Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on >> behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] >> *Sent:* Monday, January 22, 2018 9:20 AM >> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems >> >> This is what we di

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

time I got it back to > the shop and dissected it, everything was dry, so I never could prove it. > > -- > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on > behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] > *Sent:* Monday,

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

AM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems This is what we did - new radios and jumpers on both sides.  It cleared up for a few days and at this point it looks like chain1 is ~10 db lower than chain0 (which is back to the 60s).  We'll see what happens

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

nt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on > behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] > *Sent:* Monday, January 22, 2018 9:20 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems > > This is what we did - new radios and jumpers on both sides.

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 9:20 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems This is what we did - new radios and jumpers on both sides. It cleared up for a few days and at this point it looks like chain1 is ~10 db lower than

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

This is what we did - new radios and jumpers on both sides. It cleared up for a few days and at this point it looks like chain1 is ~10 db lower than chain0 (which is back to the 60s). We'll see what happens after a couple of days, it's passing way more bandwidth than what we need so it isn't

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

swap radios on both ends just to start ruling stuff out On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Mitch wrote: > This is a similar issue we had with AF5U and never got fixed > > UBNT still says it's thermal??? > > > > On 1/19/2018 11:03 PM, RickG wrote: > > True. I'm now

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

This is a similar issue we had with AF5U and never got fixed UBNT still says it's thermal??? On 1/19/2018 11:03 PM, RickG wrote: True. I'm now dealing with a bunch of my 900MHz towers doing the same thing :( On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Josh Luthman

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

True. I'm now dealing with a bunch of my 900MHz towers doing the same thing :( On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Really weird that both pig tails have the exact same level of problems, > though. Both chains dropped from 60s to 80s to 95+ and

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

What a weird bug. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 19, 2018 9:18 PM, "Nick Bright" wrote: > No, it just took me a while to notice that "CONDUCTED" showed an absurd > negative number, instead of +19dBm.

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

No, it just took me a while to notice that "CONDUCTED" showed an absurd negative number, instead of +19dBm. On 1/19/2018 8:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: But the GUI said it was normal? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 19, 2018

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

But the GUI said it was normal? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 19, 2018 9:16 PM, "Nick Bright" wrote: > I had a similar problem with an AF3X not connecting; turned out that after > updating to OS 4v,

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

I had a similar problem with an AF3X not connecting; turned out that after updating to OS 4v, it decided to back off the conducted TX power to like -26 or something stupid. It basically wasn't transmitting. I had to set the antennas to 0 gain and manually calculate the correct transmit power

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Really weird that both pig tails have the exact same level of problems, though. Both chains dropped from 60s to 80s to 95+ and the link obviously disappeared. The signals reported on the AirOS interface, I mean. Spectrum scan still shows -50 to nearby APs and -60 on the BH frequency. Josh

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

I've had a flurry of bad pigtails lately :( On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > This came back up...exact same issue. Definitely not ice today! > > Spectrum scan sees upper and lower bands just fine. Both sides see each > other at -60ish. It

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

This came back up...exact same issue. Definitely not ice today! Spectrum scan sees upper and lower bands just fine. Both sides see each other at -60ish. It attempts to register and fail Is there any possibility besides bad jumper/radio? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Well I brought the power down to -60/61 to be nice! Also higher modulation... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > sun must have melted the ice off, i

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

sun must have melted the ice off, i have had some links with ice that get affected and some that didn't, very strange sometimes, just have high link margins is about the only thing you can do. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Right on the

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Right on the money. Back up to 61 now. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 12, 2018 11:40 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > Well I thought exactly that at first but I do have radomes and another >

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Well I thought exactly that at first but I do have radomes and another north/south link that has 0 change. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > If you

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

If you have a backhaul covered in ice i can almost guarantee that the ice is causing your signal being down, seen this a couple winters ago on an AF5X link with 2 foot dishes, your pretty much screwed until the ice melts off.. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Josh Luthman

[Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

Had a wind/storm and everything come through, wind picked up at 4am and 4:30-5 we went from 61 db to 70 and a bit later down to 80 db. Everything is covered in ice. BH is 12.5 miles north/south. Have another BH 12.5 miles north/south (in line with the af5x) with no problems. Ruled out thermal