Effects me to the point that I am going to be switching to Thunar.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964186
Title:
commit to fix "Don't hide Open With applications for subtypes of
app
Bug #933973 has been named a duplicate of this one. Not sure why but I
will post this here as that bug is not confirmed.
Had upgrades for the same packages today in Xubuntu 12.04 and in Debian
Wheezy.
The Xubuntu packages, all related to cups and bluez will not install in
a chroot environment.
Well as for today there is no applet at all under Xubuntu.
I am pretty sure my connection is up and running well. Would have been
hard to get this page up if not.
Should we file another bug or is this good enough?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Xubuntu 12.04-testing amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938380
Title:
Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun
I should add that this is not a huge problem.
Running "dpkg --configure -a" when booted into Xubuntu takes instant
care of it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933973
Title:
Cups and r
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933973
Title:
Cups and related packages will not install without error in chroot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
I have Xubuntu 12.04-testing installed on my external drive.
It gets updated in a chroot environment from my main drive under Debian
testing.
All packages seem to work fine except for cups, blues-cups and anyother
cups related package. They all throw a dpkg code 1 error.
I
OK, ran the same things over on the other install.
Rebooted instead of going straight from recovery to desktop.
Got no failed to install notice from apport.
These 2 installs were both upgraded from another OS in a chroot
environment. I knew from errors there of this failure to install.
Seems t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905598
Title:
package procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
T
Public bug reported:
This is Xubuntu 12.04-testing.
I was surprised to see this come up on apport as I had just booted in
through recovery where I ran "dpkg --configure -a" which claimed to have
fixed this problem.
I reran the command and just got a new prompt.
It could be that hitting Ctrl+D t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901038
Title:
package cups (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
To ma
Public bug reported:
This is a second install of Xubuntu 12.04-testing.
Apport seems to think this is not reported. Reported it on my other
install.
Do not have time or desire to hunt up the other bug, you may have
deleted it for all I know.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Pac
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901035
Title:
package procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
T
Public bug reported:
Title says it all. This is Xubuntu 12.04-testing.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-3.8-generic 3.2.0-rc4
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-3-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 1.90-0
Public bug reported:
This is in Xubuntu 12.04 testing.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: cups 1.5.0-12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-1.3-generic 3.2.0-rc2
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-1-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
AptOrdering:
libtas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896436
Title:
package cups 1.5.0-12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
To manage no
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 879348 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879348
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 879348
evince segfaults
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 879348 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879348
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879816
Title:
will not open PDF files in Xubuntu 12.04-testing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 879348 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879348
Public bug reported:
Down loaded a Tordon herbicide label. Right click on file. Choose
"Open with Document Viewer". Nothing happens.
Choose "Open with Gimp" and it opens so the file is good.
ProblemType:
This problem has been getting worse with each release for several
releases now. It is now getting to be too much of a problem to ignore.
A warning, at least, would be a good start.
Getting more upgrade testing, as was done for the 8.04 to 10.04 upgrade
should really become standard for all relea
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868069
Title:
plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct()
To manage notifications about this bug go to
I had no problem putting synaptic on the launcher earlier. It comes up
normally and asks for a password.
I most certainly do not us the USC. Takes way too long to do anything
with it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
You folks ever look at the page we are on now? There is contrast, you
can look that word up, between the background and the font.
Hard as this may be to believe it is a good thing.
Having font and background the same color, even with a difference in
shade, is a bad thing. This is known to folks
I have a 17 inch screen and can't see the bugger. Must be fun on a
tablet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726740
Title:
Manual Partition in Ubiquity difficult to use due to Boot Load
This "zero config" idea is just not right. You can do that on
WinWhatever.
This is a major reason for switching to a Linux OS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748739
Title:
no config
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: unity
It is bad enough that there is no usable menu in unity but if we have to
be illiterates and use icons at least we should be able to pick the ones
on the launch bar.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: unity (not installed)
ProcVer
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Booting ISO from HD with grub. Tries to boot. Gets to pulseaudio
failing and flashes that screen once and goes to black. Box freezes
tight. Have to unplug to get out.
Dell XPS 420 Intel Q6600 3Gb ram ATI Radeon HD2400 Pro
** Affects: ubiqui
I would say that this effects just about anyone who installs Ubuntu.
Glad to see that there is movement on this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652852
Title:
Ubiquity doesn't suggest
Yes I was incomplete in my info. 20110329.1 natty-desktop-amd64.iso Is
what it was.
This is a Dell XPS420. 3Gb Ram, Intel Q6600.
I have no way to get you pictures and it would taken a bunch. At times
they were moving at a pretty good speed and I am not sure a picture
would help (I couldn't trac
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: casper
I think this is a casper problem. Could be ubiquity. Could be Ubuntu.
The B1 (current) image tried to boot. Several pages of I/O errors on
squashfs failing to read most things.
Did get to a login page. Open password did not work. Tried "ubun
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737982
Title:
package virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms 3.2.8-dfsg-2ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to
install/upgrade: virtualbox-ose-guest kernel module failed to buil
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose
I got the message that the package had quit. Followed the instructions.
Do not use VB.
I just update/upgraded this install. Because of Plymouth I spend little
time here. Booted up through recovery as Plymouth makes any other boot
imposs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737981
Title:
package rsyslog 4.2.0-2ubuntu8.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
Apport sent me this way. Have no idea what the package even does.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: rsyslog 4.2.0-2ubuntu8.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-
This is a great concern to me as I use a custom menu and a set partition
table. I can boot to any partition that I install to as there is a menu
entry for that partition already in place.
If I have to boot to the new install I get the generated menu. Seeing
how os-prober generates an entry for e
The eye strain caused by this tiny window, even on by 1440x900 monitor,
was uncomfortable to say the least.
I also have 2 drives with 24 partitions counting swap.
That window needs to be full screen.
This is a new installer, I understand that, out with the old and so
forth. It is never, however
On 08/30/2010 03:01 PM, Benjamin Humphrey wrote:
> In this case, the mainstream certainly does not like the wallpaper.
> That's obvious. I also don't believe this wallpaper was landed in
> Maverick with the intention of it being a temporary one. This has never
> been done before, it was landed ri
This is also a problem for amd64.
I would hope that this remains open. This is a security risk. Nothing
like just having you user name listed for folks that might need it.
If this is a feature instead of a bug it is a really stupid feature.
--
Maverick ubiquity lacks option to change computer
I will admit, that it is different than the wallpaper for 10.04. It no
longer looks like grape juice and cottage cheese vomit.
It looks like some chemically flavored frozen orange desert was added to
the menu.
--
Official 10.10 wallpaper is unappealing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625193
You
Yes I am aware what telling it not to install does.
What I am saying is that it did not install on the MBR but did screw up
the grub that was installed on the MBR. This caused me to not be able
to boot to anything.
When I am in a hurry I generally install this way. I have set
partitions and use
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53075881/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53075882/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "DRM.card0.DVI.I.1.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53075883/DRM.card0.DVI.I.1
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati
I am booted an I can read this as I type. The address bar I can't read.
The launch bar is blobs. The FF menus can't be read.
Basically I can read this page.
Terminal was not readable. Had command set on another install and
copi
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53074020/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53074021/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquitySyslog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53074022/UbiquitySyslog.gz
--
When s
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Just installed 10.10 A3 rebuild RC ISO.
Selected to not install boot loader so as not to have to deal with it.
I have a custom menu that is installed on the MBR,
Ended up with no working grub. This is not much of a problem for me as
I have a c
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53073445/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53073446/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquityDebug.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53073447/UbiquityDebug.gz
** Attachmen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
There are a number of things I do when installation is complete. The
most important to me is to relabel the partitions used for the install.
When I hit the "continue testing" option the live session logged out.
It did bring up the gdm login scr
I will give that a whack some time today from the Live Session.
--
Can't install fglrx on UNE 10.10 Alpha3 RC ISO
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Public bug reported:
I would send a screen shot if I could find the app.
I am lucky to be able to find anything as the launch panel is completely
useless. it does have some white blobs and the one that represents
Hardware Drivers wiggles occasionally.
Entire panel currently flickering.
On an i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 579683 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579683
I do not think this is a duplicate of 579683.
If you will notice the entry under "uname" gives
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-9-generic i686
I do not think that this can be right. I installed this on a 64 bit box
but
I run on a usb HDD with several testing OS' installed. Using "safely
remove drive" is very handy. Use it and the entire HDD is removed.
It is easy to tell that it is removed as the screen goes blank when the
OS that I am using is also removed.
A simple fix would be to put the unmount option bac
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52293146/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52293147/UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt
--
Ubuntuone pulls up Firefox on boot up and spams me
https://bugs.launchp
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
This is not a good marketing move. There are folks that use this type
of service on the forums recommending removing ubuntuone.
I do not use this type of thing. Left it on here as it is part of the
install and we are testing.
We are n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52273739/Dependencies.txt
--
Get only white screen after login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: unity
For the last few days I have been unable to use Unity on this install.
I am on the Ubuntu Desktop now.
When I log in to the Unity session I go to white screen, drive lights
continue, screen flickers once, drive lights go off. tty2 to reboot.
Prob
This applies to all applications that you open with gksudo from terminal
and should have a password box pop up if opening from a menu.
This means that the Login Screen, for instance, with the "unlock" on the
box will come up but Gparted will not.
Same error message on all that will not come up.
With all the changes going on in Ubuntu and new people coming in it
really is time to update the default bookmarks.
This seem like a good list that include solutions for common problems
that people have on a first time install.
--
Maverick: The defaut livecd and installed firefox bookmarks could
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51369861/Dependencies.txt
--
When trying to open synaptic i get an error "could not grab your mouse"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: unity
I go to the applications tab on the top bar of Unity, go to system and
click on synaptic. The little gnome spinner works for quite a while,
Screen flashes off and back on once. Spinner stops shortly after that
flash.
Click on the Ubuntu logo to c
Public bug reported:
Have downloaded this twice from link at ISO testing for 10.10 A2. Can't
get a md5sum to match that listed or even close.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
maverick-desktop-amd64.iso will not download accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net
This is very interesting. Marked invalid because it is a known bug.
That bug claims it is fixed. Good system for getting rid of bugs.
Still doesn't work but the bug is fixed so I guess every thing is great.
I think I will just give up on this bootchart crap.
--
bootchart fails to generate .pn
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50850215/Dependencies.txt
--
Bootchart does not generate a .tar.gz file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bootchart
I installed this 10.10 UNE and installed bootchart right off the bat.
It has never generated a file. We got the pybootchartgui update the
other day and I got a chuckle out of that. I am sure it is working hard
on this install.
ProblemType: Bu
This effects many of us judging by the mentions of it on the forum for
10.10. I am embarrassed that as bug was not filed earlier as this has
been a problem for more than 4 weeks.
--
No Sound - used a clean Install of Maverick 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596882
You received this bug not
This is a tool that is not only handy in testing, there are times when
it is just the best thing for the job and those are times when it may be
real hard to get it due to malfunctions in other package tools.
We have several partitioners, sfdisk is I would say little used. It
would be easy to inst
As you can see from the comments on this bug this is something of a
pain.
I am guessing but i really think about a third of the problems with
booting MS installs that show up on the forums is due to the
installation of grub on the MS boot sector.
While I do not have that problem as I will not hav
This really is just about shutting down a lot of boxes. There is no
sense it booting up an OS where most of the most used apps will not run
correctly.
I am pretty lucky in that enabling effects, which I absolutely hate,
does make the system run.
--
revert client side decoration, breaks everythi
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48722813/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48722814/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48722815/Dependencies.txt
** A
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
Every time I boot fsck is run on excuse that "sda11 has been mounted 33
(sometimes 25) times check forced". This seems to be strange when it
happens every time.
I really hope you folks are considering replacing this dog with one that
actually
This is an ongoing bug that is, at least, in Ubuntu 9.10, 10.04 and
10.10.
I have several similar installations on one drive so the hardware is
identical. On one bootchart works every time. On one it never works
even though I have removed or purged it and reinstalled several times.
On the other
All I can say is that this is not an improvement at all.
Folks need an obvious way to check the disk for defects.
The old menu was easy for me, as a noob, to figure out when I came in on
8.04. I think this would have run me off.
This "noninteractiveL" crap is for things like MS not Linux.
--
I have no idea why this is listed as a "wish list" item.
I would list it as critical for being able to use the computer for more
than giggles and gossip.
This may be great for twits (users of twitter) and folks just looking
for entertainment.
As for being able to anything else on here it is just
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43297030/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43297031/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquityDebug.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43297032/UbiquityDebug.gz
** Attachmen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Using the beta 2 candidate for ISO the boot time to the Live session was
6.25 minutes. This is with the mouse cocked and ready to hit the menu
item to go to the Live session.
This seems a bit long to me.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu
I just checked and can't even do this as SU. Now this is a big problem
on a multi boot system. I am not permitted to install my custom menu.
This is a very bad thing.
--
Unable to transfer data from one OS to new install from Live session as user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556828
You rece
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43295059/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43295060/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquityDebug.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43295061/UbiquityDebug.gz
** Attachmen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
In the Live session I am not permitted to transfer data from an
installed OS to the new installation with out being the Super User.
This is just silly. I would like the old nautilus behavior back in the
Live session to make setting up a new in
I have 7 variations of 10.04 installed on 1 drive. On one bootchart has
worked once since November. On one it works every time. The others are
in between those extremes.
--
pybootchartgui crashed with ValueError in get_proc_state()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556704
You received this bug n
Well, been a while since anyone had this problem.
My panels are completely gone at this point and I thought I had better
get this sent before attempting to recover the buggers here in 10.04.
--
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103268
Yo
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377343/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377344/ProcAttrCurrent.gz
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377345/ProcMaps.txt
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tar
This is just one of many bugs reported on this boot.
Get rid of plymouth and it will all go away. It sure has on the one
install on this same hardware that I Purged Plymouth on. That is the
only one of 10 installs of 10.04 that boots fast and easy.
I am pretty sure that if you simply drop plymouth this problem will go
away like magic.
--
does not terminate at computer shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
Send this to the plymouth folks. I have several installs of 10.04 and
the one that I purged plymouth on does NOT have this problem.
--
does not terminate at computer shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542205
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377308/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377310/ProcAttrCurrent.gz
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377311/ProcMaps.txt
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ureadahead
I have no idea what this is about. I suspect if I was smart and purged
plymouth this would not be a problem.
Apport generated this and I am sending it as I am damned tired of
plymouth and its infinite number of stupid problems with everything
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377315/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377316/ProcAttrCurrent.gz
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41377317/ProcMaps.txt
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bootchart
This is, I am sure, just another problem with the script as in the
Plymouth not shutting down bug.
A very easy fix for this is to remove plymouth.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Mar 14 17:16:19 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41057959/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41057960/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquityDebug.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41057961/UbiquityDebug.gz
** Attachmen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
I hope ubiquity is the right package,
I wanted to save a chroot script to the desktop of the new install.
Retrieved script from another 10.04 install and placed on desktop of
Live seasion.
Tried to copy to the desktop of new install. Wouldn't
I am using a 64 bit system and had the same problem.
--
Lucid Live CD fails to reboot after ejecting + enter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
This is more than a problem with the bug script. Plymouth is not the
last thing I see on shutting down or rebooting.
The last thing I see is text telling me that plymouth was shut down with
the kill signal.
--
plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs
https://bugs.launchpad.
The only thing I can add is that I have 5 installations of 10.04 on the
same hardware (1 box using an external enclosure for the test platform)
and I have one installation that never has a problem. It is very
similar to 2 other installs (triple redundancy as I do use this as my
production OS durin
I was removing and installing grub-common and removing grub and installing
grub-pc in an upgraded 8.04>10.04 installation when this occurred.
Terminal ouput below;
debconf: DbDriver "passwords" warning: could not open
/var/cache/debconf/passwords.dat: Permission denied
Preconfiguring packages ..
This is just the same bug on another install of an upgrade from 8.04.4
to 10.04 on the same hardware.
--
update-app-install crashed with UnicodeEncodeError in __eq__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520824
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
I am on amd64. Upgraded with "apt-get dist-upgrade". Synaptic running
when notification came up. Here I am.
Cleaned up some things in synaptic and am installing stellarium through
it right now. I do not have a clue what this is that crashed unless it
has something to doe with that wonderfully
Same deal today.
--
shutdown on live session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
My monitor did not shut down. Did not get message. Hit enter after a
minute wait. Nothing happened.
Used Alt+SysRq+b to reboot.
--
shutdown on live session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39421758/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39421759/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39421760/Df.txt
** Attachment added:
Pretty much the same deal on the same hardware, different 10.04 install.
Main difference - clean update/upgrade today and a clean, normal boot to
desktop.
--
package dbus 1.2.16-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
Just ran update/upgrade on this 10.04 install. Got an error at the end
that had "bad hash sum".
Reboot, login came up, entered password, screen went to gdm background
and hung. Had to Alt+SysRq+b out of it (Ctrl+Alt+F1 through F6 had no
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39240950/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39240951/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39240952/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
