Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread Jeremy Austin
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Kevin Lamothe wrote: > > I'm excited for Netonix's native -48v switch coming out this year. > Currently doing DCtoDC conversions to get em working. Ooh, apparently I missed this announcement. /checks forum -- Jeremy Austin (907)

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread Kevin Lamothe
We also use 4948 for routing and Netonix for powering backhauls/APs at DC sites. I'm excited for Netonix's native -48v switch coming out this year. Currently doing DCtoDC conversions to get em working. On 1/16/2017 17:21, John Hendrich wrote: > Great suggestions. I'll probably go the Cisco

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

2017-01-16 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller
not true. this firmware was beta for at least 15 revisions. i do agree more bugs are usually found when it is released into the masses. we tend to not update firmware but maybe twice a year - Original Message - From: Tommy Adams To: Ubiquiti Users Group Sent: Sunday,

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread Matt Lauer
Yeah, the 4948 is a reliable workhorse for a layer 2 / layer 3 switch. We do routing and vlans on our 4948, and I still enjoy the familiarity of IOS - especially for VLANs. Slowly learning when and where I can employ Mikrotik but I find the learning curve for VLANs is tough to get used to. You

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread John Hendrich
Great suggestions. I'll probably go the Cisco route since I need routing capability (i.e. ospf & static routing) and it doesn't appear as though the Netonix has that. Thanks again! On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 16:49 -0500, Matt Lauer wrote: > If you wanted to stick with Cisco, a Cisco 4948 with hot

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread Matt Lauer
If you wanted to stick with Cisco, a Cisco 4948 with hot swappable 48VDC power supplies and you will have 48 1G ports. $300 on ebay. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Netonix for real. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
If you don't need more than 16 ports you could go with a edgepoint16. I have had zero problems with them. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 3:33 PM, John Hendrich

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

2017-01-16 Thread Mitch
I thought the same thing and disabled ALL security with same issues still On 01/16/2017 03:36 PM, RickG wrote: That's interesting because my test AP did not have security either. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Steve Barnes > wrote: We had

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

2017-01-16 Thread RickG
That's interesting because my test AP did not have security either. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Steve Barnes wrote: > We had this exact same issue on 1 tower. But we have upgraded 5 identical > towers. Only difference we could find was that the one tower that failed >

Re: [Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread mike . lyon
Netonix > On Jan 16, 2017, at 13:33, John Hendrich wrote: > > We currently use a Cisco DC powered Layer 3 switch at one of our remote > sites. The site has an Emerson DC inverter / battery backup and outputs > 48VDC. We power the Cisco switch with 48VDC and use

[Ubnt_users] DC powered switch

2017-01-16 Thread John Hendrich
We currently use a Cisco DC powered Layer 3 switch at one of our remote sites. The site has an Emerson DC inverter / battery backup and outputs 48VDC. We power the Cisco switch with 48VDC and use "step down" devices to output 24VDC with POE. What would everyone recommend as a replacement for

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Mitch
Shawn I do not have any "Lite" all are R5 AC and R5 AC Prism Mitch Koep 218-851-8689 cell On 01/16/2017 01:49 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote: Mitch, I just checked my PtP rocket ac lite link and its on v8.0 and distance shows 15.8miles and its working fine. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Mitch
Shawn directly from the wirless tabs on each radio Mitch Koep 218-851-8689 cell R5 AC 7.2.4 10 Mhz 32.7 20 15.3 30 9.6 4015.3 Prism 8.0 same for the 5AC with 8.0 10 Mhz32.7 2015.3 309.6 40 15.3 50 11.9

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
Yes i noticed the same. The ptmp has limited distance. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 1:48 PM, alex phillips wrote: > > I know we noticed it during

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
Mitch, I just checked my PtP rocket ac lite link and its on v8.0 and distance shows 15.8miles and its working fine. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Mitch

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread alex phillips
I know we noticed it during testing when we could not connect a test customer from over 14 miles to our sector running v 8 on the AC and v6 on the client. *Alex Phillips* CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)* *WISPA President (2015-2017)*

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
The ptmp will limit you not ptp. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:58 PM, alex phillips wrote: > > in PtP or PtMP? > > Alex Phillips > CEO and General

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont
The distance is also channel width dependent. Jesse DuPont Network Architect email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont
I've not tried using v6 on a v8.0 AC device. Honestly, we do it all the time in AirRouters, but have only done it as needed on the radio and those have been AirOS XM/XW, not AC. We generally try to have the radios bridged, letting the customer's router do the L3. When we

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
I have one working at 16 miles without any problem. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:54 PM, alex phillips wrote: > > you need to watch out for distance.

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread alex phillips
in PtP or PtMP? *Alex Phillips* CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)* *WISPA President (2015-2017)* *540-908-3993* On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have one working at 16

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont
No, I'm using it to provide customers a v6 prefix. In Bridge mode, you can enable IPv6, but there is no DHCP-PD option, just static or SLAAC - this would be for management-only. In router or SOHO router mode, the WAN does DHCP-PD and the puts that on the LAN for

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread alex phillips
you need to watch out for distance. Rocket AC's have a hard limit of I think 14.1 miles. That may be ok for you but just something to consider. *Alex Phillips* CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)* *WISPA President (2015-2017)*

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont
I'm sending a /64 today. I've not tried a /56 or /48 PD, but presumably AirOS will either take a /64 from the larger prefix and put it on the LAN or put the whole /56 or /48 prefix on the LAN. Either way, AirOS isn't going to do DHCP-PD on the LAN, but you could do it

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
I think they would depend on what dhcp client is asking for but im sure a /64 Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > So now how

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Mike Hammett
So now how does this work with multiple subnets, prefixes, etc.? If I had an internal router that further sub-delegated prefixes, would I change that /64 to a /56? What size of prefix is sent down to the CPE from your router? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Josh Luthman
I love this!!! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 16, 2017 1:25 PM, "Jesse DuPont" wrote: > We do this every day using AirRouters and XM/XW CPEs. They're in router > mode, PPPoE, getting v6 via PD

[Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn C. Peppers
Has anyone successfully gotten ipv6 PD to work on ubnt devices running pppoe and configured in router mode? Also does ubnt not plan on putting any v6 features in the v8.0? Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment 866-680-8433 Toll Free 480-287-9960 Fax http://www.video-direct.tv

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

2017-01-16 Thread Steve Barnes
We had this exact same issue on 1 tower. But we have upgraded 5 identical towers. Only difference we could find was that the one tower that failed did not have WPA turned on. (It’s a shared tower with another company and did not want to show them our Pass key for the rest of our network). As