[Bug 1872968] [NEW] dash to dock settings fail because gnome-shell-extension-prefs is not installed, but even installing doesn't fix it.

2020-04-15 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 20.04 daily build 20.04.14 Steps to reproduce: Right click in the bottom left corner of the screen (on the nine dots). Choose Dash to Dock Settings. You will get a warning that gnome-shell-extension-prefs is not installed. Install it in a terminal window (apt

[Bug 1803883] Re: iostat command behaves contrary to the man page

2018-11-23 Thread Lieven
Well, actually I installed the bionic version on cosmic, so I downgraded sysstat from version 12 to version 11. ** Attachment removed: "iostat.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1803883/+attachment/5215768/+files/iostat.txt ** Attachment added: "iostat.txt"

[Bug 1803883] Re: iostat command behaves contrary to the man page

2018-11-23 Thread Lieven
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803883 Title: iostat command behaves contrary to the man page To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1803883] Re: iostat command behaves contrary to the man page

2018-11-23 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: "iostat.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1803883/+attachment/5215768/+files/iostat.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803883 Title:

[Bug 1803883] Re: iostat command behaves contrary to the man page

2018-11-23 Thread Lieven
Hi Karl I executed the following commands both on cosmic and bionic: iostat 1 5 iostat -y 1 5 As you can see from my attachment (iostat.txt) the -y command behaves different, or even erratic on cosmic. Let me know if you need more info. ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid

[Bug 1803883] [NEW] iostat command behaves contrary to the man page

2018-11-18 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 18.10 cosmic The iostat man page states the following: [code]The first report generated by the iostat command provides statistics concerning the time since the system was booted, unless the -y option is used (in this case, this first report is omitted)[/code] When

[Bug 357019] Re: KDevelop debugger stops working

2017-01-12 Thread Lieven Tytgat
Bug for kdevelop 3.5 (ancient) ** Changed in: kdevelop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357019 Title: KDevelop debugger stops working To manage

[Bug 371123] Re: autosave

2017-01-12 Thread Lieven Tytgat
Old bug report for version 3.5 ** Changed in: kdevelop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdevelop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371123 Title: autosave To manage

[Bug 1588282] Re: flightgear tutorial doesn't start at airport

2016-06-02 Thread Lieven
Thanks for your comment. I'll try your suggestion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588282 Title: flightgear tutorial doesn't start at airport To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1588282] [NEW] flightgear tutorial doesn't start at airport

2016-06-02 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: ubuntu xenial (16.04) flightgear 2016.2.1-0ubuntu1~ppa5~xenial1 I expected the Tutorial would start at Livermore Municipal Airport (like it says in the text) Instead, the aircraft starts crashing in the sea, after which it's not possible to start the engine because it's

[Bug 1549168] Re: Touchpad does not generate evdev events

2016-03-01 Thread Lieven Tytgat
Fixed in 4.4.0-8 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549168 Title: Touchpad does not generate evdev events To

[Bug 1549168] [NEW] Touchpad does not generate evdev events

2016-02-24 Thread Lieven Tytgat
Public bug reported: Since at least kernel 4.4.0-4 I do not get any touchpad events. (The elantech touchpad) This laptop has a touchscreen, which works correct. Connecting a bluetooth mouse also works ok. I have tested with evtest, and did not receive any events, while I did from the

[Bug 752542] Re: ACPI DSDT info

2015-10-13 Thread Lieven Van Acker
git clone git://github.com/Lekensteyn/acpi-stuff.git cd acpi-stuff/acpi_dump_info make sudo make load cat /proc/acpi/dump_info :00:00.0 06 \_SB_.PCI0.ADSP :00:01.0 060400 \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0 :00:02.0 03 \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0 :00:03.0 040300 \_SB_.PCI0.B0D3 :00:14.0 0c0330

[Bug 1479756] [NEW] wine doesn't install in chrooted environment

2015-07-30 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS wine 1.6.2-0ubuntu4 kernel 3.13.0-61-generic #100 When installing wine in a chrooted environment, I expected wine to install just like every other package. Instead, it refuses with the following message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean

[Bug 658865] Re: Install from USB fails: An attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from the CD failed

2015-05-09 Thread Lieven
I created a custom live cd, and had this problem too. It was solved by removing the file /usr/share/ubiquity/apt-setup, then recreating it again by hand and giving it the right permissions (see below) 1. sudo rm /usr/share/ubiquity/apt-setup 2. sudo nano /usr/share/ubiquity/apt-setup 3. enter the

[Bug 1080674] Re: [QEMU] Corrupted desktop screen for raring desktop installation in QEMU guest (Cirrus graphics). Affects KVM but not VBox.

2013-11-11 Thread Peter Lieven
Looking further it seems that the root cause is that the CIRRUS driver cannot be used in 12.04.3 because of this [ 579.647] (EE) cirrus: The PCI device 0xb8 at 00@00:02:0 has a kernel module claiming it. [ 579.647] (EE) cirrus: This driver cannot operate until it has been unloaded. It seems

[Bug 1080674] Re: [QEMU] Corrupted desktop screen for raring desktop installation in QEMU guest (Cirrus graphics). Affects KVM but not VBox.

2013-11-10 Thread Peter Lieven
Are you sure that the problem is between libcairo 1.12.2 and 1.12.4? I recechecked with Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS 64bit Desktop CDROM with is based on libcario 1.10.2 and it also shows this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1080674] Re: [QEMU] Corrupted desktop screen for raring desktop installation in QEMU guest (Cirrus graphics). Affects KVM but not VBox.

2013-11-10 Thread Peter Lieven
And has anyone tested this with a real Cirrus Logic graphic card? I still wonder if this is an emulation bug in qemu or a driver problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080674 Title:

[Bug 874199]

2013-08-01 Thread Lieven-vanacker
I can confirm the above. Also running on KDE 4.10.5. Only workaround is to set an empty password on the wallet, which completely misses the intended purpose of the application. I cannot understand the lack of attention to this bug, cause it renders the complete DE very insecure. -- You received

[Bug 1173533] [NEW] selected menu choice not visible

2013-04-27 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Raring version of libreoffice: 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1 When pointing to a menu item, let's say file, open, the selected choice isn't highlighted properly in orange. It is highlighted properly, however, if i remove the included libreoffice and install it from

[Bug 1173533] Re: selected menu choice not visible

2013-04-27 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: Libreoffice downloaded from website.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1173533/+attachment/3655963/+files/Libreoffice%20downloaded%20from%20website.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1156217] Re: panel on the left hides icons added to the desktop

2013-03-17 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: 2013-03-17-141624_1366x768_scrot.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1156217/+attachment/3579575/+files/2013-03-17-141624_1366x768_scrot.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1156217] [NEW] panel on the left hides icons added to the desktop

2013-03-17 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: Add a panel to the left of the screen. This is done by: Right-clicking the bottom panel on an empty space Clicking add new panel In the dialog that appears, choose left. Next, add some icons to the desktop. This is done by: Right-clicking an

[Bug 1155775] Re: screen resolution locked at 1024x768, module i915 not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
** Summary changed: - screen resolution locked at 1024x768 + screen resolution locked at 1024x768, module i915 not available -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155775 Title: screen

[Bug 1155911] [NEW] no network connection because module jme is not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 13.04 daily build, march 12, 2013 I will attach the following files lspci.txt (output of lspci -vvnn) dmesg.txt (dmesg) lsmod.txt (output of lsmod) I will also attach the file 12.04-lsmod.txt, which gives the output of the same lsmod command, but run from

[Bug 1155911] Re: no network connection because module jme is not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1155911/+attachment/3577521/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155911 Title: no

[Bug 1155911] Re: no network connection because module jme is not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: lsmod.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1155911/+attachment/3577522/+files/lsmod.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155911 Title: no

[Bug 1155911] Re: no network connection because module jme is not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: 12.04-lsmod.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1155911/+attachment/3577523/+files/12.04-lsmod.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155911

[Bug 1155775] Re: screen resolution locked at 1024x768, module i915 not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
I'll attach the output of lsmod below (lsmod.txt) ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) ** Attachment added: lsmod.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1155775/+attachment/3577553/+files/lsmod.txt ** Summary changed: - screen resolution locked at 1024x768,

[Bug 1155775] Re: screen resolution locked at 1024x768 because module i915 not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
I am unable to run the command apport-collect 1155775, because I have no internet connection, due to bug #1155911. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1155775] Re: screen resolution locked at 1024x768 because module i915 not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Ok, it turns out that this unwanted behaviour is a consequence of not selecting the standard proposed kernel during debian-installer. I'll file a separate bug report for that. This one can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1155911] Re: no network connection because module jme is not available

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Ok, it turns out this unwanted behaviour is due to not selecting the standard proposed kernel during debian-installer. I'll file a separate bug report for that. This bug can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1156009] [NEW] If not selecting the standard linux-generic kernel, essential kernel modules are not installed

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 13.04 alternate daily build march 12, 2013 During installation, when selecting the kernel, you have the following choices: linux-generic linux-image-generic linux-image-extra-3.8.0-12-generic linux-image-3.8.0-12-generic none The first option,

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Ok, it turns out this unwanted behaviour is due to not selecting the standard proposed kernel during debian-installer. I'll file a separate report for that issue. This one can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1156040] [NEW] wallpaper defaults to none every time the desktop preferences dialog is opened

2013-03-16 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Ubuntu 13.04 daily build, march 12, 2013 Assuming a wallpaper was set. When right-clicking the desktop, then choosing desktop preferences, the wallpaper defaults immediately to none, without any user interaction. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04

[Bug 1155775] Re: screen resolution locked at 1024x768

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155775/+attachment/3576517/+files/lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155775 Title:

[Bug 1155775] [NEW] screen resolution locked at 1024x768

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 13.04 daily build march 12, 2013 Screen resolution is not detected properly at boot. xrandr -q shows only one resolution (1024x768), which means I can't change the resolution once the system is up and running. I'll attach the files Xorg.0.log (xorg.txt) and

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155788/+attachment/3576564/+files/lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155788 Title:

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155788/+attachment/3576565/+files/lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155788 Title:

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: uname-a.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155788/+attachment/3576570/+files/uname-a.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155788 Title:

[Bug 1155788] [NEW] usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 13.04 daily build, march 12, 2013 My mouse is an optical Trust usb-mouse. It has 2 buttons and one scroll wheel. It does not work in Lubuntu 13.04, whereas in 12.04 it worked fine. I'll attach the following files: xorg.txt (Xorg.0.log) lspci.txt (output of

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: version_sig.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155788/+attachment/3576573/+files/version_sig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155788

[Bug 1155788] Re: usb-mouse doesn't work

2013-03-15 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1155788/+attachment/3576574/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155788 Title:

[Bug 608023] Re: Startup Disk Creator doesn't start , An error occurred while talking to the udisks service.

2012-08-28 Thread Lieven
None of the workarounds indicated here seem to work. However, installing the package python-gnome2 did work. I found this on the following site: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick in about half an hour after the error occurred to me. -- You received this bug

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Lieven
Fix in vanilla kernel is released. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ChangeLog-3.2.24 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-07-24 Thread Peter Lieven
The patch is still not in 3.2-stable (but in 3.0-stable). I asked the 3.2 mainline kernel maintainer to add it. Can it be cherry picked for inclusion in precise-updates meanwhile? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-07-24 Thread Peter Lieven
just got info from ben hutchings that the patch went into 3.2.24-rc1 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/bwh/linux-3.2.y-queue.git;a=commit;h=d0551d1a37f8431e33d76573aa92998847614633 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-07-05 Thread Peter Lieven
Is this in precise in the meantime? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985516 Title: vhost: don't forget to schedule() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 985516] [NEW] vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Lieven
Public bug reported: Please consider the above patch from linux 3.4-rc1 to be included in oneiric and precise kernels. Otherwise the CPU executing a vhost thread will get stuck under heavy load. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Lieven
This bug is already confirm and a patch has been submitted to upstream kernel. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985516

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Lieven
Its in: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/testing/patch-3.4-rc1.bz2 diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index c14c42b95ab8..947f00d8e091 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Lieven
Sorry, I might have misunderstood your question I think. It has not yet appeared in 3.2.x which is the long term kernel afaik. However, I can confirm that in the latest 3.2.x kernel from kernel.org the patch is not present. I have encountered this bug when experimenting with vhost-net on the

[Bug 985516] Re: vhost: don't forget to schedule()

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Lieven
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.2.0-23.36 ** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985516

[Bug 948329] [NEW] Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved with JWM

2012-03-06 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Ubuntu 12.04 beta 1 package: lxappearance 0.5.1-1 window manager: JWM Steps to reproduce: Change the default font on the first tab, apply changes and exit. Reopen lxappearance and the font is again what it was before the change was made. The fact that the changes

[Bug 948329] Re: Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved

2012-03-06 Thread Lieven
Sorry, this only seems the case from within JWM window manager ** Description changed: Release: Ubuntu 12.04 beta 1 package: lxappearance 0.5.1-1 + window manager: JWM - Steps to reproduce: + Steps to reproduce: Change the default font on the first tab, apply changes and exit.

[Bug 948329] Re: Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved outside openbox

2012-03-06 Thread Lieven
It's also the case for xfce, so I guess it's only working well with openbox. ** Summary changed: - Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved with JWM + Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved outside openbox -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 948329] Re: Changes made in lxappearance are not preserved outside openbox

2012-03-06 Thread Lieven
It seems this is related to the lubuntu-default theme. With other themes, everything seems ok. This brings me to the following question: Can I use the lubuntu-default-theme outside openbox without problems? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 945666] [NEW] guvcview doesn't start: Fatal: g_thread NOT supported

2012-03-03 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 12.04 beta i386 Version: guvcview 1.5.0-1 I was expecting guvcview would start by clicking it in the menu, but it didn't. I retried from terminal which gave the above error message. ** Affects: guvcview (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 945683] [NEW] lxappearance-obconf shows no preview in combination with default screen font

2012-03-03 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Release: Lubuntu 12.04 beta i386 Version: lxappearance-obconf 0.0.1-0ubuntu2 When you open lxappearance, go to the tab window border. No preview of the theme is shown. Go to the last tab (I guess Other in English) on the second tab row and change the font for screen display

[Bug 945683] Re: lxappearance-obconf shows no preview in combination with default screen font

2012-03-03 Thread Lieven
Another weird thing is, when a change in lxappearance is made, the changes are saved into the file ~/gtk-3.0/settings.ini Notice that the folder gtk-3.0 doesn't start with a dot, so it 's not a hidden folder. Maybe this explains why some applied changes get lost. -- You received this bug

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically, unless it has been remastered

2011-09-08 Thread Lieven
** Summary changed: - lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically + lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically, unless it has been remastered -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically, unless it has been remastered

2011-09-08 Thread Lieven
** Description changed: Booting of X doesn't succeed. Instead I get a CLI-prompt. If I type startx, then X starts, but at least two things are wrong: Firstly, the layout is not the lubuntu-layout. Instead it's a standard lxde-layout with the gnome-icon-theme. Secondly, I have to

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically, unless it has been remastered

2011-09-08 Thread Lieven
Thanks for your response. Well, it's a live-cd booting problem, if I can get to X, I assume the installation will continue normally. In a few moments, I'll use startx to start it, and I'll try to install it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically, unless it has been remastered

2011-09-08 Thread Lieven
Ok, after installation, the system seems normal. The ubiquity-installer doesn't look very good however, the title and the text just above the progressbar isn't visible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 842860] [NEW] lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Booting of X doesn't succeed. Instead I get a CLI-prompt. I've I type startx, then X starts, but at least two things are wrong: Firstly, the layout is not the lubuntu-layout. Instead it's a standard lxde-layout with the gnome-icon-theme. Secondly, I have to mount usb-sticks

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842860/+attachment/2362125/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842860 Title:

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/842860/+attachment/2362126/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842860 Title:

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/842860/+attachment/2362127/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842860 Title:

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
It 's already booting for more than 20 minutes, and still no X. I don't think that's reasonable, especially not because it's a rather new computer with a dual-core cpu and 4 GB RAM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 842860] Re: lubuntu-11.10-beta1-desktop-i386.iso doesn't boot to X automatically

2011-09-06 Thread Lieven
** Description changed: - Booting of X doesn't succeed. Instead I get a CLI-prompt. I've I type startx, then X starts, but at least two things are wrong: - Firstly, the layout is not the lubuntu-layout. Instead it's a standard lxde-layout with the gnome-icon-theme. Secondly, I have to mount

[Bug 740258] Re: Pixmap memory leak in gtk-window-decorator

2011-08-14 Thread Lieven van der Heide
I fixed this one in lp:~lievenvanderheide/compiz/PixmapLeakFix. The problem seemed to be that the author assumed GdkPixmap's was reference counted like a GtkObject (ie, initially a floating reference, which must be ref'ed to become a real reference). GdkPixmap doesn't derive from GtkObject though,

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-11 Thread Lieven
Sorry, ignore this bug. I guess I got this problem because not the whole xserver was installed. It's working fine now, so you can delete this report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: list of packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328/+attachment/2263984/+files/packages.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328 Title: Display manager

[Bug 823328] [NEW] Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: After a fresh command line install of ubuntu 11.10 alpha 3 using the alternate installer, I installed some packages using the files attached below. The file packages.txt contains just a list of packages, the file install.sh is a script that installs the packages listed in

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: installation script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/823328/+attachment/2263985/+files/install.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328 Title: Display

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/823328/+attachment/2263986/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328 Title: Display manager

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/823328/+attachment/2263987/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328 Title: Display manager doesn't

[Bug 823328] Re: Display manager doesn't show up, screen resolution wrong

2011-08-09 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: /etc/lxdm/default.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/823328/+attachment/2263988/+files/default.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823328 Title:

[Bug 428817] Re: Print Dialog does not allow editing of page parameters

2011-07-28 Thread Lieven Blancke
I think I have found a workaround: This problem does not occur on a fresh ubuntu install if I add my printer (HP Color LaserJet 2605dn) as a LPD/LPR-printer. The the device URI is lpd://ipaddress/PASSTHRU Can anyone confirm this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 428817] Re: Print Dialog does not allow editing of page parameters

2011-07-26 Thread Lieven Blancke
@Swift Arrow (swiftarrow9) Eye Of Gnome (2.32.1) does not even have a Page Setup in the Image menu. The applications that *do* have a Page Setup entry in the File menu do not provide a Paper Type option, only page orientation and paper size. I can find no way at all to set the paper type. This is

[Bug 428817] Re: Print Dialog does not allow editing of page parameters

2011-07-02 Thread Lieven Blancke
Fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 on two different PC's. Printer: HP Color LaserJet 2605dn (via network) No matter if I try to print from Eye of Gnome 2.32.1, Shotwell 0.9.3 or Gimp 2.6, I cannot change the Paper Type:. It's stuck at Not available (Greyed out). I attached a screen shot. I remember

[Bug 428817] Re: Print Dialog does not allow editing of page parameters

2011-07-02 Thread Lieven Blancke
correction on my previous comment #15, both have a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.04! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428817 Title: Print Dialog does not allow editing of page parameters

[Bug 781557] [NEW] multiple search domains not honoured

2011-05-12 Thread Lieven Van Acker
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: resolvconf in /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base I have search domain1.local domain2.local When trying to connect to a host in domain2.local using only the hostname, only the first domain is searched by my local dnscache (dnsmasq): lieven@T500:~$ ping

[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured

2011-05-12 Thread Lieven Van Acker
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 758931] Re: any script executed assumes you are root, even when you're not

2011-04-12 Thread Lieven
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758931 Title: any script executed assumes you are root, even when you're not -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 759019] [NEW] ~ in script refers to /root instead of /home/username

2011-04-12 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptdaemon Ubuntu 11.04 beta When executing the following script, #!/bin/bash echo ~ it returns /root, whereas in previous ubuntu versions, it returned /home/username (see attached screenshot) ** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 759019] Re: ~ in script refers to /root instead of /home/username

2011-04-12 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: home.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759019/+attachment/2025496/+files/home.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759019 Title: ~ in script refers to /root

[Bug 759019] Re: ~ in script refers to /root instead of /home/username

2011-04-12 Thread Lieven
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759019 Title: ~ in script refers to /root instead of /home/username -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 736953] [NEW] Unity doesn't start, screen stays purple/darkred, only curser can move

2011-03-17 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity Alternate installl i386 Ubuntu Natty alpha 3 with all updates applied Using ATI Radeon X300SE 128 MB Unity 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Single monitor setup, using 1280x1024 resolution After doing an alternate install of natty alpha3, doing all updates, unity

[Bug 736953] Re: Unity doesn't start, screen stays purple/darkred, only curser can move

2011-03-17 Thread Lieven
** Attachment added: apport.unity.xY5BMv.apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736953/+attachment/1915070/+files/apport.unity.xY5BMv.apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736953

[Bug 736957] Re: file gnome-do.desktop could not be read correctly

2011-03-17 Thread Lieven
I also had this sort of error message. But it is not complaining about 1 file that couldn't be read correctly, but hundreds I guess, seeing this message rolling over the screen for at least a few seconds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 736953] Re: Unity doesn't start, screen stays purple/darkred, only curser can move

2011-03-17 Thread Lieven
Ok, I managed to get to the login screen by installing lxdm. But after logging in, the only thing I get is the desktop background, on which I can only rightclick, to get some options. But other than that, there isn't much I can do. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 713304] Re: authentication key of extras repository is missing

2011-03-05 Thread Lieven
Thanks for your response Ian, I'm glad you're seeing this as a bug, because it's exactly as you think. Discussing this problem on ubuntu brainstorm didn't help either, they said it's not an idea. I can agree with that, but why is Fabio then suggesting to discuss it there? I'm sorry to say so, but

[Bug 579276] Re: Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure

2011-02-09 Thread Peter Lieven
I have not tested with NFS, but my newsserver test was also reliably crashing without the NAPI patch. I have seen Bruce's response. Will he take care of this patch going upstream? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 579276] Re: Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Lieven
just for the records. i have a binary newsfeed testserver with the napi patch running stable for 52 days. it really seems that this was the missing piece! more than 66TB data transferred. root@ubuntu-newsfeed:~# uptime 13:00:49 up 52 days, 14:47, 2 users, load average: 2.32, 2.61, 2.69

[Bug 579276] Re: Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Lieven
I tested with kernels that include both of these patches, but they still crashed. I also think that the both patches you mentioned have been backported to Ubuntu LTS. How should we proceed? Contact the virtio developers and the developers from Suse why this patch never went upstream? -- You

[Bug 579276] Re: Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Lieven
Can you patch the natty kernel with the napi patch to be absolutely sure? You might also use netcat to transfer files between your boxes or use iperf. This might reduce the time to crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 713288] [NEW] Need to press ALT+F1 for CLI-login

2011-02-04 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Natty Alpha 2 After installing a CLI-system using the alternate installer of Ubuntu, the login prompt doesn't show up. Instead, the screen goes blank (sometimes there is a cursur blinking in the top left of the screen). To be able to login, you need to press ALT+F1, after

[Bug 713304] [NEW] authentication key of extras repository is missing

2011-02-04 Thread Lieven
Public bug reported: Natty Alpha 2 After installing a CLI-system using the alternate installer of Ubuntu, when running apt-get update, I get a complaint about a key missing to sign the extras repository. Shouldn't the key be added by default? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided

[Bug 579276] Re: Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure

2011-01-07 Thread Peter Lieven
It seems that virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call is the final solution to the virtio_net crashes. I have a newsserver (constantly 300-500mbit throughput) running a modified kernel with this patch for almost one month now. Who can help getting this patch into ubuntu-lucid

  1   2   3   >