Rap?
Get off my lawn! Damn kids!
--
On 8/14/2018 2:10 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 8/14/18 10:04 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
>> Unless you are attempting to do make a 'wireless wire' pre-configured
>> PtP link in which case the 2-pac doesn't go far enough.
>>
>
> 2Pac is considered one of the
On 8/14/18 10:04 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
> Unless you are attempting to do make a 'wireless wire' pre-configured
> PtP link in which case the 2-pac doesn't go far enough.
>
2Pac is considered one of the greatest rappers of all time.
___
Ubnt_users
:* Monday, August 13, 2018 7:48 AM
*To:* Steve Barnes
*Cc:* b...@ubnt.com ; Ubiquiti Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs
Hi Steve -
No question the 2-pack was poor decision. This was never designed
for retail, but can definitely see it l
Seth, I read what is available but all the facts are never presented in a
lawsuit until the court proceedings. As for WISPs being sued, we live in a
litigious society. Lawsuits are a national pastime. The number of lawsuits
are astounding and WISPs are not immune. I admit this is only my opinion
ees H."
To: "Ben Moore" , "Ubiquiti Users Group"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 11:16:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs
Ben, with all due respect. I do not see that BOLD statement that Steve
requested.
And for wisps requesting this for ptp
, 2018 7:48 AM
> *To:* Steve Barnes
> *Cc:* b...@ubnt.com ; Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs
>
> Hi Steve -
>
> No question the 2-pack was poor decision. This was never designed for
> retail, but can definitely see it looks like
On 8/13/18 09:41, RickG wrote:
> With respect, we don't know everything about the lawsuit. Also, I'd bet
> if the shoe were on the other foot, another manufacturer would sue a WISP.
I presume you've read the suit to make that claim?
With respect, we don't know everything about the lawsuit. Also, I'd bet if
the shoe were on the other foot, another manufacturer would sue a WISP.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:47 AM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
> >
> > Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my
; Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti commitment to WISPs
Hi Steve -
No question the 2-pack was poor decision. This was never designed for retail,
but can definitely see it looks like it with the packaging. The 2-pack was due
to many using for quick ptp links
August 13, 2018 7:47 AM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
>> Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD
>> statement in some way that
>> shows your commitment to the WISP community and your appreciation to those
>> of us that
That's good to hear Ben. Singles and five packs work for us. And
replacement feedhorns, 5 packs of feedhorns for 5AC 400 mm dishes are good,
but we need the same for 500 mm dishes and 2 AC.
This is not just about the money, we just don't need the dishes and
hardware piling up. Less waste!
Hi Steve -
No question the 2-pack was poor decision. This was never designed for
retail, but can definitely see it looks like it with the packaging. The
2-pack was due to many using for quick ptp links with their WISP. Had a
lot of request for selling as singles or 2-pack for this purpose.
On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
> Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD
> statement in some way that shows your commitment to the WISP community and
> your appreciation to those of us that have stuck by your side through years
> of "soon GPS",
This is again another time that UBNT eyes have moved off the WISP target and
moved to the Retail space. The reason for 2 in a box is simple if you’re
selling to retail small businesses. You would sell these as a link for 2
buildings. Therefor you need a 2 pack. If you were selling them on
14 matches
Mail list logo
