Rollback successful on all 12.04 servers to PHP build 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.
Websites are again working.
** Description changed:
This morning I applied the following updates to Ubuntu 12.04 webservers:
The following packages are currently pending an upgrade:
- apt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
(Cross posting final solution here...)
Michael Lueck (mlueck) wrote 9 hours ago: #39
I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3
and am pleased and relieved to see my
I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3
and am pleased and relieved to see my test Windows XP client once again
able to login to the Samba NT4 style domain.
This update appears to resolve the defect I originally opened:
[Bug 1574228] Changes to Samba packages for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
@John #9, I had brought to my attention this:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4.2_Features_added/changed
New smb.conf options
I make use of both OS/2 which has a LANServer client integrated, and
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
@John #7, no we do not make use of the LDAP backend, thus did not spot
the similarities with bug #1572122.
I suspect this is not directly related to/not to the presence of an LDAP
backend or not.
--
You
** Attachment added: "Part of the smb.conf of one of the servers - complete
other than the shares"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645345/+files/smb.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: "Log of failed Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.25"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645175/+files/log.error.mdlxp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu 12.04 fully patched, this weekend I attempted to apply the
samba 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 updates. That resulted in a Samba NT4
PDC that downlevel Windows clients could no longer log in to. Logging
into said Windows machines with a local account and manually
** Attachment added: "Log of successful Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645174/+files/log.good.mdlxp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Supposedly there is a way to configure the NVidia drivers to force use
of the NVidia chip always. Yes yes, that drains batteries more quickly.
"I do not care."
System76 knows the technique. I sent them an inquiry seeing that they
offer a laptop with the NVidia Geforce GTX 970M or 980M chips.
Issue confirmed resolved in Xubuntu daily 20160408 amd64 ISO. Thank you
so much! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533206
Title:
Blueman-applet crash on login: DBusException in
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop
class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard.
Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems
which have no Bluetooth in the first place?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop
class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard.
Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems
which have no Bluetooth in the first place?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I used Xubuntu xenial-desktop-amd64.iso on 20160113 and in VirtualBox
PLEU 5.0.12 r104815 and the installer still gets hung after it has
ejected the ISO. I know it ejects as VirtualBox flips back from having
the ISO mounted to the drive being empty.
Should not it then get to some message about
Public bug reported:
Sound Juicer application will not start on my fully updated Xubuntu
14.04 x64 system today. I tried starting it from the terminal window,
and see this error while doing so:
$ sound-juicer
** (sound-juicer:18540): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibility
bus: Failed to
I confirmed the proposed update in #16 on an Xubuntu i386 12.04 to 14.04
LTS upgrade just now. Works flawlessly. Thank you so much! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307546
Title:
I apologize, I find I have drained my supply of test systems with custom
xorg.conf files. The rest of them are simple machines directly attached
to their display, thus get by just fine without any xorg.conf file at
all. The more complex configurations are at my desk where I make use of
a KVM
Based on #16, I submit the same question as I asked in #14... Ready for
me to test another 12.04 -- 14.04 LTS upgrade at this point? Please
confirm and I will kick one off.
Since it says Please test proposed package in #16, is there any
special steps I need to perform when doing the LTS upgrade
Based on #13, should I attempt another LTS upgrade to 14.04 with a
system having Nvidia graphics to see if the xorg.conf no longer gets
deleted? Just let me know, I have additional systems ready to test with
and would be happy to validate the fix.
--
You received this bug notification because
I had this same thing occur on my main desktop computer as well. Knowing
that the xorg.conf file got trounced on my main notebook, I made sure I
had a good backup of my xorg.conf file before beginning the LTS upgrade.
At the conclusion of the upgrade, the xorg.conf file was still in the
Public bug reported:
I just completed the LTS upgrade of Xubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04. Upon
rebooting, my notebook lost its dual display behavior of cloning the LCD
to the external display.
Researching, I found no /etc/X11/xorg.conf file in place.
Fortunately I make backups as I need different
Any update available on getting the Ubuntu repository updated and in
sync with the official stable release of SQL Ledger before the trusty
deep freeze? Seems silly to release a LTS version without updating
software to the latest available version from the developers.
--
You received this bug
I just reloaded the production drive in the test machine with the GA
release of Xubuntu 14.04 x64 and find that the USB mouse is working as
expected.
I note the mention of nvidia drivers in #11. I had not added those what
I found USB ports dead. I need to install those. I had opened a bug
report
I last loaded the test ThinkPad T540p with a Xubuntu 14.04 20140225 Beta
1 ISO. New HDD today, thus new Xubuntu ISO, and I cannot get the USB
mouse to light up (optical mouse) in either USB port on each side of the
unit.
How can I help test to resolve this critical bug?
--
You received this bug
I put the former drive back in. It appears to have only one kernel
update older than current, and the USB mouse works fine. Packages on
that drive are as follows:
$ dpkg -l | grep linux-
ii linux-firmware1.125
all Firmware for
Public bug reported:
I was running through the LTS upgrade of our last production 10.04
server, upgrading finally to 12.04. I have run into a repeat issue with
the do-release-upgrade LTS upgrade process.
Our configuration calls for the use of DJBDNS rather than Bind or some
other DNS
Public bug reported:
I see that the package of sql-ledger in Ubuntu 14.04 is recently old.
SQL Ledger project released an update five days ago. Please catch this
before 14.04 releases stable. Thanks!
http://www.sql-ledger.com/cgi-
bin/nav.pl?page=misc/whatsnew.htmltitle=What%27s%20New
Version
Public bug reported:
Hardware configuration is a ThinkPad T540p with GeForce GT 730M. I
understand that this graphics chip as some new fangled Nvidia Optimus
technology involved.
I began testing with Xubuntu 13.10 x64, then re-imaged the system with
the Alpha build of Xubuntu 14.04 x64 of
Back on 2010-02-28 I reported this issue resolved. Someone please ack
and close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284
Title:
Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will
Public bug reported:
I have been advised that the ubiquity package is where this request
should end up.
Adding Linux to an existing hard drive with Windows / NTFS format
already present magically adds a partition type of NTFS to the Use As
pick list. Thus one can establish mount points for the
This is logged against a now very old version. This problem in my mind
is no longer valid. Please confirm and close this report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540015
Title:
X Fails
Bug is not present in current versions of Ubuntu / Xubuntu. Old bug
against no longer supported versions.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Marking Invalid since it was resolved a long time ago.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
Title:
Add Lucid
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284
Title:
Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a
/boot
Frankly I had given up on customizing the stock sound schemes. It was
getting harder and harder to fight against the current and have custom
sounds. I now operate in silence... no start-up sound at all. Last I
recall, it was extremely hard to swap out one-off a particular sound to
an alternate
The #4 work-around solved this problem on an x86 based install of
Xubuntu 12.04.
Was there a security risk in that version of the package that the latest
version was suppose to address?
Aptitude is having a hard time locking in that specific back level
version, thus thinks there is an update
A while ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS to 12.04 LTS, and
the USB HDD is properly attached automatically to a USB2 controller
rather than USB 1.1. I no longer need the script posted in #23 to wake
up the USB subsystem back to reality.
--
You received this bug notification because you
@Phillip #9
Thank you for following up on this case.
What ever partitioner the Ubuntu LiveCD GUI installer uses to partition
the disk made a partition table which was incompatible with the latest
BIOS available from Intel for the motherboard in this system. Placing
the hard disk drive into a
I adjusted the speed to 400 per suggestion here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2118805p=12540305#post12540305
Then came to report success. It appears I am not alone in this change
request. Please get this one in, should be simple / safe enough, and
well enough community tested.
--
@nobuto: Thank you for sharing your steps to success. The apt-get
install step did the trick and did not complain about python-uno.
I can confirm the resolution to the problem I originally reported.
The relative font fatness in preview mode is seemingly identical to the
font fatness in
@nobuto: How did you get it to install on precise? I just attempted
again and the instructions linked to from #68 for how to test a proposed
package lead to an utter aptitude nightmare... wants to remove all sorts
of packages for selecting the libreoffice/1:3.5.7-0ubuntu4 when starting
it via sudo
Greetings Steve,
This evening I attempted to get it tested on my Xubuntu 12.04 x64
system. I ran into a snag.
I suspect what Aptitude was telling me is that the package python-uno
needs to also be updated and was not provided. Following is a text
screen dump of the dependency tangle. I had only
I was able to reproduce these odd behaviors with Xubuntu 12.04 x64.
Therefor it is probably not something Gnome specific as it happens with
Xcfe as well.
I have not installed Virtual Box on this system yet. So that rules out
all VM involvement.
I did a bit of research. These rss-glx screen
I was able to load a blank hard drive successfully in this same system
with XUbuntu 12.04.1 x64 edition. I did not have to partition the drive
with Ubuntu 9.04 like I had to when loading 10.04 LTS.
I suppose it to be a bug in the specified editions of Linux around the
time of release of 10.04
@Ubuntu, I replied to your latest update, and along comes janitor and
expires the bug report. Reopening hopefully. This is still an issue with
the latest 10.04.4 x86 build.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@Christopher,
I do not have capabilities to test the latest Ubuntu on our production
servers. I will not be upgrading production servers until well after
12.04 LTS releases stable.
As indicated in this dupe report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625134
Upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 resolved the
@Vibhav, I have not seen an update to apticron distribute, nor do I see
at
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/a/apticron/apticron_1.1.20/changelog
an update newer than the version we already have installed. How is it
then that you changed the status to Fix Released?
--
You
FYI, this is still an issue with the current 10.04 LTS x86 PAE kernel
build.
Linux ldslnx01 2.6.32-40-generic-pae #87-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 5 21:44:34
UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
I still must run my fixext_backup.sh script to get the USB HDD to attach
via the USB 2.0 controller.
Any suggestions what
My LI installation just updated running Lucid 10.04.
Now I have:
LibreOffice 3.4.5
OOO340m1 (Build:502)
This bug is still present in this build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Christopher,
??? I am on Ubuntu Linux 10.04 x64, not Vista. Gee that is great
that it is unreproducible with Vista.
Meanwhile I have switched my machines all to LibreOffice via the PPA
instructions found here:
My system is currently running with package: 2011-10-11 04:10 cups-
pdf_2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1_amd64.deb
I do not see unique filenames in the created PDF's.
I changed my configuration per the OP's suggestion and now at least get
the job number in the PDF filename.
Therefor I can not confirm
Greetings Martin-Éric,
Per the bug title All created pdf file have the same name... I thought
fixed would mean that jobs now are given unique names.
Thank you for clarifying what actually was fixed. I was expecting
something unique in the filename such as the job number. I thought I was
seeing
I just finally upgraded to 10.04.3 x64 edition a few weeks ago.
I had forgotten what I did to generate unique filenames in PDF files.
The default behavior is to still not put the job number in the filename.
I finally found this old bug report. Appears the fix has been already
distributed.
An associate I work with was able to correctly identify the trouble with
loads of Lucid, Oneiric, and the latest Debian. Turns out there is a HDD
geometry incompatibility with these newer distros.
The work-around that masked the situation was to partition the blank
drive with Ubuntu 9.04, then
The HDD BIOS settings in my computer are as follows:
ATA/IDE ModeNative (can not change this)
Configure SATA As AHCI
S.M.A.R.T. Enabled
SATA 1 - 4 They just autodetect - can not even arrow to these,
cursor position skips over them
Hard Disk Pre-Delay
I was able to clean load 10.04.3 x64 from the LiveCD onto my machine, as
usual no POST once loaded.
Then I took the drive to the P4/945 based system, installed Lilo, got
that configured. I needed to update /etc/fstab back to using /dev
devices and not referring to partitions by their UUID. Then
I tried pulling down the alternate 10.04.3 ISO and installed from that,
hoping to select Lilo rather than Grub2. No question was presented,
Grub2 was installed, box will not IPL.
How is it possible to select Lilo rather than Grub2?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
For another opinion I pulled down a copy of:
debian-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso
and installed a GUI desktop machine with that. Same thing, system will
not POST with an installation having been done to the HDD.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I am able to reproduce the same results when installing on the same
system the latest Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) x64 from the Desktop /
LiveCD. Updating bug description with the second release name.
Back to trusty Ubuntu 9.04 for the moment I guess. (shrug)
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu Lucid
Cross linking with UbuntuForums thread on the same topic...
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1856283
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698
Title:
Ubuntu Lucid prevents
Public bug reported:
My trusty main Linux machine, still loaded with Ubuntu 9.04 x86.
Intel DG33BUC motherboard, latest BIOS rev
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500
So to upgrade, I purchased a new drive:
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 0F10383 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s
3.5 Internal Hard
I tried following your steps to install LibreOffice on a recently loaded
10.04 system. I wanted to install the entire suite, not just writer so I
tried selecting libreoffice in Aptitude. That results in the following
error:
libreoffice:
Depends: libreoffice-core but it is not going to be
Never mind about the install problems, others please find the
instructions here:
Install libreoffice in ubuntu 11.04/10.10/10.04 using PPA
http://www.ubuntugeek.com/install-libreoffice-in-ubuntu-11-0410-1010-04-using-ppa.html
Off to testing the existing OO bugs I know of...
--
You received
@Björn Michaelsen
I migrated a 10.04 Lucid machine over to LibraOffice this evening.
The behavior is identical to that of OpenOffice. Bug remains.
I am not sure what you intended me to do about this bug since it
persists.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug was originally for me:
Lucid Impress crashes when opening a file located on a Samba smbfs mount
Bug #586438
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586438
I removed the nobrl option from my mount commands
I logged off all mounts / logged back on
I can open files on the Samba server
@Jeremy #5:
It is NOT an update which solved this problem, it is the addition of a
package which was not in the suggested list in the tsclient package.
IT SHOULD BE LISTED AS A SUGGESTION! Otherwise people have no way of
knowing why tsclient has the VNC protocol grayed out.
Marking back to
Thank you for the addl explanation. I am contently running 10.04 LTS.
I liked tsclient as it did not waste screen real estate when connecting
to remote systems. Vinagre wastes a bit more space, but has the C-A-D
capability which comes in handy on Windows hosts. I use them both.
--
You received
Thanks, I flushed out the previous PPA's and added that one. I see it
now.
The samba package depends on:
* samba depends on libwbclient0 (= 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1)
Which libwbclient0 is not on our servers. Did you build your package
some other way than the official Ubuntu 10.04
All right, I got the dependencies happy finally. Pulled down the
following packages:
libpam-smbpass_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb
samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb
samba-common_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_all.deb
Thanks, I flushed out the previous PPA's and added that one. I see it
now.
The samba package depends on:
* samba depends on libwbclient0 (= 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1)
Which libwbclient0 is not on our servers. Did you build your package
some other way than the official Ubuntu 10.04
All right, I got the dependencies happy finally. Pulled down the
following packages:
libpam-smbpass_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb
samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_i386.deb
samba-common_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1~lucid~ppa1_all.deb
I checked back this evening on this topic. Now I see Samba package files
at the URL in #15.
However Samba does not show up here:
https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/mogile
So not a surprise that I am not offered to move to that build of Samba.
More assistance please.
--
You received
I checked back this evening on this topic. Now I see Samba package files
at the URL in #15.
However Samba does not show up here:
https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/mogile
So not a surprise that I am not offered to move to that build of Samba.
More assistance please.
--
You received
I had to do:
$ sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
To be able to use the add-apt-repository command listed in #12.
That done, refreshed the package list several times, and am not finding
your updated Samba build you posted for me to test with. I will keep
clawing at the keyboard...
FYI, I see no Samba packages under here:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/clint-fewbar/fixes/ubuntu/pool/main/
That just might be a problem... Chuck, could you please check on the
build machine? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
I had to do:
$ sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
To be able to use the add-apt-repository command listed in #12.
That done, refreshed the package list several times, and am not finding
your updated Samba build you posted for me to test with. I will keep
clawing at the keyboard...
FYI, I see no Samba packages under here:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/clint-fewbar/fixes/ubuntu/pool/main/
That just might be a problem... Chuck, could you please check on the
build machine? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
How's progress getting this fixed in stable distribution? I just had to
sudo rm /etc/motd.tail on Lucid servers again. So I guess doing so is
not a one time manual fix. :-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Evidently status = Incomplete also has an annoying 60 day timer...
gggrrr... reopening and set to new.
** Changed in: djbdns (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Aaakkk!!! @Till Kamppeter I updated this report a couple of times.
Resetting the Samba ticket back to new as I feel the addl testing done
confirms it to be a Samba bug and not CUPS.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Suggestion noted how to handle responding to a developer question. I had
no idea that Incomplete had a timer ticking.
BTW: Is there a best place to install Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) packages of
Samba higher than the stable release maintained for Lucid? Perhaps this
is fixed by a higher release of
Aaakkk!!! @Till Kamppeter I updated this report a couple of times.
Resetting the Samba ticket back to new as I feel the addl testing done
confirms it to be a Samba bug and not CUPS.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Suggestion noted how to handle responding to a developer question. I had
no idea that Incomplete had a timer ticking.
BTW: Is there a best place to install Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) packages of
Samba higher than the stable release maintained for Lucid? Perhaps this
is fixed by a higher release of
'twas so long ago I forgot I opened this bug report!
I ended up writing my own docs here:
HOW-TO: Basic installation of Daniel J. Bernstein's djbdns (TinyDNS) on Ubuntu
Linux
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/HOW-TO_Basic_installation_of_Daniel_J_Bernstein_djbdns_TinyDNS_on_Ubuntu_Linux
HOW-TO:
I am still on 10.04 LTS Lucid servers and I have been seeing this
reported behavior for a couple of days. Evidently it does not only
affect upgrades to 10.10.
I see one comment about lucid-proposed, but at the top Lucid is not
included in the affects list.
Oh, #13 did not include the word
On our server we tested this fix on, I disconnected the testing
repository. This morning I was notified that linux-image-2.6.32-31
-generic-pae_2.6.32-31.61_i386.deb was available. I pulled down that
build, IPL'ed, and performed a backup. The backup completed flawlessly.
Next up, testing this same
Checking in on this... Is there additional testing which needs to get
done? Or is this code ready to release to Lucid stable? Is there an ETA
as to when this update will be distributed to Lucid stable? Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Today I installed kernel:
linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic-pae_2.6.32-31.60_i386.deb
To hopefully test the fix on Lucid. The backup went through 100%. That
is a good thing.
However I saw a few warnings when it was backing up the /etc directory.
The backup command run was as following, then the full
@Bill Nickless #33, thank you for your quick work in both verifying and
taking a shot at updating the tags on this bug report. Hopefully soon
these new Lucid kernels will be released, and this problem will fade
into memories... :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Greetings Martin, Thank you for this invitation. This morning I followed
the step in the documentation you posted a link to. I do not see an
updated kernel version queue up for installation. I suppose that is to
be expected as I only have the -26 kernel installed.
Manually looking through (in
Christopher Penalver, it is encouraging to see progress on one of my bug
reports. Thank YOU so much for your assistance on this report. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910
Title:
Yes the tinydns component of djbdns needs that specific ID.
Per DJB (the author) three ID's are needed for a basic installation of
djbns.
Johannes Hessellund pointed out that a fourth ID is needed for an
optional step in the set up of djbdns, so I added that ID as well, and
references the URL's
All right, I retested this via testing Samba Port based printing which I
used until SpoolSS / Point-n-Print was not working properly in Samba,
back in v 3.0.2 time frame. That works properly allowing the check boxes
/ selection to enable the Envelope Feeder option to be active.
I was able to
All right, I retested this via testing Samba Port based printing which I
used until SpoolSS / Point-n-Print was not working properly in Samba,
back in v 3.0.2 time frame. That works properly allowing the check boxes
/ selection to enable the Envelope Feeder option to be active.
I was able to
Confirmed that today's current 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) still has this
issue.
Could someone please review my patch and check it in. That would be
appreciated! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Tim: The only application I know of which is able to comprehend the
envelope feeder on the printer is WordPerfect which is a Windows
application.
We run Ubuntu Server edition on our servers, no GUI, no nothing!
Yes my workstation runs Ubuntu Desktop edition (9.04 still as I have one
application
Thank you so much Stefan!
I switched over 100% to Ubuntu with 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) and XFS has been
very stable since then. (Other than 7.10 which was the worst release
ever, and I never did get a 7.10 box to production state!)
What about maverick (10.10) and also natty? Are these versions also
Aaahhh, excuse me, Chuck Short: How could this possibly be CUPS which is
causing these problems? The workstations print to Samba, which in turn
prints through CUPS. CUPS direct printing from Windows workstations
works. CUPS does not get involved until the print job reaches the
server, however we
@Stefan #8, On our server which I first saw the crash on, only three out
of the eight or so xfsdump backups regularly scheduled caused this
crash. The others all backed up successfully. The dump I originally
started this case with actually produced a partial backup size. The
other two backup jobs
Thank you so much Dann! Please let me know if you would like me to
install an updated kernel package, and from where, to confirm the fix
for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848
101 - 200 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
