And please tell me how 2.4 AC can work in the limited spectrum without wiping
out/degrading things for other users. Or do we just not care about others any
more?
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Moore
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014
Use a channel size appropriate for the environment?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:42:18 AM
I thought AC chipsets were 5ghz only... is that not that case?
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:49 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re:
A. 1 802.11ac only specifies operation in the 5 GHz band. Operation in the 2.4
GHz band is specified by 802.11n. B. 1 2 3 With 802.11n, 600 Mbit/s in the 2.4
GHz band can be achieved by using four spatial streams at 150 Mbit/s each. As
of September 2014, commercially available devices that
So basically, the AC standard doesn't support anything beyond N in 2.4ghz, but
there are chipsets out there that added the useful stuff anyway... that makes
sense.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett
Why isn't anybody petitioning IEEE for smaller channel sizes as the big ones
are generally not needed. A 10 MHz channel of 2x2 AC would provide ~100
megabits of usable throughput.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
Which I guess would be a problem if you're not already an E-Rate
provider (we are).
Yes, in certain states I have heard of some crazy things school
district admins contacting their friends in the MSP world to come up
with an e-rate service RFP (which is tailored for the MSP in mind),
Would solve some BH issues.
Thanks.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80
and 160MHz wide channels.
3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz.
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote:
Would solve some BH
I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point...
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re:
With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of
spectrum :/
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at
I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price wise.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com
To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December
The force110 ptp is 220 megs so I'm sure the 450 meets or exceeds.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 16, 2014 9:43 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:
I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not
With a pair of 20mhz channels (or even a 10 and a 20), it would certainly be
worthwhile... with 3550-3650 it would definitely make sense.
If I remember correctly, PTP450 in 3.65 is pretty close to the same price as
AF5... maybe a bit less. I think they claim something like 125Mbps... so yeah,
Up to 125 Mbps capacity
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:49:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users]
15 matches
Mail list logo