Solved it for me by editing /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox on XSE
(Debian- & Xubutnu 18.04 LTS-based distro):
# per-user firefox configuration
#...
owner @{HOME}/.{firefox,mozilla}/**/gmp-widevinecdm/*/lib*so m,
That solved the problem when using Mz Firefox 100.0 (64-bit) and widevine
4.
The only solution ATM is to check
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/3q53kc/list_of_ubuntu_repository_mirrors_available_over/
an chose a nearby mirror.
Then compare http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-
security/InRelease and your mirror, e.g. https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/dists
/bioni
Will the required pat set be backported to older kernel, such as Ubuntu
4.15.0-70.79-generic 4.15.18?
Will the patches be in 20.04 LTS (kernel >= 4.18), which is around the
corner?
NOTE:
Unfortunately with issue #1774711 the use of "auditd" has become
problematic on systems with SSDs, since sys
Hello TJ, your gvfs-package build on
https://launchpad.net/~tj/+archive/ubuntu/bugfixes seems to have
resolved the problem for me! Therefore, a 1000 thanks! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
For the record:
My/our signature line is:
Ubuntu 4.15.0-50.54-generic 4.15.18
Messages look like this:
Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arc
Yes Antonio (tonecas), this looks promising indeed.
Could the Ubuntu Developers please look in to
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/commit/d7e1397854f32e793b4f65d894908d67072dcb3f
and port this to "gvfs (Ubuntu)" and rebuild?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
With regards to CVE-2019-3462, my organization agrees with the statement
made on NSA QUANTUM:
https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/1087810526539931649
On behalf of my intelligence organization, I think it would be much
better, if Canonical servers would require TLS >= 1.2 encryption (HSTS
and ECDH
> It allows for attacking a repository via MITM attacks, circumventing
the signature of the InRelease file.
> ("deb http://192.168.0.2:1337/debian/ jessie-updates main" or so).
[..] This simulates a MITM attack or compromised mirror.
That sounds like it matters, where that InRelease file comes fr
Every time I log into Xubuntu's Xfce, using LightDM I can see the
following log lines in /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log
The configuration was not changed significantly, except for lightdm-gtk-
greeter-settings, in which I chose theme Adwaita-dark and icons
elementary-xfce-dark.
** Message: 2
After some research I can now safely confirm this bug. However, the log
lines do not seem to be related to any rules in "/etc/audit/rules.d" or
AppArmor profiles loaded. %‑)
The only difference between the log lines in *this* bug report, my lines
and the ones mentioned on
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Oh in short my /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules looks like this:
-D
-b 8192
-f 1
-i
--backlog_wait_time 0
-w /etc/anacrontab -p w -k AU-FS01-0001
[some more -w `foo` -p w -k `bar` here ...]
Has someone here tried
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117953 / adding a "-a
task,never" to /etc
I can confirm the problem on my system:
gvfsd-metadata[PID]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE
(device)' failed
(hundrets of entries ...)
As a temporary workaround I killed (only) the gvfsd-metadata process (will
auto-respawan, unless changed in systemd) and erased the l
I can confirm the problem with `journalctl`:
Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so):
/lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
dire
Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so
Jan 03 01:05:13
Which version of the distribution does it affect, Peter? Also does it
happen during LiveCD usage or on an already installed system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1513387
Title:
spinn
Cannot confirm this on our 18.04 installations.
Btw. bug is:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: xfce4-session 4.11.0-1ubuntu1
therefore EOL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406516
T
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1371144 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371144
Seems to be the case for me too, as long as I use Xfce4 (since 2008).
Glad someone mentioned it. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Um..
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: xfce-keyboard-shortcuts 4.10.0-1
I think this should be closed, since its an STS version, end of life
since 2014.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Franck, I liked your post, because I think you addressed a serious
issue. As Joanna R. (Invisible Things Lab) pointed out repeatedly, X is
not secure by design.
However, I don't understand your question whether one should use
firewalld instead of ufw? Isn't that an entirely different matter?
--
Ah, thanks for your explanation and clarification, Simon and Łukasz. It
now makes sense to me. :-) Wish you a pleasant weekend!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780933
Title:
[SRU] xfc
"[..] and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the
team." Huh? Wow, why does the bug bot say that? Doesn't sound too nice;
btw. if someone is a team member that may be for a reason, right?
*confused*
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Both systems 11.10 and 12.04 are EOL. It was pointed out correctly, that
there have been several (eol) versions of Ubuntu since 2012. No wonder
there are 736594 open and 67280 unconfirmed bugs on launchpad.
By the way I cannot confirm this behavior on Xubutnu 14.04 LTS and 18.04
LTS.
--
You rece
** Summary changed:
- Remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session
+ xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Is this Roland B. from the Xfe file explorer project? I love the
software and use Xfe every day! :-]
Regarding the bug I think it must be a regeression, since its not
present in 14.04 LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Package lightdm-gtk-greeter-setting seemed not to be available from the
selection menu though.
However, current sate is TRIAGED (wishlist) for package lubuntu-artwork
(Ubuntu), which seems appropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Thanks Hadmut! Since lubuntu-icon-theme is not listed on Lauchpad (PPAs
not considered) I added lubuntu-artwork as an affected package.
You're right also; it comes out of the box after installation that way.
I can confirm that. Therefore it should be fixed.
** Also affects: lubuntu-artwork (Ubunt
Well, adding a different distribution resulted in:
Oops!
Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies
for the inconvenience.
(Error ID: OOPS-5ac38be1f3c1ceca3e245935663fd246)
That's not helpful either.
Simon, plea
Hadmut, would you please execute:
sudo dpkg-query -S
to determine the exact package name where the image file resides? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528
Title:
ugly lowr
Looks trivial though... The AppArmor profile may need an entry like
"/var/log/kern.log rw,".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573995
Title:
I just upgraded to 16.04 and I'm getting a
The problem was confirmed and documented on iso.qa.ubuntu.com on 2018-04-26.
see:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/389/builds/171062/testcases/1305/results/
** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
Status: Opinion => Confirmed
** Also affects: boot (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Yes, Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) reported that the bug was reported.
However its not *exactly* the same bug. The environment is similar and
the description matches, except that the VM freeze happens during
suspend (black screen w/ cursor in the upper left corner) and *not*
during resume. Killing o
It's not exactly the same, but I see the following during reboot, when
testing Xubuntu 18.04 daily ISO (2018-04-21), on VirtualBox 4.3
installed on a trusty system.
[ 118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1178984
[ 118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 11774
I found the following thread, which explains some things. I'll post it
here in case someone else was looking for an answer.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/991874/how-to-disable-page-table-
isolation-to-regain-performance-lost-due-to-intel-cpu
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
> - kaiser: add "nokaiser" boot option, using ALTERNATIVE
O.k. for clarification; does GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="nokaiser" in
/etc/default/grub disable kaiser at boot time then?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
Quote by r0lf: "The NTP code has seen numerous security vulnerabilities
and we have to assume that ntpdate is not receiving the same scrutiny
anymore when compared to NTPd."
Sorry r0lf, but that's laughable. Do you really want people to run a
fully featured (your wording: vulnerable) NTP daemon ju
I can confirm this bug.
The following operations took about 15 minutes.
sudo apt-get install linux-generic linux-headers-generic
linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal linux-image-generic
linux-image-generic-lts-quantal linux-tools linux-tools-lts-quantal
[...]
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-53 (from
Looks promising. So far I installed 3.5.0-31 on two X230 and it runs
flawlessly. On some of my T430 its not yet perfect. Sometimes the
devices hang during boot sequence and docking/undocking is not yet
stable. However display errors in Unity are far less.
--
You received this bug notification bec
The bug is unassigned since no one whats to have the responsibility I
assume. Honestly I came to Xubuntu and Canonical (to a certain extend)
years ago since I was fed up with M$ and their broken system. At present
however I'm in the middle of a migration to FreeBSD -- also because of
bugs like this
See #101 and #128, please. I suggested you to do nothing at all. The
memory consumption has nothing to do with the bugs name "console-kit-
daemon spawns too many threads" (comment #107, #108, #110, #116) in my
opinion. And threads are not "expensive" when it comes to context
changes. Also some peop
The bug is still assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs team and gnome-bugs
#401655 in status confirmed. Can someone there provide us with an update
with regards to the issue/bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
The content of comment #10 from 2009-12-29 is obsolete. It works
flawlessly right now. Also the distribution and package are EOL. I do
not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here
at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such,
please.
--
You received
Yeah, probably the meta package really depends on one of the two ntp
packages. I guess its just not important enough at this point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619
Title:
ntpdate
I agree with commenter #6, Etienne. I think this bug is not specific to
any given distribution release number and therefore not obsolete yet.
Can the appropriate owner/person in charge (S. R.) alter the package and
set the dependency to recommends, please?
--
You received this bug notification be
The bugs name should be altered. I think Microsoft is just one player in
this game. Have you realized some things changed since the 90's? Just
imagine... Oracle took over Sun, Apple released OS 10 (X) and BSD is a
powerful and usable OS . :-]
Seriously guys I think Microsoft is not the biggest pro
The distribution is EOL (end of life) and the software version is also
obsolete. Therefore I recommend to change this bug to WONT FIX now since
this annot and won't be reproduced ever according to the original bug
report description. I think in case this is still an issue someone will
file a new bu
The current status to this problem/bug on one of the last non-migrated machines
here is:
"0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined."
However Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS is EOL (end of life) and therefore someone
close this bug, please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Adam, thank you for that update. Yet I can indeed confirm a significant
improvement for 3.2.0-43 and -44 (same +sec fixes). Guess some intel
stuff was added in -43 (as I heard). I also recall something from the
changelogs. With regards to 3.5.0-xx I hope things were backported. So
fare these with >
Nonetheless nice to see some progress with regards to this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619
Title:
ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
To manage notifications abo
I experienced the freezes and problems during boot as well as
docking/undocking with several Lenovo X230 (new devices) in our
computing lab. I checked all the hardware so far (board, CPU, RAM) with
the appropriate diagnostic tools so far (Lenovo Diagnostics, Intel CPU
Diagnostics and Memtest86+). s
I have a Lenovo 230 notebook with an LCD attached to the docking station
and an external 24" screen connected to the very same station. As long
as the 24" screen is offline (switched of) the Plymouth boot screen is
correctly scaled at 1366x768 in the notebooks LCD -- which is the
primary screen. Bu
Yes, but it's not in hardy server which is supported until April 2013
AFAIK.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097042
Title:
Risk of filesystem corruption with ext3 in lucid
To manage
I read R. Stallmans article "Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do? " as well as
the reply "On Richard Stallman and Ubuntu" by Jono B. Therefore I can
say that Jono plain wrong. On the one hand he shares the goals of the
FSF and points out that he shares the very same goals as well and on the
other hand he ap
Thanks for your input, Tyler. My colleagues and I came to the same
cnclusion yesterday when we read the CERT messages and digged a bit
deeper regarding the MXit protocol. We run several different versions of
Pidgin from 2.4.1 to 2.10.6. Fortunately none of the packages was
shipped with a MXit plugi
Is there currently a workaround for this flaw? Upgrade on my site was
delayed due to "corporate procedures". Can I disable that MXit thing
somehow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022012
Sorry, but I can't since I'm running Xubuntu 8.04 LTS.
--
Audacious initialization assertion failed on icon change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
I don't suffer from that regresion in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS (hardy) since I'm
using Xfce I guess.
"On a side note, it would be much better if ubuntu used something more
like vista's UAC. E.g. instead of entering a password you just push
Allow or Deny. The reason for this is that entering your password
I tried to follow the "Workflow" described on [L1] but yet without
success. On the one hand I don't know which OS bug #48407 refers to.
Maybe it's Ubuntu 6.06 which has been discontinued except for the rarely
used server distibution (until June 2011). On the other hand there is no
demand for a fix
Public bug reported:
When running the latest build as of 06.05.2010 (Lubuntu 10.04 LTS) using
Sun VirtualBox on Xubuntu 8.04 LTS the following problem occoured.
After a few minutes inactivity the screensaver started which I
interrupted quickly. When opening the xscreensaver configuration from
the
The problem dissapeared after I manually purged the »sun-java6-plugin«
package yesterday and reinstalled it today. I assume the error (Try to
overwrite »/usr/lib/firefox«, which is also in package »xine-plugin«.)
is not present anymore. Thanks to whoever fixed it! :-)
--
package sun-java6-plugin
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803410/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803411/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade:
Versuche, »/usr/
Public bug reported:
Wen I tried to upgrade the system via "sudo apt-get upgrade" the error occoured.
System is Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May 4 18:18:51 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welche
Sebastian, in case this bug has already been reported/is a dupblicate I
ask you to link it with that bug so everyone can follow.
--
Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Attachment added: "Thunar configuration file"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47463733/thunarrc
--
Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: thunar
For this bug report [1] and [2] applies. After installation of the
mentioned Xubuntu ISO I started configuring the system the way I prefer
it simply for the purpose of testing. I have to admit that I noticed the
bug I report here even in the build
** Attachment added: "Xubuntu GDM Screenshot"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47453424/xfce_login_oddly_shaped.png
--
Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Public bug reported:
As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1]. After
installation using VirtualBox [2] the login screen (GDM) looks a bit
malformed. More specifically the bottom bar has a misplaced icon on the
lower right and the font is cut off on the left side. The screenshot
ma
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-utils
Whenever running gome-search-tool on my Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS installation
I get lots of the following messages in my ~/.xsession-errors:
** (gnome-search-tool:15805): WARNING **: gsearchtool_strdup_strftime
does not support non-standard escape
It's still not fixed as of 3rd May 2010. Is there maybe another problem?
--
xubuntu logo in plymouth splash screen looks like it has spider webs in it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It also happened when testing [L1]. I marked the bug as serious in
iso.qa.ubuntu.com since this happened the third time to me now and I
think it is a severe drawback for Xubuntu users.
[L1] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-
desktop-i386.iso
--
xfce4-panel crashed with
I'm using Xubuntu 8.04 LTS GNU/Linux (2.6.24-27-generic / i686) and have
gpaint v0.3.3 installed. Without undo/redo functionality the program is
hard to use. I wonder how the authors could actually use it.
I also ask the triager of this bug to set importance at least to medium.
Regarding my Xubunt
Ok I think you can mark this bug as invalid since I can't reproduce
this. I either made a mistake or there is no problem anymore. I can
adjust mouse speed even in LiveCD mode when configuring "ImExPS/2
Generic Explorer Mouse".
--
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (201004
* I can confirm this the same way charlie-tca did when testing. I used Xubuntu
daily (20100419), casper 1.236.
* After clicking on restart now Xfce shuts down and you drop to the tty where
you see daemons stopping, etc.
* In the end (before the actual reboot) I receive dozens of these I/O errors
Things have changed and I ask people to confirm this if possible. After
installation (on HDD) of Xubuntu (20100419) changes took effect when
configuring Xfce as follows:
Accelleration from 2,0 (default) to 1,0 and threshold from 4 to 8. I
applied these settings to all (3) predefined profiles. I no
Great someone already adressed that issue! I wanna mention though, that
the installation is still a bit *boring* for the average user. It all
started really nice with an explaination about existing games and stuff
like that, but from then on only that help information (see attached
image) was shown
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
-
I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or
thelike).
When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
_IceTransWrite().
+
+ Whoever will be the triager I ask that person to set this bu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically.
I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or
thelike).
When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
_IceTransWrite().
ProblemT
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
- Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically.
-
- I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or
- thelike).
-
- When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
- _IceTr
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000140/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000142/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000143/ProcMaps.txt
** Attac
** Attachment added: "Screenshot"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44998731/screenshot_vm_20100419_mouse.png
--
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1] and followed
the guidelines mentioned on [2]. Though everything worked out fine I
realized that changed mouse settings in LiveCD-mode did not take effect
(screenshot of area of interest attached).
I expect mouse settin
On the one hand it's against the principle of DRY (on't Repeat Yourself)
when *actually* having an editor like nano installed but with unncessary
dependencies of vim in place, right? So in the past I crafted a
blueprint about how to better handle dependencies. On the other hand I
agree with Daniel
"Window Control buttons" -- is that the most important thing to discuss
right now? I would rather like to know about these "features" which cant
wait until maverik. Further I think it makes sense to package stuff when
it's done, tested (and demanded).
--
[Master] Window Control buttons: position/
81 matches
Mail list logo
