OK, sounds good. Like I said, I don't have much time to deal with it
right now as I am moving so San Francisco. keep me posted if you guys
make any significant progress (ie, they fix it on their end or rework
the license). metasploit is a tool by them, for them, and we have the
benefit of
* Now talking on #ubuntu-motu
* Topic for #ubuntu-motu is: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTUs?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://ubuntu.joejaxx.org/
- TOP 10 Uploaders/Packages | REVU is back up on a new box at the
I agree with everything you mentioned here, especially braking up the
packages. I am actually glad that Ubuntu is rejecting it :-) it
shows me that people care about what packages make it into the
repositories and results in a high quality system for the users. I am
a long time user since Warty
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
I just updated my Gutsy install, but I don't see it. Has it made it
into multiverse yet? This is the last day. Do you want me to get on
#ubuntu-motu and coordinate this with
** Attachment added: poster.mov
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012289/poster.mov
--
MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: poster.mov.2pass.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012291/poster.mov.2pass.log
--
MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gpac
Tried to encode this video using podencoder, which makes a call to
MP4Box, which may be corrupting itself. I have not looked at the source
to see if this is a security issue or not. Tested on Feisty...
podencoder is a shell script available from
** Attachment added: poster.mov.mencoder.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012292/poster.mov.mencoder.log
--
MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
So is it officially in Gutsy now? Can I sudo aptitude update sudo
aptitude install metasploit3 ??
--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not yet, I have uploaded to my PPA, (not sure the status of that system
yet). I will upload to REVU now...time to face the fire.
I know some of the packaging people at Canonical/Ubuntu. If they give
you a hard time, mention Kristian Erik
I can confirm this in latest updates of Gutsy on my HP amd64 laptop...
** Changed in: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I have a bcm4306 wifi chipset, and this all worked in feisty amd64, as
well as gutsy amd64 until a week ago...
** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: ndiswrapper = linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Network Team
--
ndiswrapper
Oh, forgot to mention that blacklisting the ndiswrapper module still
resulted in bootup deadlocking. But, manually deleting
'/lib/modules/2.6.22-10-generic/ubuntu/misc/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper.ko'
allowed the system to boot properly...
--
ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
On 8/21/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pulled the latest snapshot from (Rev:5080), however all of the
permission issues are still present.
The permissions issues are able to be modified, and do not fall under
the relevant source code changes policy. They did fix the ruby files
On 8/20/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be packaging tonight, and will place the package online for testing
etc.
Let me know if you are interested in testing.
Great! Sure, I will test it. I think we should make the 'subversion'
package a RECOMMENDS. What do you think?
--
On 8/17/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian, I know you have been attempting to speak with the MSF Dev's.
Any chance they will apply the patches upstream? Alessandro is right,
it would make things a lot easier, because then we would have no need to
edit the source.
hdm is
I am also encountering this bug.
--
[Feisty] Wide screen not correctly detected (16/10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67369
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, well, we should be good to go, I was able to integrate the needed
permission changes into the build. The Ruby patch applies as well.
Excellent.
Any other needed changes?
Not that I can think of!
I'll post linda/lintian without SVN
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello guys,
i was away this days for the CCCamp.
I heard it was a good time from my hackers on a plane friends :-)
I see that you done a good work, but remember that tha msf sources can't
modified.
So you can't apply any sort of
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's break down the License, and see where we fall.
OK. So let's do this. Will msf3 work unmodified? And will Ubuntu
allow msf3 to slip in unmodified into multiverse? If so, I say we
just add it to Gutsy ASAP and then worry about cleaning
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right, and none of us (as far as I know) are lawyers, nor Dev's
for MSF. But it is clear to me that modifications are allowed, and they
would result in a cleaner package. Just throwing everything together,
without fixing the current
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that we need a law expert, and as i say in the first posts of
this bug the only easy way is that the msf dev team start to distribute
good archive.
Yes ok, but that law does not come into play unless the package is
modified, right?
Thank you for working on this!
--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
--
feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to check into this a bit more, as I asked about the policy (when I
started working on MSF), and was told, it is not against policy, just frowned
upon. The problem, without the SVN updates, the user would be unable to pull
the new
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E: metasploit: wrong-path-for-ruby ./usr/share/metasploit/external
/ruby-pcapx/examples/tcpdump.rb #!/usr/local/bin/ruby
Your script does _NOT_ seem to fix this error. However, I do not get
that output with or without your patch.
It
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ssl-cert
# make-ssl-cert /usr/share/ssl-cert/ssleay.cnf
/etc/apache2/ssl/apache.pem
If the ssl sub-directory in /etc/apache2 does not exist, and you try to
create the certificate, everything appears to have gone OK, but the file
is never written to
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the diff patch to correct Ruby paths...
** Attachment added: Ruby Path Correction (diff/patch)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8841542/ruby.patch
Great! So is it ready to be uploaded for Gutsy??? :-)
--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
--
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Ruby issue has been resolved, but the scripts method for determining
the correct permissions only partial worked. We still have plenty of
permissions issues. So we need to decide how we will proceed with
those.
Can you post the warning
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you post the warning messages?
W: metasploit; Executable
/usr/local/metasploit/framework-3.0/external/source/meterpreter/source/extensions/stdapi/server/net/net.h
with perms 0755 is not an ELF file or script.
Seems this should have
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When packaging you cannot modify the source package at all, other then
through patches.
As such I added the patch to the debian/rules. Let me check something.
My file is a shell script, not a patch made with diff. And I made the
script
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, I made a diff, after running your script, thats the RUBY patch
above.
Of course :-) I saw that...
However, 'diff' doesn't catch the change in file permissions etc.
Yup!
Therefore, within the debian/rules I used part of your
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is a build function to do this, I just need to find it
Let me know if you find it...
I am on the road, will be back on the PC in 45.
No problem. I just got back from the BeanSec security meetup in
Boston. Fun times...
--
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so I got it working, sort of.
I am now getting an error from you function, looking into this.
Post the output?
--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
I hope you have spoken with hdm about this, as the package is not freely
distributable per the Metasploit license agreement. See my duplicate
bug. I am currently try to engage them to make us a proper
On 8/14/07, Bryan McLellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, many of the scripts were not written by the authors. There
are scripts in these packages using a number of different licenses,
including GPL, MPL, Perl Artistic, BSD (with advertising clause), and
many pieces of code without
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Kristian Hermansen, I'll make further comments on bug 102212.
This bug has been labeled as invalid.
You can still help package it when the time
On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too have a packaged version, from the unmodified metasploit release,
it is more then possible to build the deb with the SVN, as SVN is used
to update the exploits, and other framework modules. May not be the
ideal build, but can work.
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues
with it...
** Attachment added: Patch to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835571/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues
with it...
** Attachment added: Script to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835572/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
If you could submit a backtrace from the automated crash tool (apport),
that would be helpful in getting at why this is occurring...thanks!
** Changed in: xfce4-mixer (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608
On 7/22/07, Kristian Hermansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make
the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run
it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that
sound? Do you want to write
Public bug reported:
http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdca.html
libdca - a free DTS Coherent Acoustics decoder
libdca is a free library for decoding DTS Coherent Acoustics streams.
The code is written by Gildas Bazin and was based on the a52dec project.
It is released under the terms of the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vlc
This file looks bad in vlc, but fine in totem. Only 1/4 of the top is
seen in vlc, whereas totem shows the full picture...
http://www.stevenshiau.org/misc/Clonezilla-talk-by-Kristian.mp4
** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
I am marking this bug as invalid, but please reopen if you have more
information.
** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107778
You received this bug notification because you are a member
a MOTU, and then from there, try to work on the Commercial repos...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
about this, he just mentioned that they
didn't have enough time or resources to get a RealPlay package into
Feisty Fawn (7.04). So, I think it would be a good idea to leave the
bug open so that we can mark it RESOLVED if Gutsy adds the package
again...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
feisty-commercial does
)
OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make
the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run
it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that
sound? Do you want to write it or have me do it? I don't care,
either way...
--
Kristian
this is
all interpreted code. Just let me know what your method was for
building the completed DEB...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
previously so that your DEB is legal to the
license agreement (unchanged package)? Do I understand you correctly?
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
involved. Let's make it work.
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
a clause that allows such simple modifications. How
does that sound?
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Summary changed:
- [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness
conversion from int to unsigned int in fuction call
+ [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness
conversion from int to unsigned int in function call
--
[PR 26167, fixed in
This issue is mentioned by some Debian folks...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00144.html
And the apparent realization of the issue, with no solution given...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00147.html
--
coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptitude
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.04
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux hermbuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686
I do not agree with your statement below, as it appears you are not
familiar with Canonical's commercial Ubuntu repository!
http://archive.canonical.com/dists/edgy-
commercial/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
Notice that realplay is there. It has nothing to do with the software
provider. I want to
leoquant,
OK. But then I must ask the question about how to file a bug report on
Canonical's commercial repositories. How would I do that? Launchpad
and Ubuntu are both funded by Canonical. However, I don't understand
why realplay dropped from the commercial repositories, and neither do
many
Couldn't you guys just use nvidia-glx rather than nvidia-glx-new?
Does that resolve your issues?
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
. This is the
dangerous game you play when utilizing closed source drivers. The
binary packages are out of the developers hands...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
[nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Assigning to ubuntu-installer team...
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Installer Team
--
ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112444
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 54050 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54050
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 54050
helix-player conflicts with realplay
--
realplay install conflicts with helix-player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92234
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Why did realplay disappear from feisty-commercial?
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857
You received this bug notification because
I am presenting on this topic at Ubuntu LIve. Can I mention any updates
to this bug at the conference?
http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_sess/12510
http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_spkr/3455
--
[need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98886
You
** Summary changed:
- icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments
+ icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arguments
--
icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arguments
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110601
You received this bug notification because you
I no longer use the Audioscrobbler feature, so I cannot reproduce.
Marking as closed, unless someone else wants to try and reproduce...
** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Summary changed:
- unknown banshee crash
+ audioscrobbler plugin crashes banshee while
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218138/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218139/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218140/ProcStatus.txt
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xfce4-mixer
Happens on login...
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CoreDump:
Date: Tue Jun 19 08:05:51 2007
Disassembly:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-mixer-plugin
NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom
This happens on Gutsy. It only happened once, and I cannot reproduce to
obtain backtrace. Please close.
--
xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
Marking as FIXED. Bug closed...
** Changed in: blackbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Blackbox fails to install if Fluxbox is also installed due to shared
/usr/bin/bsetroot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29503
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Seeing this also in Gutsy...
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
openoffice crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115705
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 111940 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111940
I am still seeing this issues in the supposedly FIXED version as
well...so I wonder what is wrong! :-(
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[gutsy] Open Office crashs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 111940 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111940
$ aptitude search openoffice.org~i | while read line; do sudo aptitude
reinstall `echo $line | awk '{print $2}'`; done
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
responders, and the methods used make use of ping, which does not work
behind firewalls or places where an HTTP/FTP proxy is in use only.
Additionally, it is a GUI, so what if an Ubuntu Server admin wants to
get the same effect from the command line? What does he do?
--
Kristian Hermansen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-properties-gtk
instead of writing a custom python solution, why isn't apt-spy utilized?
I have found the python implementation to be somewhat slow and less than
ideal. Does anyone else agree?
$ aptitude show apt-spy
Package: apt-spy
New: yes
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nemesis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
Linux khermans-laptop 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Wed May 23 00:30:47 UTC 2007
x86_64 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty
OK, so it definitely sounds like a packaging error. Assigning to the
Ubuntu Kernel Video team.
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: grub = linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Video Team
--
Feisty don't work with
** Summary changed:
- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
+ libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
--
libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831
You received this bug notification
nevertheless. Let me know if you have any other info. As I said, the
8800 GTS is reported to not be working, yet it is claimed to be
supported by the nvidia-glx-new package. This has been confirmed by
numerous reports...
--
Kristian Hermansen
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 98641
with a clean
system can either confirm or deny the bug. Thanks for the info...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
adding new entries to alacarte has no effect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: xorg = grub
--
Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
make dmraid play nice with udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
From the various accounts of the issue, some different than others, I am
uncertain still exactly what the issue is. All I know is that there are
more than enough complaints to move this to someone's queue for
inspection. I am sending to Ubuntu Desktop bugs. If there is a better
place for it,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gaim
Many corporations use Sametime/Meanwhile, so it might be a good idea to
move libmeanwhile1 into the depends section for gaim. Corporations that
use Sametime already and may be possibly moving to Gaim will be happy
that it is available by default.
I ran into a similar issue. Appears to be a bug in udev upstream?
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703
--
System doesn't boot after upgrade to feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
Is this not an upstream bug in udev?
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703
--
Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Could be upstream bug in udev?
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
dmraid no longer sees partitions in Feisty after upgrade from Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111030
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
I booted an amd64 CD for Feisty and tried to set my /home partition to
be on /dev/md0. Here's what happened:
$ sudo -i
# aptitude install mdadm
# mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3
# mkfs.reiser /dev/md0
Now run installer. You
dmraid is for FakeRAID. mdadm is for Linux-only software RAID and is a
completely different concept. So, it still appears that my initial bug
report is legitimate.
--
ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during
installation
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-kdump
I am experiencing many kernel panics on an amd64 laptop. I wanted to
try kdump to get some more info, but I see it is not available any
longer. Maybe a dev can explain why? And how can I get to the bottom
of my kernel panics (hard
I can confirm this one too!!!
--
apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tremulous
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ dpkg -l tremulous
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: isic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic
usage: icmpsic [-v] [-D] -s sourceip[,port] -d destination ip[,port]
[-r seed] [-m max kB/s to generate]
[-p pkts to generate] [-k skip packets] [-x send packet X times]
Percentage Opts: [-F frags]
Removes info about optional port designations for icmpsic...
** Attachment added: fixes the usage requirements
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7438406/isic-0.06-icmpsic_ports-kristianhermansen.patch
--
icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments
My last patch left out a few places...just noticed some more issues, so
use this patch instead...
** Attachment added: fixes the usage requirements and examples
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7438719/isic-0.06-icmpsic_ports-kristianhermansen.patch
--
icmpsic should not accept
it stopped happening.
OK, great. I will close the issue. Feel free to reopen if you can
reproduce with whatever settings caused it previously.
--
Kristian Hermansen
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Andrew Ash = (unassigned)
Status: Needs Info = Confirmed
** Changed in: amarok
This is on Feisty? Can you post some more details if you have them?
When did it last work, etc. I will check it out tonight...
** Changed in: gstreamer (Ubuntu)
Status: Rejected = Needs Info
--
cannot select mp3 encoding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107846
You received this bug
On 4/22/07, Dan O'Huiginn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked ogra about this bug in irc, and he said:
(06:30:42 PM) ogra: hwdb-send should probably just move out of /usr/bin so it
doesnt need a manpage
Where are you planning to move it to?
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
hwdb-send man page
it encounters an
encrypted DVD and no decryption libraries are installed.
--
Kristian Hermansen
** Summary changed:
- [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if libdvdcss2 is not installed
+ [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not
installed
--
[feisty
** Changed in: k9copy (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
--
[feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not
installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93175
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
I purged libdvdcss2 and tried again with the DVD 'Miracle'. I could not
reproduce the issue. I anyone else can, please place your comments
here.
--
[feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not
installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93175
You received this
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
