Ugly as it is, but mozilla could also maintain profiles for different
feature sets, or distros, respectively.
But there's more: Different versions of FF with different requirements.
The only right place to keep track of that is in the source repo of FF.
Even if Mozilla does not maintain it distro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1553758 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553758
Right. Did not reread the issue number. Sorry for that.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1553758
usr.bin.firefox apparmor profile blocks access to meminfo
--
You received this bug
@sdeziel In the long run, I think that mozilla should provide such a
profile, now that FF's dependencies can change at any time, whereas
distros must roll it out quickly because of security fixes.
Why should all the distros do that independently? There's a lot of
redundancy which could be
@sdeziel Exactly. To be honest, I have seen your ticket and effort you
did. But I could not figure out what your version of the profile
intended to fix, because that is not documented anywhere.
That could also be the reason why nobody merged it within more than a
year. There's nobody to blaim for
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1553758
usr.bin.firefox apparmor profile blocks access to meminfo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660268
Title:
Apparmor blocks Firefox
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1533232
missing many apparmor rules on Xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553712
Title:
usr.bin.firefox apparmor profile blocks
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1659922
Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659988
Title:
Firefox apparmor
@sdeziel That was intentional: How should someone keep track of what
your profile fixes if there's no ticket for each rule?
How should a maintainer decide if that should be merged?
Please don't duplicate specific tickets to an unspecific ticket. That
just confuses - at least me.
--
You
Given that bug #1660268 is very unspecific and does not allow tracking
specific rules, I think that this issue is not a duplicate of bug
#1660268.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1533232
missing many apparmor rules on Xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@sdeziel Is this somehow related to the E10S issues? Have you been faced
with these issues and do you claim that your apparmor profile fixes
them?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
What happens if you do a
cd /etc/apparmor.d/disable
ln -s ./../usr.bin.firefox
ln -s ./../usr.bin.firefox_patched
?
This is just to test if your problem is at least _related_ to apparmor.
Should be undone after the test as it disables the apparmor profile for
firefox (temporarily weakens
@asgard2 ...followed by a
service apparmor reload
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Title:
Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.
To manage notifications
@asgard2 Which version of the patch are you using? Which version of
ubuntu are you using? The patch is against 16.04, whereas it's unknown
what it does to 12.04/14.04.
Please try again with "VERSION 6" of the patched full version, as shown
in
I get this message in a row with cups messages:
Jan 31 07:35:09 lat61 systemd[1]: Stopping Make remote CUPS printers available
locally...
Jan 31 07:35:09 lat61 systemd[1]: Stopped Make remote CUPS printers available
locally.
Jan 31 07:35:09 lat61 systemd[1]: Stopping CUPS Scheduler...
Jan 31
Im on xenial 16.04, Kernel 4.4.0-59-generic. Still get this message.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442050
Title:
(colord:832): Cd-WARNING **: failed to get session [pid 690]:
Trying to work around the issue with a
#pip uninstall transaction # <-- that package was not installed on my system!
pip uninstall zope.interface
pip install transaction
pip install zope.interface
as taken from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40583855/importerror-
If I remember correctly, I get the errors since I updated python's
"setuptools" to work on certbot (development tools), similar to what is
demonstrated at https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/cant-install-
certbot-on-debian-jessy-unmet-dependencies/19417.
Pip now shows these packages and versions:
Public bug reported:
Taken from syslog:
Jan 31 01:53:33 lat61 com.ubuntu.sso[3005]: Traceback (most recent call last):
Jan 31 01:53:33 lat61 com.ubuntu.sso[3005]: File
"/usr/lib/ubuntu-sso-client/ubuntu-sso-login", line 67, in
Jan 31 01:53:33 lat61 com.ubuntu.sso[3005]: from
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi Thanks for reporting back.
I thought you were affected by the black/white tabs, too. If not,
Firefox should be usable at least (and indeed not be broken).
Which problem exactly did the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi Indeed, python 3.5 dependency is not the cause for
white/black tabs. But the patch fixes that, too. It fixes every apparmor
blocking I'm aware of in terms of firefox.
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi Not exactly. The patch is against the apparmor profile
of FF only.
Attached, I send the full version of a patched apparmor profile (patched
with VERSION 6)
You can even leave the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi Please try out VERSION 6 of the patch. I think it
fixes the [GFX1] issues, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi Ah, my error. Thought this was a new issue.
It even gets better: The person who posted these
[GFX1]: Failed 2 buffer db=0 dw=0 for 0, 0, 1920, 876
errors was me.
And from my side, I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@roberto-colnaghi I had similar issues as well. These have all gone in
my case after applying my patch.
I'll post a comment in bug #1643200, eventually some of the affected
users can test it.
--
You
I can reproduce this issue with and without FF-extension "ubuntu
modifications" enabled.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660298
Title:
Firefox misses interface org.gtk.vfs.Enumerator
Testing so far happened with FF 51.0.1, ubuntu 16.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660298
Title:
Firefox misses interface org.gtk.vfs.Enumerator
To manage notifications about
I've uploaded a patch named VERSION 6 at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659988 which all changes I suggested in
this ticket so far.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660287
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Patch VERSION 6.
Supposed to fix issues
- 1660287 apparmor blocking VFS related operations
- 1660314 apparmor blocking recently added files
regression potential: FF now exposes some other issues like:
I just DID reproduce this issue with FF's apparmor profile disabled.
That said, this issue seems to not be related to apparmor profiles.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660298
Title:
ca.desrt.dconf.Writer also needs receive:
Jan 30 13:32:08 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session"
path="/ca/desrt/dconf/Writer/user" interface="ca.desrt.dconf.Writer"
member="Change" name=":1.578" mask="receive" pid=3201 label="unconfined"
peer_pid=7811
FF's apparmor profile shipped with 51.0.1 contains a line
deny @{HOME}/.local/share/recently-used.xbel r,
which leads to this issue.
I removed the line in a patch named "VERSION 6" provided at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659988
That said, this issue
- is 100% related to the firefox
Public bug reported:
Taken from syslog:
Jan 30 12:55:35 lat61 gnome-session[3140]: (firefox:4627): Gtk-WARNING
**: Attempting to read the recently used resources file at
'/home/thomas/.local/share/recently-used.xbel', but the parser failed:
Datei »/home/thomas/.local/share/recently-used.xbel«
Also catched a "receive", which is part of VERSION 6 of the patch.
Jan 30 12:45:21 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_signal" bus="session" path="/org/gtk/vfs/mounttracker"
interface="org.gtk.vfs.MountTracker" member="Mounted" name=":1.8"
mask="receive" pid=836
There's more:
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.gnome.GConf.Database,
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor,
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.freedesktop.DBus,
dbus (receive, send)
bus=session
For changes I made to FF's apparmor profile to reproduce this issue, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660287
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660298
Title:
Firefox misses
Public bug reported:
To reproduce this issue with ubuntu 16.04, you must first unblock
org.gtk.vfs.Daemon/Mount via FF's apparmor profile.
When I click the file upload button at https://uploadfiles.io/
then syslog reports:
Jan 30 12:16:19 lat61 org.gtk.vfs.Daemon[3005]: ** (process:3444):
When I disable FF's apparmor profile, nothing is logged to syslog.
That said, it's unclear to me if this is apparmor profile related or
not.
In any case this is not related to the apparmor PACKAGE.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I CAN'T reproduce this issue EVERY time I click on the upload button.
Just every 2-3 times I click it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660298
Title:
Firefox misses interface
Please also note that I'm in apparmor's reporting mode (which logs an
entry every time apparmor blockes something and which I tested for also
complaining).
The syslog entries mentioned above are thrown WITHOUT entries telling me
that apparmor blocked something. Basically that means that apparmor
This issue can be mitigated by adding the following lines to FF's
apparmor profile:
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.gtk.vfs.Daemon,
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.gtk.vfs.Mount,
I've uploaded a patch named VERSION 5 at
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Patch VERSION 5.
Here's a new version of the patch which also fixes:
- 1660287 Apparmor blocking FF to access org.gtk.vfs.Daemon and Mount
** Patch added: "usr.bin.firefox.patch"
Public bug reported:
Taken from syslog:
Jan 30 11:12:29 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session" path="/org/gtk/vfs/Daemon"
interface="org.gtk.vfs.Daemon" member="GetConnection" mask="send" name=":1.77"
pid=18514
@mailing-m1
I uploaded a patch named "VERSION 4" at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659988 which integrates your suggestion
for 14.04. Would you like to retry?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
All 4 apparmor blockings can be mitigated by adding 4 rules to the
apparmor profile:
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver,
dbus (send)
bus=session
interface=org.gnome.SessionManager,
dbus (send)
bus=system
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Patch VERSION 4.
Here's a new version of the patch which also fixes:
- 1660272 Apparmor blocking Freedesktop interfaces on video playback
- 1660268 Apparmor blocking access to
There's more:
Jan 30 10:25:47 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session" path="/ScreenSaver"
interface="org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver" member="Inhibit" mask="send"
name="org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver" pid=12831
label="/usr/lib/firefox/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}"
Public bug reported:
taken from syslog:
Jan 30 10:25:47 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session" path="/ScreenSaver"
interface="org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver" member="Inhibit" mask="send"
name="org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver" pid=12831
Public bug reported:
Taken from syslog:
Jan 30 10:13:46 lat61 kernel: [212284.232797] audit: type=1400
audit(1485767626.654:46432): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open"
profile="/usr/lib/firefox/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}"
name="/sys/devices/system/node/node0/meminfo" pid=10696 comm="firefox"
@christoph-thomas I did not propose to disable the apparmor profile. I
just disabled it to demonstrate that the issue is fully related to the
apparmor profile provided by ubuntu and not related to FF upstream.
Later on, I uploaded a patch which fixes the profile itself. With the
patch applied to
@dupondje Not exactly: In my case FF was broken directly after the
update to 51.0.1, without any further change, including configuration
and extensions/plugins.
And yes, by its nature, it's a regression. Not in FF upstream, but in
the ubuntu package (apparmor profile).
The problem itself could
@chrisccoulson I can confirm that the problem can be reproduced with all
FF extensions/plugins disabled.
Since FF 51.0.1, enabling or disabling the extension "ubuntu
modifications" does not fix this issue any more (to my knowledge, that
was the case up until FF 49 and 50).
--
You received this
Google translate translates comment 19 to "Thomas Mayer (thomas303),
after adding the owner /dev/shm/org.chromium.* rw in the patch and
Apparmor profile for Firefox Firefox earned. Thank you. But this is a
crutch, an update on the issue as there was no and no. Employees of
Canonical - Student
@wfhammond My patch is tested by myself against 16.04 only. It's not
tested against 12.04 or 14.04. I'm not sure how that works out, would be
great if you can test it against 12.04, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@wfhammond It is not necessary to build FF to test my patch from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
The patch patches a config file only (an apparmor profile, to be
precise). Can be done in a text editor, too. With the patch applied, FF
51.0.1 should work again.
--
Google translate translates comment #15 to "Thomas Mayer (thomas303),
check yourself, assholes, we need to was a patch that fixes the problem.
Students, blah! Unprofessional!"
Not the feedback I wish to hear for voluntary work.
Не обратной связи я хотел бы услышать о доброволь
A patch which might fix this issue, too, is available at 1659988.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
Everyone affected, please give it a try and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
A patch which might fix this issue, too, is available at 1659988.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
Everyone affected, please give it a try and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
A patch which is known to fix this issue, is available at 1659988.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
Everyone affected, please give it a try (take the latest version of the
patch!) and report back.
@Maintainers: This issue duplicates
Related and/or duplicate:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1627239
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Title:
Firefox 51.0.1 после обновления в Ubuntu 16.04
A patch which might fix this issue, too, is available at 1659988.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
Everyone affected, please give it a try and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
A patch which might fix this issue, too, is available at 1659988.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
Everyone affected, please give it a try and report back.
I think it should fix your issues too.
@Maintainers: This issue might duplicate
@mikecaines-gmail This issue is apparmor related, whereas FF's apparmor
profile is part of the firefox package as demonstrated here (first file
is the apparmor profile):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/firefox/filelist
That said, this issue needs to be fixed in the firefox package and
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
Related or duplicate:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1627239
I'm optimistic that my patch fixes that as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
The patch also fixes
- 1660086 apparmor blocking /usr/share/distro-info/debian.csv
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
When starting FF in console, console output reports:
PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/usr/share/distro-
info/debian.csv'
To reproduce this issue, please note that I first had to apparmor-
unblock python 3.5 to run into this issue (there's issue 1659988 for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
I think this issue is not exactly a duplicate of bug #1659922.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1659922 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922
@chrisccoulson
Thanks. Please note that my patch is supposed to fix issues
- 1659922 apparmor blocking /dev/shm/org.chromium.[...]
- 1659988 apparmor blocking python 3.5
- 1495248 apparmor blocking blocks
It turned out that this issue was completely apparmor related. I filed a
new issue at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988 ,
together with a patch which fixes all the issues in my case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I fixed all the issues now.
Now the apparmor profile works:
- console output remains silent
- nothing is logged to /var/log/syslog
- firefox renders content again in tabs
Tested with ubuntu 16.04 (up-to-date) and firefox 51.0.1
Please reread the patch carefully in terms of security. I think I
My test was wrong (had another instance open with profile disabled)
The patch still does not fix the problem with white/black tabs, not
rendering any content.
In syslog, I get:
Jan 28 02:13:58 lat61 dbus[3005]: apparmor="DENIED"
operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session"
Patch available in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659988
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1495248
Title:
usr.bin.firefox blocks /dev/shm
To manage
In addition, I applied the suggestion from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1495248.
Now the apparmor profile works:
- console output remains silent
- nothing is logged to /var/log/syslog
- firefox renders content again in tabs
** Patch added: "usr.bin.firefox.patch"
The following patch mitigates the error message, but it's only a partial
fix for the issue (which is white tabs). Note that I had python 3.5
installed whereas the apparmor profile only supported 3.0-3.4.
So there's something else to do, and it also seems to be related to
apparmor (because when
Public bug reported:
When I start Firefox, even when run as root, I get an error message:
/usr/bin/python3: error while loading shared libraries: cannot apply
additional memory protection after relocation: Permission denied
As a result, Firefox only shows white or black content in browser tab
After upgrading from FF 51.0.0 to FF 51.0.1, FF now shows me white
pages, sometimes with light grey rectangles.
Uninstalling and installing the firefox plugin "ubuntu modifications"
does not work around this issue any more.
Currently, I'm not aware of a workaround for that, so I can't use FF for
Doing updates with apt-get, I get messages like
cryptsetup: WARNING: failed to detect canonical device of /dev/sdXY
Besides the warning message, everything seems to run fine.
I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with recent updates.
related: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671056
** Bug
The warning appears although I use UUIDs all over the place in my
/etc/fstab.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580308
Title:
update-initramfs cryptsetup must correctly take into
A also need to add that my hard disks are unencrypted from the
perspective of the OS (I use hardware encrypted SSDs).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580308
Title:
update-initramfs
I reported this issue to LibreOffice upstream and further tracked it
down.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105159
As it turned out, I could solve it by installing a font-package and
clearing the font cache (documented in my upstream bug report).
As it turned out, this is not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535
Worked around it by upgrading to debian's 3.6 version:
Upgrading to debian's 3.6 package worked for me for ubuntu 16.04:
wget
Upgrading to debian's 3.6 package worked for me for ubuntu 16.04:
wget
"http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/m/msttcorefonts/ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb;
sudo apt-get remove --purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
sudo dpkg -i ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535
This seems to be a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1371783 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535
** This bug has been marked a
The funny thing is that when I download a file with wget, it always
works.
That said, I think this issue somehow needs to be fixed in
msttcorefonts-installer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Related: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2323229
This still is not fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654702
Title:
user _apt can't write to directory "partial"
To
I filed a separate issue 1654702 for the permissions problem.
However, after temporarily fixing permissions of that directory, I still
struggle to download the files automatically:
Sourceforge seems to set a mirror per files. Rarely one of the mirrors
is hosting the file.
Now that
"somewhere" could be the github department of MS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654700
Title:
Downloading fonts fails: Most sf mirrors fail
To manage notifications about this bug
Eventually, ask Microsoft if they could host their files somewhere. This
is not a joke.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654700
Title:
Downloading fonts fails: Most sf mirrors fail
Public bug reported:
Permissions for directory "partial" are:
ls -lh /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/
insgesamt 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Jan 7 04:21 partial
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan 7 04:21 ttf-mscorefonts-installer.failed
A user with name "_apt" can't write to directory
Permissions are:
ls -lh /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/
insgesamt 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Jan 7 04:21 partial
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan 7 04:21 ttf-mscorefonts-installer.failed
Indeed, a user with name "_apt" can't write to directory "partial".
Permissions need to be
There's a bug.
andale32.exe already was downloaded in the target directory:
/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial$ ls -lh
insgesamt 196K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 194K Aug 15 2002 andale32.exe
I deleted the file and tried again:
ttf-mscorefonts-installer: processing...
Downloading the file directly works perfectly fine:
wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
--2017-01-07 04:12:37-- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
Auflösen des Hostnamen »downloads.sourceforge.net
(downloads.sourceforge.net)«... 216.34.181.59
Same for the other http resource: Direct download works:
wget "https://vorboss.dl.sourceforge.net/project/corefonts/the
fonts/final/andale32.exe"
--2017-01-07 04:15:18--
https://vorboss.dl.sourceforge.net/project/corefonts/the%20fonts/final/andale32.exe
Auflösen des Hostnamen
Public bug reported:
Downloading andale32.exe returns http status 404 (not found):
ttf-mscorefonts-installer: processing...
ttf-mscorefonts-installer: downloading
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
Fehl:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
404 Not
Upstream issue got closed without a fix.
I filed issue https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99269
Eventually this can be fixed there.
Otherwise, this could still be fixed or improved in smartd.conf by the
distro, according to https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/788
** Bug watch added:
Filed a new issue upstream at https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/788
** Bug watch added: www.smartmontools.org/ #788
https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/788
** Also affects: smartmontools via
https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/788
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You
Normalization seems to be:
Temperature_Celcius_normalized = 150 - Temperature_Celcius_RAW_VALUE
In my case:
112 = 150 - 38
That said, my hard disk's temperature has 112% health.
Values below 100% mean that the hard disk is hotter than 50°C.
As powersj pointed out, this is documented
I can confirm this for ubuntu 16.04 with Kernel 4.4 (up-to-date).
I see this error in syslog, during boot (I'm using Luks-encrypted
software raid (dmraid)).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm also using WD hard disks: WD30EURS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470014
Title:
systemd-udevd: Process '/lib/udev/hdparm' failed with exit code 5.
To manage notifications about
Replacing the SATA cable fixed this issue for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385165
Title:
"Exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x400 action 0xe frozen" when
playing media
** Summary changed:
- smartctl shout output RAW_VALUE as Temperature_Celcius
+ smartctl should output RAW_VALUE as Temperature_Celcius
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653560
Title:
101 - 200 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
