All autopkgtests for the newly accepted samba (2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.9) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
libsoup2.4/2.70.0-1 (amd64)
gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
I hadn't realised that they renamed the IM module with the version bump:
that means snaps built against older platforms won't load the old (but
working) Fcitx 4 module when run on a host system configured with Fcitx
5.
We can certainly look at adding the new IM module to the platform snaps,
but
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware. I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take include
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for sudo (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915945
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for sudo (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921423
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1930945
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
On 20.10 Anthy was set to choose the keyboard layout according to the current
input language.
After the upgrade to 21.04, this setting got lost; Apparently the settings of
anthy are not upgrade-safe.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: anthy 1:0.4-2
Booted today's impish daily (live QA-test) on
- dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550)
On initial boot there were glitches on the top of the display (panel &
top of wallpaper below panel). It booted with wallpaper (not no
wallpaper today so not identical).
On
Fixed in Ubuntu 21.04
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901401
Title:
SD card does not work on linux, but window
5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.461
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Jun 5 03:01:52 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish I
I'm unable to change wallpaper now.
On selecting some they appear to flash on screen, then get replaced by a
image... currently this firefox window appears on my other display with
this "add comment" box frozen at the word "currently" last line when the
image was changed...
Wallpaper on other
s zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.461
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Jun 5 03:01:52 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210604)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=
Public bug reported:
Novice user. submitting report because Ubuntu said I should
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
ApportVersion:
Current Lubuntu daily was written to media using
`sudo dd bs=4M oflag=sync status=progress of=/dev/sdb
if=/de2900/lubuntu_64/impish-desktop-amd64.iso`
and that boots normally... with desktop up & visible within 6 mins
anyway (I forgot to look at clock; too busy picking up mouth from
floor..)
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:27:19AM -, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> It means that it explicitly looks for the fcitx 5 gtk im module, while
> Chromium only has access to the fcitx 4 one.
Oh! Excellent debugging to find the root cause.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
Assignee: $uperu$er (nozzz) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930939
Title:
package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to
hwmatch should not be used in x86_64 systems.
set GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=keep in /etc/defaults/grub
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I presented the snap problem for James Henstridge, and he gave me a very
useful hint: The Chromium snap makes use of the bionic library stack
(the gnome-3-28-1804 snap) including the im module installed by fcitx-
frontend-gtk3, i.e. the fcitx 4 gtk im module.
That made me think of
** Changed in: thunderbird
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882
Title:
Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS
To manage
Patch sent upstream:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/hostap/patch/20210525031333.7665-1-mathew.hod...@gmail.com/
** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 6/4/21 5:29 PM, tomdean wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
>error:can't find command 'hwmatch'
>
> The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
> proper location for grub to find during boot.
>
> cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub
On 6/4/21 5:29 PM, tomdean wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
>error:can't find command 'hwmatch'
>
> The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
> proper location for grub to find during boot.
>
> cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub
Thunderbird 91 is just around the corner, and any change to 78 could no
longer get beta testing, so even with a fix to the old code we would not
take it at this point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The other reason this is a critical bug is because if the user does not
have Thunderbird configured to save messages in Sent Mail -- which the
user *shouldn't*, e.g., if the user is using Gmail, since Gmail saves
outbound messages automatically, then this bug causes DATA LOSS by
closing the window
We have a [Smtpd.jsm](https://searchfox.org/comm-
central/source/mailnews/test/fakeserver/Smtpd.jsm) fakeserver for
testing, we don't have a test case for this bug though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I just realized Ben has a test script comment 160. Does smtp-js have a
test library, and does it cover this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882
Title:
Emails are silently
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #180)
> Do we expect this to be gone with smtp-js?
Yes, I think so. Compose window is still open in my local test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Do we expect this to be gone with smtp-js?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882
Title:
Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS
To manage notifications about this
Opened another ticket to upgrade alsa-lib to 1.2.5 for impish.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1930941
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921632
Title:
build module
Ubuntu Desktop boots good on
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
(http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/424/builds/231660/testcases/1303/results)
ISO was written using GNOME-disks (recovery)
at ~2 mins 19 the maybe-ubiquity TRY/INSTALL
Public bug reported:
Please build the latest alsa libraries (version 1.2.5) for impish/
upgrade from version 1.2.4
libasound2 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
libasound2-data 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
alsa-utils 1.2.4-1ubuntu3
alsa-topology-conf 1.2.4-1
alsa-ucm-conf 1.2.4-2ubuntu1.1
alsa-tools
In case of non-kernel packages can ubuntu deviate from debian?
According to
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=debian
debian uses alsa-lib version 1.2.4 in testing branch.
Is it the reason ubuntu cannot upgrade to 1.2.5 of this package for impish?
--
You received this bug
New Lubuntu daily attempting to boot on
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
stop watch started at grub/lubuntu as I hit enter..
today's Lubuntu daily was written with mkusb/LIVE (yesterdays was
mkusb/CLONE I believe)
75mins on the stopwatch and
** Summary changed:
- failure to boot impish daily (or too slow; i gave up ~15 mins in..)
+ failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884
Two questions.
1) Will impish 5.13 kernel be backported and made available to ubuntu
21.03/hirsute ?
2) Will the packages
libasound2 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
libasound2-data1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
alsa-utils 1.2.4-1ubuntu3
alsa-topology-conf 1.2.4-1
alsa-ucm-conf
Public bug reported:
Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
error:can't find command 'hwmatch'
The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
proper location for grub to find during boot.
cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub
fixes this problm
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease:
I don't have the "faulty" system anymore (it was in 2015)
I cannot reproduce the problem on another machine running 16.04 and
bsdmainutils-9.0.6ubuntu3
I cannot reproduce the problem on 18.04 nor 20.04.
The years 2020-2023 looks good to me on 20.04 then you can close this ticket.
--
You
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ply (3.11-3ubuntu0.1) for focal have
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
astropy/4.0-4ubuntu1 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding
** Changed in: firefox
Status: Confirmed => Expired
** Changed in: firefox
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051
Title:
Firefox should not
** Changed in: firefox
Status: Confirmed => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335388
Title:
Firefox does not play local flash files
To manage notifications about this
Adobe Flash is no longer supported.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051
Title:
Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run
To manage notifications about this
Depending on browser settings, Adobe's website can strobe, trigger
migraines, and for some people, trigger seizures, with several refreshes
per second. I think it may be a cookie-handling bug. Firefox shouldn't
point any users to the website.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Adobe Flash is no longer supported.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335388
Title:
Firefox does not play local flash files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: llvm
Status: Confirmed => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365701
Title:
clang crashed with SIGSEGV, reproducible with c file
To manage notifications
This issue also happens when targeting ARM in 32-bits mode.
It can be fixed, similarly to the x86 fix, by calling
setLibcallName(RTLIB::MUL_I128, nullptr) inside
ARMTargetLowering::ARMTargetLowering(const TargetMachine , const
ARMSubtarget ) in the file
"llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp".
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930939
Title:
package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
installed shim-signed package
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862053
Title:
Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
occurred yesterday upon install i believe then it occurred again right
now when i restarted my laptop
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19-generic 5.11.17
Uname: Linux
Ok, I thank you very much for your effort!
If anything else comes to your mind I'm willing to do the testing.
Can you please suggest how do I get the debug code and what the
pm_genpd_add_device() function is?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
@Brian - it maybe that very issue (why I mentioned the bug in the
description & likely wrote as if it was) but for it to be that issue,
the box has to eventually boot..
feels similar yes, but still different..
I didn't want to leave the box on overnight (I thought about; it'd have
answered the
** Package changed: ubuntu => virtualbox (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930911
Title:
virtualbox dkms should not prevent building for unsupported kernel
To manage
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930938
Title:
package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed
grub-pc package
Public bug reported:
Don't know enough to provide more info.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture:
I've added a few more packages to the bug; nothing in the various links
suggested to me that anyone has yet identified where the fault lies.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
cloud-config userdata to provide during Azure PRO FIPS 16.04 (Xenial)
launch with accelerated networking: via 'az vm create --custom-data
azure-xenial*workaround.yaml...'
** Attachment added: "azure-xenial-pro-fips-workaround.yaml"
I have proposed an upstream PR to fix this inconsistency in handling
excluded drivers for azure in stages at https://github.com/canonical
/cloud-init/pull/914
Given that Xenial is currently in Extended Security Maintenance for
support, I don't know if we will be able to publish a fix into xenial-
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915059
Title:
[Upstream] Compare Document highlighting unchanged words as
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388491
Title:
[upstream] calc: "Cut" and "Paste special" -> "Transpose"
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: aide (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582334
Title:
aide
Created attachment 172605
version compared screen
This bug seems to have been resolved in 3.6 which makes it opposite to bug
71155 which started then.
Comparison attached.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Dear Leo H,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open,
confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked
on this bug
scito committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/c82d96da1c9a03e1742f2f5a7a93b9993c96a0a0
tdf#68976 fix paste transposed regression for notes/patterns
It will be available in 7.2.0.
The patch should be included in the daily
it's ok in
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 3b57ebb445df8a2bc3d916ea79f8af45e20e4e62
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
--
You received this bug notification because you
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.4.0.1041.39) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 (amd64)
sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64)
Public bug reported:
In Bionic, screen-resolution-extra has a dependency on policykit-1-gnome
| polkit-1-auth-agent. Focal replaces this with a dependency on gnome-
shell | policykit-1-gnome | polkit-1-auth-agent. As a result, when
install screen-resolution-extra (e.g. as a dependency of nvidia-
Hmm, I thought the only 'reliable' way of addressing the 'not yet
active' problem was to use the sd_notify(3) family of functions to let
systemd know when a service is actually ready to handle requests. I
suggest proposing your patch in a Debian bug to get the maintainer's
feedback on it. (A test
It's not really clear to me the use case for having
/usr/share/calendar/calendar.ubuntu at all. Does anybody have a use for
the file existing?
** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898815
Title:
Focal upgrade fails, can't mark packages for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1886748 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886748
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1886748
upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if libomp5 is installed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks for taking the time to report this upgrade failure. There is
currently a new version of the release upgrader available which may
resolve the error you've encountered. Please run the following command
to test the new version of the upgrader:
do-release-upgrade
Please lets us know the
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393
Title:
any
I've tried using boto3+s3:// as well before and it was unsuccessful.
Swapping it out with this newer version of duplicity produced an error
regarding the HeadBucket operation.
See new failure below. I turned up the verbosity to 9 for this one.
Note: My company is using Duplicity 0.8.11 and Duply
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
