

That's what I was afraid of. Thanks. Phil On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > No. Only Rocket PTP and Rocket PTMP. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > >

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam AC

No. Only Rocket PTP and Rocket PTMP. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Phil Curnutt" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 10:15:58 AM Subject: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam AC Do the PowerB

[Ubnt_users] PowerBeam AC

Do the PowerBeam AC's have airPrism? Doesn't say so on the Spec Sheet, but it would be useful for PtP backbone links. Phil ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

I'm assuming an AP with NanoBeams and NanoBridges as clients was set to a DFS channel and the NanoBeam didn't connect. Assuming it had DFS, they probably spun their tires looking for other causes. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams Please...

Eric, you did not fully explain the issue other then "one NanoBeam mixed in with older NanoBridges" costing you time due to freq change. Wanted to make sure you are aware that you cannot connect a NanoBeam to a NanoBridge. It will drop traffic down stream eventually. On Saturday, January 10, 201