[Bug 1636573] Re: xinit flooding syslog
Thanks Mike, following your step I was able to use the YouTube plugin 5.4.5 again on My Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS AMD64. I first had to install standard "python-setuptools" package, then proceeded with the above steps. Thank you!!! I was getting mad...very bad that you have to do such patch on a LTS install, BTW... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636573 Title: xinit flooding syslog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyopenssl/+bug/1636573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292398] Re: Second screen position isn't saved from one session to another
Ok I got it! I was about to implement this solution http://www.calgorithms.com/blog/2014/07/30/fixing-multiple-monitor- position-in-ubuntu-gnome-14-dot-04/ (thanks for this one, even it was a patch I did not like to use) when I was enlighted by this: Gnome is not getting monitor IDs correctly. I have 2 digital BenQ and one analog Asus. If I run Ubuntu 16.04 (on Gnome Fallback) System settings, they are identified correctly, albeit in the wrong position (note: right after login, the monitor position is set correctly for a few seconds, then when desktop is loaded, is messed up again). So, I execute step 1 of the above solution, deleted monitors.xml, installed gnome-control- center and run it: the monitors where wrongly identified. I changed monitor position using the wrong IDs for the monitor, getting them were I wanted. Then just shut down and re-boot...voilà: after login the desktop was loaded with correct monitor position for all the 3 monitor! Hope this can shed some light on this annoying Ubuntu bug...the fact that Ubuntu system settings/monitor and gnome-control-center IDs monitor in different ways is clearly the problem. I remember something similar when using Catalyst Control Center in 14.04 with fgrlx: could not get it to set it right - then, using system settings/monitor, I was able to fix it - and it stayed there until the upgrade to 16.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292398 Title: Second screen position isn't saved from one session to another To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/elementaryos/+bug/1292398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
..thanks again Scott for the explanation. I'm coming from Ubuntu 14.04, no problems there. But going back is kind of let down, and also not safe to go back: I would have to reinstall the system...very long...waiting 'till April..is almost 1 year away.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
Thanks Scott for #166...indeed the memory is excessive from the start, but I can live with that: 1 GB, ok, another 1 GB for firefox, ok...the problem is that java keeps growing...until it eats all the memory (I have 8 GB), the system starts to go paging on disks and become unusable. I'm using Ubuntu since 7.04 and upgraded ever since, this is the first time I have such serious problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
..this is about 16.04 memory leaks, not just unity, that BTW, I'm not using..I'm on Gnome Classic...fallback..and my principal application works on java 8, and it was perfect until 14.04..then the upgrade and this nightmare... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
..this is my system monitor...java 8 starts at around 1GB and then grows to grab all memory... ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2017-07-06 15-55-10.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+attachment/4910369/+files/Screenshot%20from%202017-07-06%2015-55-10.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
..well, instead of a new report, I will like to have new solutions... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
Yeah, .. what's wrong with Ubuntu 16.04...? This LTS update I delayed a lot, waiting for support of the official AMDGPU-PRO driver, was really a nightmare. My system was upgraded since 7.04 and everything just worked PERFECTLY...Now I find myself with low ram warnings, Oracle java 8 system unstable with unusable graphic performance on AMDGPU-PRO. So I have to use Radeon FOS driver, much better, but still much slower than the old fglrx from ADM...and I cannot go back..cannot risk a mess on my work machine... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
#151: NO, I am (and always been) on Gnome Flashback...fallback...the old ubuntu desktop, the one like it is meant to be...AND it eats memory... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
...here again, have been monitoring..I'm on Gnome Fallback as GUI and Oracle Java 8, last update: my java app, Prorealtime 10.3 (owrking ok since 2 years on 14.04) keeps growing in memory space: from the start it occupies 1.1 GB as Firefox, then, with no other activities, java in monitor keeps growing to 3 GB at midday...by evening I'll be on swap...really? Not even windows...Developers? Anyone? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
...tried the AMDGPU-PRO driver (AMDGPU is not available for HD7770), graphic performance on Java are a joke: 5 times worst than Gallium (not Noveau)...you move the mouse and the cursor follow after 1 second...a joke. Back to Gallium, yesterday started with 29% mem free, ended up in the evening with 1% and 30% swap used! Also, another known problem, monitors position is not remembered...this is the worst upgrade I ever made...planning on going back to 14.04...what a mess.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572801] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10
..just upgraded from 14.04...my system has 8GB ram, never had problem with memory, now using my main app in Java ?im getting memory low warning! I have an AMD Athlon 2 X4, Radeon 7770 with 1GB ram, using the Noveau driver... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572801 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 Unity desktop uses much more ram than Ubuntu 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1572801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292398] Re: Second screen position isn't saved from one session to another
Hi guys, same problem after upgrading from 14.04 LTS to 16.04.2 LTS...Gnome fallback of course (it is called fallback becouse Unity is supposed to be an improvement?) I had this problem in 14.04, with AMD Catalyst Control Center not remembering monitors position. Solved using system/monitors to set them and it was ok. After the upgrade, Catalyst is gone for free Gallium...but I get the bug. Strange enough at login monitors are correctly positioned...after login they get messed up. Same system since 7.04, always worked with 3 monitors...I know there is a script to work back the monitor config file...but is such an inelegant solutions...c'mon this bug is old years! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292398 Title: Second screen position isn't saved from one session to another To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/elementaryos/+bug/1292398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1334329] Re: Sound input settings not saved
...yep, here on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS, amd64, years ago I was able to solve the bug...but now it is back again.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334329 Title: Sound input settings not saved To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1334329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875543] Re: [Dell Inspiron 2500] Can't eject cd rom : Inappropriate ioctl for device
...is 2016 and this bug is still ON! eject: unable to eject, last error: Inappropriate ioctl for device tried all the above...nothing. First drive CD-ROM ejects, second, DVDRW does not...used to work...system uptodate 14.04 lts, amd64.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875543 Title: [Dell Inspiron 2500] Can't eject cd rom : Inappropriate ioctl for device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/875543/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478761] Re: failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
Happened again, Ubuntu 14.04 AMD64 latest upgrade...said wrong permissions...tried everything, finally changed USB port power off and reboot...ok... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478761 Title: failed to start scanner: Invalid argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane/+bug/478761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875543] Re: [Dell Inspiron 2500] Can't eject cd rom : Inappropriate ioctl for device
Hi there, it happens occasionally here on 14.04 lts amd64 upgraded from 12.04, 10.04, 8.04 etc. Unable to eject “LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-1635S” Error ejecting /dev/sr0: Command-line `eject /dev/sr0' exited with non-zero exit status 1: eject: unable to eject, last error: Inappropriate ioctl for device ...I was using Rythmbox...after some 6 discs I could not eject anymore... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875543 Title: [Dell Inspiron 2500] Can't eject cd rom : Inappropriate ioctl for device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/875543/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872220] Re: Fails to boot when there's problems with softraid
I was dropped to busybox on my RAID1 Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 system uptodate. cat /proc/mdstat reported [U_] on all 3 md devices (/, swap /home), but I was pretty sure the disk (sdb) was functional. On reset I pressed ESC to get to the grub menu to select rescue, I could see the message array degraded press Y to boot degraded but could not, it automaticcally selected N and drop me again into busybox. From there I could resync the array manually with: mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1 waited for the md0 to resync and checked again with cat /proc/mdstat that md0 was ok. Repeated the operation for md1 and checked, then md3 and checked again that all MD devices were [UU] good. Reset and the system came up OK! I then checked extensively disk sdb with SMART that reported no errors and no bad sectors. Did a surface test: ok; a fsck, ok. So, bottom line, array went out of sync for no apparent reason, and could not start degraded... Any ideas? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872220 Title: Fails to boot when there's problems with softraid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/872220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280034] Re: disk/by-uuid only created for md0 (rootfs raid)
I then updated with no problem up to 12.04 lts on the same hw and same arrays, still formatted as ext3. So it seems to work perfectly! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280034 Title: disk/by-uuid only created for md0 (rootfs raid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/280034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082030] Re: skype-bin seem to have strange dependency
Same here on 12.04 lts amd64: Changes for the versions: Installed version: 4.0.0.8-0oneiric1 Available version: 4.1.0.20-0ubuntu0.11.10.1 This update does not come from a source that supports changelogs. repos are added ok... how to upgrade? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082030 Title: skype-bin seem to have strange dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skype/+bug/1082030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971051] Re: No Alt+Tab in gnome classic session (switcher plugin not loaded)
Upgraded to 12.04 lts amd64 from 10.04 lts amd64... same bug here: alt- tab does not work, and it is correctly configured in gconf settings. It works in gnome classic (no effects) but no in gnome-classic with compiz. Very annoying... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971051 Title: No Alt+Tab in gnome classic session (switcher plugin not loaded) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/971051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1055096] Re: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot
update: Hardware watchdog driver for the AMD/ATI SP5100 chipset. The TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) timer is a watchdog timer that will reboot the machine after its expiration. The expiration time can be configured with the heartbeat parameter. To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called sp5100_tco. ...so it is something we can live without lsmod | grep sp # to see running module: sp5100_tco running, so... in file /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-custom added the line blacklist sp5100_tco # so the module does not get loaded ...and seems to solve the CD tray problem too...! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055096 Title: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1055096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1055096] Re: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot
Update 2: No, the CD tray keeps opening unexpectedly ! Arghh... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055096 Title: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1055096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1055096] Re: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot
Upgraded yesterday from 10.04 lts amd64 to 12.04 lts and 64 on my 5 years working perfectly system. I got everything well except the above error, which appear at the splash screen before login - splash is non graphical as I have installed ATI proprietary drivers, upgraded OK during the advance to 12.04. The error does not seem to couse any misbheaviour execpt from the CD burner tray opens by itself after a minute or so after the boot, login or not. Nothing hard, but still not a perfect system as it used to be... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055096 Title: SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use - system failed to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1055096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136252] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot hotplug fails)
Well, what you described is not standard upgrade procedure, as per Ubuntu. I did upgrade from 8.10, following Ubuntu directive, going to - 9.04 ; reboot - 9.10 ; reboot - 10.04 LTS with my system on RAID1 and GRUB on both disks. That was a year ago and it is still working. Hope this can be of any help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 Title: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot hotplug fails) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566149] Re: Lucid: No USB after resume on Thinkpad X201, T410, T410s, T510, W510
Hi all, I'm on Ubuntu 10.04 AMD64 on a Asus M2NSLIdeluxe and have the same problem. My USB printer scanner are dead after a resume. Yes, all the latest Updates applied. To get my printer to continue working, I had to unplug it plug it back; it worked, but the printer panel crashed and would not come back. Printer is a Samsung CLP 310 with prop. driver. Any idea on fixes? -- Lucid: No USB after resume on Thinkpad X201, T410, T410s, T510, W510 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478761] Re: failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
Dear Doug, sorry for the delay, I finally had time to give a try to your solution: IT WORKS! (where nothing else did...) This is what I did: 1) started Windows 2000 in VirtualBox 3.1.6 on my Ubuntu 9.10 AMD64 2) on the Devices menu of VirtualBox I selected unknown USB device 05D8:4022 - this is the address where my Mustek scanner lives on. 3) started DirectScan, the Mustek scan program on Win2K 4) the Win2K device disconnect window appeared, informing that it was now safe to unplug USB device Mustek ScanPlus 1200 5) at THE SAME TIME the XSane dialog box appeared offering which device to use for scanning, my webcam or Mustek ScanPlus 1200 - this is common as I have 2 scanning device, at least for sane. 6) selected the Mustek ScanPlus 1200 and instead of getting open of device gt68xx:libusb:001:009 failed: Invalid argument I had xsane up and running! So definitely using the Windows driver took the scanner away from this strange lock mode it was fallen! Thanks again for your solution, Dave -- failed to start scanner: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478761] Re: failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
+1; read everything and tried everything (ubuntu 9.10 amd64, it was working with 9.04) scanimage: open of device gt68xx:libusb:001:009 failed: Invalid argument tried also with libsane 1.0.19 ... nothing. And I read around the bug is still there in 10.04 Any help? TIA -- failed to start scanner: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486361] Re: raid1 filesystems cannot yet be mounted after karmic upgrade
Exactly the same situation: I had my workstation perfectly working with 9.04 AMD64 with all latest updates and did a Dist Upgrade from Upgrade Manager. The upgrade did not complete for some reasons logged into /var/ could not do anything but restart the system. At boot, the system could not mount any of the md devs I have, (0,1,2,3, respectively /, swap, /home, /stripe). Could do nothing since the busybox recovery terminal was read only. Could see that the mds were ok using cat /proc/mdstat but could not assemble the arrays to boot the computer. So after reading the above I did: 1) fsck (maybe not needed - but found many errors) 2) manually mount devs rw with sudo mount /dev/md0 -o remount,rw sudo mount /dev/md2 -o remount,rw sudo mount /dev/md3 -o remount,rw Note: /dev/md1 is swap, already mounted rw 3) aptitude update - could not run, so sudo dpkg --configure -a and apt dbase rebuilded 4) aptitude update 5) aptitude upgrade and restart after finish - OK! But to do all this I had to have: 1) another computer available 2) pretty good system knowledge 3) cold blood I can imagine the average user clicking upgrade and then have a non bootable system! Ubuntu+RAID=not for fainted hearts Rich, thank you so much for posting this info! You're the man... -- raid1 filesystems cannot yet be mounted after karmic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365361] Re: flash does not work in mythbrowser
No it does not. Mythbuntu 9.10 AMD64 with firefox 3.5 running adobe flash latest 64 bit .so perfectly... mythbrowser says no plugin installed... -- flash does not work in mythbrowser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440701] Re: firefox crash on some site updating (bigcharts.marketwatch.com?)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32871141/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32871142/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32871143/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32871144/profiles.ini.txt -- firefox crash on some site updating (bigcharts.marketwatch.com?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440701] [NEW] firefox crash on some site updating (bigcharts.marketwatch.com?)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Ubuntu 9.04 AMD64 up to date VMware server 2 up to date Adobe Flash 10 64 bit up to date Jave Sun 64 bit... ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.14+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- firefox crash on some site updating (bigcharts.marketwatch.com?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271700] Re: ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33
And thanks a lot indeed! Modified the /boot/grub/menu.lst as per your suggestions above and now both my disks are running at UDMA5! Szefu, thank again for your precious help! Hope it helps others too! -- ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136252] Re: [gutsy] mdadm, initramfs missing ARRAY lines
Thank you for providing a solution - I printed the page and started to update from 8.10 to 9.04 on AMD64 with /, /home and swap on md0, md1 md2 on RAID1, plus a RAID0 on md3 using two spare partitions on my 2 SATA disks. But... The upgrade just went as smooth as silk! The system booted just fine. For now I just had to reconfigure VMWare server 2. Not so for md3, the RAID0. Raid monitor says md_d3 (instead of calling it md3): inactive sdb4[0](S) Any help? TIA -- [gutsy] mdadm, initramfs missing ARRAY lines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330298] Re: mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade
Thank you for providing a solution - I printed the page and started to update from 8.10 to 9.04 on AMD64 with /, /home and swap on md0, md1 md2 on RAID1, plus a RAID0 on md3 using two spare partitions on my 2 SATA disks. But... The upgrade just went as smooth as silk! The system booted just fine. For now I just had to reconfigure VMWare server 2. Not so for md3, the RAID0. Raid monitor says md_d3 (instead of calling it md3): inactive sdb4[0](S) Any help? TIA -- mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271700] Re: ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33
Thank you szefu for confirming that yannis solution works for you... But can you help in explaining WHERE to put that kernel option? With the previous solution I just edited /etc/modprobe.d/options file. With yannis's what I have to do? TIA -- ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303429] Re: hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23
The board on my PC is an old MSI K7T with VIA Apollo 4 chipset, if this is of any help. I think that many have this problem, just that not many are aware of it. Ubuntu devs should do something - at least as workaround like the libata force=80c that worked before. GoodBye all Dave -- hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303429] Re: hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23
Eric you are in good company: I confirm that upgrading to 9.04 brings back to UDMA2 - This is really annoying... Ubuntu devs? Where are you ? Now what we do? -- hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271700] Re: ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33
This is a very important matter for many. Can you be more specific on how to add libata.force=80c in kernel options. Do we have to recompile the kernel? Can you point to a simple howto? TIA -- ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303429] Re: hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23
I modified /etc/modprobe.d/options as you suggested, with options libata force=80c But still it does not work - dmesg: 4.156770] ata1.00: ATA-7: Maxtor 6Y080L0, YAR41BW0, max UDMA/133 [4.156779] ata1.00: 160086528 sectors, multi 16: LBA [4.157250] ata1.01: ATA-7: Maxtor 6Y080L0, YAR41BW0, max UDMA/133 [4.157255] ata1.01: 160086528 sectors, multi 16: LBA [4.157275] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable [4.157280] ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable [4.172632] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33 [4.188657] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/33 [4.352502] ata2.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-STDVD-RAM GH22NP20, 1.00, max UDMA/66 [4.352528] ata2.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable [4.368488] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 [4.368733] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 6Y080L0 YAR4 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [4.368969] scsi 0:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 6Y080L0 YAR4 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [4.370266] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROMHL-DT-ST DVD-RAM GH22NP20 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [4.372144] usb 2-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Can you help? (wires are ok) TIA -- hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303429] Re: hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23
OK, it works! I forgot to sudo update-initramfs -u reboot system Now its at UDMA5 - great! Thanks! -- hd limited to udma33, thinkpad t23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271700] Re: ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33
OK, I solved with this: found a workaround by forcing the 80c. But the problem is already an existing bug in the kernel, the cable detection is messed up. e...@vishnu:~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/options # XXX: Ignore HPA by default. Needs to be revisted in jaunty #options libata ignore_hpa=1 options libata force=80c Save the file sudo sudo update-initramfs -u reboot system - OK! UDMA5 is set! -- ExpressCard CF adapter limited to UDMA/33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285595] Re: Intrepid kernel UDMA/33 (slow disk transfer rate)
Just update the Jaunty partition with latest beta 9.04: same as intrepid 8.10 - UDMA2 is set instead of 5!! Ubuntu, are we going backward? Anyhelp? TIA -- Intrepid kernel UDMA/33 (slow disk transfer rate) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285595 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285595] Re: Intrepid kernel UDMA/33 (slow disk transfer rate)
I confirm this bug exists on 8.10 (mythbuntu)
BIOS is set to UDMA 100 and shows it at startup, but hdparm reports
udma2 and dmesg the 40-wire cable - NOT!
I tried this solutions that worked for a guy:
Modified /etc/modules:
Code:
fuse
lp
#custom start
amd74xx
mousedev
psmouse
via82cxxx
piix
ide-core
#ide-generic
ide-disk
ide-cd
#custom end
Added to /etc/hdparm.conf:
Code:
/dev/sda {
dma = on
io32_support = 1
write_cache = on
}
but it did nothing for me - any suggestions?
BTW: System is old but proven capable of running at udma5...
--
Intrepid kernel UDMA/33 (slow disk transfer rate)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Great! It worked like a charm! I just noted that ~/bin was already there so the first line (mkdir ~/bin) was not necessary To make shure for others: 1) I run the updater from Vuze 3.1; when finished I closed Vuze instead of restarting. 2) followed Anders instructions 3) logout login again Now Vuze 4.1.04 has started! It asked to update the UPnP server to 2.5, and this time the autoupdater worked! My system: Ubuntu 8.10 AMD64, Linux v2.6.27-11-generic, Java 1.6.0_12-ea Sun Microsystems Inc. SWT v3448, gtk, amd64Athlon X2 4800, 2 GB, 2 x 400GB Sata Raid 1 (mdadm) VMWare server 2 Thank you Anders, Vuze 3 was leaking memory all over, and my system was swapping to disk too much... Thanks! -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
If you mean the Install/Remove standard Ubuntu packet manager, fine. Vuze was installed from there (3.1) and still results installed. -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332042] Re: notify-osd crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED()
I', using mythbuntu 9.04 alpha 5. The bug shows up during a packet manager upgrade. Now packet manager does not work anymore... back to 8.10 wait for a more stable release... Good by all -- notify-osd crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260765] Re: DVD playback broken in Intrepid because of resindvd
OK, Milan, you are the man. I did: sudo gedit /usr/share/doc/libdvdread3/install-css.sh for my i386 notebook and mod. the script for my amd64 as suggested: In the line available=i386 replace it with available=ia64 then re-run the script. it works as it should on both (a bit slow on the notebook, I will investigate) - still the problem remain. We had a nice info in the packet manager saying that DVD DeCSS was not installed by default becouse blablabla and now, in the latest Ubuntu we just have an error? This is a serious drawback that will scare many first timer away; I'm not a first timer and, given for granted that DVD support was installed and working on the previous release, I had to research the net for answer and waste several hours. This MUST be corrected in the reps! Ubuntu team please take note. Thank you for your precious help -- DVD playback broken in Intrepid because of resindvd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260765 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Same problem on Ubuntu 8.10 amd64 w Sun Java: Azureus 3.1.1.0 tries to upgrade forever to 4.1.0.0. I changed Java from default ubuntu conf., but no luck with Vuze; the rest works wonders with the sun java plugin 64 bit. Thanks to all! -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260765] Re: DVD playback broken in Intrepid because of resindvd
I'm astonished... I've upgrade from 7.10 to 8.10 for not having DVD support. I've an amd64 and a an HP pavillion in 32 bit version, both fail with DVD on 8.10 My mythbuntu 8.10 box 32 bit works wonder with any DVD... So, what do we do know? TIA -- DVD playback broken in Intrepid because of resindvd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260765 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290885] Re: SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy
Thanks for answering Dustin, very fast as usual! Just to make sure I get it correctly: 1) back-up data (of course...) 2) boot normally my 7.10 amd64 desktop with both disks in Raid1 3) do a live distribution update from Update Manager New dist rel 8.04 LTS is available button 4) reboot after 8.04 upgrade 5) do a live distribution update from Update Manager New dist rel 8.10 is available button 6) reboot after 8.10 upgrade 7) do a grub-install /dev/md0 to update grub on both disks instead of grub-install /dev/sda + grub-install /dev/sdb as I did on 7.10 Correct? -- SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290885] Re: SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy
Thank you very much for your help! -- SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290885] Re: SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy
Dustin, I have been following this from the beginning, but I'm still puzzled on the way to upgrade my 7.10 AMD64 desktop, working OK with the patch on 2 sata HD. I would like to: 1) disconnect 1 HD boot degraded 2) update to 8.04 via network 3) update to 8,10 4) connect the second HD and sync the array but... upgrading will require a reboot... will I be able to boot in 8.04 and do the next upgrade to 8.10? Any help appreciated! -- SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206495] Re: hvr-1100 is not configured properly
No, it still does not work on Mythbuntu 8.10 - I've tried all Hauppage settings and above modification to lirc.hwdb lircd version is still 0.8.3 What can I try? -- hvr-1100 is not configured properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280034] Re: mount fails after upgrade: no disk/by-uuid
Exactly (almost) the same I get if I boot with a Ubuntu 8.04.1 AMD64 liveCD and I try to mount my /dev/md0 array on /mnt I made a backup of / using tar, just in case an eventual upgrade to 8.04.1 will fail - but it seems that upgrading from 7.10 having the system on RAID 1 is risky at this point... what to do? My config: Ubuntu 7.10 AMD64 on two SATA2 WD 400 MB HD: root on md0, swap on md1 and /home on md2 Ahtlon 64 X2 4800+ on Ausu M2N Sli Deluxe 2GB DDr2 800 ATI HD2400 -- mount fails after upgrade: no disk/by-uuid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188473] Re: Mythtv DVB-T channel scanning and importing broken
I always had problem importing channel conf with DVB-T (DVB-S works ok) but also with scanning: scanning in mythbuntu worked in 7.10 using a mix of GB, Germany Spain def.conf. to get italian channels. Now since 8.04, it does not find anymore Mediaset2 network, which is found ok using scan of dvb-utils. It finds all other network, even data only and DVBH (discarded) but not the Mediaset2 network, with the main channels Rete4, Italia1 e Canale5... annoying. And also inputing direct freq. does not work. This is the same with 8.04.1, 8.10 alpha 6 now Beta1 My config is: Athlon 2000+ on MSI K7T Turbo 512MB Nvidia GF5200 AGP Technosat Skystar2 Hauppauge HVR 1100 Thanks to all for helping -- Mythtv DVB-T channel scanning and importing broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227819] Re: New networkmanager null assert in Hardy
Same problem: NetworkManager: info SWITCH: terminating current connection 'eth0' because it's no longer valid... And it's happening every minute! This because I looked in the logs after I started having serious problems. In fact as soon as I start to increase the loads on the LAN eth0 crash and then it's up again. It will do that with VNC, copying a large file or streaming video. My LAN (CAT5 100Mbps) is very simple: Ubuntu 7.10 PC Ubuntu 8.04 PC Pirelli router on adsl as DHCP And it all started after an auto-upgrade of something, could not recall, but very recent... before everything was fine -- New networkmanager null assert in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206495] Re: hvr-1100 is not configured properly
Thanks Lucas, but it does exactly the same as Nova500 settings: it works, but only some buttons. The strange is that if you try from the lirc console text mode, every key works ok. It is mythbuntu specific. Guess I will wait for Intrepid - hopefully tuning the HVR1100 will work better too in that release... -- hvr-1100 is not configured properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206495] Re: hvr-1100 is not configured properly
I tried Lucas solution, replacing line 79 in lirc.hwdb: result, the remote does not work anymore. If I use the Nova T500 or 1100, the remote act the same: only very few keys are recognized by lirc Mario says: the bug it is fixed - does not seems so... My installed version is 0.8.3-0ubuntu7.1 (latest), on mythbuntu 8.04 with latest weekly patch -- hvr-1100 is not configured properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
So, just to summarize, we are stuck to ubuntu 7.10? I would like to upgrade to 8.04 for many reasons, but to risk to find myself with the same problem as before is unacceptable. Do you guys think situation will improve by the time of 8.10 ? Do you also find the following procedure suitable: 1) unplug 1 drive from RAID 1 2) update ubuntu from 7.10 to 8.04 with only one drive in the array 3) verify that everything works; if yes... 4) add the drive as spare and reassemble 5) No, upgrade is not good; then... 6) plug back the old drive and start the machine with that and reassemble the other as spare... Help? Suggestions? TIA -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
So, just to summarize, we are stuck to ubuntu 7.10? I would like to upgrade to 8.04 for many reasons, but to risk to find myself with the same problem as before is unacceptable. Do you guys think situation will improve by the time of 8.10 ? Do you also find the following procedure suitable: 1) unplug 1 drive from RAID 1 2) update ubuntu from 7.10 to 8.04 with only one drive in the array 3) verify that everything works; if yes... 4) add the drive as spare and reassemble 5) No, upgrade is not good; then... 6) plug back the old drive and start the machine with that and reassemble the other as spare... Help? Suggestions? TIA -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dear Plnt Ken, thanks for providing trying solutions to this major problem as it looks to me too. But have any of you tried mdadm version 2.6.4, that I found around, as I stated a few posts up? Regards, Dave -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dear Diego, thank you for clarifying matters, I'm glad that it works for you. So now you got RAID1 as it is supposed to run. Just by changing OS... Is it that difficult to get it to work on Ubuntu?!? I mean, it is a serious bug - not dependent on the SW component but on OS version - and no solution? I thought Ubuntu was one of the most supported distributions... We have to wait for another release? -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Meaning what, exactly? You replaced ubuntu with debian? -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dear brunus, no: I have not. I was thinking about using Fumihito procedure with 2.5.6, but then I discovered that 2.6.3 existed in ubuntu repository (although Synaptic packet manager does not find any update over 2.6.2) and was thinking about installing that. Then I discovered 2.6.4 is the latest mdadm version as shown above. I downloaded the source... and stopped. I do not have enough knowledge to compile install something as critical as driver for RAID (my RAID with data on it...); is not that I'm scared of it, but is my production machine and cannot risk data failure or restore time. Also I'm not convinced of the results. If this is to just result in a so-so procedure like selecting foulty drive from grub menu... I'll wait for a cleaner solution - like stable and safe mdadm driver release that will make my RAID1 start with only 1 disk WITHOUT me having to do anything, like it should be. Thanks all for your precious thinking. Dave out -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Searching, I found out that latest release is 2.6.4 - but no option in ubuntu repository (yet?). ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.4 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.4 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:06:29 +1000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive-link: Article, Thread I am pleased to announce the availability of mdadm version 2.6.4 It is available at the usual places: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/ Does some of the following changes applies to our bug? Changes Prior to 2.6.4 release - Make --create --auto=mdp work for non-standard device names. - Fix restarting of a 'reshape' if it was stopped in the middle. - Fix a segfault when using v1 superblock. - Make --write-mostly effective when re-adding a device to an array. - Various minor fixes Changes Prior to 2.6.3 release - allow --write-behind to be set for --grow. - When adding new disk to an array, don't reserve so much bitmap space that the disk cannot store the required data. (Needed when 1.x array was created with older mdadm). - When adding a drive that was a little too small, we did not get the correct error message. - Make sure that if --assemble find an array in the critical region of a reshape, and cannot find the critical data to restart the reshape, it gives an error message. - Fix segfault with '--detail --export' and non-persistent superblocks. - Various manpage updates. - Improved 'raid4' support (--assemble, --monitor) - Option parsing fixes w.r.t -a - Interpret --assemble --metadata=1 to allow any version 1.x metadata, and be more specific in the metadata= message printed with --examine --brief - Fix spare migration in --monitor. Changes Prior to 2.6.2 release - --fail detached and --remove faulty can be used to fail and remove devices that are no longer physically present. - --export option for --detail or present information in a format that can be processed by udev. - fix internal bitmap allocation problems with v1.1, v1.2 metadata. - --help now goes to stdout so you can direct it to a pager. - Various manpage updates. - Make --grow --add for linear arrays really work. - --auto-detect to trigger in-kernel autodetect. - Make return code for --detail --test more reliable. Missing devices as well as failed devices cause an error. -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dear Fumihito, first of all, thanks for your fast reply! 1) No, ?No, I'm on amd64. I just went to the archive ubuntu site you suggested and found out that the following exists: mdadm-udeb_2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu1_amd64.udeb 13-Dec-2007 01:04 76K mdadm-udeb_2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu1_i386.udeb13-Dec-2007 00:04 73K mdadm-udeb_2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu1_powerpc.udeb 13-Dec-2007 01:04 85K mdadm-udeb_2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu1_sparc.udeb 13-Dec-2007 01:04 91K ...it seems a fresh new 2.6.3 version of mdadm - maybe it cures the bug ?!? 2) First time I deal with mdadm RAID, but from experiences on other OS with SW RAID, I learned (the hard way) that it is safe not to mess around with driver version different than the ones that created the arrays. But if I have no alternatives... I will try. 3) I tried to find details of this new 2.6.3, but found none. Good common sense makes me think that the mantainer od mdadm was aware of the bug and solved it in this new version, making the all scripting from grub menu solution unnecessary... Suggestions? -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Dear Fumihito, Thank you for your help in this very annoying bug with ubuntu (so long for the newimproved version)... I'm running 7.10, tried the above procedure and realized (as you stated) that mdadm_2.6.2-1ubuntu2 DOES NOT work on 7.10 with grub trick. 3 questions: 1) How to degrade to mdadm_2.5.6-7ubuntu5_arch.deb as you suggest? In Synaptic packet manager the option force is not available... 2) I'm a little bit scared of running a previous version of mdadm on my RAID1 created with 2.6.2: is it safe? 3) Since this is just a workaround and not a solution (the system should automatically start without user selecting a grub option), shall I wait for a new mdadm? Thanks in advance for yours and everybody's help -- cannot boot raid1 with only one disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
