[Bug 1945368]

2021-12-22 Thread Richard Leger
As some work was undertaken regarding the null entry, I would suggest FIXED. If someone still encounter the calendar empty issue upon upgrade with newer version of TB then opening a separate follow up bug may be best to further investigate, referencing this bug for info. Unless anyone has

[Bug 1945368]

2021-12-01 Thread Richard Leger
Both the following shall fix the issue a priori: Bug 1729664 Comment 13 and Bug 1727938 Comment 16 But it is hard to tell as the local home calendar empty issue upon upgrade is very hard to reproduce at will. Only an affected user waiting for available update could confirm. Also it remain

[Bug 1945368]

2021-12-01 Thread Richard Leger
Wayne please re-read comment 67, this bug is clearly about local home calendar being empty following upgrade due to: TypeError: item.id is null (24 times) CalStorageCalendar.jsm:2252:9 add-on issue was a separate one that was early repored fixed via remove/re-add the add-on. -- You

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-20 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to Richard Leger from comment #91) > (In reply to rimersburgb...@comcast.net from comment #81) > > **Note 2: Also installed clean TB 91.2.0 and when I tried to import .ics > > calendar, it appeared to just stall on "loading items" - see screenshot. >

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-20 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to rimersburgb...@comcast.net from comment #81) > **Note 2: Also installed clean TB 91.2.0 and when I tried to import .ics > calendar, it appeared to just stall on "loading items" - see screenshot. Only > took seconds in 78.13. Should I wait longer? Why will it not import the .ics? >

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-14 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to rimersburgb...@comcast.net from comment #74) Bug 175342 seems unrelated, no attachment and was last updated 13 years ago... were there a typo in bug number you refer to? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-09 Thread Richard Leger
Some positive update towards a possible fix... (In reply to Richard Leger from comment #66) > (In reply to Anje from comment #61) > > The issue regarding Home default calendar has not been discussed very much. > I have suggested some troubleshooting steps here

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-09 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to Anje from comment #61) > The issue regarding Home default calendar has not been discussed very much. FYI, Some of the Home default calendar issues seems to have been discussed and addressed in Bug 1729664 which this bug may depends on... hard to tell if the fix there will fix this

[Bug 1945368]

2021-10-09 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to Anje from comment #64) > Feedback: > Asking people to try using the calendar-data/backup 'local.v22.sqlite' file > renamed as 'local.sqlite' to replace the 'local.sqlite' file stored in > 'calendar-data' is not getting any of the calendar data to display. >

[Bug 1846423]

2021-06-19 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to OpenJD from comment #39) > Well as it's chaining inequality comparisons (to catch wrong types), it will > work; if you follow the link to the full source code of this file, this is > how the other elements are tested. > I'm not sure this is the most optimal way to test it (maybe it

[Bug 1846423]

2021-01-29 Thread Richard Leger
See also user story here with some details: https://sourceforge.net/p/davical/mailman/davical-general/?viewmonth=202101=18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846423 Title: Lightning:

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-05-04 Thread Richard Leger
For reference... Samba security regression tracking bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1577739 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122 Title: Samba upgrade to

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-05-03 Thread Richard Leger
Christopher, As indicated here https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2115.html default settings of Samba may have changed and therefore may require extra new option in global settings to bring back compatibilty... The first I would suggest is try adding the following: client ipc signing

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-04-30 Thread Richard Leger
For additional reference, recent Samba known cybersecurity vulnerabilities report (apply to Samba 3 & 4) indicate a change in default setting for "client ipc signing" as well as the global conf options newly introduced to keep compatibility: SMB client connections for IPC traffic are not

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-22 Thread Richard Leger
For reference... Related Debian bug reports: - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820982 (samba: Users cannot open their Windows session anymore) - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821811 (samba: badlock patch breaks trust relationship) Related others: -

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-22 Thread Richard Leger
Another quick and dirty solution is to: - unplug network cable from client computer (disconnecting machine from network) - ask user to login (if it has connected recently he/her should be authenticated via cache on local machine) - once logged in and on Desktop, reconnect network cable, to allow

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-22 Thread Richard Leger
As a quick workaround, you can downgrade samba to previous version and restart service, that is of course not a fix but will allow end-users to connect/authenticate again for time being. After downgrade, client workstation may need reboot before user can connect again. If it still does not work,

[Bug 1347305]

2014-11-18 Thread Richard Leger
Created attachment 8524740 8515396 Mockup Revisited Based on mockup proposed by Josiah (attachment 8507360 and attachment 8515396), and few comments that follows, I would suggest the following modifications (see mockup attached): - keep white background by default - remove underline below

[Bug 1347305]

2014-11-18 Thread Richard Leger
Created attachment 8524840 8524740 Mockup variation (with margins) As a further proposal, here is a slight variation of my previous mockup (attachment 8524740) with following changes: - added more space between labels and value fields - made the subject field higher to create a better and more

[Bug 1347305]

2014-10-21 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to Josiah Bruner [:JosiahOne] (needinfo CC) from comment #52) Created attachment 8507360 OS X 10.10 Compose Proposal Alternatively, I would suggest following what OS X does now, and have full lines with the header background the same color as the input area. It does look nice, I

[Bug 1347305]

2014-10-18 Thread Richard Leger
Created attachment 8507216 TB31-compose-windows-mockup-improvement-proposal.png Idea for improvement... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347305 Title: Address fields are grey when

[Bug 1347305]

2014-10-18 Thread Richard Leger
(In reply to Josiah Bruner [:JosiahOne] (needinfo CC) from comment #49) First of all, I want to thank you for having an issue with the design *and taking action* on it, it's very much appreciated, and a rare quality. I actually am a fan of your idea, and think that if done properly, could

[Bug 1347305]

2014-10-18 Thread Richard Leger
As indicated in Bug 1084539 after upgrade to TB 31.2 (Win 7 64bits) the lack of contrast between the background color of windows and background color of fields (currently same color) in compose window is the main issue. It make the fields much more difficult to read and edit and therefore are

[Bug 550593] Re: package grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-06-29 Thread Richard Leger
Well I don't really understand why I should file a new bug report when the description of this bug correspond to the issue I encountered ?! Would you explain and advise on the procedure and name of bug report I shall file instead ? Not quite sure to understand why and how to proceed... Thanks

[Bug 471266] Re: /etc/rc.local is not executed at startup

2010-06-08 Thread Richard Leger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453473 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453473 Maybe your rc.local script is executed but terminates unexpectidly du to the -e option in the shabang declaration (e.g #!/bin/sh -e) With this option, any command in the script returning an error (exit

[Bug 453473] Re: Scripts in /etc/rc2.d/ are not executed

2010-06-08 Thread Richard Leger
About rc.local not executed at startup... Maybe your rc.local script is executed but terminates unexpectedly due to the -e option in the shabang declaration (e.g #!/bin/sh -e) With this option, any command in the script returning an error (exit code other than 0) will stop execution of the

[Bug 451048] Re: qutecom crashed with SIGSEGV in QLibrary::setFileName()

2010-05-20 Thread Richard Leger
As I was not aware of the ppa for qutecom (and I still have to look into it), if like me you did a simple sudo apt-get install qutecom to have application installed in Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, it does work fine with the work arround described above :) In addition, for those which would like to

[Bug 550593] Re: package grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-05-19 Thread Richard Leger
Hello Philip, As I got the same issue after fresh install of Ubuntu 9.10 on MacBook Pro 5,5 followed by installation of all updates available, please find in attachment the file you requested above. Hoping it would help. Regards ** Attachment added: grub-pc.postingst.log

[Bug 550593] Re: package grub-pc 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-05-19 Thread Richard Leger
For extra information, on MacBook Pro 5,5 GRUB is usualy installed on /dev/sda3 (the third partition) because the first one is EFI, the second one is Max OS X, then come GRUB followed by Ubuntu :-) Just in case it might be linked to this configuration... Cheers! -- package grub-pc

[Bug 522339] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.18-0ubu ntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pre-removal installé a retourné une erreur de s ortie d'état 1

2010-02-15 Thread Richard Leger
Public bug reported: $ sudo apt-get remove slapd ldap-utils [sudo] password for xxx: Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Les paquets suivants ont été installés automatiquement et ne sont plus nécessaires :

[Bug 522339] Re: package slapd 2.4.18-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pre -removal installé a retourné une erreur de sorti e d'état 1

2010-02-15 Thread Richard Leger
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244300/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244301/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244302/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package

[Bug 522339] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.18-0ubu ntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pre-removal installé a retourné une erreur de s ortie d'état 1

2010-02-15 Thread Richard Leger
Public bug reported: $ sudo apt-get remove slapd ldap-utils [sudo] password for xxx: Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Les paquets suivants ont été installés automatiquement et ne sont plus nécessaires :

[Bug 522339] Re: package slapd 2.4.18-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pre -removal installé a retourné une erreur de sorti e d'état 1

2010-02-15 Thread Richard Leger
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244300/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244301/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39244302/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package