[Bug 1871917] Re: Unable to boot 20.04 installer on Dell XPS 15 9560

2021-06-04 Thread Szabolcs Mate
Same issue on Chuwi Aerobook Pro, except choosing safe graphics makes no difference. Also, no legacy options in bios, and the only way I managed bott it into linux was removing the ssd and installing ubuntu on it on a desktop pc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1813398] Re: qemu user calls malloc after fork in multi-threaded process

2019-01-26 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
** Also affects: qemu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: qemu (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813398 Title: qemu user calls malloc after fork

[Bug 1813398] [NEW] qemu user calls malloc after fork in multi-threaded process

2019-01-26 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
Public bug reported: qemu user may hang in malloc on a musl based system because it calls malloc after fork (in a pthread_atfork handler) in the child process. this is undefined behaviour since the parent process is multi-threaded and only as-safe functions may be called in the child then. (if

[Bug 1781808] [NEW] USB hard drives are not automatically spinning down after period of inactivity

2018-07-15 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
Public bug reported: I have quite a few Western Digital 6 Tb USB 3 hard drives and none of them is spinning down when they are inactive. I know that each hard drive can have a different interface controller but this worked perfectly in Ubuntu 16.04 and stopped working when I upgraded (with a

[Bug 1774889] Re: Passwords fields of Firefox extensions can't be focused

2018-06-04 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1765304 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765304 Apparently there is already a bug report being worked on: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2002 ** Bug watch added: github.com/ibus/ibus/issues #2002 https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2002 **

[Bug 1774889] [NEW] Passwords fields of Firefox extensions can't be focused

2018-06-03 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
Public bug reported: My system is Ubuntu 18.04 x64 which comes with Firefox 60.0.1. I have installed two extensions (NordVPN and LastPass) into it but I can't use either of them because I can't sign in to my account: as soon as I try to click the password field or try to focus it by pressing the

[Bug 1769416] Re: Can't login on 18.04 after entering wrong password

2018-05-06 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
It's a fresh install, I am not upgrading from a previous version. As a matter of fact I installed Ubuntu 18.04 on two different computers and both behave the same way with the login screen: when I make a typo in the password, I can't login even if I type the correct password the next time. It just

[Bug 1769416] Re: Can't login on 18.04 after entering wrong password

2018-05-06 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
I have no idea what package handles the login. According to the wiki (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage) if one encounters a bug at the login screen, the package is the display manager, which is LightDM in Ubuntu 11.10 or above. ** Package changed: ubuntu => lightdm (Ubuntu) -- You

[Bug 1769416] [NEW] Can't login on 18.04 after entering wrong password

2018-05-05 Thread Szabolcs Andrasi
Public bug reported: Hello, so I just installed Ubuntu 18.04LTS on my computer ( HP Spectre x360 15 ), running in dual boot mode with windows 10, everything went well during the installation, the only problem I encountered is, if I type a wrong password and then I type the correct password, the

[Bug 1232727] Re: Extracting zip archives in mc is horribly slow

2017-04-29 Thread Szabolcs Szasz
Just adding some more weight to this: Unzipping a 20 MB Drupal update package (50 megs raw), and it's been going on for like 5 hours now!... :-o :) All vanilla stuff (DigitalOcean's Drupal8 droplet image + apt-get update + install mc): mc: 4.8.11 Ubuntu: 14.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.13.0-88-generic

[Bug 1605532] [NEW] installer crashes

2016-07-22 Thread Szabolcs Petyár
Public bug reported: the installer cannot copy the boot files. quick boot is turned off in bios, but I cannot turn off the secure boot... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.2 [modified: lib/partman/automatically_partition/question] ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 1539513] Re: networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

2016-01-29 Thread Szabolcs Seláf
Same here, after downgrade I used sudo apt-mark hold libnl-3-200 libnl- genl-3-200 libnl-route-3-200 to prevent accidental upgrade, of course, once it's fixed sudo apt-mark auto libnl-3-200 libnl-genl-3-200 libnl- route-3-200 enables upgrade again. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1539513] Re: networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

2016-01-29 Thread Szabolcs Seláf
Same here, after downgrade I used sudo apt-mark hold libnl-3-200 libnl- genl-3-200 libnl-route-3-200 to prevent accidental upgrade, of course, once it's fixed sudo apt-mark auto libnl-3-200 libnl-genl-3-200 libnl- route-3-200 enables upgrade again. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-08-12 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I made a test with v3.11-rc5-saucy: # md5sum linux-* ecb40827ad3979c503cc0c2d1972317e linux-headers-3.11.0-031100rc5_3.11.0-031100rc5.201308112135_all.deb fee51a20890c8f040ad5cf8f9b34cfc1 linux-headers-3.11.0-031100rc5-generic_3.11.0-031100rc5.201308112135_amd64.deb

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-06-20 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
linux-backports-modules-cw-3.6-3.5.0-35-generic from http://ppa.launchpad.net/canonical-kernel-team/ppa/ubuntu Package: linux-backports-modules-cw-3.6-3.5.0-35-generic Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 10839 Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-06-18 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I had a very busy week and the v3.10-rc6-saucy is come out. So i made a test with it and not with rc5. $ md5sum linux-* 2d2948da4067e3e159394ff27f7175ac linux-headers-3.10.0-031000rc6_3.10.0-031000rc6.201306151835_all.deb c9b04abd01c48f9c16bdb88639ab230d

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-06-04 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I remove all encryption, but nothing change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156346 Title: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-05-30 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
1. Lenovo G580 (20157) 2. There is no BIOS update to this laptop: BIOS Update is not required for this product - Lenovo G480 (2688, 20156), G580 (2689, 20157) http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS035106 3/A. Model: Cisco EPC3925 Vendor: Cisco Hardware

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-05-30 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
3/a. I don't change any parameter, if you tell me what i could change, then i will probe it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156346 Title: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-05-27 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I maid a test with lucid. The problem also exits. ( I must create USB pendrive to boot linux. I use LinuxLive USB Creator. ) I created a pendrive from lucid ISO file and maid a test with lucid. The problem also exits. After this i created a pendrive from saucy, but i have got mount error

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-05-24 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I bought this laptop at 2013 february. I install Quantal on it, so i didn't probe older Ubuntu releases. But i think this problem is also effected the older release(s): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/947697 Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.04 is slow, unstable and has a

[Bug 1156346] Re: 168c:002b Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-05-23 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
Hi! 1. I test with the lastest development release of Ubuntu, but the booting was failed with mounting error. I have got a rescue CLI. I could browse the dvd folders, ... Later i will try another daily image with another rewriteable DVD. $ md5sum saucy-desktop-amd64.iso

[Bug 1156346] Re: Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-03-19 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156346 Title: Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal. To manage

[Bug 1156346] Re: Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-03-19 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
I have made some tests with my notebooks. (My AP SSID name is WIZLAN). I did scan for SSIDs of the nearest APs in every room (r0,r1,r2) (20 times 5 seconds pause between scans, same positions in the rooms). Then i count the unique SSID names and i have got this result: There was 4 test case: hp

[Bug 1156346] Re: Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-03-19 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156346 Title: Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a

[Bug 1156346] [NEW] Atheros AR9285 Wireless on Ubuntu 12.10 is slow, unstable and has a weak signal.

2013-03-17 Thread Szabolcs SZŐKE
Public bug reported: There is 3 room in my flat: room0: here is my AP room1: there is one wall between room0 and room1 room2: there is two wall between room0 and room2 If i use my new Lenovo G580 (Atheros 9285) with Windows 8 or my old notebook (HP NX6310 (Broadcom wifi) with Kubuntu 8.04 ) the

[Bug 1027801] Re: Packages.gz not found because instead searching for Packages only

2013-03-14 Thread Szabolcs Feczak
I was trying to loop mount the wubi iso to offload my network bandwidth and install some packages from there I have followed this guide https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGet/Offline/Repository and ran into the problem that the iso only contained .gz files for Package list -- You received

[Bug 527938] Re: Writer crashes on Tools-Bibliography without libreoffice-base

2013-03-09 Thread Szabolcs Feczak
I've followed the instructions on #91 and it took me here, so it is still happen. Had to manually install libreoffice-base with apt-get just installing libreoffice-writer going to Tools/Bibliography just throw a non-userfriendly error: terminate called after throwing an instance of

[Bug 856779] Re: gvim slow to respond

2011-11-04 Thread Szabolcs
Are there updated packages (with the fix) for Oneiric somewhere, that I could install now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856779 Title: gvim slow to respond To manage notifications

[Bug 856779] Re: gvim slow to respond

2011-11-04 Thread Szabolcs
There's a related issue: The global menu either doesn't show *at all* with gvim, or it shows in the vim window (it's not global). This problem disappears too when starting gvim with gvim -f, hence it might be related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 856779] Re: gvim slow to respond

2011-11-04 Thread Szabolcs
The bug for that is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/776499 (sorry for so many replies) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856779 Title: gvim slow to respond To

[Bug 776499] Re: gvim gets no global menu, timeout warning on the console

2011-11-04 Thread Szabolcs
Possibly related bug (also worked around by gvim -f): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/856779 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776499 Title: gvim gets no global menu,

[Bug 884127] [NEW] gVim freezes when entering input mode and Chinese IME (IBUS) is installed

2011-10-31 Thread Szabolcs
Public bug reported: I have a Chinese input method enabled (IBUS), but it's not the default. (The default is US English) Every time I open gvim, and press 'i' to enter input mode, it freezes for about 10-15 seconds. Note that English input is active during this time! In the terminal I get

[Bug 884127] Re: gVim freezes when entering input mode and Chinese IME (IBUS) is installed

2011-10-31 Thread Szabolcs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884127 Title: gVim freezes when entering input mode and Chinese IME (IBUS) is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 477430] Re: grub 2 error: out of disk. failed to boot default entries. press any key to continue...

2011-08-11 Thread Szabolcs
Every version of Ubuntu that uses grub2 gives me an out of disk error on first boot after a clean install. Whenever a new version comes out I try installing it on a logical partition (side by side with WinXP), and it fails to boot. Despite many tries, couldn't come up with a solution, and

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

2010-10-29 Thread SZÉKELYI Szabolcs
This bug is still present in libgtk2.0 2.22.0-0ubuntu1. Emacs23 fails to start with the same error message. ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Invalid = Incomplete ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- emacs fails to start: X

[Bug 634428] [NEW] Unable to use Smart 5.1 funcrion with Via VT1708s Sound Card. Unable to use 5.1 Surround.

2010-09-09 Thread Szőke Szabolcs
Public bug reported: Hi! I want to use my sound card in 5.1 mode. In Windows works but in linux... I cant get to work the 5.1 Surround. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.23+dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.28-generic 2.6.35.3 Uname: Linux

[Bug 634428] Re: Unable to use Smart 5.1 funcrion with Via VT1708s Sound Card. Unable to use 5.1 Surround.

2010-09-09 Thread Szőke Szabolcs
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634428/+attachment/1562400/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.info.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634428/+attachment/1562401/+files/Card0.Amixer.info.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 417757] Re: [regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

2010-07-21 Thread Szabolcs
It took forever for this to get fixed for Karmic, and now, after upgrading to Lucid, the bug is back. This is absolutely ridiculous. And no, most of us are not in a position to buy a new router or switch ISPs because Ubuntu gets randomly broken with every upgrade. -- [regression] all network

[Bug 562139] Re: FUSE filesystems cannot be accessed when shared

2010-04-14 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 175689 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175689 On Tuesday 13, April, Chow Loong Jin wrote: crippled filesystem (driver)s that do not implement ownership and/or permissions properly. For the record, NTFS-3G developers has ported the POSIX File System

[Bug 562139] Re: FUSE filesystems cannot be accessed when shared

2010-04-14 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 175689 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175689 On Tuesday 13, April, Chow Loong Jin wrote: crippled filesystem (driver)s that do not implement ownership and/or permissions properly. For the record, NTFS-3G developers has ported the POSIX File System

[Bug 514223] Re: Vista, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7 unable to access devices touched by ntfs-3g versions prior to 2010.1.16

2010-01-30 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Some correction to the bug report from the NTFS-3G developers: 1. It is not true that Vista, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7 unable to access devices touched by ntfs-3g versions prior to 2010.1.16. Just try and you will see that all of them will see the NTFS partition fine. The fact is that

[Bug 417757] Re: [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

2009-10-29 Thread Szabolcs
I am affected by this problem too, and I can't help but wonder why this bug isn't blocking release. It makes Ubuntu Karmic practically unusable for me (and most likely everyone else who is affected). -- [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default

[Bug 427154] Re: Add This Computer blocked by Firefox ABE

2009-10-14 Thread Szabolcs Ladányi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 405581 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405581 This is NoScript extension issue. Disable it. Add client to Ubuntu One. Enable it. -- Add This Computer blocked by Firefox ABE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427154 You received this bug notification

[Bug 412119] Re: Copying NTFS partition full might cause NTFS errors

2009-08-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Please see http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#indexo ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Copying NTFS partition full might cause NTFS errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 389718] Re: Ntsf-3g is corrupting NTFS structure.

2009-08-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Ntsf-3g is corrupting NTFS structure. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 396874] Re: mount ignores options from fstab

2009-08-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#wine It's a mount(8) bug/feature. Use 'users,exec', not 'exec,user'. ** Package changed: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) = util-linux (Ubuntu) -- mount ignores options from fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396874 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 368134] Re: nfts-3g ubuntu 9.04 filesystem corruption

2009-08-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- nfts-3g ubuntu 9.04 filesystem corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 318625] Re: Rhythmbox shouldn't set illegal / special characters on filenames (i.e. ?; question mark) when ripping to NTFS volumes

2009-08-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
** Package changed: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) = rhythmbox (Ubuntu) -- Rhythmbox shouldn't set illegal / special characters on filenames (i.e. ?; question mark) when ripping to NTFS volumes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 393817] Re: openssl upgrade makes sasl unusable

2009-07-31 Thread Szabolcs Parragh
Noone? Seriously: is this not a real enough issue? Or am I doing something wrong to see this happen? -- openssl upgrade makes sasl unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 162863] Re: ntfs-3g does not respect fstab options

2009-07-10 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#useroption2 -- ntfs-3g does not respect fstab options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 393817] [NEW] openssl upgrade makes sasl unusable

2009-06-30 Thread Szabolcs Parragh
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper) a new upgrade has been released that upgrades the openssl package and the corresponding libssl0.9.8 library: Preparing to replace libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-7ubuntu0.7 (using .../libssl0.9.8_0.9.8a-7ubuntu0.9_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libssl0.9.8

[Bug 368134] Re: nfts-3g ubuntu 9.04 filesystem corruption

2009-05-28 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
What NTFS-3G does is actually detects and reports that something has corrupted two files. The 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption with ICH8/ICH9 on 64 bits installations bug is indeed a very good candidate to be the real culprit. Data and file system corruptions almost exclusively origin

[Bug 336762] Re: ntfs hard links not working

2009-04-28 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Ubuntu doesn't compile with the internal FUSE library which is used to ensure and certify NTFS-3G quality. The external FUSE library has several issues which are fixed only in the FUSE CVS. -- ntfs hard links not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336762 You received this bug notification

[Bug 364183] [NEW] stunnel not updated from 7.10 to 8.04

2009-04-20 Thread Szabolcs Ferenczi
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stunnel4 From 7.10 updated to 8.04 and this error happened ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 20 17:24:55 2009 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: no package named `stunnel' is installed, cannot

[Bug 364183] Re: stunnel not updated from 7.10 to 8.04

2009-04-20 Thread Szabolcs Ferenczi
** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25790043/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25790044/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz

[Bug 307090] Re: acpi wakeup doesn't work with HP tx2510us unless hpet is disabled

2009-03-29 Thread Szabolcs Ladányi
same problem here my HP Compaq nx6310 laptop does not wakeup after 20 sec -- acpi wakeup doesn't work with HP tx2510us unless hpet is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307090 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 340151] Re: ICQ protocol update [March 2009]

2009-03-18 Thread Szabolcs Parragh
As I see it, the problem with Hardy is that the version in backports (2.5.2) doesn't have the fix, only the stable repository version (2.4.1.) Therefore if you have backports enabled, you won't get a good version, which ICQ works with. You'll have to disable backports, remove the podgin and

[Bug 340151] Re: ICQ protocol update [March 2009]

2009-03-16 Thread Szabolcs Parragh
Sorry guys, but will this fix not make it into hardy-backports? -- ICQ protocol update [March 2009] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 336762] Re: ntfs hard links not working

2009-03-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The problem can not be reproduced with NTFS-3G 2009.2.1, internal FUSE and kernel 2.6.26. NTFS-3G and/or the kernel is too old in Ubuntu 8.10. Upstream NTFS-3G has closed this issue report as INVALID and Ubuntu specific. -- ntfs hard links not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336762 You

[Bug 336762] Re: ntfs hard links not working

2009-03-07 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: util-linux = ntfs-3g -- ntfs hard links not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 336762] Re: ntfs hard links not working

2009-03-07 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Hard links work fine (you can confirm by ls -i after cp -al) but probably the 'echo B B' case doesn't because apparently the '' creates a new file for some reason. Do you have any specific software which doesn't work correctly with NTFS-3G? -- ntfs hard links not working

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2009-02-21 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
This is a known Vista problem handling sparse files. Please contact Microsoft. Good luck! -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 330023] Re: ntfs-3g crashed with SIGSEGV in ntfs_attr_lookup()

2009-02-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
NTFS-3G 2009.2.1 did fix a crash in ntfs_attr_lookup if a file or directory (this is the case here) was highly fragmented and there was an NTFS corruption or hardware problem: http://ntfs-3g.org/releases.html -- ntfs-3g crashed with SIGSEGV in ntfs_attr_lookup()

[Bug 330023] Re: ntfs-3g crashed with SIGSEGV in ntfs_attr_lookup()

2009-02-17 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The crash happens exactly at the same place which was fixed in NTFS-3G 2009.2.1. However the stack trace doesn't look correct. There are some problems with it. Like apparently using debug symbols from the NTFS-3G 2009.2.1 release and manual edition of vital parameters to corrupt values which

[Bug 250060] Re: ntfs-3g crashed with SIGSEGV in ntfs_log_handler_syslog()

2009-02-15 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Not ntfs-3g specific, other programs crash in syslog - dl_fixup() too: Bug #188354, Bug #279586, Bug #124453 ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: ntfs-3g = glibc -- ntfs-3g crashed with SIGSEGV in ntfs_log_handler_syslog() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250060 You received this

[Bug 175503] Re: User-friendly automounting of ntfs partitions with an unclean logfile

2009-02-13 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
NTFS-3G solved this issue from version 2009.2.1: http://ntfs- 3g.org/releases.html -- User-friendly automounting of ntfs partitions with an unclean logfile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 310326] Re: Intrepid: USB HDD not mounted

2009-02-13 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: ntfs-3g = hal Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Intrepid: USB HDD not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 240429] Re: adding files to mercurial repository fails on ntfs

2009-02-13 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The driver works as expected (Operation not permitted). Remove the default_permissions option then it should work. Please see more detail about permission handling in the NTFS-3G manual ('Access Handling and Security' section): http://ntfs-3g.org/manual.html ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu)

[Bug 328352] Re: mount.ntfs causes 100% CPU (iowait)

2009-02-13 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
It's not clear what you copied from where to where and how. Anyway it looks to be a hardware problem. Check your RAM and disks for bad sectors, e.g. by the utility badblocks. -- mount.ntfs causes 100% CPU (iowait) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328352 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 328352] Re: mount.ntfs causes 100% CPU (iowait)

2009-02-13 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
It's impossible to see what NTFS-3G has to do with the problem. Yes, the /dev/sda1 NTFS partition is mounted at /media/WindowsRecovery by NTFS-3G but you were reading from another file system mounted at /media/mobile120 and writing to partition /dev/sda2. The IOWAIT is completely normal when one

[Bug 322751] Re: Not mounting drives unsafely removed in windows is an annoying default

2009-01-30 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Joseph: This is a long and complex story. I make it short. I've seen many thousands related comments, suggestions, arguments in the last many years but yours was the first one which had a good point (case 3). Theoretically you're not right but practically you are: the damage was already done when

[Bug 320192] Re: ntfs-3g doesn't support exec option

2009-01-23 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The 'exec' mount option is of course supported. In fact it's the default NTFS-3G option. There are over 80 NTFS-3G mount options. These are NTFS- 3G, FUSE user space, FUSE kernel driver and kernel VFS related. The NTFS-3G man page documents only the NTFS-3G specific mount options, none of the

[Bug 318625] Re: Rhythmbox shouldn't set illegal / special characters on filenames (i.e. ?; question mark) when ripping to NTFS volumes

2009-01-20 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
This is definitely not an NTFS-3G problem. The '?' is a perfectly legal NTFS character in the POSIX namesspace NTFS-3G uses: http://ntfs- 3g.org/support.html#posixfilenames2 -- Rhythmbox shouldn't set illegal / special characters on filenames (i.e. ?; question mark) when ripping to NTFS volumes

[Bug 291294] Re: after upgrade to 8.10 (new x.org) SiS driver is not working well (issue with color depth?)

2008-12-20 Thread Szabolcs Parragh
I would like to confirm this very serious bug. I experience this on my Asus L4000. The workarounds didn't work for me on this laptop! -- after upgrade to 8.10 (new x.org) SiS driver is not working well (issue with color depth?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291294 You received this bug

[Bug 250705] Re: Please backport ntfs-3g

2008-12-02 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
@Shirish: NTFS-3G is a user space driver. It can't hang the system. Only buggy kernels can. Nevertheless your experience is very unique and it sounds to be a hardware problem. It's also possible that Ubuntu patched the driver and something went terrible wrong. But then, much more people would

[Bug 303610] Re: file move causes data loss if interrupted due to system crash

2008-12-02 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
@Florian Linux NTFS development claims 100% NTFS compatibility. If you think otherwise then please describe here what your problems are because we very much would like to know and fix it if it's justified. Please note, Ubuntu uses an extremely old version of the driver which indeed has many

[Bug 303610] Re: file move causes data loss if interrupted due to system crash

2008-12-02 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Things don't work the way you think. They are much, much more complex. E.g. a full NTFS driver implementation requires more than 150 person years work. Not only the file data but ALL relevant metadata must be on the disk as well. If only a few metadata bytes are missing then one may lose

[Bug 303610] Re: file move causes data loss if interrupted due to system crash

2008-12-02 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
No software solution will help because the (disk) caches will lie about the data. It's not possible to build a reliable (predictable) system on unreliable hardware. People want the cheapest and fastest disks = disk manufacturers provide them but data unreliability is the real price. The faster

[Bug 303610] Re: file move causes data loss if interrupted due to system crash

2008-12-02 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
It's mathematically not possible, not statistically. If Windows were safe Microsoft wouldn't have documented the same data loss problem: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940508 They talk about not unmounted devices which is the same as suddenly removing them or power outage. Moreover the severity

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
It's possible that this is a pure Windows bug. Either a Microsoft NTFS or a device driver related. Google found many similar crashes but none of them involved NTFS-3G, only for Windows recovery. Here is an idea how we could prove and document this is a pure Windows bug. 1. Install Cygwin (a

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The ZIP package at http://www.flexhex.com/docs/articles/download/sparse.zip contains a CS.EXE file which is supposed to work similarly as the cygwin cp --sparse=always command. The test could be simpler. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
I've found the below on http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256701-QuickTime-BSODs- Vista-solution That eMule had to remove all the sparse file support on Vista because of Vista bugs So, it's very well possible this is a pure Vista bug what any software can trigger, not only NTFS-3G. --

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Cygwin cp --sparse=always doesn't work. The files are not sparse. CS.EXE also doesn't work on my x64 because it's a 32-bit EXE file. Maybe you're more lucky. Of course it's also possible that Microsoft silently disabled sparse file support because they had too many reliability problems with them.

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-09 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
No such problem was reported with XP. Sparse support can't be disabled for NTFS-3G because it's part of the POSIX specification. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
What are the outputs of ntfs-3g.probe --readwrite /dev/sda5 ntfs-3g.probe --readonly /dev/sda5 Yes, the log file is important even if we can't create yet the NTFS debug file. We will make a solution for you depending on the above results. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Storno the ntfs-3g.probe's. I just realized you use ntfsprogs-2.0.0 and have problem with the image file, not the NTFS device. Please use ntfsclone from ntfsprogs 1.13.1. ntfsprogs-2.0.0 has problems. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Well, if the journal file is unclean then ntfsclone-1.13.2-wip will fail too. There are two choices: 1. Run ntfsfix on /dev/sda5 before running ntfsclone (any version). 2. Run ntfsfix on ntfsmeta.img then ntfsclone ntfsmeta.img. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Use the --force option. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Good job! :-) Yes, bzip2 is unfortunately very slow. We will solve this issue in the future by using a different NTFS debug image format. The actions are correct. I would also need the output of egrep -3i 'ntfs|ata|sd|i/o' /var/log/daemon.log and the name of the file which crashes Vista. --

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Please download http://ntfs-3g.org/download/ntfsclone-1.13.2-wip.tgz Unpack it and use ntfsclone-1.13.2-wip instead of ntfsclone. Thanks. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Please also send the output of egrep -i 'ntfs|ata|sd|I/O' /var/log/daemon.log /var/log/daemon.log could be also /var/log/messages, /var/log/messages.log, /var/log/syslog or something else distribution specific. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
I'll make you an ntfsclone binary which you can use, please wait a bit. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Yes, --force ntfs-3g mount and unmount should also fix it. -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
NTFS interoperates with several other subsytems and if one of them fails then the problem appears as an NTFS bug but in fact it isn't. That's why more, non-NTFS info is needed, to confine where the problem is. The good news is that no sign of any hardware problem. However it seems the NTFS

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
The file metadata is indeed inconsistent. Did you start to download the file in Linux or Vista? What is your Vista version? Do you have Vista Patches, Service Packs? -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Yes, chkdsk has many problems unfortunately. If it still crashes then no need for the other debug file. What are the Amule versions for Windows and Linux? You don't have Windows Home Server, do you? Microsoft is having major problems with NTFS file corruptions and they even had to hire back

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
That would be a very good observation! If BSOD comes when you copy the file then please run the below command in Linux shell. It is one line: for i in $(seq 1 200); do dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse bs=4096 seek=$((2*$i)) count=1 conv=notrunc; done Then try to copy the 'sparse' file on Windows. If it

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, [utf-8] Nicolò Chieffo wrote: Do you think that sparse files are wrongly managed by ntfs-3g? They are fine. But your case is more complex than the usual one. It also could be a unique, subtle problem. Nobody else reported this problem and I also can't reproduce it. This

[Bug 279017] Re: sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD

2008-10-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Can you write down the Vista BSOD messages, or make a photo about it? -- sharing amule temp files winth Vista in ntfs partition gives BSOD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

  1   2   3   >