[Bug 1603715] Re: bluetooth unavailable after rfkill hard (or soft) unblocking and after suspend/resume
I'm experiencing a similar issue on Thinkpad x220 running Linux Mint 18 (based on Ubuntu 16.04) with kernel 4.4.0-21. In my case, rfkill unblock needs to be called twice in order to fully enable (and soft unblock) bluetooth: # rfkill block bluetooth # rfkill list bluetooth 0: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: no # rfkill unblock bluetooth # rfkill list bluetooth 0: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 5: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: no (At this stage, Bluetooth appears to be on in the Mint Bluetooth configuration dialog but can't see any devices). # rfkill unblock bluetooth # rfkill list bluetooth 0: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 5: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no (Now Bluetooth works fully as expected). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603715 Title: bluetooth unavailable after rfkill hard (or soft) unblocking and after suspend/resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bluez/+bug/1603715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1
After spending a couple hours trying to fix or work around this issue, I eventually just decided that the only workaround for now is a downgrade. So I installed jetty and libjetty-extra-java 6.1.26-ubuntu1, but then bumped into a problem with the most recent version of libtomcat6-java (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740596), so I manually downloaded and installed the earlier packaged version of libtomcat6-java (6.0.37-1). I'm happy to report that Solr now works on my machine. Better would be if jetty6 were fixed to only depend on libtomcat6-java again instead of libtomcat7-java, I suspect, along with a backport of the fixes that were done to resolve the Debian bug mentioned above; but for my purposes, I'm content to just stick with earlier packages for what is a localhost-only setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508562 Title: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jetty/+bug/1508562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
That fix was from three hours ago, and made it into mainline 3.6, I believe. I've long since switched computers and haven't tested it recently, but I would assume it has long since made it into Ubuntu's releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159205] Re: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816859 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816859 Aha! I figured it out -- I'd worked around this in the previous release but forgotten about it. It's a bad interaction between uswsusp and plymouth. So this is basically a duplicate of #816859, which has an easy workaround, which makes me wonder why Ubuntu maintainers can't take the trouble of adding a two-line fix to /usr/share/initramfs- tools/scripts/local-premount/uswsusp. In an attempt to upgrade-proof the workaround described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/816859/comments/9, I've copied the script to /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816859 restore after hibernate freezes the computer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159205 Title: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hibernate/+bug/1159205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159205] Re: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded
I don't think this is a kernel bug per se -- I just tried reinstalling the 3.5.0-27 kernel that was working from debs, and now resume from hibernate is broken with that kernel as well. As a result, I've restored my backups from quantal, since this functionality is important to me. Could the might be with initramfs-tools or something else that changed between quantal and raring? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159205 Title: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hibernate/+bug/1159205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159205] Re: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded
I just tested with a variety of mainline kernels from kernel-ppa, and am confused by what I found. I observed similar freezes while trying to resume from hibernate using all of the following versions: 3.5.0, 3.5.7, 3.6.11, 3.7.10, 3.9.0. I don't understand why resume from hibernate works fine with the 3.5.0-27 Ubuntu kernel and not the mainline 3.5.0 kernel, but that's what I've observed, for whatever it may be worth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159205 Title: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hibernate/+bug/1159205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159205] Re: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded
This is happening for me on my Thinkpad R61 after upgrading to Ubuntu 13.04 (kernel 3.8.0-19), but it was working fine with the leftover kernel from Ubuntu 12.10 (kernel 3.5.0-27). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159205 Title: Hibernate won't resume after image was successfully loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hibernate/+bug/1159205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868358] Re: Hibernate hotkey (fn + ...) triggers suspend to ram
Just to keep the record complete, the changes markusj suggested didn't work on my R61. I'd imagine this is probably the case for others too. For now, I've worked around it by using CompizConfig Settings Manager to assign Super-F12 to a command that invokes hibernate, but this seems like it ought to be a silly regression that should be easy to sort out at the code level... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868358 Title: Hibernate hotkey (fn + ...) triggers suspend to ram To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/868358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993265] Re: Wine breaks window decorations for all applications (gtk-window-decorator crashes)
OK, here's a stack trace (with breakpoint on _XError)... ** Attachment added: backtrace at _XError for WINE-related gtk-window-decorator crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/993265/+attachment/3219355/+files/backtrace%20at%20_XError%20for%20WINE-related%20gtk-window-decorator%20crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993265 Title: Wine breaks window decorations for all applications (gtk-window- decorator crashes) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/993265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993265] Re: Wine breaks window decorations for all applications (gtk-window-decorator crashes)
I'm seeing the same problem trying to get a backgrace. Even if I respond 'y' to gdb's prompt regarding gdk_x_error, I still get no break, just an exit with code 01. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993265 Title: Wine breaks window decorations for all applications (gtk-window- decorator crashes) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/993265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
I've already uploaded a patch to the upstream bug tracker, but I just thought I'd note here that the fix is to turn on USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME for this webcam in drivers/usb/core/quirks.c. Any chance that such a fix could be backported into the Ubuntu kernel as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
One more comment (which is already in the upstream log): this webcam actually appears to work fine even after a suspend/resume cycle in 2.6.38 and earlier, but fails after system suspend/resume or runtime USB autosuspend/resume in 2.6.39-rc1 and later. So now I'm not sure where the issue lies... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
Well, I found something. After 13 kernel builds (not counting working around broken commits several times) and countless reboots, I found myself staring at this as the culprit: commit e1620d591a75a10b15cf61dbf8243a0b7e6731a2 Author: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl Date: Fri Mar 18 19:55:36 2011 +0100 USB: Move runtime PM callbacks to usb_device_pm_ops USB defines usb_device_type pointing to usb_device_pm_ops that provides system-wide PM callbacks only and usb_bus_type pointing to usb_bus_pm_ops that provides runtime PM callbacks only. However, the USB runtime PM callbacks may be defined in usb_device_pm_ops which makes it possible to drop usb_bus_pm_ops and will allow us to consolidate the handling of subsystems by the PM core code. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de I actually went back and started testing several of the earlier steps in the bisection because I couldn't believe this was the issue, since the commit looked completely irrelevant. Maybe I'd not tested thoroughly enough and falsely labeled as good one of the bad commits. But then I looked more closely at the patch associated with this commit, and decided to play around with some settings. With USB power management turned on in the current kernel (default in 3.2.0-25), all I have to do is run guvcview once after plugging in the webcam, close guvcview, wait at least two seconds (which is the default autosuspend idle-delay time), then open guvcview again. Voila! Bug reproduced. However, if I turn off USB power management), then this issue is no longer reproducible. I do this by running echo -1 /sys/module/usbcore/parameters/autosuspend as root. I have not yet found a way to turn off autosuspend for just the webcam, but this appears to be a (somewhat sledgehammer-ish) workaround. So... now what? Have I found a kernel bug, or just a bug in the webcam firmware tickled by a legitimate change in the kernel code? If the latter, then is there a way to indicate that this particular webcam is not compatible with USB autosuspend as implemented now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
I just found a way to turn off autosuspend for just the webcam (by writing to the appropriate power/control attribute under /sys/bus/usb/devices/*) but this seems like a kludge -- and having to do it after each time I plug in the webcam is not too elegant either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
One more note: the same issue occurs, even with runtime USB power management turned off, if I suspend my system with the webcam connect and then resume. So it appears to be a problem not with runtime power management per se, but with the way this particular webcam reacts to a suspend/resume cycle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #44191 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44191 ** Changed in: linux Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: linux Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: linux Remote watch: None = Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #44191 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
Christopher, I already downloaded v2.6.39-rc1 (mainline kernel build from ubuntu ppa) and confirmed that the bug happens there. So I am left to conclude that the bug was introduced between v2.6.38 (in which the bug doesn't happen) and v2.6.39-rc1; so what would you now suggest? I'm preparing to do a bisection between those two mainline kernel versions; do you think that's the right step? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
Hi Christopher, where oh where have you gone? :-) Since I couldn't build from Ubuntu-2.6.39-0.0 (which appears to actually be 2.6.38 in some form), I did some more reading and started to make use of git bisect skip. Three git bisect skips and three git bisect goods later, git bisect just tells me that the earliest known bad commit was... Ubuntu-2.6.39-0.0. Not terribly helpful! So now what? There are several v4l-related commits, including a major merge from v4l_for_linus, but I don't know git well enough to know whether it's possible to revert those specific commits for testing. Any further suggestions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
I've now tried it on 2.6.39-0.5; for some reason, it takes many more tries before it happens, but I can still coax this bug to show up in this version. I haven't been able to reproduce it, however, in 2.6.38-8 (from Oneiric) or in 2.6.38-15 (from Natty). So how do I proceed with bisection here? If I list all the tags in the Oneiric repository, the earliest one seems to be Ubuntu 2.6.39-0.0, not 2.6.38-8.42. So how would I track down the possible causes of regression between 2.6.38-8.42 and 2.6.39-0.5? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
OK, a brief update from the land of trying to build a kernel in Ubuntu regression land for the first time: I built a kernel from the tag Ubuntu-2.6.39-0.1, and confirmed that the regression still happens there. When I tried building from Ubuntu-2.6.39-0.0 (a logical step, no?), the build (actually, the pre-build command fakeroot debian/rules clean) failed immediately with this error: debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk:12: *** first argument to `word' function must be greater than 0. Stop. So... now what? It seems that I've found an inconvenient place in the development cycle for trying to determine the cause of a regression... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
I'll try to do so sometime soon -- but I think it needs to be a kernel bisect from Natty, based on comment #5 in bug 865131. There's an awfully wide gap between 2.6.38 and 3.2.0; which kernel/git branch do I pull down to start the process: the one from Natty or the one from Precise? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
Hi Christopher, thanks for your help so far. I've determined that the webcam worked with the Natty kernel but fails with the latest Oneiric kernel. So I'm ready to start the bisection process, but I'm a little unclear: the document on kernel bisection seems to assume that the working and non-working kernel are in the same tree in the example given (e.g., ubuntu-maverick.git). But in this instance, I'm finding a problem moving from the Natty kernel to the Oneiric kernel. So which git tree do I clone? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] [NEW] Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
Public bug reported: The first time I plug in this webcam, it seems to work ok (e.g., in guvcview). If I turn off the webcam and then turn it on again, all I see is a noisy screen with lots of multicolored horizontal lines (see attached; colors change in response to waving my hand in front of webcam lens, so I know it's still receiving/processing video from camera). Sometimes, it works the second time, but after a few more times, I see the video with just noise again. If I unplug the webcam and then plug it back in, then the video shows up again -- at least for one time. I see this problem after upgrading from Maverick straight to Precise. This is reminiscent of bug 865131, which expired on 2012-05-30. I've tested with mainline kernel 3.4 as well, with similar results. 046d:08c1 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Fusion ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.2.0-25-generic-pae 3.2.0-25.40 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: ericding 3287 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: ericding 3287 F pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfe02 irq 48' Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1984' Components : 'HDA:11d41984,17aa20d7,00100400' Controls : 32 Simple ctrls : 20 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'U0x46d0x8c1'/'USB Device 0x46d:0x8c1 at usb-:00:1d.7-1, high speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB046d:08c1' Controls : 2 Simple ctrls : 1 Card1.Amixer.values: Simple mixer control 'Mic',0 Capabilities: cvolume cvolume-joined cswitch cswitch-joined penum Capture channels: Mono Limits: Capture 0 - 3072 Mono: Capture 1536 [50%] [24.00dB] [on] Card29.Amixer.info: Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw 7KHT24WW-1.08' Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 7KHT24WW-1.08' Components : '' Controls : 1 Simple ctrls : 1 Card29.Amixer.values: Simple mixer control 'Console',0 Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum Playback channels: Mono Mono: Playback [on] Date: Sun Jun 24 15:37:19 2012 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=659e091f-4341-4c37-85eb-04642310de7a InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) MachineType: LENOVO 7732CTO PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-25-generic-pae root=/dev/mapper/vg-root ro quiet splash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.2.0-25-generic-pae N/A linux-backports-modules-3.2.0-25-generic-pae N/A linux-firmware1.79 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 05/11/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 7LETC6WW (2.26 ) dmi.board.name: 7732CTO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7LETC6WW(2.26):bd05/11/2009:svnLENOVO:pn7732CTO:pvrThinkPadR61/R61i:rvnLENOVO:rn7732CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 7732CTO dmi.product.version: ThinkPad R61/R61i dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
** Attachment added: video captured in guvcview when webcam not working properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072/+attachment/3202254/+files/SecondTime.avi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017072] Re: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time
I just tested with 3.5.0-030500rc3-generic #201206162135 3.5.0-030500rc3-generic #201206162135 SMP and can still reproduce the issue. ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017072 Title: 046d:08c1 Regression: Quickcam Fusion doesn't work after first time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1017072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 865131] Re: Regression: Logitech Quickcam Fusion doesn't work since upgrade
I see this problem after upgrading from Maverick straight to Precise. The webcam works when first plugged in, but after turning off the webcam and back on, I get all sorts of problems. Even when it works the first time, the image is significantly underexposed (way too dark). Can this bug be revisited? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865131 Title: Regression: Logitech Quickcam Fusion doesn't work since upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/865131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 996604] Re: When number of workspaces is set to 1, the Spread no longer works
@Sebastien: Ben may have been a little crass about it, but the fact is that this is a regression since 12.04 was released. It worked in 12.04 out of the box, but then stopped working with the Unity 5.12 upgrade. Surely you can't be serious in saying that we can only expect Ubuntu to work if we stick with strictly standard options! Does that mean that if I include more launchers than are there by default, or if I decide to change the panel to display the day and month, not just the time, then I can't expect it to work because it's not a standard option? That's just silly. I expect minor bugs and issues to arise, so I'm not about to go on a rant about this issue, but your regression test suite really should include not just one standard configuration, but other common configurations and boundary cases too. Don't you think? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996604 Title: When number of workspaces is set to 1, the Spread no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/996604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
