[Bug 1358966] Re: Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2016-01-22 Thread Brian Norris
Iain,

1. Apparently, I was wrong about the STA driver; it has the same problem, but 
it was never patched up
2. For your 14.04 build, you're using the older 3.13 line of kernels:

Building for 3.13.0-68-generic and 3.13.0-71-generic

I believe the later "point" releases (e.g., 14.04.3) are using a newer
line of kernels, for newer hardware support [1]. See this bug, where the
user has kernel 3.19.0-33:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/broadcom-sta/+bug/1522548

So this is still a valid bug.

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack

** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev"
  requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358966] Re: Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2015-10-30 Thread Brian Norris
This has nothing to do with broadcom-sta package. Only bcmwl, which is
already fixed in all supported releases.

** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev"
  requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358966] Re: Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2015-10-30 Thread Brian Norris
@HugoHirsch: unfortunately, we couldn't get this fix into 14.10. (I'm
just a community contributor, and I don't know that much about Ubuntu's
release processes work (or don't), but it seems to me like it's really
hard to fix things in the current release.)

But fortunately for you, there are three releases (14.04, 15.04 and
15.10) that already have the fix! I just double-checked 14.04's
repository, and it has the updated package:

bcmwl-kernel-source (6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu0.1)
http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-updates/admin/bcmwl-kernel-source
http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/admin/bcmwl-kernel-source
http://packages.ubuntu.com/wily/admin/bcmwl-kernel-source

So, I think you can either use one of these releases, or just download
and install the deb package directly from the above URL.

(And now I realize your comment was several months ago, and it's only
the robots that decided to change things. But others have apparently
been reporting this on old package versions, so the info is still
useful.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  Broadcom kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev"
  requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1263088] Re: search, next doesn't change pages when needed

2015-03-13 Thread Brian Norris
No backport for Trusty?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263088

Title:
  search, next doesn't change pages when needed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/1263088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1263088] Re: search, next doesn't change pages when needed

2015-03-12 Thread Brian Norris
It's fixed in Evince 3.11 and newer. Evince works fine in Utopic, but I
haven't tested Vivid.

The upstream commit and patch are already mentioned and attached
(respectively) here, with test results. What more needs to be done? Can
the patch be applied?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263088

Title:
  search, next doesn't change pages when needed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/1263088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"

2015-01-15 Thread Brian Norris
Go ahead and run the .run package, and you'll see that it indeed does
support DKMS, and the dkms.conf file is identical to the those in
Ubuntu. So yes, the Ubuntu nvidia packages are mostly direct from
Nvidia.

That doesn't rule out other problems in Ubuntu, of course. This bug
could actually be an issue with the DKMS tool, with the Nvidia-provided
Makefile or dkms.conf, or with the Ubuntu-modified kernel itself. I'd
lean toward one of the first two, and not the third. The kernel is not
developed for DKMS, but DKMS is developed for the kernel.

For those who complained about the most recent kernel updates being
related: the original report (and several reproductions of it) came
before 3.13-0-44. So the large number of recent issues are likely
coincidental, or exacerbated by some other still-unknown issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257

Title:
  nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module
  failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such
  file"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"

2015-01-15 Thread Brian Norris
The Ubuntu package is mostly just a drop-in of the official Nvidia
packages for Linux:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html

So yes, this is actually an Nvidia upstream problem.

I suspect that there is some sort of race condition in the provided
build scripts written by Nvidia, and they are only showing up
intermittently or under particular system configurations/states, so
package reinstallation tends to work fine the second time.

Related: I see this comment in Nvidia's Makefile regarding the "new"
build system in Linux >= 2.6:

# The new approach currently has its own share of problems, some of which
# are architectural difficulties with KBUILD, others minor annoyances. For
# this reason, an improved version of the NVIDIA Makefile is available to
# those experiencing difficulties.

So it sounds like they admit to having architectural difficulties here.
I wonder where this "improved version" of the Makefile can be
obtained...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257

Title:
  nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module
  failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such
  file"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2014-12-19 Thread Brian Norris
My patch was finally merged. I think it should show up in Thunderbird 36
(?). Let's see if they'll backport it to a version we're actually
using...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2014-12-19 Thread Brian Norris
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #773636
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773636

** Also affects: thunderbird via
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773636
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** No longer affects: thunderbird

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #765803
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765803

** Also affects: thunderbird via
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765803
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075479] Re: libao defaults to ALSA output, should probably use Pulseaudio

2014-12-19 Thread Brian Norris
** Branch linked: lp:~computersforpeace/ubuntu/trusty/libao/fix-
for-1075479

** Changed in: libao (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Norris (computersforpeace)

** Changed in: libao (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075479

Title:
  libao defaults to ALSA output, should probably use Pulseaudio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libao/+bug/1075479/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075479] Re: libao defaults to ALSA output, should probably use Pulseaudio

2014-12-18 Thread Brian Norris
This is still a problem in Ubuntu 14.04 (and I'm sure in 14.10 as well).
Your suggested change is noted in the Arch Wiki:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PulseAudio#libao

Of course, I had to put a comment ('#') in my config, which helpfully is
broken:

https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1971

** Bug watch added: Xiph.org Trac #1971
   http://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1971

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075479

Title:
  libao defaults to ALSA output, should probably use Pulseaudio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libao/+bug/1075479/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1367468] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build [error: #error "Please don't include directly, include instead."]

2014-09-13 Thread Brian Norris
** Branch linked: lp:~computersforpeace/ubuntu/utopic/nvidia-graphics-
drivers-331/fix-for-1367468-v2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367468

Title:
  nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
  [error: #error "Please don't include  directly, include
   instead."]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1367468/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1185253] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build [‘MAX_RT_PRIO’ undeclared (first use in this function)]

2014-09-13 Thread Brian Norris
It seems like these lttng modules are bitrotting. There are even more
build errors against the latest kernel (3.17-rc4). They don't include
the right headers, and several of the APIs have changed.

Have you taken a look at the PPA? It might have more up-to-date versions
that will actually work. Perhaps the Ubuntu team can consider pulling in
a more recent package.

https://launchpad.net/~lttng/+archive/ubuntu/ppa

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185253

Title:
  lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to
  build [‘MAX_RT_PRIO’ undeclared (first use in this function)]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1185253/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1366925] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build for kenel 3.16.2 [error: code model ‘kernel’ not supported in the 32 bit mode]

2014-09-12 Thread Brian Norris
I'm not sure how this happens, exactly, but your build log shows dkms
trying to build with 32-bit options (-m32 -march=i686) but using
-mcmodel=kernel, which gives the complaint you saw.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1366925

Title:
  nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
  for kenel 3.16.2 [error: code model ‘kernel’ not supported in the 32
  bit mode]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1366925/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1357376] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build

2014-09-12 Thread Brian Norris
Possible duplicate of Bug #1268257?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357376

Title:
  nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1357376/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1367468] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build [error: #error "Please don't include directly, include instead."]

2014-09-12 Thread Brian Norris
Whoops, posted on the wrong ticket... sorry!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367468

Title:
  nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
  [error: #error "Please don't include  directly, include
   instead."]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1367468/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1367468] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build [error: #error "Please don't include directly, include instead."]

2014-09-12 Thread Brian Norris
Possible duplicate of #1268257?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367468

Title:
  nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
  [error: #error "Please don't include  directly, include
   instead."]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1367468/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358966] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Norris
** Patch added: "bcmwl DKMS patch for 3.17"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+attachment/4187199/+files/0013-add-support-for-Linux-3.17.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but
  only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358966] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Norris
** Patch added: "nvidia DKMS patch fix for 3.17 kernel"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+attachment/4187198/+files/nvidia.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but
  only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358966] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Norris
A little grepping through the changes for 3.17, and it looks like there
are a few simple changes to apply.

1. The nvidia wrapper driver should drop #include  from its
buildfix_kernel_3.14.patch;  was never intended to included
directly for external modules

2. There's a small update for the kernel's alloc_netdev() API

I have patches for both which I'll upload here. I'm not sure how to
update Ubuntu's dkms packages for bcmwl and nvidia-331, so we'll see if
the Ubuntu devs will pick this up eventually...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358966

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but
  only 3 given]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1358966/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1360086] Re: Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with in compose window during address autocompletion

2014-08-21 Thread Brian Norris
Marked confirmed, because it's been reported by multiple people upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360086

Title:
  Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with  in compose window
  during address autocompletion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1360086/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1360086] [NEW] Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with in compose window during address autocompletion

2014-08-21 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

There are two similar/related regressions in Thunderbird 31, when typing
address(es) in the 'To' field(s) of the compose window. Both regressions
involve the widget focus behavior when navigating via keyboard after
typing an address that is in your autocompletion address list. In one
case, we see unexpected behavior when pressing  while
autocompleting an address, and in the second case, we see unexpected
behavior when pressing + in the same scenario.

Comments are borrowed below from the upstream bug reports:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043784
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1051564

Issue #1:

STR
1 compose new msg
2 in exactly the last empty recipient row (with set recipient type), type a 
searchword which triggers at least one autocomplete suggestion: e.g. [To: 
][searchword >> autocomplete suggestion]
3 press 

Actual Result (TB31)

a) focus moves away from the current recipient row immediately
b) a new empty recipient row is created
c) the just-added recipient row gets focus

Expected Result (as in TB24)

b) don't create a new empty recipient row
c) As a consequence, as there's no other (empty or filled) row widget after the 
just-filled row widget, move focus to the next widget, which happens to be 
Subject box.


Issue #2:


STR
1 compose new msg
2 in exactly the last empty recipient row (with set recipient type), type a 
searchword which triggers at least one autocomplete suggestion: e.g. [To: 
][searchword >> autocomplete suggestion]
3 press +

Actual Result (TB31)

a) focus moves away from the current recipient row immediately
b) a new empty recipient row is created
c) the just-added recipient row gets focus

Expected Result (as in TB24)

b) no new recipient row is created
c) jump to the 'To:' combo box (i.e., the previous widget, rather than the next 
widget)

** Affects: thunderbird
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360086

Title:
  Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with  in compose window
  during address autocompletion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1360086/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1360086] Re: Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with in compose window during address autocompletion

2014-08-21 Thread Brian Norris
It looks like there's the start of a solution patch for Issue #1
upstream. Please backport the appropriate patches when the upstream
issues are fixed.

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1043784
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043784

** Also affects: thunderbird via
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043784
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360086

Title:
  Thunderbird 31 regression: changing focus with  in compose window
  during address autocompletion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1360086/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1263088] Re: search, next doesn't change pages when needed

2014-06-17 Thread Brian Norris
This issue is still present on trusty (14.04). I've built the patch from
post #8 (with some slight tweaking to the debian packaging info, to get
dpkg-buildpackage to complete successfully), and it looks to work OK.
Thanks (other) Brian!

Any chance we can get this merged?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263088

Title:
  search, next doesn't change pages when needed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/1263088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1324328] [NEW] bottlerocket: does not create persistent /dev/firecracker

2014-05-28 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu 14.04 (and 13.10), the /dev/firecracker symlink to /dev/ttyS0
is created at installation time, but not on reboots. This is a problem
when /dev is a devtmpfs.

I think this is the same issue, found in Debian:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498657

I believe this can be solved by packaging a proper udev script.

$ apt-cache policy bottlerocket
bottlerocket:
  Installed: 0.05b3-14.1
  Candidate: 0.05b3-14.1
  Version table:
 *** 0.05b3-14.1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: bottlerocket (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324328

Title:
  bottlerocket: does not create persistent /dev/firecracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bottlerocket/+bug/1324328/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1292403] Re: Suspend to RAM on notebook, wake up with two screens -> solid pitch black shadows

2014-05-13 Thread Brian Norris
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1301206 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301206

Will mark as duplicate of bug #1301206. Please reopen this bug if you
have reason to believe it is not a duplicate. Thanks!

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1301206
   [regression] Black frame around windows and buttons "censored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292403

Title:
  Suspend to RAM on notebook, wake up with two screens -> solid pitch
  black shadows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1292403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1308003] Re: Black squares after suspend in 14.04

2014-05-13 Thread Brian Norris
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1301206 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301206

Marked as duplicate of #1301206. Reopen this bug if you have reason to
believe this is not a duplicate. Thanks!

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1301206
   [regression] Black frame around windows and buttons "censored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308003

Title:
  Black squares after suspend in 14.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1308003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1308003] Re: Black squares after suspend in 14.04

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Norris
Potential duplicate of bug #1301206?

Regarding workarounds: Adam Benfer's comment works for me: "An alternate
way of getting rid of the black bars is to go to a console (e.g. Ctrl +
Alt +F1) and come back (i.e. Ctrl + Alt + F7)"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308003

Title:
  Black squares after suspend in 14.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1308003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1292403] Re: Suspend to RAM on notebook, wake up with two screens -> solid pitch black shadows

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Norris
Potential duplicate of bug #1301206? Does this occur only with an extra
monitor, or does this occur even with just a single monitor?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292403

Title:
  Suspend to RAM on notebook, wake up with two screens -> solid pitch
  black shadows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1292403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884]

2014-02-08 Thread Brian Norris
(In reply to comment #38)
> Do you have any reason to believe that you have the same problem? This one
> was bisected to commit 4f6029da58ba9204c98e33f4f3737fe085c87a6f which
> appeared in v3.8 (which means that 3.7.x should all be fine).

Not necessarily, although initially the bug symptoms were rather
similar, and it's a similar family of hardware. I'm only now checking
the bisection myself, and it seems that that particular commit is not my
only problem.

> Of course you have the additional problem of having a nva8 (this bug has
> nv98 hw users, although that doesn't exclude you from having the same issue
> -- the bisected commit was fairly generic), which is still unstable for some
> users, but was even more unstable in earlier kernels.

Well, that could complicate my ability to fix things here. I suspect
that this particular regression is one of several issues on my hardware,
then.

> As for not seeing a
> PAGE_NOT_PRESENT -- are you sure that the kernels in question had code to
> emit the error in the first place?

The code seems to be present. For instance, I'm trying 3.6, where I see
nv50_fb_vm_trap() (drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fb.c) has the same "VM:
trapped write at 0x" log message. So I presume that if I was still
experiencing the fault in 3.6, it would appear in the log.

BTW, I noticed Ben Gamari's earlier comments about mesa versioning, so I
downgraded to 9.1.4, and I still experience the same behavior.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  10de:0611 nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884]

2014-02-07 Thread Brian Norris
I've been following this ticket and attempting to poke around a bit. I
just tested my hardware with various points in the 3.6, 3.7, and 3.7-rc
kernels, and all of those still gave me a non-responsive screen with
messages like the following after resume. e.g., on Linux 3.6:

[  161.192867] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Failed to idle channel 2.
[  164.355897] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Failed to idle channel 4.

or on Linux 3.7.9:

[  336.337207] nouveau E[3134] failed to idle channel 0x

None of these builds give me a PAGE_NOT_PRESENT error, though. This
makes it hard to bisect, as I can't find any working point to test...

My hardware:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation GT218M [NVS 3100M] 
[10de:0a6c] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:040a]
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16
Memory at e200 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Memory at d000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at e000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=32M]
I/O ports at 7000 [size=128]
Expansion ROM at e300 [disabled] [size=512K]
Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [b4] Vendor Specific Information: Len=14 
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel
Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting 
Capabilities: [600] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=024 

Kernel driver in use: nouveau

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  10de:0611 nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884]

2014-01-30 Thread Brian Norris
Re-tested on drm-next, at:

commit ef64cf9d06049e4e9df661f3be60b217e476bee1
Merge: 279b9e0cc300 f3980dc50c51
Author: Dave Airlie 
Date:   Thu Jan 30 10:46:06 2014 +1000

Merge branch 'drm-nouveau-next' of
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 into drm-next

Still reproducible:

  nouveau E[Xorg[1140]] failed to idle channel 0x [Xorg[1140]]
  nouveau E[ PFB][:01:00.0] trapped read at 0x002001e020 on channel 
0x0001fb14 [unknown] SEMAPHORE_BG/PFIFO_READ/00 reason: PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  10de:0611 nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884] Re: 10de:0611 nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

2014-01-14 Thread Brian Norris
I believe 10de:0611 is the associated PCI ID of the NVIDIA GPU on which
this problem was seen. You can check yours with something like lspci -nn

I'm not sure about latest-bios-0709. I assume it helps with tracking.

BTW, I've also see this problem on a PCI ID of 10de:0659:

$ lspci -nn | grep NVIDIA
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation G96GL [Quadro FX 
580] [10de:0659] (rev a1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  10de:0611 nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 603402] Re: Thunderbird incorrectly shows some Gmail archived messages as unread via IMAP

2013-12-09 Thread Brian Norris
Reassigned to the duplicate Mozilla bug. Unfortunately, this resets the
Lanuchpad ticket to "Unkwown" status and "Unknown" importance instead of
"Confirmed" status and "Medium" importance. Unfortunately, I can't edit
these fields...

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #693204
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693204

** Changed in: thunderbird
   Importance: Medium => Unknown

** Changed in: thunderbird
   Status: Invalid => Unknown

** Changed in: thunderbird
 Remote watch: Mozilla Bugzilla #518581 => Mozilla Bugzilla #693204

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603402

Title:
  Thunderbird incorrectly shows some Gmail archived messages as unread
  via IMAP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/603402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884] Re: nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

2013-11-16 Thread Brian Norris
After a few more tests: I still get the same PAGE_NOT_PRESENT errors, as
well as a subsequent NULL pointer kernel oops. This occurs both with the
new Ubuntu package and with a manually-compiled upstream libdrm. So the
mesa/libdrm update does not solve this bug.

After thinking about this, this problem can't be solely a user-space
issue; user space should not be able to trigger this kind of kernel
oops. Plus, Ben Gamari was already able to bisect this within the
kernel. So at least some part of this is related to the kernel-space
nouveau component.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111884] Re: nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

2013-11-16 Thread Brian Norris
@jhoechtl: What makes you think the bug you linked is related?

I've updated to the "fixed" libdrm in Ubuntu 13.10 (2.4.46-1ubuntu1),
and I still have problems with nouveau on resume. I no longer get the
PAGE_NOT_PRESENT nouveau error, but my X server still hangs on resume. I
get some new errors in my Xorg.0.log. I'll past a snippet below, but
perhaps this should be the basis of a new bug report?

[  1995.657] setversion 1.4 failed
(EE) [mi] EQ overflowing.  Additional events will be discarded until existing 
events are processed.
(EE) 
(EE) Backtrace:
(EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x49) [0xb77000b9]
(EE) 1: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x213) [0xb76e0113]
(EE) 2: /usr/bin/X (QueuePointerEvents+0x6d) [0xb75b41ad]
(EE) 3: /usr/bin/X (xf86PostMotionEventM+0x24b) [0xb75ed84b]
(EE) 4: /usr/bin/X (xf86PostMotionEvent+0xaa) [0xb75ed9aa]
(EE) 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/synaptics_drv.so (0xb6a48000+0x434d) 
[0xb6a4c34d]
(EE) 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/synaptics_drv.so (0xb6a48000+0x5e81) 
[0xb6a4de81]
(EE) 7: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0x7ce85) [0xb75dce85]
(EE) 8: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0xa7d5b) [0xb7607d5b]
(EE) 9: (vdso) (__kernel_sigreturn+0x0) [0xb753d400]
(EE) 10: (vdso) (__kernel_vsyscall+0x10) [0xb753d424]
(EE) 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x19) [0xb720dd09]
(EE) 12: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2 (drmIoctl+0x40) [0xb74309e0]
(EE) 13: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2 (drmCommandWrite+0x3c) [0xb74333dc]
(EE) 14: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libdrm_nouveau.so.2 (nouveau_bo_wait+0xa5) 
[0xb6c53ee5]
(EE) 15: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb6c5a000+0x9a57) 
[0xb6c63a57]
(EE) 16: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb6c5a000+0xa079) 
[0xb6c64079]
(EE) 17: /usr/bin/X (DRI2SwapBuffers+0x366) [0xb76d0bc6]
(EE) 18: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0x172498) [0xb76d2498]
(EE) 19: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0x3c48d) [0xb759c48d]
(EE) 20: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0x2a52a) [0xb758a52a]
(EE) 21: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0xb713e905]
(EE) 22: /usr/bin/X (0xb756+0x2a908) [0xb758a908]
(EE) 
(EE) [mi] These backtraces from mieqEnqueue may point to a culprit higher up 
the stack.
(EE) [mi] mieq is *NOT* the cause.  It is a victim.
(EE) [mi] EQ overflow continuing.  100 events have been dropped.
... (more here) ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884

Title:
  nouveau fails at suspend/resume - PAGE_NOT_PRESENT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2013-11-11 Thread Brian Norris
I'm interested in getting this resolved, and I might even be willing to
learn the innards of Nautilus just to fix this, but it's unclear what
the impact would be even if I did. It seems that upstream made an
immovable "design" decision to blaze ahead with the type-to-search
misfeature and that nothing users say/do will change that.

So, are you proposing that Ubuntu will maintain a fork (or a forked
patch or two) for Nautilus? Is that a reasonable goal? If we develop a
simple enough fix, is it likely Ubuntu will carry it separate from
upstream GNOME/Nautilus?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016

Title:
  restore type-ahead find

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2013-09-17 Thread Brian Norris
Darren,

There seems to be a variety of issues here, but the 'b43' problem you
link here is certainly unrelated. That is a totally different set of
hardware and software.

If you are having real problems with the rt2x00usb driver, perhaps you
can provide constructive information for this bug report. But if you are
using b43, you need to file a different bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2013-06-15 Thread Brian Norris
Hi ErircDHH,

This bug report is specifically for one problem: that Thunderbird places
extra newlines on certain types of messages. Having "the complete text
... demolished by thunderbird" sounds like a different issue. In that
case, you should file a new bug report with detailed information.

Thanks,
Brian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2013-01-08 Thread Brian Norris
I believe the Ubuntu 3.2.0-34 kernel now should contain the upstream
commit (see bug #1075355). I'm not using NFSv4 anymore (because of this
bug), but I may switch back temporarily to try to confirm this fix
myself...

Can anyone else confirm that this is fixed in the repos?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047566

Title:
  Memory leaks when using NFS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1047566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1047566] Re: Memory leaks when using NFS

2012-10-11 Thread Brian Norris
I think Andrew is referring to my team in comment #7 (my NFS exports are
on an ext3 partition). I can confirm that mainline kernel 3.2.27-generic
does *not* resolve the leak, as I recently noticed the leak again. I
think it was a NFSv3 vs. v4 issue, as many of my clients moved back to
v3 as an attempt to resolve the issue. But a few rarely-utilized clients
remained, and it seems that NFSv4 activity from these clients correlates
with memory leakage in idr_layer_cache.

So, I've seen the leak on all the following:

3.2.0-30-generic
3.2.0-29-generic
3.2.27-030227-generic

The last kernel is a vanilla build from the Ubuntu PPA:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.2.27-precise/

So, I think that this is an upstream leak, at least in the 3.2.x stable
branch.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047566

Title:
  Memory leaks when using NFS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1047566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2012-07-10 Thread Brian Norris
Thanks for the workaround. It mostly works for me, but it doesn't take
care of removing the extra newlines added at the end of emails.

I agree that this is a regression, of course.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2012-07-06 Thread Brian Norris
Adding another screenshot. This one has some text entered into the reply
to show the issue more clearly.

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of a composed reply"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+attachment/3215237/+files/filled-reply.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] Re: Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2012-07-06 Thread Brian Norris
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of an empty reply"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813/+attachment/3215212/+files/empty-reply.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021813

Title:
  Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using
  "reply above quote"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1021813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021813] [NEW] Thunderbird places incorrect newlines when composing a reply using "reply above quote"

2012-07-06 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

When I compose a reply to any message, the newlines placed around the
quote are incorrectly formatted. I am using "reply above the quote", and
I only get a single newline above the quote, but there's two newlines
below the quote. This means I always have to click around and press
"Enter" and "Delete" a few times to reformat every email reply I
compose.

I think this is a regression moving to Thunderbird 13.x. I see the issue
on both Ubuntu 11.10 and 12.04.

I will try to add some screenshots to demonstrate.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: thunderbird 13.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.11.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-19.33-generic 3.0.27
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC892 Analog [ALC892 Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  brian  1767 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  brian  1767 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20120615164636
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'PCH'/'HDA Intel PCH at 0xfa62 irq 60'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC892'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0892,10438469,00100302'
   Controls  : 35
   Simple ctrls  : 20
Card1.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:1 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfa08 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Nvidia GPU 15 HDMI/DP'
   Components   : 'HDA:10de0015,10de0101,00100100'
   Controls  : 16
   Simple ctrls  : 4
Channel: release
Date: Fri Jul  6 09:41:05 2012
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0  proto static 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  scope link  metric 1000 
 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.80  metric 1
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
PrefSources:
 /etc/thunderbird/syspref.js
 prefs.js
 user.js
 
[Profile]/extensions/{a62ef8ec-5fdc-40c2-873c-223b8a6925cc}/defaults/preferences/preferences.js
 
[Profile]/extensions/{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}/defaults/preferences/lightning.js
Prefs:
 places.database.lastMaintenance: 1336507414 (prefs.js)
 extensions.lastAppVersion: "13.0.1" (prefs.js)
 network.cookie.prefsMigrated: true (prefs.js)
 places.history.expiration.transient_optimal_database_size: 167772160 (prefs.js)
 places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages: 104858 (prefs.js)
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=13.0.1/20120615164636 (In use)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 gnome-shell   3.2.2.1-0ubuntu0.1
 rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~20110908-0ubuntu1.3
 icedtea-plugin1.1.3-1ubuntu1.1
 totem-mozilla 3.0.1-0ubuntu7.1
RfKill:
 0: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: thunderbird
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-11-08 (241 days ago)
WifiSyslog:
 Jul  6 09:25:52 brian-ubuntu NetworkManager[966]:  kernel firmware 
directory '/lib/firmware' changed
 Jul  6 09:26:34 brian-ubuntu NetworkManager[966]:  kernel firmware 
directory '/lib/firmware' changed
 Jul  6 09:32:16 brian-ubuntu kernel: [589127.615257] gnome-shell[1757]: 
segfault at 10 ip 7f605935f0c4 sp 7fffeedf12f8 error 4 in 
libnvidia-glcore.so.280.13[7f6058386000+15f4000]
 Jul  6 09:32:48 brian-ubuntu kernel: [589160.172707] SysRq : HELP : 
loglevel(0-9) reBoot Crash terminate-all-tasks(E) memory-full-oom-kill(F) 
kill-all-tasks(I) thaw-filesystems(J) saK show-backtrace-all-active-cpus(L) 
show-memory-usage(M) nice-all-RT-tasks(N) powerOff show-registers(P) 
show-all-timers(Q) unRaw Sync show-task-states(T) Unmount show-blocked-tasks(W) 
dump-ftrace-buffer(Z) 
 Jul  6 09:32:49 brian-ubuntu kernel: [589161.171764] SysRq : HELP : 
loglevel(0-9) reBoot Crash terminate-all-tasks(E) memory-full-oom-kill(F) 
kill-all-tasks(I) thaw-filesystems(J) saK show-backtrace-all-active-cpus(L) 
show-memory-usage(M) nice-all-RT-tasks(N) powerOff show-registers(P) 
show-all-timers(Q) unRaw Sync show-task-states(T) Unmount show-blocked-tasks(W) 
dump-ftrace-buffer(Z)
dmi.bios.date: 11/22/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2103
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P8P67 PRO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2103:bd11/22/2011:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnP8P67PRO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVers

[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2012-02-17 Thread Brian Norris
Dax,

So 2.6.38 has been working totally fine for you? Can you give the 'uname
-r' output for your working system? That could be helpful for
determining the cause.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2012-02-12 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Dax,

Sorry for the delay on this. I've noted these problems on the rt2x00-users 
mailing list, where development for the supported Ralink drivers takes place. 
For help in debugging, they've suggested you try the official Ralink driver 
(a.k.a. "legacy driver") found here:
http://www.ralinktech.com/en/04_support/support.php?sn=501

I believe you would need the "RT2501USB(RT73:RT2571W/RT2573/RT2671)"
package. It's freely available, based on a simple usage agreement, but
it is not really "maintained" (the in-kernel driver is the main support)
and it is certainly a "use at your own risk" situation. It takes some
work to properly extract, compile, and insert the driver into your
system...if you want to proceed and have trouble, perhaps I can help.

Anyway, the driver maintainers would be interested in seeing if your
problems still exist on the legacy driver.

BTW, sample pieces of the mailing list conversation are at the URLs below. 
There's not much progress on this issue, it seems:
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2012-January/004498.html
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2012-January/004532.html

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500766] Re: update-rt73-firmware link is is dead.

2012-01-28 Thread Brian Norris
It seems that this package has been phased out and replaced in recent versions. 
Ubuntu 10.04 is the last to use this, and the "broken link" can be found here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+package/rt73-common

Marking invalid since the rt73 project has been replaced with the rt2x00 
project:
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

** Changed in: rt73 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500766

Title:
  update-rt73-firmware link is is dead.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rt73/+bug/500766/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2012-01-23 Thread Brian Norris
In summary of my last 2 comments: all people commenting on this report
are not necessarily experiencing the same bug. They just all happen to
be using Ralink-based USB devices which share a driver/firmware
framework. The issues could be related but not necessarily.

I am marking this "Incomplete" until we have a set of good information
regarding a related issue on the most recent Ubuntu distribution with
proper logs, etc. That means something like the following:

1) Describe in detail how you reproduce your issue (i.e., step-by-step)
2) Describe your system, giving Ubuntu version, etc.
3) Provide the output from the following commands in your comment or as 
separate attachments:
dmesg
lsusb
uname -a
lsusb -vv
dkpg -l | grep linux-firmware

If we find more than one set of valid logs that represent distinct
issues, then we should file new, separate bug reports.

(BTW, the logs attached by Andrea Carpineti are totally worthless; they
are not related to this bug and seem to apply to a Broadcom chip, not
Ralink)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2012-01-22 Thread Brian Norris
More notes:

Regarding my previous comment (1) above: the various reported messages
are different. You can check the Linux kernel source for the meaning of
"error -71" for instance. The ones mentioned so far by various observers
on this thread are:

error -71:  -EPROTO (Protocol error)
error -19:  -ENODEV (No such device)
error -110: -ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
error -108: -ESHUTDOWN (Cannot send after transport endpoint shutdown)

So these are not all the same issue and should be handled separately.

>From my comment (2): I have retested my USB device on Debian and it is
working fine. I only see one or two "firmware error" messages when
unplugging, which is understandable.

>From my comment (3): It looks like the firmware in Ubuntu 11.10, Debian
sid, and the Linux firmware repository (found at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git) all
match up. So there should be no descrepancy between different
distributions. (i.e., what works on Debian Sid should work on Ubuntu and
vice versa)

My lsusb output:
ID 0b05:1723 ASUSTek Computer, Inc. WL-167G v2 802.11g Adapter [Ralink RT73]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2012-01-22 Thread Brian Norris
I notice a few things:

(1) The error messages reported by various people are not all exactly
the same. Perhaps they are having different problmes related to the same
firmware?

(2) I posted problems I had with one of these Ralink-based adapters
years ago. I used that same adapter on an up-to-date Debian machine
recently, and it has worked flawlessly under moderate use with Debian's
separate "firmware-ralink" package. I have yet to try it again on
Ubuntu.

(3) I understand that this driver is built in part from an open-source
driver (part of the Linux kernel; should be mostly standard across
Ubuntu and Debian), and in part from binary firmware images provided
freely by Ralink. Maybe Ubuntu is using an old or incorrect version of
the firmware? I will try to compare more sometime.

For information on the applicable Linux/Ralink project:
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Also, Wolfgang Kufner, why did you immediately change the "affects" away
from rt2x00 a few months back? Did you have a particular reason to
believe that it's not a problem with the rt2x00 driver? Maybe you knew
that this is a problem with the firmware, not with the open-source
rt2x00 code?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500766] Re: update-rt73-firmware link is is dead.

2012-01-22 Thread Brian Norris
Where is they URL found? Is this still an issue?

(I can confirm that the URL points to a non-existent page)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500766

Title:
  update-rt73-firmware link is is dead.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rt73/+bug/500766/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 826806] Re: when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port banshee does not open

2011-11-14 Thread Brian Norris
** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826806

Title:
  when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port  banshee does
  not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/826806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 826806] Re: when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port banshee does not open

2011-11-10 Thread Brian Norris
So your player is still detected properly in Oneiric, but GNOME does not
launch any software at mount time. This is an issue.

I was not interested only in Removable Media choices that involve
Banshee; I wanted to see if other devices follow the options you specify
in Removable Media. If so, then this is a fairly general system bug
(although this bug doesn't appear on my system with my devices). If not,
then it's somehow tied to the properties of your device.

So can you see if anything appears (displaying software options or
opening photo software automatically, for example) for other devices
when they are plugged in?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826806

Title:
  when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port  banshee does
  not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/826806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 826806] Re: when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port banshee does not open

2011-11-08 Thread Brian Norris
Hmm, have you tried other types of media that should be affected by the
options under the "Removable Media" configuration? For instance, a
digital camera? Or a different media player? Audio CDs? And what sort of
icon shows up in the sidebar? Just a USB key icon? Or something else?

GNOME may not be detecting your player as a media player anymore - just
as a removable drive. Or maybe the whole automount system has a bug.
Narrowing this down is important for your bug report to have any chance
of finding its way to the right developer, let alone being fixed. Right
now, it's just a generic "Ubuntu" bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826806

Title:
  when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port  banshee does
  not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/826806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 826806] Re: when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port banshee does not open

2011-11-07 Thread Brian Norris
Marking this bug Incomplete until the reporter tries the suggested
configuration methods.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826806

Title:
  when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port  banshee does
  not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/826806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 826806] Re: when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port banshee does not open

2011-11-07 Thread Brian Norris
I'm not sure why anyone thinks this is a kernel bug. The kernel is
basically just responsible for providing setting up and providing
interfaces for user software for reading and writing to the device. The
fact that you can play your music in Banshee means that the kernel sets
up your device just fine.

Thus, this is not a "linux (Ubuntu)" bug. It's a bug (or maybe just
misconfiguration) for nautilus media handling.

Unity has screwed with all kinds of things, so it's hard to find the
right way to configure this (I think they intend not to autostart
anything from USB for safety reasons). I think on 11.10, you can find a
"Removable Devices" configuration page under the System Settings (or
type "Removable Devices" into the Dash search bar). Be sure to uncheck:
"Never prompt or start programs on media insertion" and then choose
Banshee under "Music player".

On older systems, you might be able to run:

nautilus-file-management-properties

Under the "Media" tab, see if the options for "Music Player" are
helpful. For your case, you would want choose "Open Banshee Media
Player."

BTW, just because a problem exists when running the upstream kernel
doesn't mean that it's a problem with the upstream kernel.

** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826806

Title:
  when attaching a usb based music player to a usb port  banshee does
  not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/826806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset

2011-07-01 Thread Brian Norris
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => rt2x00 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875

Title:
  rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for
  offset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rt2x00/+bug/362875/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791023] Re: mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

2011-06-28 Thread Brian Norris
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 774434 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774434

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 774434
   mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791023

Title:
  mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/791023/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791023] Re: mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

2011-05-31 Thread Brian Norris
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791023

Title:
  mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791023] [NEW] mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

2011-05-31 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel

I recently upgraded to 10.04 => 10.10 => 11.04, and I have a new problem
appearing on 11.04. My mouse cursor disappears after hovering over
certain types of items, like the drop-down menus on the gnome system
panel, tabs in Firefox, or other items that give tooltips. The cursor
reappears when I move the mouse, but it will disappear again if I hover
over the wrong items.

I've seen several other bugs with the same types of problems appearing
on 11.04, but they don't include their logfiles and necessary
information. Hopefully this report will be helpful.

I'm using an old Dell Dimension 2400, with Intel integrated graphics:

$ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE 
Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01)

This machine did not have the required hardware for Unity, so I'm using
'Ubuntu Classic.'

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
DRM.card0.VGA.1:
 status: connected
 enabled: enabled
 dpms: On
 modes: 1680x1050 1280x1024 1280x1024 1280x960 1152x864 1024x768 1024x768 
1024x768 832x624 800x600 800x600 800x600 800x600 640x480 640x480 640x480 
640x480 720x400
 edid-base64: 
AP///wBMLUsEMjJNQykSAQMOLx54Ku6Ro1RMmSYPUFS/74CzAIGAgUBxTwEBAQEBAQEBfC6QoGAaHkAwIDYA2igRAAAa/QA4Sx5RDwAKICAgICAg/ABTeW5jTWFzdGVyCiAg/wBIOUxRQTAyODA5CiAgAEg=
Date: Tue May 31 18:29:06 2011
DistUpgraded: Log time: 2011-05-30 10:37:49.165275
DistroCodename: natty
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 vboxhost, 3.2.12, 2.6.34-020634-generic, i686: installed 
 vboxhost, 3.2.12, 2.6.32-30-generic, i686: built
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device 
[8086:2562] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
MachineType: Dell Computer Corporation Dimension 2400
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic 
root=UUID=91e42ed9-5bbb-483e-8a6d-59838f5c8fcd ro 
crashkernel=384M-2G:64M,2G-:128M quiet splash vt.handoff=7
Renderer: Unknown
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-30 (1 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/02/2003
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Computer Corporation
dmi.bios.version: A05
dmi.board.name: 0G1548
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Computer Corp.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 15
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Computer Corporation
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellComputerCorporation:bvrA05:bd12/02/2003:svnDellComputerCorporation:pnDimension2400:pvr:rvnDellComputerCorp.:rn0G1548:rvrA00:cvnDellComputerCorporation:ct15:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Dimension 2400
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Computer Corporation
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu2
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty needs-reassignment regression-update ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791023

Title:
  mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 774510] Re: Pointer Disappears When Cursor Type Changes

2011-05-31 Thread Brian Norris
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 774434 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774434

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 774434
   mouse pointer disappears in ubuntu 11.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774510

Title:
  Pointer Disappears When Cursor Type Changes

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 682543] Re: Upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, fails to install aptitude

2010-11-28 Thread Brian Norris


-- 
Upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, fails to install aptitude
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682543
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 682543] [NEW] Upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, fails to install aptitude

2010-11-28 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: aptitude

This system has been updated from 9.10 to 10.04 with no problems, and
recently I tried updating to 10.10, Maverick, using "do-release-
upgrade". This fails with some error messages like the following, I
wasn't able to catch it all. Hopefully the crash report info is helpful.

package aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

I can try to provide more information if it's helpful.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.44-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Nov 28 20:01:23 2010
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: cannot access archive: No such file or directory
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
SourcePackage: aptitude
Title: package aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: 
ErrorMessage: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 maverick

-- 
Upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, fails to install aptitude
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682543
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270653] Re: torque-scheduler prints errors during package configuration

2010-08-30 Thread Brian Norris
This is still a problem in 2.3.6+dfsg-0ubuntu3 on 10.04. Just because
there's some changelog data about a "fix" doesn't mean it was actually
fixed...can anyone help?

** Changed in: torque (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

-- 
torque-scheduler prints errors during package configuration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270653
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 550858] Re: aptitude does not draw box borders consistently

2010-08-30 Thread Brian Norris
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
aptitude does not draw box borders consistently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550858
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 550858] Re: aptitude does not draw box borders consistently

2010-08-25 Thread Brian Norris
I've had this same (or very similar) problem for a long time, and
apparently others have too.

Apparently, the problems I've been having have been "fixed" in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307583

However, the fix is documented as a change somewhere between 0.4.0-1 to
0.4.4-1. If the version numbering matches my thinking, then Ubuntu is
not using the most current version (my Ubuntu 10.04 install gives
version 0.4.11.11).

So I've tried building a newer version of aptitude, and it seems nearly
impossible. There are silly build errors all over the place (things like
not including stdio.h but calling printf? what's up with that??). So if
someone else knows how to verify that newer versions of aptitude have
this fixed then please help.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #307583
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307583

-- 
aptitude does not draw box borders consistently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550858
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566162] Re: Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Norris
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 566379 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566379

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 566379
   [i855] X doesn't start with kernel 2.6.32-21 unless passing i915.modeset=1

-- 
Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566162] Re: Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Norris
I believe this problem is a direct result of the "fix" for this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/563277

-- 
Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566162] Re: Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Norris
** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566162] Re: Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2

2010-06-12 Thread Brian Norris
It seems like the following page describes the issue:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Bugs/Lucidi8xxFreezes

Does that mean there's no bug-fix, just a set of configuration changes
or workarounds to try?

-- 
Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566162] Re: Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2

2010-06-12 Thread Brian Norris
I'm also on a Compaq Presario 2200 notebook. I've just upgraded to 10.04
and so I only have the option of the downloading the Ubuntu 2.6.32-21 or
2.6.32-22 kernel. I can bring the system up slowly--i.e. from GRUB,
choose to start in single user mode then go to multiuser w/o GUI--with
no problems until I force gdm to start. Then it freezes/black screen as
above.

So from single user mode, also I viewed my logs, and it doesn't seem
that anything for booting to GUI mode. It must crash very early in the
boot process?

I can try and provide more info if necessary, as this is still labeled
Incomplete.

-- 
Boot fails after kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-21generic on Ubuntu Lucid Beta2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 564948] Re: Created USB drives have one-word descriptions on boot menu

2010-04-23 Thread Brian Norris
Well, I had some free time to test this one again. I tried creating a
new bootable USB drive and it worked fine this time. Last time might
have been some kind of fluke or other write-error of some kind - and not
truly a "bug." Perhaps this was a misfiled bug...Sorry

-- 
Created USB drives have one-word descriptions on boot menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564948
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 564948] [NEW] Created USB drives have one-word descriptions on boot menu

2010-04-16 Thread Brian Norris
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: usb-creator

I have discovered this problem on the prerelease version of Lucid, using
the "usb-creator-gtk" package which reports version 0.2.22. Previously,
when I made a bootable USB drive from a CD image (e.g. from usb-creator
on Karmic) the resulting drive would boot with menu options like "Try
Ubuntu without any change to your computer" and "Install Ubuntu" whereas
on Lucid, usb-creator produces drives that have choices like "live" and
"live-install." I'm sure this is not the intention and should be edited
back to the previous descriptions.

I haven't provided screen shots since I am not running Lucid on a VM,
but I can do my best to get some if necessary.

** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: lucid

-- 
Created USB drives have one-word descriptions on boot menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564948
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362875] Re: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset 0x308c with error -71.

2009-11-09 Thread Brian Norris
I'm getting similar messages. They come at (seemingly) random times when
I'm not using the computer. Here's a bit from my syslog:

Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.930054] usb 1-3: USB disconnect, 
address 2
Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.940247] phy0 -> 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset 0x3040 
with error -19.
Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.940292] phy0 -> 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3040 
with error -19.
Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.940327] phy0 -> 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3028 
with error -19.
Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.940361] phy0 -> 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3064 
with error -19.
Nov  9 21:50:22 AMD-Server kernel: [ 8121.940396] phy0 -> 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0c failed for offset 0x 
with error -19.

My adapter is (lsusb):
ASUSTek Computer, Inc. WL-167G v2 802.11g Adapter [ralink]

I'm on Ubuntu (Server) 9.10. I believe I've had very similar problems on
9.04 as well.

>From the looks of the first line shown, my system thinks that the USB
adapter is being disconnected. I hadn't touched anything, but the
connection was then lost, so I had to "ifdown" and "ifup" my wlan0.

-- 
rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset 0x308c 
with error -71.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 462436] Re: Desktop background becomes black when desktop effects are enabled on GNOME and KDE

2009-11-06 Thread Brian Norris
I am having this same problem on a 9200SE card. There's a whole forum topic on 
this:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1308027

Simply disabling desktop effects has "solved" my problems (I get full
desktop functionality but no effects). Also, editing xorg.conf to force
XAA instead of EXA mode has worked to allow desktop effects, although
performance is then very slow.

I can provide information for my system if need be. I was attempting to
file a new bug when launchpad directed me to this report.

-- 
Desktop background becomes black when desktop effects are enabled on GNOME and 
KDE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462436
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 378706] Re: Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account

2009-06-16 Thread Brian Norris
Hello, I'm new to reporting bugs, but I know my way (a bit) around
linux.

I am on a old iMac g3 (slot-loading) and am reproducing the same problem
multiple times on fresh installations from the alternate PowerPC Ubuntu
install disk. I've been using the recovery mode on the alternate disk to
try and check the /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow files for information on
my *supposedly* added account and found no traces of an account.

To remedy this, I have tried (by others' suggestion) modifying the root
password while in recovery mode and my installation partition mounted at
/, but this fails with an "authentication token manipulation error."

Have there been any updates to this bug? I can provide more details on
the configuration of my machine if that helps the process at all.

-- 
Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs