[Bug 1896498] [NEW] Ubuntu installer failed while trying "fresh" install over existing instalation on btrfs

2020-09-21 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Public bug reported: I have a previous installation of Ubuntu 16.04. My disk has 2 GPT partitions: /dev/sda1 for /boot/efi /dev/sda2 btrfs with 2 subvolumes: @ mounted as /, @home mounted as /home. I tried a fresh install of Ubuntu 20.04.1. I selected manual partitioning and /dev/sda1 was

[Bug 1550950] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-jdk-head

2018-03-10 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I'm on Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial). I just did a `apt update; apt upgrade`. ~$ apt show openjdk-9-jdk Package: openjdk-9-jdk Version: 9~b114-0ubuntu1 ... If I install this package I still get the error, so it seems the fixed version is not in the Xenial repos, yet. -- You received

[Bug 1701793] [NEW] package linux-image-4.8.0-58-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2017-07-01 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1701310 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701310 Public bug reported: This was reported upon reboot after a recommended software upgrade. I've got a Dell Latitude E7470 and recently a BIOS (UEFI) firmware upgrade was made by the software update system

[Bug 1393469] Re: indicator-printers does not show up when printing

2016-01-28 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I'm using Ubuntu 14.04, installed from scratch, not upgrade. The only unusual setup I can think of is that my root partition is btrfs. In my case, the problem is intermittent. Some days everything seems to work as expected. When it happens, I launch the system-config-printer tool and open the

[Bug 1393469] Re: indicator-printers does not show up when printing

2016-01-28 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
@ Alberto: Thanks for the suggestion. I had already done that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393469 Title: indicator-printers does not show up when printing To manage

[Bug 1333773] Re: scanning for btrfs file systems on system startup

2014-12-22 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I have a fresh 14.04 installation. I did set up a single partition as btrfs, with 2 subvolumes for / and /home, so removing brtfs-tools is out of question. The Scanning for btrfs file systems appears early on, but stays there for some 25 seconds until the boot resumes again. The system finally

[Bug 1164083] Re: libreoffice spams stdout with Fontconfig warning: ignoring C.UTF-8: not a valid language tag

2014-11-03 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I confirm this on a up-to-date ubuntu 14.04 amd64 server installation. My X server is running on a different machine. Running gnome-terminal gives: Fontconfig warning: ignoring C.UTF-8: not a valid language tag Maybe I could change locale settings to workaround this, but it is bug and there

[Bug 1341562] Re: indicator-printers not working on Ubuntu 14.04

2014-09-03 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I installed 14.04.1 (fresh, not an update) a week ago, and have kept it up-to-date. I have only installed a couple of packages from the standard repositories: vim, java, no fancy stuff. I configured a couple of network printers (via SMB print server), and noticed that when I print, no indicator

[Bug 768924] [NEW] nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed

2011-04-22 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Public bug reported: A few seconds/minutes after login in defaut unity session, the following messages start appearing in .xsession_errors: (nm-applet:1468): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed In spite of this, I

[Bug 768924] Re: nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed

2011-04-22 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768924/+attachment/2082104/+files/.xsession-errors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768924 Title: nm-applet

[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692

2010-08-03 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I'm just reporting that the issue is still there with Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS, kernel 2.6.32-24-generic-pae. I believe this has been confirmed by others. Should I report upstream? Anyone had better luck? João -- Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579865 You

[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692

2010-05-18 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I've installed mainline kernel linux-image-2.6.32-02063211-generic_2.6.32-02063211_i386.deb and rebooted. Tried a suspend and resume shows same symptoms as originally reported: no screen, no reaction. I've also tried kernel linux-image-2.6.34-999-generic_2.6.34-999.201005181210_i386.deb and

[Bug 579865] [NEW] Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692

2010-05-13 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Public bug reported: After a suspend, touching a key will restart the fans and there's disk activity, but the screen remains blank and there's no reaction to key presses (CapsLock won't toggle the led). This is a fresh install of Lucid Lynx 10.04, not an upgrade. Suspend/resume has worked on

[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692

2010-05-13 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378152/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378153/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378154/ArecordDevices.txt

[Bug 426418] Re: [Acer, inc. Aspire 1690] suspend/resume failure

2010-05-13 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Filed a new bug which is probably related (a duplicate?). See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579865 João Rodrigues -- [Acer, inc. Aspire 1690] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 538697] [NEW] Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash On a specific type of computer, while booting, a routine check of the root filesystem started and almost immediately the screen turned black and entered a power-saving mode. If left alone for some more time (1 minute or so), the computer stops

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: fstab http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926045/fstab -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
More info follows. ** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926068/lspci-vnvn.log ** Description changed: -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: menu.lst http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926086/menu.lst -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: uname-a.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926089/uname-a.txt -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Attachment added: usplash.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926092/usplash.conf -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem

2010-03-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
** Description changed: Binary package hint: usplash On a specific type of computer, while booting, a routine check of the root filesystem started and almost immediately the screen turned black and entered a power-saving mode. If left alone for some more time (1 minute or so), the

[Bug 360925] Re: md5sum check of UNR image fails in one file

2009-04-28 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I confirm this bug. After mounting (as VFAT) on a ubuntu 6.06 system, the correct file appears as: ff0358bc3eb43e9420a7f009482c278a ./pool/main/p/ppp/PPP_245~.D whereas md5sum.txt contains: ff0358bc3eb43e9420a7f009482c278a ./pool/main/p/ppp/ppp_2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2_i386.deb João

[Bug 120015] useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch

2007-06-12 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: passwd In a machine with nsswitch configured to used a LDAP server with around 5 users, trying to add a new local user (with useradd) takes a really long time. My /etc/nsswitch.conf contains this: passwd: files ldap group: files

[Bug 120015] Re: useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch

2007-06-12 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Forgot to say: I'm using Ubuntu 6.06 but I recall similar behavior with a Mandrake 10.1 distro a few years ago. This is probably a upstream problem. Some more info: In my current setup, ldap is only used for the passwd DB --- Kerberos is used for authentication, so there is no need for shadow

[Bug 67487] Re: Install 6:10 Failure: Black screen at Live Desktop Stage

2006-11-02 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I agree with Slogger that this might be related with bug #22985. At least some of the problems mentioned here look similar, but there are some new issues, too. Bug #22985 comes from Dapper (6.06), still exists in Edgy (6.10). In Dapper, switching to a console worked fine and a fix was easy to

[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong

2006-09-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
This probably does not belong here, but just to let you know: With latest update of the 686 kernel (2.6.15-26.47), restricted modules (2.6.15.11-4) and proprietary ATI fglrx driver (7.0.0-8.25.18+2.6.15.11-4), I now have hardware 3D with the 686 kernel. Problem seems to be gone. -- cpu idle

[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong

2006-08-14 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I confirm anonym's problems. I have an Acer aspire 1692WLmi, Pentium M740 with ATI X700 graphics. With the proprietary fglrx driver (version 8.25.18), hardware 3D is unavailable with -686 kernel (version 2.6.15-26.46) but works with -386 kernel. This can be verified by running glxinfo and

[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong

2006-08-04 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
Should the bug now be marked Fix released? According to the changelog on the latest (2.6.15-26.46) dapper kernel: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changel...6.46/changelog It seems to be out now. -- cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong https://launchpad.net/bugs/30557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong

2006-08-04 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
I'm now running linux-image-2.6.15-26-686, version 2.6.15-26.46 on a Pentium M 740 1.73MHz (Acer Aspire 1692WLMi). So far, it seems fine: Without changing max_cstate, CPU rapidly throtles down to 800MHz and, when idle, CPU usage settles around 5--6%. Starting new apps, such as opening a firefox

[Bug 30570] Re: CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it

2006-06-27 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 30557 *** On a Core Duo T2300 (1.6GHz), kernel -686 does not sem to have this problem. When idel, top reports tipically Cpu(s): 2.3% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.2% id, 0.0% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.0% si This seems to be the average between the 2 CPUs. System monitor

[Bug 30570] Re: CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it

2006-06-24 Thread João Manuel Rodrigues
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 30557 *** On a Core Duo T2300 (1.6GHz), kernel -686 does not sem to have this problem. When idel, top reports tipically Cpu(s): 2.3% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.2% id, 0.0% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.0% si This seems to be the average between the 2 CPUs. System monitor