On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:11 -0800, Merk wrote:
The Ubuntu Title Font is available on sites like dafont.com
http://www.dafont.com/ubuntu-title.font
There are 2 and this is the better one:
http://betatype.com/node/36
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 16:24 -0800, Chris Tooley wrote:
[snip]
You should also consider whether this implies microsoft word to your
average user.
I would go one step further: does this imply word processing document
to the average user and does it tell him how it will be handled when
they
It has too do with the law, Apple is much more of a social company then
Microsoft.
Think apple putted on a flexible license. (like CC/GPL/APSL) I think the
last one is apple used.
Microsoft I pretty sure they not.
On 16 February 2010 20:39, Merk merkin...@hotmail.com wrote:
So I see a lot of
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
Joeri Jungschlager wrote:
It has too do with the law, Apple is much more of a social company then
Microsoft.
Think apple putted on a flexible license.
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
It is a mimetype and as such needs to visually represent a certain type of
file. It goes without saying
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
It is a mimetype and as such needs to visually represent a certain type of
file. It goes
MAC USERS may expect that exact icon, not Windows users. Since we can't
satisfy both exactly, we should satisfy both roughly.
By that I mean the 'visual metaphor' should be Blue W for Word, Green X
for Excel, etc. Not Stylized and gel-like font in perspective only
present in the Mac version
I made another using the upper case of that font.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p27626085/humanity-msword2.svg
humanity-msword2.svg
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:11 -0800, Merk wrote:
The Ubuntu Title Font is available on sites like dafont.com
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
It is a mimetype and as such
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
It is a mimetype and
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
Vishnoo a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
Vishnoo a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
Vishnoo a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 05:04:46 pm Merk wrote:
MAC USERS may expect that exact icon, not Windows users. Since we can't
satisfy both exactly, we should satisfy both roughly.
By that I mean the 'visual metaphor' should be Blue W for Word, Green X
for Excel, etc. Not Stylized and
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 06:17:12 pm Vishnoo wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
Vishnoo a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010
The problem is the same for the psd file icon (attached): why putting a
Photoshop logo? The user only has to know it is an image, with the psd
extension. The photoshop logo is a nonsense here.
I was under the impression that a PSD file was a PhotoShop Document.
Is this not a proprietary
17 matches
Mail list logo
