[Bug 567606] Re: Power option switch from .. gives black screen

2010-04-20 Thread Peter Ralph
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44929328/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44929329/GConfNonDefault.txt -- Power option switch from .. gives black screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567606 You

[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-17 Thread Ralph Corderoy
It isn't a matter of being able to work around the problem; an experienced user can do that, I agree. As I pointed out, it's that squid not running on moving to run level 2 isn't obvious to the admin that's just made the change. It has to affect users before the admin gets to know about the

[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-17 Thread Ralph Corderoy
It isn't a matter of being able to work around the problem; an experienced user can do that, I agree. As I pointed out, it's that squid not running on moving to run level 2 isn't obvious to the admin that's just made the change. It has to affect users before the admin gets to know about the

[Bug 562465] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

2010-04-16 Thread Ralph Ulrich
/var/lib/dkms/bcmwl/5.60.48.36+bdcom/build/src/include/linuxver.h:23:28: error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file must be generated/autoconf.h -- package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Is it low importance? It's easily worked around if I know it occurs, but if I don't know this bug exists then I'm left with a server at runlevel 2 without squid, and it may cause users all kinds of problems before they get back to me and I work out what's wrong. -- squid is not started on

[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Is it low importance? It's easily worked around if I know it occurs, but if I don't know this bug exists then I'm left with a server at runlevel 2 without squid, and it may cause users all kinds of problems before they get back to me and I work out what's wrong. -- squid is not started on

[Bug 554069] Re: xscreensaver activated on kubuntu after upgrade to lucid

2010-04-11 Thread Ralph Janke
Since there seems to be no intuitive way to stop xscreenserver in the Kubuntu settings, it is very confusing for a user that the screensaver cannot be disabled. I believe the screensaver functionality must be de- coupled such that there are no side-effects to another desktop only because there are

[Bug 544471] Re: Download unavailable in several countries

2010-04-09 Thread Ralph Wabel
Not working in Switzerland, still same error message :-( -- Download unavailable in several countries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 528688] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work+0xa7/0xd0 [cfg80211]()

2010-04-08 Thread Ralph
I reported this same issue in bug 546469 and I tested the new kernel. I didn't get a kernal panic but I still suffered from the same problem of my wireless network connection randomly dropping. -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work+0xa7/0xd0

[Bug 549227] Re: comment out _set_root_ in grub.cfg

2010-03-30 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- comment out _set_root_ in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 550884] Re: mac mini shows usb disk only as fd0

2010-03-29 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Tags added: upstream ** Tags added: mac refit -- mac mini shows usb disk only as fd0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 550884] [NEW] mac mini shows usb disk only as fd0

2010-03-29 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 I start my efi-gpt mac mini system using refit.sf.net. I wanted to boot an extern usb-stick using grub2 on there. I had done: grub-install --recheck --no-floppy --root-directory=/mnt /dev/sdb1 This disk showed up in refit, but it ever failed to

[Bug 550884] Re: mac mini shows usb disk only as fd0

2010-03-29 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Description changed: Binary package hint: grub2 - I start my efi-gpt mac mini system using refit.sf.net. I wanted to boot an extern usb-stick using grub2 on there. I had done: + I start my efi-gpt mac mini system using refit.sf.net. I wanted to boot an extern usb-stick using grub2 on

[Bug 549980] Re: lucid grub2 has no /dev/sda but is in grub.cfg

2010-03-28 Thread Ralph Ulrich
/dev/sda is really wrong using with set root -- lucid grub2 has no /dev/sda but is in grub.cfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549980 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 549227] Re: comment out _set_root_ in grub.cfg

2010-03-28 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Colin Watson and my suspicions about search behavior is right: search does NOT change variable root if the device was not found. But there is a lack of clear wordings of that fact in grub help search text. So, I changed this bug to NEW again, hoping documentation strings will get clearer

[Bug 549638] Re: Grub error drops me into grub rescue prompt after latest lucid upgrade - error: no such device

2010-03-28 Thread Ralph Ulrich
At grub prompt try: --- insmod ext2 #search_using_Label: search -l --set YourLabel_of_sda1 search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set fb815699-d076-4a96-8c14-1045deb80c00 set ls ls ($root)/boot --- to see which device is root - most likely hd1,1 and not hd0,1 For to find something under /dev/sdb1 try to

[Bug 549215] Re: insert option GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER

2010-03-28 Thread Ralph Ulrich
And I wish also to be included in /etc/default/grub: #GRUB_DISABLE_MEMTEST=true But that does not work - is not an option right now -- insert option GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 549763] Re: Install kubuntu 10.04 on the virtualbox

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively

[Bug 549830] Re: Bad version of exaile in 10.04 LTS

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! ** Changed in: exaile (Ubuntu)

[Bug 549857] [NEW] login manager does not start from system settings

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace Steps to reproduce: Open system settings and goto advanced. Click on Login Manager Nothing happens and login manager screen is not shown. if system settings is started from command line, the following error message appears in the

[Bug 549857] Re: login manager does not start from system settings

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42203270/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42203271/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42203272/ProcStatus.txt -- login

[Bug 549857] Re: login manager does not start from system settings

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
It actually started, in a different window. ** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- login manager does not start from system settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 480471] Re: KDM refused to start but gave no indication as to why

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Thanks for reporting this issue. Could you please give us some more information about your system: 1) Kubuntu Version 2) kernel version 3) X-server Version 4) KDE version please also include into this report the following error logs: /var/log/Xorg.*.log Please also give us the information

[Bug 474631] Re: user dirs are not saved persistantly

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Thanks for reporting this issue. I tried these steps on lucid and could not reproduce this problem. After login out and in again, the file has still the new changes. Please re-test if you can reproduce this in lucid. Thanks for your help ** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 545511] Re: KDE shortcut keys don't work

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
I can reproduce this issue. ** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- KDE shortcut keys don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545511 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 545511] Re: KDE shortcut keys don't work

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
As a workaround, you can set the global shortcuts in systemsettings = Input Actions ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace-bin KDE shortcut keys don't work in Kubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) Alpha 3 and Beta 1. To reproduce this bug: - install Kubuntu 10.04

[Bug 548997] Re: kdm login fails while console login + startx works fine

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
Thanks for reporting this issue. However, the problem seem to be unrelated to the error message given. I can login with the same empty directory. Please provide more information. 1) /var/log/Xorg.*.log files 2) output of sudo lshw showing your hardware Please also state some more information

[Bug 538820] Re: [Lucid] Update awesome to 3.4.4

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Janke
** Changed in: awesome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: awesome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- [Lucid] Update awesome to 3.4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 549980] [NEW] lucid grub2 has no /dev/sda but is in grub.cfg

2010-03-27 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 since grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu2 menuentries in /boot/grub/grub.cfg look different: - menuentry Ubuntu, mit Linux 2.6.32-17-generic noext2 --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { insmod ext2

[Bug 549215] [NEW] insert option GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER

2010-03-26 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Please insert an additional commented out option in file /etc/default/grub #GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true for documentory user/admin purpose. Rationale: If you want to use your ubuntu grub installation for to chainload in, then you don't need

[Bug 549227] [NEW] comment out _set_root_ in grub.cfg

2010-03-26 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Such an entry: -- menuentry Ubuntu, mit Linux 2.6.32-17-generic --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail

[Bug 549227] Re: comment out _set_root_ in grub.cfg

2010-03-26 Thread Ralph Ulrich
I wrote this bug, because there isn't any clear spezification what search really does! If there is this undocumented feature I thought about: search should not touch the root if it does NOT find anything! Then set root is valuable. If it does touch (root=NULL) then set root should be commented

[Bug 527666] Re: multiple LVM volumes not mounted in Lucid

2010-03-25 Thread Ralph
I have created 3 logical volumes on a removable USB drive - one volume group of one physical partition. If I have fstab entries for these LV's the system will start to boot then give me a Waiting ... message on the first LV if the drive has not been connected; enter gives a maintenance shell. If

[Bug 527666] Re: multiple LVM volumes not mounted in Lucid

2010-03-25 Thread Ralph
Please amend last line to read 9.10 not 9.04. -- multiple LVM volumes not mounted in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 546469] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work+0xe9/0x110 [cfg80211]()

2010-03-24 Thread Ralph
Analog [ALC269 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ralph 1376 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: ralph 1376 F...m pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info

[Bug 546469] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work+0xe9/0x110 [cfg80211]()

2010-03-24 Thread Ralph
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41882591/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41882592/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41882593/BootDmesg.txt **

[Bug 184817] Re: unable to lock screen with ctrl - alt - L if numlock is on

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Does https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125618 explain the behaviour? ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #125618 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125618 -- unable to lock screen with ctrl - alt - L if numlock is on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184817 You received this

[Bug 371012] Re: Unable to lock screen using Ctrl+Alt+l if Show pointer when Ctrl is pressed option enabled

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Apparent in 9.10. It seems that Mouse Preference greedily grabs Control so nothing else sees the KeyPress event. However, the keypress of the L key would have a state field that shows the Control modifier is set. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: GNOME

[Bug 371012] Re: Unable to lock screen using Ctrl+Alt+l if Show pointer when Ctrl is pressed option enabled

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Corderoy
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125618 seems to be Gnome's bug. If others agree, please link. -- Unable to lock screen using Ctrl+Alt+l if Show pointer when Ctrl is pressed option enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371012 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 459976] Re: Pointer locator shortcut conflicts with Lock Screen's

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Corderoy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 371012 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371012 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 371012 Unable to lock screen using Ctrl+Alt+l if Show pointer when Ctrl is pressed option enabled -- Pointer locator shortcut conflicts with Lock Screen's

[Bug 481335] Re: Show position of pointer when the ctrl... option wont turn on

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Perhaps it couldn't grab the Control key because something else has already grabbed in on your setup? -- Show position of pointer when the ctrl... option wont turn on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Ulrich
1MiB boundaries are optimal for they also align with 128KiB and 256KiB which could be used in solid disk hardware. Now how to do this using fdisk: My thought of using of 32 heads and 64 sectors per cylinder doesn't work for older fdisk versions (openSUSE11.2). Let's try the other way round:

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Ulrich
And a question regarding above usage of fdisk: It seems to me that numbering of: sectors begin with 0 , but cylinders begin with 1 count ? -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 538682] Re: New HFS+ partition not labeled correctly in partition table

2010-03-23 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Don't know if it help you. Here an output of a new mac mini / efi-gpt system: -- r...@maci:/etc# parted /dev/sda print Modell: ATA Hitachi HTS54323 (scsi) Festplatte /dev/sda: 320GB Sektorgröße (logisch/physisch): 512B/512B Partitionstabelle: gpt Anzahl Beginn EndeGröße

[Bug 236381] Re: Doesn't install /usr/share/xsessions/stumpwm.desktop

2010-03-18 Thread Kenyon Ralph
** Changed in: stumpwm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Doesn't install /usr/share/xsessions/stumpwm.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Janke
Since portmap is now started by upstart, it makes more sense to port autofs over to upstart too and trigger the start on the event of portmap being started. -- portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511245

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Scary different outputs on a mac mini I have tried to align my many partition beyond the 4. partition. But the following outputs scares me for they are totally different: 1. First Gpt fdisk from sf.net finds more available sectors than ubuntu lucid fdisk which is powered by parted-2.2 2. fdisk

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
A new idea for partitioning a new disk Megebyte aligned. Using a different CHS config to get MiB alignments: Now it is 1 cylinder = 255 heads * 63 sectors * 512 bytes If you change fdisk config to 1 cylinder = 32 head * 64 sectors * 512 bytes this should align a partition for parallel us with

[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Janke
Since portmap is now started by upstart, it makes more sense to port autofs over to upstart too and trigger the start on the event of portmap being started. -- portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511245

[Bug 415888] Re: Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Rachael wrote: formatting should take place with: ~# mke2fs -t ext3 -E stripe-width=32 /dev/sda(x) ?? But due to man mkfs.ext3: stripe-width=stripe-width Configure the filesystem for a RAID array with stripe-width filesystem blocks per stripe.

[Bug 415888] Re: Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
with mke2fs -t ext3 -E stripe-width=32 /dev/sda(x) you attempt using 32 disks . You probably mean: mke2fs -t ext3 -E stride=32 /dev/sda(x) -- Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Rachael wrote: Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with 63 sectors per track to accommodate solid state drives. that is 240 * 63 * 512 = 7 MiB alignment. I heard about Win7 aligning at 1 MiB. -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-17 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Got it wrong... 240 * 63 * 512.0 / (1024 * 1024) = 7.3828125 MiB = 7560.0 KiB -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 342671] Re: Doesn't support installations which require a removal

2010-03-15 Thread Ralph Navarro
I fully agree with Adam. In addition, I feel his argument is at the crux of an inerrant problem with the decisions that Kubuntu 4.x development made in general. Why rewrite most applications that worked great to begin with? The new releases of Kubuntu applications have broken or missing

[Bug 539269] [NEW] Help-Documentation does not open documentation

2010-03-15 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: git-cola Using Help-Documentation tries to open the following url: file:///usr/share/doc/git-cola/git-cola.html However, the html files are in file:///usr/share/doc/git-cola/html/ in the particular directory is on the git-cola.txt file. ** Affects:

[Bug 368650] Re: software updates kcm module does not work in ldap configuration

2010-03-11 Thread Ralph Janke
It turned out to be a problem with the group assignments. After adding the ldap username to the local admin group it works. ** Changed in: policykit-kde (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- software updates kcm module does not work in ldap configuration

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-03-08 Thread Ralph Ulrich
new libparted-2.2 should have solved the issue - so no extra compatibility warning in regard to Win7 is needed any more ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual Status: New = Invalid -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 136971] Re: eject -X sets speed to maximum

2010-03-07 Thread Ralph Corderoy
9.10 still has this bug. I've downgraded 9.10's eject package to Adam's PPA and, with the -v option, it shows it saving and restoring the speed set at the start of the -X processing. The patch also looks sane and correct. Adam, let me know if this isn't sufficient for you to submit upstream.

[Bug 125591] Re: Freeguide does not work with the GNU Java Interpreter

2010-03-07 Thread Ralph Corderoy
On a fresh 9.10 install, freeguide installs and runs. It has the odd quirk, but they may be different bugs, or problems caused by the Java runtime it's using. The interesting thing is, none of the Java packages it claims to need are installed AFAICS. $ apt-cache show freeguide ...

[Bug 529904] Re: libparted-2.1 ro funcs writing empty hybrid mbr on gpt disks

2010-03-06 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Bug watch added: Parted tracker #250 http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/250 ** Also affects: parted (Debian) via http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/250 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- libparted-2.1 ro funcs writing empty hybrid

[Bug 136971] Re: eject -X sets speed to maximum

2010-03-05 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Adam, https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/InstallingSoftware isn't clear whether as a 8.04/Hardy user I can use an 8.10/Intrepid PPA. Do you know? -- eject -X sets speed to maximum https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 529904] Re: libparted-2.1 ro funcs writing empty hybrid mbr on gpt disks

2010-03-02 Thread Ralph Ulrich
From the Changelog: parted (2.1-4ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Resynchronise with Debian experimental. Remaining changes: - gptsync.dpatch: On Intel Mac systems, write a synced MBR rather than a protective MBR.

[Bug 529904] [NEW] libparted-2.1 ro funcs writing empty hybrid mbr on gpt disks

2010-03-01 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: parted libparted-2.1 ro writes empty hybrid mbr on gpt disk This is the known upstream bug of libparted-2.1 Readonly operations emptying hybrid MBR on a gpt-disk / mac mini My observation using fdisk which I know uses libparted-2.1: See that

[Bug 527613] [NEW] ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given

2010-02-25 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: netpbm Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10, package netpbm 2:10.0-12 and 2:10.0-12ubuntu1. ppmrainbow(1) fails unless the optional -t option is given specifying a temporary directory. 9.04: $ ppmrainbow -w 9 -h 1 red cyan | pnmnoraw Use of uninitialized value

[Bug 229976] Re: gnome-panel has major memory leak

2010-02-24 Thread Kenyon Ralph
Sounds like this bug may actually be the same as Bug #432794. -- gnome-panel has major memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-23 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Thank you Colin, I aspect this is discussed further at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/511075 -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-21 Thread Ralph Ulrich
... I don't know how to get attention from ubuntu developers to this release critical issue... ** Also affects: parted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 523788] Re: Only see X mouse cursor on VT during boot

2010-02-19 Thread Ralph Ulrich
I can confirm this using: lucid nvidia drivers pam_mount for mounting encrypted /home partition -- Only see X mouse cursor on VT during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 523788] Re: Only see X mouse cursor on VT during boot

2010-02-19 Thread Ralph Ulrich
this update solved my issue: 2010-02-19 16:01:49 configure metacity 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu2 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu2 2010-02-19 16:01:49 status unpacked metacity 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu2 2010-02-19 16:01:49 status half-configured metacity 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu2 2010-02-19 16:01:50 update-alternatives: run with --install

[Bug 523732] [NEW] enable parallel to win7 install - libparted-2.1

2010-02-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Use new libparted-2.1 version to enable install to more than winXp version. Prior to this version of libparted using extended partitioning parallel to Win7 is not compatible. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- enable parallel to win7

[Bug 511075] Re: Update to upstream GNU parted-2.1

2010-02-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
parted-2.1 is the way to compatible parallel install to Vista/Win7: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998 not knowing that - here is my experience: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+question/99298 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569998

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-16 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Debian bug of this is closed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998 because of libparted-2.1 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569998 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998 -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You

[Bug 297058] Re: Consistent repeating [ata1: link is slow to respond, please be patient ]

2010-02-15 Thread Ralph
Same problems, hardware: Dell Inspiron 2200 (ATA disk). I replaced a drive because of the error and the new drive reports the same thing. I noticed the problems starting when I switched to Karmic (9.10). SYSLOG excerpt: Feb 15 16:24:09 foo kernel: [186477.800141] ata1.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xa0)

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-14 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Also affects: gparted Importance: Undecided Status: New -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-14 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Please add attention to this horrible Ms bug which will crackdown the linux image seen by potential new users having Win7/Vista installed. If you are able to follow german language discussion have a look at: http://sidux.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=19795 for more users bad

[Bug 521045] [NEW] partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-12 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: partman-auto I would like to give people a try using ubuntu but I fear to setup some trouble for them if they use win7. This isssue is described here: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+question/99298 It is a MS related partitioning

[Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries

2010-02-12 Thread Ralph Ulrich
** Also affects: ubuntu-manual Importance: Undecided Status: New -- partitioning using mb boundaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 24741] Re: Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages

2010-02-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
** Summary changed: - Spurious account_policy_get failed messages on install + Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages -- Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24741 You received this bug notification

[Bug 24741] Re: Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages

2010-02-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
** Summary changed: - Spurious account_policy_get failed messages on install + Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages -- Installing samba gives spurious account_policy_get failed messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24741 You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 500791] Re: package grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-08 Thread Peter Ralph
, Peter Ralph -Original Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement jeanbaptiste.lallem...@gmail.com To: peterjra...@talktalk.net Sent: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 22:01 Subject: [Bug 500791] Re: package grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post

[Bug 518137] [NEW] package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: quassel Installed quassel-client and quassel-core with apt-get ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Feb 6 13:38:28 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Bug 518137] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38836997/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38836999/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38837000/Df.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 480022] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 518137 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518137 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 518137 package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package

[Bug 518137] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480022 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480022 After running apt-get install quassel-core again, it installs fine. This problem can be reproduced by removing the package and installing it again. -- package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to

[Bug 518137] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480022 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480022 The installation is performed correcty, only quasselcore fails to start from the postinst script. It does start after this without a problem ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low --

[Bug 518137] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ralph Janke (txwikinger) -- package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518137 You received this bug

[Bug 480022] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
in: quassel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ralph Janke (txwikinger) ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ralph Janke (txwikinger) = (unassigned) -- package quassel-core 0.5.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install

[Bug 518137] Re: package quassel-core 0.5.2-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Janke
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480022 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480022 Increased the timeout for checking that the deamon has really started to prevent the error to occur. ** Attachment added: debdiff with patch

[Bug 382096] Re: syslog(3) doesn't cover openlog()'s ident being NULL

2010-02-06 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Sorry for not identifying the package. I normally do. As you see, I specified the version of the manpages-dev package. Thanks for correcting. Now all it needs is for someone to confirm it! :-) -- syslog(3) doesn't cover openlog()'s ident being NULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382096 You

[Bug 475010] Re: Hard lockups with new kernels

2010-01-31 Thread Ralph
I had another hard lockup today. Again I searched the var/logs and found nothing :( -- Hard lockups with new kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 475010] Re: Hard lockups with new kernels

2010-01-31 Thread Ralph
My current hardware: Mobo : Msi 790fx-gd70 Proc: Phenom2 x4 955 Black edition GPU: XFX 250 GTS model# GS250XYDFC Ram: Mushkin Model 996601 (4gig) uname -a Linux Testmachine 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 17:01:44 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Hard lockups with new kernels

[Bug 475010] Re: Hard lockups with new kernels

2010-01-31 Thread Ralph
I have decided to try upgrading the kernel to see if this matter would resolve. I am now using r...@testmachine:~/Documents$ uname -a Linux Testmachine 2.6.33-020633rc5-generic #020633rc5 SMP Fri Jan 22 10:09:54 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Will keep you guys updated. -- Hard lockups with new

[Bug 127399] Re: bogus background command often causes shell to exit

2010-01-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
I can't reproduce your symptoms on 9.10. For me, the original problem is fixed; I no longer see the strace output I quoted above. Your need to chdir away from your home directory is probably pertinent. I'd suggest investigating that and perhaps using strace -p pid-of-bash -s 3000 -f -o /tmp/st

Re: [Bug 127399] Re: bogus background command often causes shell to exit

2010-01-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
I agree, it does look as if it still fails in a similar manner in the case you strace'd. Perhaps the fix above works, but there's a race condition where the checks don't always work. -- bogus background command often causes shell to exit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127399 You received this

Re: [Bug 475010] Re: Hard lockups with new kernels

2010-01-23 Thread Ralph
of the bug. -- Ralph. -- Hard lockups with new kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 511245] [NEW] portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-01-22 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Problem: autofs is used to automatically mount filesystems via nfs (including the home directories of users). During the boot process autofs is started but does not work, hence the login into the Desktop fails since it tries to access the user directory. In order to fix the

[Bug 511242] [NEW] After re-login konsole starts without any tabs opened

2010-01-22 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Problem: When logging into the KDE desktop, (some) applications are restarted that were running when the desktop was last exited. Konsole is among those applications started, however, it is started without any tabs opened inside, hence looks like an odd blank window. This

[Bug 511242] Re: After re-login konsole starts without any tabs opened

2010-01-22 Thread Ralph Janke
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38256955/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38256956/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38256957/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 511245] [NEW] portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly

2010-01-22 Thread Ralph Janke
Public bug reported: Problem: autofs is used to automatically mount filesystems via nfs (including the home directories of users). During the boot process autofs is started but does not work, hence the login into the Desktop fails since it tries to access the user directory. In order to fix the

[Bug 475010] Re: Hard lockups with new kernels

2010-01-22 Thread Ralph
I am using 2.6.31-17_64 and I have had 2 lockups this week. Have been searching for an answer without luck. Have any of you guys figured this out yet? -- Hard lockups with new kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >