has been now already couple of years and Ubuntu is getting
on each release better and better.
The 6 month release cycle is very rapid and things change for better
at amazing rate.
Best Regards,
Karoliina Salminen
(running couple of Ubuntu computers)
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu
Hello,
I have M-audio Axiom 25 which I use as a portable 2 octave keyboard. It is very
good. The keys are much more plastic and lower quality on Oxygen8 than on Axiom,
I would like to recommend the Axiom models instead - the keys are
semi-weighted and
have a whole diffferent feel to them. To the
Hi,
Well, there was the discussion about laptops... I use this and I swear on it.
Well, I have a gadget freak's solution: have them all. As a result, I
don't swear on any particular machine and the only ones of them I
really love of them are all Apple hardware. I don't really look for
the
Generalizations tend to be innaccurate. Certainly Dell has their low
cost lines (the Inspiron), but their Latitude lines are awesome.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have one Latitude D600 on my
table and I never liked it. I have stopped using it (replaced it with
Thinkpad T61p which
I agree. The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
hardware used. I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook. The Dell is
using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
drive) etc. It
Public bug reported:
I installed Ubuntu Intrepid Beta from CD. I was able to setup nVidia on
it, by installing the nvidia driver from Ubuntu repository. However, it
is not fully functional. Direct rendering does not work. It worked on
Hardy, but does not work in Intrepid. Some OpenGL applications
I just finished installing Intrepid beta. Same problem here, there is
absolutely no way to up the eth0 on Thinkpad T61p, there is no driver.
This has worked before on the same machine on all previous Ubuntu
versions that have been installed on the T61p (Gutsy, Hardy), so I think
this is a serious
I installed the Intrepid beta from Install CD because upgrade from
Hardy-Intrepid failed on the nVidia driver - there was absolutely no
way to get X up again (even the nVidia site drivers did not work because
Ubuntu screws up the nVidia kernel modules so that the nVidia
installer's compiled kernel
Oops, this was about wifi, my issue here is the eth0 which does not
work. Indeed, the wifi works neither, in my case, it connects to a
network succesfully sometimes, but then disconnects after 1 minute or
so. It was doing already in Hardy this for me, and I have been using the
wired network
For TV/Movies, you cannot beat the tv output quality from a matrox card,
although their output support is s-video/composite.
I would like to have this clarified: You mean obviously with TV-output
here analog tube-TV?
Rather than today's flat panels which have HDMI and which get 100% perfect
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:23 AM, aYo Binitie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'd nigh but given up on ever being able to use 2 monitors. I almost
cannot wait to go to work and try this out now.
Have you tried the nVidia installer from the nVidia site? Would it work better?
On certain versions
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the state of the intrepid artwork? Any screenshots of what it
currently looks like?
I don't know as an outsider for sure.
But thing is: I would really love this:
Yes, my desktop edition works fine with 3D graphics, NVIDIA drivers and
Xinerama enabled. The problem is I've got a RME hammerfall and Behringer
ADA8000 that NEED the RT kernel to operate without xruns.
I think RT kernel is needed for low latency on any hardware.
But I really wanted two
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, John Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I know its been discussed recently but this is slightly different (i
think)
I have 8.04 (32bit) Desktop and Studio versions installed on two
different hard drives on my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+. My
Hi again,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Karoliina Salminen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, John Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I know its been discussed recently but this is slightly different (i
think)
I have 8.04 (32bit) Desktop and Studio versions
I have the same problem on Ubuntu Hardy and Lenovo Thinkpad T61p.
I need to use the serial cable to do my work, but minicom exits before
displaying anything and says that device /dev/ttyS0 disappeared.
dmesg prints the following:
[435438.377880] ttyS0: LSR safety check engaged!
[435446.329923]
and at least having the digital output
working properly would make me quite happy (I do not use the analog
multi channel output as I have a better decoder in my home theater
amplifier/receiver).
Best Regards,
Karoliina Salminen
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
On Nov 25, 2007 1:50 PM, verymeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all. Does anyone know if it's possible in Ardour to play a loop in
one track, while recording another track? Obviously, I would want the
recording track to move forward linearly - at the moment, I can get
Ardour to loop all the
Hi,
I have been thru the Archives of this List and did not find an answer
to my problem. ( It sure would be useful if the Archives had a
Search option.
Now as to my Problem. When I have several Terminals minimized at the
bottom of my panel they disappear upon rebooting. Is there a
The low-spec card is supposed to support this resolution via DVI because
I have identical chip on identical laptop running Windows (well, it is
not mine, but the company's) and it runs the Cinema Display fine with no
problems at all.
I am now running Gutsy and this problem still persists and it
Public bug reported:
I have been keeping my Gutsy up-to-date. However, Today dist-upgrade reported
errors on packages:
apport
apport-gtk
eog
evolution-common
gnome-panel-data
gnome-panel
synaptic
update-manager
Here is the log of apt-get dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/karoliina#
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91556
Additional findings about the resolution:
- After getting everything to work, I have had to edit configuration files from
several applications and games by hand since their configuration does not
generally
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91556
The very same thing happens with stable Feisty Fawn, with GeForce 8800GTX the
Feisty Fawn is broken by default.
I have Club3D GeForce 8800GTX 768 MB + 30 inch Dell 2560x1600 resolution
display. There are
standard
solution with no fresh breeze in the air. This is fine for most of the
people I think, but some would love to see something completely
different.
Best Regards,
Karoliina Salminen
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
, the
situation is not much better there currently, most themes in most
distributions tend to be boring and very conservative, they do not
have any Maccish-shine.
Best Wishes
Karoliina Salminen
http://www.karoliinasalminen.com/blog
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https
Hello,
On 4/19/07, Alvaro Medina Ballester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a few words. Ubuntu = linux for human beings. Human beings =
disctint cultures. Disctint cultures = distinct themes. Artwork team,
start working!.
Well said! I am sure that there are many talented artists in the
Ubuntu
Hi,
On 3/22/07, Corey Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an observer from the previous two SoC's, I can say the biggest
problem is students biting off more than they can chew. One of the
biggest issues with tablets is that GNOME often barfs on the screen
rotation, primarily the panel
Latest update about the situation:
- I tried your suggestion and it didn't help. The image is still distorted and
unreadable. The laptop was last time dist-upgraded on last Friday, so the
Feisty is pretty much up to date and so this occurs even with the latest
version of the open source driver.
So my temporary fix for continuing running the scratchbox is to use 2.6.20-6
-kernel.
Any news on this? This affects every Maemo developer running Feisty.
--
(maemo-on-ubuntu) Scratchbox does not work with latest Feisty kernel image
https://launchpad.net/bugs/86457
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-8-generic
Feisty kernel image 2.6.20.8.4 prevents running Scratchbox (r4 Apophis)
(Scratchbox stopped working after
dist-upgrade last week). Here is what the Scratchbox complains:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratchbox$ ./login
Welcome to
Hi,
I have since updated the system many times and not tried to update with
update manager again. So the /var/log/dist-upgrade is no longer valid I
think.
Best Wishes,
Karoliina
--
Update Manager's dist-upgrade to from Edgy to Feisty failed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79536
--
ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 60621 ***
2560x1600 would be really good to have support since (also) I have a 30
inch widescreen monitor at home.
Also would be a very good idea to take in account HTPC users which are using
HD-Ready video projectors and
LCD televisions, which have the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
I have a fresh installation of Ubuntu Edgy, had to reinstall the system as the
Feisty to refused to boot up after
one dist-upgrade. Ok, I reinstalled edgy and started to proceed with
dist-upgrade to feisty:
I changed sources.list to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-driver-ati
SOFTWARE
Ubuntu Feisty, 14.12.2006. See DESCRIPTION for xorg.conf settings.
HARDWARE
Dell Latitude D600 laptop + docking station + Apple Cinema HD Display connected
to the laptop using DVI connector.
DESCRIPTION
This has never
Here is the original video file.
** Attachment added: Video of the bug occurring with Apple Cinema Display
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5396027/atidrivercinemadisplay.mp4
--
ATI Open source driver shows distorted unreadable image on Dell laptop + Apple
Cinema Display 23 inch
There is one thing though (IMHO):
- the orange ones (screenshot above) look stylish and professional
- the old ones look unprofessional
I think the fact that they are ugly has nothing to do with their usability and
usability of stylish
graphics should be improved instead of replacing the new
I have tried Ardour 2 on Jacklab (compiled by myself). It appears to
work and I would prefer to use it rather than the Ardour 1.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73900
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
But remember, I am not part of Ubuntu Studio Development team, so I am
not the person who is making the decision of its inclusion or not
including it, so please do not take my positive comments about Ardour 2
versus Ardour 1 as any commitment for taking it.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
Oops, I didn't notice that there was already a reply from C.Kontros.
Please disregard my above comments.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73900
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Cool. Yes, it is downside of most distributions and also other operating
systems that the background images
are usually supplied with a crappy resolution.
I am using 23 inch Apple Cinema HD Display at work and will soon be using 30
inch Dell 3007WFP at home (as soon as it arrives from Dell,
40 matches
Mail list logo
