[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-05-17 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Thanks for the answer, but now that I think about it, I'm not sure NEW_LABEL alone would cause wholesale RAID array corruption. Correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not an expert on how parted works, but that

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-05-17 Thread Alvin Thompson
(copying comment from bug 568183) Thanks for the answer, but now that I think about it, I'm not sure NEW_LABEL alone would cause wholesale RAID array corruption. Correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not an expert on how parted works, but that bug with NEW_LABEL would only overwrite the RAID

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-05-01 Thread Alvin Thompson
Linux000, don't bother; I have practically written a dissertation on why it isn't likely to be a grub problem in one of these bugs. -- Installer corrupts raid drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
If you're going to fix this before the release, how about also fixing bug 568183 / bug 191119 as well? Those bugs can actually destroy your data on RAID partitions, even if the user did not elect to use the RAID partitions during the install. This has been confirmed by several people at this

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
I reported it, but I believe it's the same bug as 191119, which is similar (although the reporter didn't give as much information). That bug coincides with when they changed how file systems are detected in the installer. -- [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
Well, I posted it on the mailing list. Impute used that data to file the report. -- [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570765 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
If I may editorialize, the logic people are using to evaluate the bug is pretty amusing: 1. It can't exist, because a problem this big would have been reported much earlier. 2. It can't be a dup of bug 191119, because that bug was reported much earlier. -- [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
Chris, if that's the case, I'm afraid for people's data. That RAD bug is still there. It's going to be interesting to see how they answer questions about this when people ask why their data had to be lost... -- [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

[Bug 570765] Re: [Lucid] no GRUB menu entry for other operating systems

2010-04-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
Charlie, The problem is that there's no evidence that those bugs have even been seen or evaluated by the appropriate personnel, despite being clearly ubuntu installer problems that result in file system corruption and the loss of data. Bug 19119, for example, managed to go over 2 years without

[Bug 560152] Re: installing lucid over existing software raid 1 does not work

2010-04-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542210 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 Hi, NickJ, If I interpret Whoop correctly, his problem was that he tried to install Ubuntu to 2 separate machines while leaving his RAID /home partition alone on each. The end result was the installer

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
It probably won't work in a VM, because of the way a VM's virtual storage devices work. They discard everything that's not being used at that moment, otherwise you'd have to allocate the full size of the drive. Thus, you probably couldn't have any defunct file systems sitting around. --

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
Yup, and I thank you for it. And if this bug does get fixed, I imagine those people whose data won't be hosed as a result would thank you too. -- Installer corrupts raid drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 560152] Re: installing lucid over existing software raid 1 does not work

2010-04-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542210 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 NickJ, your problem is actually bug 191119 or bug 568183 (the latter is currently a dup of the former). -- installing lucid over existing software raid 1 does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560152

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
Note that in bug 560152, NickJ's problem is actually this bug. -- Installer corrupts raid drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)

2010-04-26 Thread Alvin Thompson
This is likely a cause of bug 191119 and bug 568183 as well. However, those bugs are not dups; in those bugs existing RAID partitions are corrupted, even if they aren't used during the install. Looking at this report, I would guess the RAID partition corruption is because the installer is

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-26 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Yup, that bug is likely the cause of the corruption of the RAID partitions. If I had to make a guess, that NEW_LABEL command was being used on the incorrectly detected file systems, thus overwriting RAID

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-24 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Thanks for taking the time to help investigate this. Check out my reply to you in the mailing list thread for suggestions on recreating the bug. Number 3 especially is required. -- Non-selected Raid Array

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-24 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 BTW, please use post to bug #191119. Subscribers to this bug will be notified if you post there, but not vice-versa. -- Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-24 Thread Alvin Thompson
I'm adding this message from the thread to provide as much information for people trying to recreate this bug as possible; Top-posting for (my) convenience on this one... It's nice to see someone actually trying to recreate the bug instead of just flapping their gums trying to sound smart. If

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
Logic 101: There is nothing in this report that would even remotely suggest that it's a GRUB problem. By your logic, it could be anything that writes directly to the hard drive, not just GRUB. While it's true that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, the absence of evidence

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 I have no idea what you mean by 'loader-RAID5'... It likely doesn't matter what type of RAID is being used. I also tested on the live CD with the same problem. mdadm isn't present on the live CD and the

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 191119 Installer corrupts raid drive -- Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568183 You received this bug

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Please don't remove the duplicate tag. There are 3 parts to every bug report: 1. an initial set of conditions 2. a procedure that was followed 3. actual results which differ from expected results The

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
I forgot to mention in my first post that once the problem shows itself, it persists indefinitely across attempts to install Ubuntu. The way I was able to fix the problem at that point was to physically zero out the defunct file system on the disk. This should be obvious, but I'll say it anyway:

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
Please see bug #568183 for steps on recreating the issue. -- Installer corrupts raid drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 191119] Re: Installer corrupts raid drive

2010-04-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
No, it is NOT fucking fixed. I can't believe it's been OVER TWO YEARS and no one has bothered to even look at this easily reproducible issue? And because of it my (and who knows how many other people's) data is hosed. What issues DO you investigate, if you don't investigate corrupted file

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Dup of bug #191119 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 191119 Installer corrupts raid drive -- Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568183 You

[Bug 568183] Re: Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

2010-04-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191119 Yes, this is a a dup of 19119. Just because his hardware RAID is reporting the problem it doesn't follow that the hardware caused the problem. -- Non-selected Raid Array Corruption from Installer

[Bug 419501] Re: apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy-last_request_read) - (long) (dpy-request)) = 0)' failed.

2010-02-24 Thread Alvin Thompson
Just remember, the point of spring break is to TAKE A BREAK. -- apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy-last_request_read) - (long) (dpy-request)) = 0)' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419501 You received this bug

[Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

2010-02-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
Karun, please explain why you marked the bug as invalid. ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 450554] Re: when upgrading to Karmic from earlier versions of Ubuntu, warn that Maven is no longer supported

2009-10-25 Thread Alvin Thompson
Happily, maven has been fixed so this has been rendered moot. :) ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- when upgrading to Karmic from earlier versions of Ubuntu, warn that Maven is no longer supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450554 You received this bug

[Bug 416312] Re: Upgrade maven to 2.2.1

2009-10-25 Thread Alvin Thompson
w00t! -- Upgrade maven to 2.2.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 411578] Re: ant shouldn't recommend ant-gcj

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
I believe this was fixed for a while, but now -gcj is back to recommends. what gives? ** Changed in: ant (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ant shouldn't recommend ant-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 411579] Re: ant-optional shouldn't recommend ant-optional-gcj

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
I believe this was fixed for a while, but now -gcj is back to recommends. what gives? ** Changed in: ant (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ant-optional shouldn't recommend ant-optional-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411579 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 411596] Re: libxerces2-java shouldn't recommend libxerces2-java-gcj

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
thanks! -- libxerces2-java shouldn't recommend libxerces2-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411596 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 411590] Re: libjaxp1.3-java shouldn't recommend libjaxp1.3-java-gcj

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
thanks! -- libjaxp1.3-java shouldn't recommend libjaxp1.3-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 411592] Re: libxalan2-java shouldn't recommend libxalan2-java-gcj

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
thanks! -- libxalan2-java shouldn't recommend libxalan2-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 416312] Re: Upgrade maven to 2.2.1

2009-10-23 Thread Alvin Thompson
i haven't played with it much yet, but it looks like 2.2.1 is in the main repo as well! -- Upgrade maven to 2.2.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
Mathias, I'm not sure I understand your comment. Isn't it the maintainer's job to maintain Maven? By your logic, if I don't know enough about the trip computer in my car to maintain it, I shouldn't rely on my car? Also, I love Ubuntu and have been using it exclusively since Breezy, but it does

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
Mathias, I'm not sure I understand your comment. Isn't it the maintainer's job to maintain Maven? By your logic, if I don't know enough about the trip computer in my car to maintain it, I shouldn't rely on my car? Also, I love Ubuntu and have been using it exclusively since Breezy, but it does

[Bug 437016] Re: gnome-about-me crashed with SIGSEGV in pixman_image_composite()

2009-10-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
It only crashed that one time... -- gnome-about-me crashed with SIGSEGV in pixman_image_composite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 417164] Re: latest plexus packages breaks Maven

2009-10-15 Thread Alvin Thompson
According to bug #427539, they aren't going to fix this for Karmic and will likely just drop the Maven package entirely. I hope they warn people who are considering upgrading... -- latest plexus packages breaks Maven https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417164 You received this bug notification

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
I agree with comment #37. Also, during the upgrade process from earlier versions of Ubuntu you must warn people (before they commit to the upgrade) that maven will no longer work. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Bug #417164 and Bug #416312 explain why Maven no longer works. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libgoogle-collections-java in

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Whoops, wrong bug report... -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libgoogle-collections-java in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
I agree with comment #37. Also, during the upgrade process from earlier versions of Ubuntu you must warn people (before they commit to the upgrade) that maven will no longer work. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug

[Bug 450554] [NEW] when upgrading to Karmic from earlier versions of Ubuntu, warn that Maven is no longer supported

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: I imagine this belongs in the update-manager package but I'm not sure, since it involves a special case when upgrading from previous versions of Ubuntu. Previous versions of Ubuntu had a working version of Apache Maven in the repository, and many people depend on it for

[Bug 450554] Re: when upgrading to Karmic from earlier versions of Ubuntu, warn that Maven is no longer supported

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Bug #417164 and Bug #416312 explain why Maven no longer works. -- when upgrading to Karmic from earlier versions of Ubuntu, warn that Maven is no longer supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Bug #417164 and Bug #416312 explain why Maven no longer works. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-13 Thread Alvin Thompson
Whoops, wrong bug report... -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 417164] Re: latest plexus packages breaks Maven

2009-10-08 Thread Alvin Thompson
A duplicate of itself? :) ** Changed in: maven2 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- latest plexus packages breaks Maven https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 445484] [NEW] incorrect completion for new upstart commands

2009-10-07 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash-completion Upstart adds four new commands for controlling services: status, start, stop, and restart. On lines beginning with these commands, bash-completion should offer the list of services, similar to how the service command currently does. For

[Bug 445484] Re: incorrect completion for new upstart commands

2009-10-07 Thread Alvin Thompson
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33231310/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33231311/XsessionErrors.txt -- incorrect completion for new upstart commands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445484 You

[Bug 411588] Re: libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj

2009-10-07 Thread Alvin Thompson
Anybody home? ** Changed in: libitext-java (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 445513] Re: can't connect to VPN

2009-10-07 Thread Alvin Thompson
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33232733/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Gconf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33232734/Gconf.txt ** Attachment added: IpAddr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33232736/IpAddr.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 445513] [NEW] can't connect to VPN

2009-10-07 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager When I try to connect to my office VPN, I get an error message like, Can't connect to VPN because the VPN service stopped unexpectedly. This connection worked fine in Jaunty and up until recently in Karmic. Relevant syslog messages: Oct

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-06 Thread Alvin Thompson
Of course i checked both the main repo and the US mirror and it wasn't there. But it's there as of today so good enough. -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Well put Martin! For a while there I thought everyone had gone nuts. I know no one wants extra work this close to a release but there are a lot of people (myself included) who depend on Maven. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
I updated to the latest packages and the shadow is still here for me... ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 408030] Re: Problem when resizing and the Panels

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
This is still not working. It looks as though none of the bugs that compiz (1:0.8.3+git20091005-0ubuntu5) was supposed to address have been... ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Problem when resizing and the Panels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408030

[Bug 408030] Re: Problem when resizing and the Panels

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Actually, it looks like the clock shadow fix is the only other issue addressed by this version that's also not working. -- Problem when resizing and the Panels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
The clock applet. Additionally, issue #408030 also is not resolved for me, but other issues in this version are (at least the polkit focus issue) are working. Here's some possibly relevant information: amd64 nVidia driver 185 clean install as of about 5 days ago For those that it's working,

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Yup, I rebooted a couple of times. -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
added a picture showing the shadow and compiz version ** Attachment added: problem still exists for me http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33050354/Screenshot-2.png -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Acer FX laptop 1920x1200 nVidia 9800 GTS -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
So the question is, why is my system showing as fully updated then? -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Dave, how did you get them? According to synaptic, the only one that was updated was compiz. -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
It looks like the packages were built for x86 but not amd64... -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
Or at least the packages were not released on amd64. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

[Bug 428783] Re: shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window

2009-10-05 Thread Alvin Thompson
No, it's not in http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic/main /binary-amd64/Packages.gz which is what counts. -- shadow remains on desktop after closing applet window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 436973] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-11-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2009-10-02 Thread Alvin Thompson
I think this occurred right after I did a clean install of a daily build (first update). It hasn't happened since. -- package linux-image-2.6.31-11-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

[Bug 435036] Re: acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway

2009-10-02 Thread Alvin Thompson
The fix to bug 435958 seems like it should have fixed this as well, but it didn't. :( -- acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-09-30 Thread Alvin Thompson
great! perhaps we can get this 'wishlist' item added then :) -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 436425] Re: nm-connection-editor crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_container_remove()

2009-09-30 Thread Alvin Thompson
same here. i tried to edit a vpn connection. ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- nm-connection-editor crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_container_remove() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436425 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 438820] [NEW] desktop install boots to TTY1 instead of GDM

2009-09-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart After recent updates to Karmic on my laptop (when most of the Sys-V stuff was replaced by upstart), booting my laptop brings me to TTY1 instead of GDM. Only after I manually switch to TTY7 will GDM finish loading and display the graphical login

[Bug 438820] Re: desktop install boots to TTY1 instead of GDM

2009-09-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32684093/Dependencies.txt -- desktop install boots to TTY1 instead of GDM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 438820] Re: desktop install boots to TTY1 instead of GDM

2009-09-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
As I said, ignore the stuff above. ** Summary changed: - desktop install boots to TTY1 instead of GDM + desktop install of Karmic boots to TTY1 instead of GDM ** Description changed: Binary package hint: upstart After recent updates to Karmic on my laptop (when most of the Sys-V stuff

[Bug 438820] Re: desktop install of Karmic boots to TTY1 instead of GDM on TTY7

2009-09-29 Thread Alvin Thompson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 434361 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434361 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 434361 gdm sometimes fails to switch to VT7 after new upstart merge -- desktop install of Karmic boots to TTY1 instead of GDM on TTY7

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-09-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
* compatible* -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-09-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
The new version of libplexus is not compatable with Maven 2.0.9, so Maven does not work at all. This is a blocker bug, not a wishlist item. Please change. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-09-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
I meant that the Maven that is currently in Karmic (2.0.9) does is completely broken (does not work at all with the synced version of libplexus). In this case Maven must be synced with libplexus in order for Maven to work. Since libplexus has already been synced, syncing the Maven package is no

[Bug 427539] Re: [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable

2009-09-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
The other alternative would be to slot the old versions of Maven's dependencies. -- [FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 411588] Re: libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj

2009-09-28 Thread Alvin Thompson
Can someone bump up the priority on this? Almost all of the other Java libraries have been changed in this manner for Karmic, and this is the only library package left that's preventing Maven from installing properly. -- libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj

[Bug 436973] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.31-11-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2009-09-25 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: upgrading packages via update-manager ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

[Bug 436973] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-11-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2009-09-25 Thread Alvin Thompson
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32466954/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32466955/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32466956/AptOrdering.txt **

[Bug 435036] [NEW] acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway

2009-09-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
Public bug reported: When trying to boot Karmic, I get this error in dmesg: [ 15.943654] acerhdf: Acer Aspire One Fan driver, v.0.5.16 [ 15.943658] acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway /P-7805u/9C.11.00 , please report, aborting! This appears similar to

[Bug 435036] Re: acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway

2009-09-22 Thread Alvin Thompson
** Attachment added: full dmesg output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32296850/dmesg -- acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Gateway https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 417301] Re: update-manager crashed with GError in __init__()

2009-09-01 Thread Alvin Thompson
ditto #16 -- update-manager crashed with GError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 417964] Re: Authentication always required to unmount media

2009-08-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
I just installed the latest updates. The 'eject' button on my laptop DVD works once for me after I reboot, but after I re-insert the disc, the eject button doesn't work again. I can eject through Nautilus without a password, however... ** Changed in: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu Karmic)

[Bug 417964] Re: Authentication always required to unmount media

2009-08-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
The eject button on the DVD *will* work subsequent times only after I manually unmount (for example, using the Unmount option in Nautilus. ** Changed in: devicekit Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Authentication always required to unmount media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417964

[Bug 417964] Re: Authentication always required to unmount media

2009-08-27 Thread Alvin Thompson
To avoid any confusion, after inserting the disc wait until it's automatically mounted. After the disc is mounted, you can't use the eject button on the DVD drive any more. -- Authentication always required to unmount media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417964 You received this bug

[Bug 48216] Re: renaming computer does not update correctly the files: hosts, hostnames

2009-08-26 Thread Alvin Thompson
ah, thanks -- renaming computer does not update correctly the files: hosts, hostnames https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 411580] Re: libantlr-java shouldn't recommend libantlr-java-gcj

2009-08-26 Thread Alvin Thompson
yup ** Changed in: antlr (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- libantlr-java shouldn't recommend libantlr-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 411580] Re: libantlr-java shouldn't recommend libantlr-java-gcj

2009-08-26 Thread Alvin Thompson
whoops ** Changed in: antlr (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- libantlr-java shouldn't recommend libantlr-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 386307] Re: -java package should not recommend -java-gcj counterpart on all architectures

2009-08-24 Thread Alvin Thompson
yup, i created separate bugs for the ones that Maven depends on, at least. :) -- -java package should not recommend -java-gcj counterpart on all architectures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 416025] Re: gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies()

2009-08-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
yup, the latest updates worked for me as well. i didn't need to reinstall gdebi. -- gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 416025] Re: gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies()

2009-08-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
can we add 'ant' and 'ant-optional' to this list? -- gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 386307] Re: -java package should not recommend -java-gcj counterpart on all architectures

2009-08-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
can we add 'ant' and 'ant-optional' to this list? -- -java package should not recommend -java-gcj counterpart on all architectures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 416025] Re: gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies()

2009-08-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
whoops, wrong bug! disregard #8 -- gdebi-gtk crashed with TypeError in get_dependencies() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 386307] Re: -java package should not recommend -java-gcj counterpart on all architectures

2009-08-21 Thread Alvin Thompson
also, 'libitext-java' would be nice since it's needed by Maven. here are others that i'm aware of: (canonical) libdb4.6-java libdb4.7-java libsac-java libsxltc-java (universe) libaxis-java libbcmail-java libbcpg-java libbctsp-java libitext-java libswt3.2-gtk-java -- -java package should not

  1   2   >