Re: gnome shell versus mate

It's been some time since I've used a standard mate configuration, so honestly I do not remember whether once III added the mate network applet to my panel it just worked like it should have with orca, or if I had to go in to the system menus and use the networkinterface and enter the name

Re: gnome shell versus mate

Message: 5 Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 05:22:49 -0600 From: "B. Henry" To: ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: gnome shell versus mate Message-ID: <20160402112249.gc2...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii And how did you add your own network?

OT. Error booting ARCH.

Hi, I apologize if the question is not correct in this group. I am installing TalkingARCH from a USB flash drive created with Rufus. All the installation process is correct. When booting from the hard disk using the boot loader of my motherboard enters a recovery mode advanced, taking a few

Re: gnome shell versus mate

There is more than one way you can to this, but basically you either make a link to a .desktop file, the files used to launch graphical applications, or copy the file it self from /usr/share/applications to your desktop. You can even sym link directly to an executable. I think what Kendell was

Re: gnome shell versus mate

And how did you add your own network? This should be easy. Did you not remove the mate bottom panel, and perhaps relocate the top panel to the bottom? You can only read one panel, and it will be the last installed. Put all your icons and applets on the same panel, and things work as they

Re: gnome shell versus mate

Honestly, the current state of the classicmenu-indicator is much less helpful than it could be in my opinion. There are too many categories, and a large percentage of items appear in multiple sub-menus. I mean, really, sundry and other? This is too bad as this was a nicer tool back when I