Waking up a bit late here as well, and we're *seriously* rural (second
least populated county in the sixth least populated state in the nation).
The power company and the mine both have all manner of dual-pol 40 MHz
links on 6 GHz and 11 GHz running hither and yon. 400+ mbits full duplex
to a
"Conserve Spectrum"
"Waste of Resources"
"Spectrum Efficiency".
Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ..
When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about spectrum
grab.
My advice to you all newbies get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum
On 4/13/17 12:48, J Portman wrote:
> ETSI allows 112MHZ channels. FCC limits to 80. BUT, if your equipment
> supports it, you can license two adjacent bands of 80 for 160MHZ channels.
Danger... do not think of it as a 160MHz channel. The FCC requires
individual carriers per channel, so you CAN
Marina was VERY nervous about giving this interview and it showed. I've
promised her a re-do in Vegas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayrEmIFKAOs
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "J
ETSI allows 112MHZ channels. FCC limits to 80. BUT, if your equipment supports
it, you can license two adjacent bands of 80 for 160MHZ channels.
However, you can achieve the 160MHZ 'virtual' channel width by using dual core
radio and xpic at 80MHZ which conserves spectrum.
5GHZ already has
Sweet. Having a heck of a time with their website trying to get technical
data but I've emailed them for more info.
BTW, the RFIC that Ubiquiti is building for airFiber LTU is supposed to be
capable of 4096 QAM on a 100 MHz channel. I'm thinking next-generation
AF-11 that can truly pack the
Which is the argument many vendors use for licensing keys. IE, grow as needed.
You might consider coordinating for 80MHZ/xpic/4096 QAM but only license the
radio for your immediate needs, which does lower the initial cost (sometimes by
a great deal). As you grow, drop in more keys, etc.
I
I'd imagine a lot of times it's the choice between a $200 Rocket\ePMP and a
$500 - $1k AF11\B11 (plus other costs). Extending that to $15k+ can be a bit
much of an ask.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:27 AM, J Portman wrote:
>
> I realize my argument may not be convincing to everyone, that's what makes
> America great! (:)
> Still, the waste of a very, very precious resource seems almost
> unforgivable.
>
I can understand this perspective. I can
Varies somewhat on features and antennas.
Last alfoplus2 quote I got for 2ft antennas, dual cores opened full modulation
was about 19K.
Yah, a LOT higher, but, in my view, when you get to the point where you NEED
that much backhaul, you are probably COINING money (as we are).
So, I don't
Whats the rough cost for one of those SiAE links?
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 09:56, J Portman wrote:
>
> Yah, B11 is 50% (or less) as efficient as is possible.
>
> For real data throughput and spectral efficiency, you can't beat something
> like SIAE AlfoPlus2 (4096) qam at
Yah, B11 is 50% (or less) as efficient as is possible.
For real data throughput and spectral efficiency, you can't beat something like
SIAE AlfoPlus2 (4096) qam at 80MHZ) and can run XPIC so only using ONE
frequency pair to push well over a gig with sub-millisecond latency. Sure,
costs more,
And trashes the 11g spectrum. Put a real radio up
On Apr 13, 2017 11:21 AM, "Tommy Adams" wrote:
> No experience with the AF11, but the B11 will give you every bit of 1 gig.
> We put one up 4 months ago, no rain fade and it really moved the data.
>
>
>
No experience with the AF11, but the B11 will give you every bit of 1 gig. We
put one up 4 months ago, no rain fade and it really moved the data.
Tommy A.
Digitex.com
817.558.6230 V
817.558.1204 F
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Tim-GM
Will have techs test at tower
Thanks for feedback
We plan on moving or adding 11ghz for this link 24ghz would be backup.
Just not sure if we do ubnt, mimosa, or cambium for the 11ghz
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Agreed
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:38 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
With the CCR generating tests. With 1100ah
With the CCR generating tests. With 1100ah generating you're probably way
behind.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
> If you're running bandwidth tests
If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I doubt that anything less
than a CCR is going to be able to handle a 700Mbps TCP test. In my experience,
if an AF24 is showing full capacity (770Mbps), it will do 700Mbps consistently.
We have an inactive AF24 link (it was replaced with 11ghz
Im not sure i get 700 mbps test across a few of mine either when running tcp.
I do however hit 600+ at peak times. Like Adair stated, its likely either the
routers just are not accurately handling the bandwidth test, you have errors on
the ethernet link or some other variable.
Shawn C.
Your numbers are almost identical to one of our links. Pulling a TCP bandwidth
test from a CCR1009 plugged in on each side we get 700 megs. We use the
CCR1009 to bond two backhauls together for failover when it rains. Anyone
telling you these things do not fail in the rain is crazy or lives
What are you using for the bandwidth testing?
Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Tim-GM wrote:
>
> UDP around 653meg
>
> But that has NO value.
>
>
> From:
Af24 will do 90% of whatever the capacity graph shows. So if it's not
moving that much you have some issue generating that much traffic or
ethernet issues.
On Apr 13, 2017 9:43 AM, "Tim-GM" wrote:
> UDP around 653meg
>
>
>
> But that has NO value.
>
>
>
>
>
>
UDP around 653meg
But that has NO value.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
Must be
Must be something else messing with it. How are you bandwidth testing? Try a
UDP test.
Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Tim-GM wrote:
>
>
>
> From:
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
What does the capacity show?
Shawn C. Peppers
Video
What does the capacity show?
Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Tim-GM wrote:
>
> Just noticed airlink at 33db says 500
> At 38 db says 728
>
> The airfiber maximum power is 33db
>
No.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Tim-GM"
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:06:54 AM
Subject:
Same here, with the AF24 line, always see full throughput. Is it
possible the routers on the ends can't handle the throughput? Especially
if they are generating the traffic for the Bandwidth test.
On 4/13/2017 7:22 AM, Adair Winter wrote:
we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are
How much spectrum (channel width) did you allocate to the link?
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nate Burke
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:26 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link
we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are you testing?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Tim-GM
wrote:
> Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles
>
>
>
> DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model
>
> We have them set at full duplex
>
> All
Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles
DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model
We have them set at full duplex
All indications are a 764-759 meg link
Yet our TCP-IP throughput is 300-330meg
Any thoughts on why?
The signal have solid colors for each chain on both sides
31 matches
Mail list logo