Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

wall with AC. Tim From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tim-GM Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 12:05 PM To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber Will have techs test at tower

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Which is the argument many vendors use for licensing keys. IE, grow  as needed. You might consider coordinating for 80MHZ/xpic/4096 QAM but only license the radio for your immediate needs, which does lower the initial cost (sometimes by a great deal). As you grow, drop in more keys, etc. I

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Message - From: "J Portman" <ba...@baron.com> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 12:27:51 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber Varies somewhat on features and antennas. Last alfoplus2 quote I got for

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:27 AM, J Portman wrote: > > I realize my argument may not be convincing to everyone, that's what makes > America great! (:) > Still, the waste of a very, very precious resource seems almost > unforgivable. > I can understand this perspective. I can

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

have techs test at tower > > Thanks for feedback > >   > > We plan on moving or adding 11ghz for this link 24ghz would be backup. > > Just not sure if we do ubnt, mimosa, or cambium for the 11ghz > >   > >   > > > > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_u

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

or adding 11ghz for this link 24ghz would be backup. >>> > Just not sure if we do ubnt, mimosa, or cambium for the 11ghz >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] >>> > On Beha

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Mathew Howard > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:36 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber >   > > If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I d

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

n...@wispa.org > <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:36 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber > > > > If you're running bandwidth tests from

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Mathew Howard > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:36 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber > > If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I doubt th

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:36 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I doubt that anything less than a CCR is going to be able to handle a 700Mbps TCP test. In my expe

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Agreed From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:38 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber With the CCR generating tests. With

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:04 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber > > Im not sure i get 700 mbps test across a few of mine either when running > tcp. I do however hit 600+ at peak times. Like Adair stated, its like

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

10:04 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber Im not sure i get 700 mbps test across a few of mine either when running tcp. I do however hit 600+ at peak times. Like Adair stated, its likely either the routers just are not accurately handling the bandwidth test

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

> > > From: <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of Tim-GM > <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com> > Reply-To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Date: Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 9:43 AM > To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' <ubnt_users@wispa.org>

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

;ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber UDP around 653meg But that has NO value. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Gro

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

; > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber > > Must be something else

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

> > But that has NO value. > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *Shawn C. Peppers > *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubn

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

UDP around 653meg But that has NO value. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:16 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber > > What does the capacity show? >

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:16 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber What does the capacity show? Shawn C. Peppers

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

er maximum power is 33db > > Can this power be increased on the airfiber? > > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Adair Winter > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:48 AM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org&

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

13, 2017 9:06:54 AM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber Just noticed airlink at 33db says 500 At 38 db says 728 The airfiber maximum power is 33db Can this power be increased on the airfiber? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Same here, with the AF24 line, always see full throughput. Is it possible the routers on the ends can't handle the throughput? Especially if they are generating the traffic for the Bandwidth test. On 4/13/2017 7:22 AM, Adair Winter wrote: we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

How much spectrum (channel width) did you allocate to the link? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nate Burke Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:26 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Gh

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are you testing? On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Tim-GM wrote: > Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles > > > > DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model > > We have them set at full duplex > > All

[Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model We have them set at full duplex All indications are a 764-759 meg link Yet our TCP-IP throughput is 300-330meg Any thoughts on why? The signal have solid colors for each chain on both sides