[Bug 969359] Re: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu

2012-05-28 Thread heckheck
I had not had any problems of this nature until I tried updating some packages this morning. Then this bug hit me. I was seeing 100% CPU utilization and strace showed a continued access to a futex. Sorry I don't have a package update list since I had to revert the system immediately (it is a

[Bug 994212] Re: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-16 Thread heckheck
Below is the contents of my network interfaces file. As you suspected, it is empty and I am using network manager to provide network interface setup for the user, and so I guess the network isn't being brought up early enough to satisfy autofs. The network manager has long bothered me. I REALLY

[Bug 994212] Re: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-16 Thread heckheck
Below is the contents of my network interfaces file. As you suspected, it is empty and I am using network manager to provide network interface setup for the user, and so I guess the network isn't being brought up early enough to satisfy autofs. The network manager has long bothered me. I REALLY

[Bug 993202] Re: lircd crashing on boot in precise. Can be restarted and then stays up

2012-05-16 Thread heckheck
I'm wondering if more information is needed. If someone can point me to some detailed instructions on how to compile the offending driver with symbols for Ubuntu, to provide a more meaningful stack trace I'd be happy to try. This bug is causing me grief one out every two boots. Also, although I

[Bug 994212] [NEW] ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-03 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: This bug is very similar in nature to Bug #958704. In a nutshell, autofs is unable to initialize correctly on boot due to upstart not starting things in proper sequence. In my case, network drives are described in LDAP maps and autofs is most likely starting before the

[Bug 994212] Re: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-03 Thread heckheck
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994212 Title: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 994212] [NEW] ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-03 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: This bug is very similar in nature to Bug #958704. In a nutshell, autofs is unable to initialize correctly on boot due to upstart not starting things in proper sequence. In my case, network drives are described in LDAP maps and autofs is most likely starting before the

[Bug 994212] Re: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot

2012-05-03 Thread heckheck
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994212 Title: ubuntu 12.04 automounts (autofs) not working with ldap maps on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 993202] [NEW] lircd crashing on boot in precise. Can be restarted and then stays up

2012-05-02 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: On my fresh install of Precise Ubuntu, I am suffering an lircd crash on boot. This occurs most boots and apport has sent a few error reports in, but I didn't see an official bug open yet. I am using a usbuirt receiver. Judging by the SegvAnalysis, it looks like a null

[Bug 993202] Re: lircd crashing on boot in precise. Can be restarted and then stays up

2012-05-02 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: crash report https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993202/+attachment/3124952/+files/_usr_sbin_lircd.0.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993202 Title: lircd

[Bug 993202] Re: lircd crashing on boot in precise. Can be restarted and then stays up

2012-05-02 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: button definition file referenced in lircd.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/993202/+attachment/3124954/+files/lircd.conf.hauppauge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 198125] Re: suspend and hibernate may cause data corruption because it doesn't syncs nor umounts external drives previously

2012-01-28 Thread heckheck
I too have experienced disk corruption following suspend to ram, which I use on my NAS storage server in conjunction with PowerNap. I have observed this working in both Lucid and Natty over the last year. In my experience, this problem is not limited to external drives. I have observed

[Bug 899927] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 InputMonitor not working also breaks DiskMonitor

2011-12-18 Thread heckheck
I put back the problem configuration and ran again and the error logs were empty. I installed the latest 2.17 PPA for Natty and enabled disk monitoring in its normal position in the config file (below the InputMonitor). Everything seems to work fine. FYI, one thing I did notice, however is that

[Bug 899927] [NEW] powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 InputMonitor not working also breaks DiskMonitor

2011-12-04 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: I noticed that my system was going into standby at odd times, when it should have been staying on. I make use of the DiskMonitor plugin that I authored some time back. I investigated and found that the InputMonitor doesn't seem to be loading/parsing correctly at init time

[Bug 899927] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 InputMonitor not working also breaks DiskMonitor

2011-12-04 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: powernap.config.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899927/+attachment/2619118/+files/powernap.config.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899927 Title:

[Bug 899927] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 InputMonitor not working also breaks DiskMonitor

2011-12-04 Thread heckheck
The broken log file ** Attachment added: powernap.log.broke https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powernap/+bug/899927/+attachment/2619119/+files/powernap.log.broke -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 899927] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 InputMonitor not working also breaks DiskMonitor

2011-12-04 Thread heckheck
The working log file ** Attachment added: powernap.log.works https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powernap/+bug/899927/+attachment/2619121/+files/powernap.log.works -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 872109] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 causes unclean rootfs unmount

2011-10-31 Thread heckheck
Steps: 1. Install powernap and configure (in my case see above config file) 2. Enable powernap debugging by setting DEBUG=1 in /etc/powernap/config 3. Reboot system (using 'shutdown -r now') 4. Disable powernap debugging by setting DEBUG=0 in /etc/powernap/config 5. Reboot system (using 'shutdown

[Bug 872244] [NEW] grub2 recordfail logic prevents headless system from rebooting after power outage

2011-10-11 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: With the move to grub2 I recently discovered that my headless Natty server running as a NAS device will not reboot following a power failure. I was able to track this down to the behavior of the 'recordfail' logic in grub2. This logic prevents grub from booting following an

[Bug 872244] Re: grub2 recordfail logic prevents headless system from rebooting after power outage

2011-10-11 Thread heckheck
Here is a better diff of the change I made to /etc/grub.d/00_header to work around the problem jheck@twilightzone:/etc/grub.d$ diff -Naur 00_header.orig 00_header --- 00_header.orig 2011-10-10 19:23:44.0 -0400 +++ 00_header 2011-10-10 19:24:43.0 -0400 @@ -229,11 +229,11 @@

[Bug 872109] [NEW] powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 causes unclean rootfs unmount

2011-10-10 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: I have determined that powernap is causing my system to be unable to unmount root (/) on shutdown or reboot. I noticed that my system was doing an fsck check of root on every boot following installation of powernap. I found that the system was failing to unmount '/' due to

[Bug 872109] Re: powernap 2.15-0ubuntu2 causes unclean rootfs unmount

2011-10-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: Powernap config file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872109/+attachment/2535792/+files/config -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872109 Title: powernap

Re: [Bug 738764] Re: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-05-04 Thread heckheck
Thanks, I'll check it out! I'm just finishing building my NAS box, so the timing is good. -Jim On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu-pe.orgwrote: Hi Jim, Just commited your branch. Will be released in the next upstream release of testdrive ** Changed in:

[Bug 738757] Re: spindown settings lost on pm-suspend indirectly affects powernap power savings

2011-03-27 Thread heckheck
I have done more testing with the patch released in hdparm (9.32-1ubuntu2) and found that there are some problems with the approach taken. I think this bug should be marked FIXED-FAILED and revisited. By adding the hdparm -S parameter handling to the power.d script for 'true' and 'false' power.d

[Bug 738764] Re: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-03-26 Thread heckheck
I have created a branch with the DiskMonitor changes here https://code.launchpad.net/~jinfo/powernap/trunk. This was my first time using the bzr source control system, but I think I did it correctly. Let me know if not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 737479] Re: powerwake enhancement, monitor ARP requests for sleeping machines and send magic packets

2011-03-22 Thread heckheck
Andres, Yes your understanding of my script is correct and your example is spot on. Explained another way, there are three computers involved in the process. There is the requester who is ARPing for the sleeping machine, there is the sleeping machine, which will not wake to ARP requests, and

[Bug 738764] Re: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-03-22 Thread heckheck
Andres, No I have not tested it with the pm-powersave ACTION_METHOD. I will have to take a look at this and see how it works to comment. The hardware I have been working with is too old to do much with the powersave mode, so I really hadn't looked at it much. The way the plugin works, it

[Bug 738764] Re: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-03-22 Thread heckheck
I will also see what I can do about posting a step by step with hdparm.conf example. -Jim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738764 Title: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to

[Bug 738757] [NEW] spindown settings lost on pm-suspend indirectly affects powernap power savings

2011-03-20 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hdparm Upon wakeup from pm-suspend, all spindown settings on drives as set in hdparm.conf are lost and drives will not spindown until reboot. This will affect the performance of such useful packages such as powernap, since drives will not enter spindown

[Bug 738757] Re: spindown settings lost on pm-suspend indirectly affects powernap power savings

2011-03-20 Thread heckheck
** Patch added: /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/95hdparm-spindown to restore spindown parameters after pm-suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738757/+attachment/1923484/+files/95hdparm-spindown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 738764] [NEW] powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-03-20 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powernap I have coded a powernap plugin module that leverages hdparm to monitor disks that enter standby or sleeping state. This plugin should be useful in scenarios such as building a NAS box, where the primary objective is to have the server powered

[Bug 738764] Re: powernap enhancement, DiskMonitor plugin to add monitoring of standby/sleeping disks

2011-03-20 Thread heckheck
** Patch added: DiskMonitor plugin for powernap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738764/+attachment/1923503/+files/powernap-2.5.disk.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738764

[Bug 737479] [NEW] powerwake enhancement, monitor ARP requests for sleeping machines and send magic packets

2011-03-18 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powernap Here is a suggestion for an enhancement that could be made to the powerwake utility. I am posting this suggestion as an enhancement bug here since it seems very in line with the functionality of powernap/powerwake, and I thought you might find

[Bug 737479] Re: powerwake enhancement, monitor ARP requests for sleeping machines and send magic packets

2011-03-18 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: scapy script to wake on ARP to specific IPs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737479/+attachment/1917148/+files/sniffwake.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737479

[Bug 737479] Re: powerwake enhancement, monitor ARP requests for sleeping machines and send magic packets

2011-03-18 Thread heckheck
Could I please bother you to block out the MAC addresses in the script I just posted, or to delete the attachment and let me upload it again. Best Regards, -Jim Heck -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 737479] Re: powerwake enhancement, monitor ARP requests for sleeping machines and send magic packets

2011-03-18 Thread heckheck
I am uploading a version of the script with MACs removed. Best Regards, -Jim Heck ** Attachment added: sniffwake.py Monitor for ARP from IPs and send Magic Packets https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powernap/+bug/737479/+attachment/1917178/+files/sniffwake.py ** Attachment removed:

[Bug 735452] [NEW] IOMonitor Plugin does not use optimal /proc parameter to find process PID

2011-03-15 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powernap I have been looking at the forthcoming changes to powernap in natty and noticed something I think can be a significant enhancement for the IOMonitor Plugin. The IOManager Plugin currently uses a regex search of '/proc/%s/cmdline' to find the

[Bug 735452] Re: IOMonitor Plugin does not use optimal /proc parameter to find process PID

2011-03-15 Thread heckheck
One more piece of useful information. Processes without a /proc/PID/cmdline can be easily identified in the ps list, in that they have their process names placed inside square brackets. From the ps man page: args COMMANDcommand with all its arguments as a string. Modifications to

[Bug 735452] Re: IOMonitor Plugin does not use optimal /proc parameter to find process PID

2011-03-15 Thread heckheck
It occurred to me just after writing this bug report, that some people may be using the current functionality of the regex search of the cmdline to find a particular instance of a process based on its args. So a better enhancement idea may be to keep the current functionality of scanning the

[Bug 623502] [NEW] autofs mounts not working properly with network-manager static IP configuration

2010-08-24 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Release Lucid $ apt-cache policy network-manager network-manager: Installed: 0.8-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 0.8-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 0.8-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100

[Bug 623502] Re: autofs mounts not working properly with network-manager static IP configuration

2010-08-24 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623502/+attachment/1515925/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: IfupdownConfig.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623502/+attachment/1515926/+files/IfupdownConfig.txt ** Attachment added: IpAddr.txt

[Bug 367744] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/mm/slub.c:2743!

2009-08-05 Thread heckheck
I can confirm that a kernel BUG involving memory allocation happens on every boot of my Inspiron 5000e when booting from the Jaunty LiveCD. I can install Intrepid fine, and found that if I update to Jaunty, the kernel BUGs on reboot after the update. It seems to occur right around the time the

[Bug 134726] Re: MythTV 0.20.2 SRU

2007-09-10 Thread heckheck
An update to this bug states that the uploads to proposed have been accepted, yet I have not yet found that the new version is available when I update my apt cache. There are only three days of guide data left from Zap2It, is there any hope that it will be possible to update from the normal

[Bug 98641] Re: NVidia driver missing libwfb

2007-04-17 Thread heckheck
zimgao, Thanks! You were correct, the nvidia driver was not getting loaded due to its name. I am compiling a custom kernel using the nvidia-new- kernel-source package along with the linux-source-2.6.20 package. It appears as you suggest that nvidia-glx-new causes the modprobe to look for

[Bug 107368] nvidia-new-kernel-source package creates improperly named driver causing X not to start for custom compiled kernels

2007-04-17 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nvidia-new-kernel-source The name of the NVIDIA driver created when compiling a custom kernel and compiling the module code from nvidia-new-kernel-source is nvidia.ko. The nvidia-glx-new package depends on linux-restricted-modules-common (so that is

[Bug 106543] Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 I build a custom kernel using the linux-source, mainly to get LIRC module support built in for my MythTV box. On the latest update of the linux-source-2.6.20 package (2.6.20-15.25), the kernel that I have built is causing a machine

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: dmesg-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330141/dmesg-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vv-nn-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330144/lspci-vv-nn-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lsmod-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330142/lsmod-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: uname-a-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330154/uname-a-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: proc_version-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330151/proc_version-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vv-crash http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330143/lspci-vv-crash -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: IMG_0358_1.JPG http://librarian.launchpad.net/7330180/IMG_0358_1.JPG -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
Of note is that this system includes one PATA drive and two SATA drives. The PATA drive is the boot drive. -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
Another note. This problem also occurs with linux- source-2.6.20_2.6.20-14.23. Also unfortunately I no longer have 2.6.20-14.22 deb in my /var/cache/apt/archive directory and has disappeared off the mirrors. Since this is the only version currently working on my machine is there a way I can get

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
The kernel command line option did not help (same kind of machine check), but I did check my aptitude log and it was indeed 15.24 and not 15.25. I will install the latest 15.25 source package and rebuild and retest. [UPGRADE] linux-source-2.6.20 2.6.20-14.23 - 2.6.20-15.24 Two questions. 1.

[Bug 106543] Re: Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout

2007-04-14 Thread heckheck
Recompiling with 2.6.20-15.25 has resolved the panic issue. It booted cleanly. Thank you VERY much. -Jim -- Machine Check on AMD64 with 2.6.20-15.25 (built from source) during (S)ATA disk discovery - bus timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106543 You received this bug notification

[Bug 106217] hidden file controlling NVIDIA driver does not get removed when switching from nvidia-glx-new back to nvidia-glx causing X not to start due to mismatch of versions

2007-04-13 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: I have found that when I tried switching back from the new nvidia-glx- new package to the nvidia-glx package, a hidden file .nvidia_new_installed gets left behind and X won't start because /sbin /lrm-video continues to load the nvidia-new driver due to the hidden file.

[Bug 98641] Re: NVidia driver missing libwfb

2007-04-12 Thread heckheck
Adding another note. I have found that for some reason, on my system, the missing wfb driver causes X to not start with my custom kernel and compiled nvidia-kernel-source module, while X will start with the generic 2.6.20-14 kernel and the nvidia module from the linux- restricted-modules package

[Bug 98641] Re: NVidia driver missing libwfb

2007-04-12 Thread heckheck
Log of successful X start with generic kernel and linux-restricted- modules nvidia drivers ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.generic http://librarian.launchpad.net/7300014/Xorg.0.log.generic -- NVidia driver missing libwfb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 You received this bug

[Bug 98641] Re: NVidia driver missing libwfb

2007-04-12 Thread heckheck
Log of failing X start with custom kernel and module compiled from nvidia-kernel-source. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.custom http://librarian.launchpad.net/7300017/Xorg.0.log.custom -- NVidia driver missing libwfb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 You received this bug notification

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-11 Thread heckheck
I agree that by using UUIDs the system is stable. Perhaps this should be classified a documentation bug. A comment at the top of the /etc/fstab file would suffice to warn the user that unexpected results could occur when using the more traditional /dev/sdX designations. While the installer puts

[Bug 105756] /sbin/lrm-manager allows nvidia_new .ko module to get loaded when DISABLED_MODULES=nv in /etc/default/linux-restricted-modules-common

2007-04-11 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-restricted-modules-common The /sbin/lrm-manager script is allowing the new nvidia_new.ko driver to be loaded when DISABLED_MODULES=nv in /etc/default/linux-restricted- modules-common. The case statement for 'nv' in this script needs to have the

[Bug 105148] Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev Since updating my Fiesty installation a few days ago, my parallel IDE drive is no longer described by udev as /dev/hdc, but instead is being designated as /dev/sda or /dev/sdc depending on the boot. I also have two SATA drives in the box, and these

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci_vvnn.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237372/lspci_vvnn.log -- Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237375/uname-a.log -- Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: dpkg_udev.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237371/dpkg_udev.log -- Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237369/dmesg.log -- Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: proc_version.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7237373/proc_version.log -- Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 105148] Re: Udev is swapping hard disk /dev/sdX designations for PATA drive

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
In the dmesg.log on this particular boot, /dev/sdc is the PATA drive with 4 partitions (/dev/sdc1 /dev/sdc2 and /dev/sdc3 are EXT3 /dev/sdc4 is SWAP). Also, /dev/sda is a SATA drive with EXT3 partition on top of LVM, /dev/sdb is SATA drive with simple EXT3 partition. -- Udev is swapping hard

[Bug 98641] Re: NVidia driver missing libwfb

2007-04-10 Thread heckheck
Just another note, I had had 9755 working on my system, with a custom built kernel, but lost it with a set of upgrades today. I was doing some cleanup and removed some old built kernels at the same time. Between that and changing from the nvidia-glx package to the nvidia-glx- new package, the

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vv-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056224/lspci-vv-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: dmesg-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056218/dmesg-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
Public bug reported: In order to properly setup my myth box under Fiesty, I have recompiled the 2.6.20-13 kernel in order to build module support for LIRC. I am also setting up a PCHDTV 5500 card, which has drivers for both DVB (cx88-dvb) and video4linux (cx8800). The DVB drivers are not

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lsmod-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056221/lsmod-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vv-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056228/lspci-vv-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056229/lspci-vvnn-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: dmesg-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056219/dmesg-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: proc_version-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056235/proc_version-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: proc_version-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056236/proc_version-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: uname-a-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056239/uname-a-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: uname-a-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056249/uname-a-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn-2.6.20-13-generic.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056232/lspci-vvnn-2.6.20-13-generic.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-cx8800 http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056251/blacklist-cx8800 -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
** Attachment added: lsmod-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7056258/lsmod-2.6.20.3-ubuntu1.070326.log -- modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel https://launchpad.net/bugs/98982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
Also, I should note that the cx8800 driver unloads and loads properly when I use modprobe. So for example, once the machine is booted with the recompiled kernel, if I execute modprobe -r cx8800 the module unloads properly as checked with a subsequent lsmod. Also, the cx88-dvb driver loads

[Bug 98982] Re: modprobe.d blacklist of cx8800 driver does not work for recompiled kernel

2007-03-30 Thread heckheck
Well it doesn't seem quite as simple as that. I now have blacklisted all of the following drivers --- $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-cx8800 # 2.6.20.3 kernel seems to find the analog driver # for the PCHDTV 5500 card and fail to load # the dvb driver, so blacklist it